Big C said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

Big C said:

---

Eric Trump: "Our children WILL love God!"

Dear Eric:

My children might love God and they might not, but it's not you, your father or the government who are going to decide for them. That's not the way it works here.

---

Can you please send this same message to Gavin Newsome and the democrat dominated legislature? I'm looking forward to your criticizing them for intruding on parental rights.

And just to be clear, do you criticize and oppose the recent CA law banning parental notification?

https://apnews.com/article/gender-identity-schools-california-law-af387bef5c25c14f51d1cf05a7e422eb

---

There is some connection here, but in general, the analogy isn't working for me. Eric Trump is saying that kids WILL do something (something that seems to violate the Constitution). Gavin Newsom (note spelling) is saying that kids in school can be something w/o their parents being automatically informed.

I have a daughter and son in middle school and high school, respectively: Can you give me a hypothetical case study that I can relate to?

As a teacher, I had a ~15 year old student (this is about 10 years ago, as things were still evolving... heck they still are, maybe back the other way), who was listed on the roster as female and had a female name on the roster. Said student seemed non-binary or transgender male and told me they would prefer to be called "x" (gender neutral name). When I spoke to their dad at Back to School Night, he referred to his kid as "girl's name as listed on the roster". I didn't make a big deal of it either way and sort of went with the flow. Do you think I should have done something differently? If so, what?

---

People like BearGoggles want that kid's parents to have the opportunity to domineer the teenager. The way BearGoggles wants it, there will be more abuse. But MAGAts are fine with abuse of "those" people.

dajo9 said:

---

Big C said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

Big C said:

---

Eric Trump: "Our children WILL love God!"

Dear Eric:

My children might love God and they might not, but it's not you, your father or the government who are going to decide for them. That's not the way it works here.

---

Can you please send this same message to Gavin Newsome and the democrat dominated legislature? I'm looking forward to your criticizing them for intruding on parental rights.

And just to be clear, do you criticize and oppose the recent CA law banning parental notification?

https://apnews.com/article/gender-identity-schools-california-law-af387bef5c25c14f51d1cf05a7e422eb

---

There is some connection here, but in general, the analogy isn't working for me. Eric Trump is saying that kids WILL do something (something that seems to violate the Constitution). Gavin Newsom (note spelling) is saying that kids in school can be something w/o their parents being automatically informed.

I have a daughter and son in middle school and high school, respectively: Can you give me a hypothetical case study that I can relate to?

As a teacher, I had a ~15 year old student (this is about 10 years ago, as things were still evolving... heck they still are, maybe back the other way), who was listed on the roster as female and had a female name on the roster. Said student seemed non-binary or transgender male and told me they would prefer to be called "x" (gender neutral name). When I spoke to their dad at Back to School Night, he referred to his kid as "girl's name as listed on the roster". I didn't make a big deal of it either way and sort of went with the flow. Do you think I should have done something differently? If so, what?

---

People like BearGoggles want that kid's parents to have the opportunity to domineer the teenager. The way BearGoggles wants it, there will be more abuse. But MAGAts are fine with abuse of "those" people.

---

There are lots of things that I might inform students' parents about... things having directly to do with behavior or academic performance in my class.

OTOH, if I hear something else from or about a student -- and teachers hear a lot... you wouldn't believe what we hear -- I'm not gonna inform the parent unless... a) it involves student safety... b) I would absolutely want to be informed were it my kid (ok, that is where it gets subjective, I will admit)... or... c) that parent asks me a specific question (I would answer it, honestly)

Parents have rights, but at the same time, kids (talkin' about at the high school level) have the right -- to some extent -- to have their own, private life.

Here's a more specific example of what I mean...

Two kids making out in the hallway (may be of opposite or same gender): I'm not gonna call their parents, automatically, but if a parent had specifically asked me to watch out for their kid in that regard, I would. (This is what, as a parent, I would expect from one of my kids' teachers.)

bearister said:

---

The Fall of the American Empire depicted in a single photo:

---

European brains are imploding watching American politics right now.

🔊

pic.twitter.com/INJSRJWn6a

— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) July 19, 2024

Make America Great Again, brother!

30 years later and these two are the stars at the Republican National Convention ... pic.twitter.com/pPr7RBvVX8

— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) July 19, 2024

Who would have predicted this?

It’s catching on, especially in the Arizona delegation. pic.twitter.com/SFjIfQbWPf

— Ryan Lizza (@RyanLizza) July 17, 2024

Big C said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Big C said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

Big C said:

---

Eric Trump: "Our children WILL love God!"

Dear Eric:

My children might love God and they might not, but it's not you, your father or the government who are going to decide for them. That's not the way it works here.

---

Can you please send this same message to Gavin Newsome and the democrat dominated legislature? I'm looking forward to your criticizing them for intruding on parental rights.

And just to be clear, do you criticize and oppose the recent CA law banning parental notification?

https://apnews.com/article/gender-identity-schools-california-law-af387bef5c25c14f51d1cf05a7e422eb

---

There is some connection here, but in general, the analogy isn't working for me. Eric Trump is saying that kids WILL do something (something that seems to violate the Constitution). Gavin Newsom (note spelling) is saying that kids in school can be something w/o their parents being automatically informed.

I have a daughter and son in middle school and high school, respectively: Can you give me a hypothetical case study that I can relate to?

As a teacher, I had a ~15 year old student (this is about 10 years ago, as things were still evolving... heck they still are, maybe back the other way), who was listed on the roster as female and had a female name on the roster. Said student seemed non-binary or transgender male and told me they would prefer to be called "x" (gender neutral name). When I spoke to their dad at Back to School Night, he referred to his kid as "girl's name as listed on the roster". I didn't make a big deal of it either way and sort of went with the flow. Do you think I should have done something differently? If so, what?

---

People like BearGoggles want that kid's parents to have the opportunity to domineer the teenager. The way BearGoggles wants it, there will be more abuse. But MAGAts are fine with abuse of "those" people.

---

There are lots of things that I might inform students' parents about... things having directly to do with behavior or academic performance in my class.

OTOH, if I hear something else from or about a student -- and teachers hear a lot... you wouldn't believe what we hear -- I'm not gonna inform the parent unless... a) it involves student safety... b) I would absolutely want to be informed were it my kid (ok, that is where it gets subjective, I will admit)... or... c) that parent asks me a specific question (I would answer it, honestly)

Parents have rights, but at the same time, kids (talkin' about at the high school level) have the right -- to some extent -- to have their own, private life.

Here's a more specific example of what I mean...

Two kids making out in the hallway (may be of opposite or same gender): I'm not gonna call their parents, automatically, but if a parent had specifically asked me to watch out for their kid in that regard, I would. (This is what, as a parent, I would expect from one of my kids' teachers.)

---

If the family doesn't know, there may be a good reason for that, from the teenager's perspective. I think in most healthy families, the support the teenager is looking for already begins at home.

Big C said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Big C said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

Big C said:

---

Eric Trump: "Our children WILL love God!"

Dear Eric:

My children might love God and they might not, but it's not you, your father or the government who are going to decide for them. That's not the way it works here.

---

Can you please send this same message to Gavin Newsome and the democrat dominated legislature? I'm looking forward to your criticizing them for intruding on parental rights.

And just to be clear, do you criticize and oppose the recent CA law banning parental notification?

https://apnews.com/article/gender-identity-schools-california-law-af387bef5c25c14f51d1cf05a7e422eb

---

There is some connection here, but in general, the analogy isn't working for me. Eric Trump is saying that kids WILL do something (something that seems to violate the Constitution). Gavin Newsom (note spelling) is saying that kids in school can be something w/o their parents being automatically informed.

I have a daughter and son in middle school and high school, respectively: Can you give me a hypothetical case study that I can relate to?

As a teacher, I had a ~15 year old student (this is about 10 years ago, as things were still evolving... heck they still are, maybe back the other way), who was listed on the roster as female and had a female name on the roster. Said student seemed non-binary or transgender male and told me they would prefer to be called "x" (gender neutral name). When I spoke to their dad at Back to School Night, he referred to his kid as "girl's name as listed on the roster". I didn't make a big deal of it either way and sort of went with the flow. Do you think I should have done something differently? If so, what?

---

People like BearGoggles want that kid's parents to have the opportunity to domineer the teenager. The way BearGoggles wants it, there will be more abuse. But MAGAts are fine with abuse of "those" people.

---

There are lots of things that I might inform students' parents about... things having directly to do with behavior or academic performance in my class.

OTOH, if I hear something else from or about a student -- and teachers hear a lot... you wouldn't believe what we hear -- I'm not gonna inform the parent unless... a) it involves student safety... b) I would absolutely want to be informed were it my kid (ok, that is where it gets subjective, I will admit)... or... c) that parent asks me a specific question (I would answer it, honestly)

Parents have rights, but at the same time, kids (talkin' about at the high school level) have the right -- to some extent -- to have their own, private life.

Here's a more specific example of what I mean...

Two kids making out in the hallway (may be of opposite or same gender): I'm not gonna call their parents, automatically, but if a parent had specifically asked me to watch out for their kid in that regard, I would. (This is what, as a parent, I would expect from one of my kids' teachers.)

---

If the family doesn't know, there may be a good reason for that, from the teenager's perspective. I think in most healthy families, the support the teenager is looking for already begins at home.

Big C said:

---

bearister said:

---

bear2034 said:

---

Bearister, you missed your chance. You would have had a blast at this year's RNC.

---

….not as fun as the woman behind tRump in this video.

What’s going on behind Trump pic.twitter.com/cnTjmYK4QZ

— Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) July 18, 2024

Looks like it was Guilfoyle petting the cat behind tRump. They say she's a goer.

Of course it was 🤣 https://t.co/KPQyzOCAxR

— Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) July 18, 2024

---

She can't contain herself since her fiance's father dodged that bullet and came up fighting! OMG, I can't stop laughing. Glad I finished my coffee earlier. And she probably tells Don Jr. that she saving herself for after the're married.

---

OMG. Don Jr’s girlfriend is dumber than I thought.

Kimberly Guilfoyle: “The Heroes who stormed Normandy and faced down communism"
pic.twitter.com/W8oXwztIRZ

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) July 19, 2024

Guilfoyle is a 3D printer created version of the perfect MAGA female: horny, surgically enhanced and not good at stuff like that history thingy.

dajo9 said:

---

Big C said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Big C said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

Big C said:

---

Eric Trump: "Our children WILL love God!"

Dear Eric:

My children might love God and they might not, but it's not you, your father or the government who are going to decide for them. That's not the way it works here.

---

Can you please send this same message to Gavin Newsome and the democrat dominated legislature? I'm looking forward to your criticizing them for intruding on parental rights.

And just to be clear, do you criticize and oppose the recent CA law banning parental notification?

https://apnews.com/article/gender-identity-schools-california-law-af387bef5c25c14f51d1cf05a7e422eb

---

There is some connection here, but in general, the analogy isn't working for me. Eric Trump is saying that kids WILL do something (something that seems to violate the Constitution). Gavin Newsom (note spelling) is saying that kids in school can be something w/o their parents being automatically informed.

I have a daughter and son in middle school and high school, respectively: Can you give me a hypothetical case study that I can relate to?

As a teacher, I had a ~15 year old student (this is about 10 years ago, as things were still evolving... heck they still are, maybe back the other way), who was listed on the roster as female and had a female name on the roster. Said student seemed non-binary or transgender male and told me they would prefer to be called "x" (gender neutral name). When I spoke to their dad at Back to School Night, he referred to his kid as "girl's name as listed on the roster". I didn't make a big deal of it either way and sort of went with the flow. Do you think I should have done something differently? If so, what?

---

People like BearGoggles want that kid's parents to have the opportunity to domineer the teenager. The way BearGoggles wants it, there will be more abuse. But MAGAts are fine with abuse of "those" people.

---

There are lots of things that I might inform students' parents about... things having directly to do with behavior or academic performance in my class.

OTOH, if I hear something else from or about a student -- and teachers hear a lot... you wouldn't believe what we hear -- I'm not gonna inform the parent unless... a) it involves student safety... b) I would absolutely want to be informed were it my kid (ok, that is where it gets subjective, I will admit)... or... c) that parent asks me a specific question (I would answer it, honestly)

Parents have rights, but at the same time, kids (talkin' about at the high school level) have the right -- to some extent -- to have their own, private life.

Here's a more specific example of what I mean...

Two kids making out in the hallway (may be of opposite or same gender): I'm not gonna call their parents, automatically, but if a parent had specifically asked me to watch out for their kid in that regard, I would. (This is what, as a parent, I would expect from one of my kids' teachers.)

---

If the family doesn't know, there may be a good reason for that, from the teenager's perspective. I think in most healthy families, the support the teenager is looking for already begins at home.

---

So, if a ten year old Jackson's parents don't appear to support his transition to being Jackie, a liberal teacher should secretly transition him to a her against their wishes?@

You should probably just shut up. Your whataboutism and false equivalency are really getting old.


Feel free to chime in when you have an original thought, but otherwise keep your grade school debate tactics for the Trump Humper Fanboy He-man Woman Haters Club.

AunBear89 said:

---

You should probably just shut up. Your whataboutism and false equivalency are really getting old.


Feel free to chime in when you have an original thought, but otherwise keep your grade school debate tactics for the Trump Humper Fanboy He-man Woman Haters Club.

---

Says the poster without an original thought, ever. There is nothing wrong with my question or the way I debate. I certainly want to be involved in major changes to my children's gender and sexuality.

2 outa 3 of the objects of his purported affection didn't recoil…..and you know what they say about 2 outa 3….

*….'taint bad. MAGA!

bearister said:

---

Guilfoyle is a 3D printer created version of the perfect MAGA female: horny, surgically enhanced and not good at stuff like that history thingy.

---

And don't forget "totally submissive," as Jesus would want child-birthers to be.

Which schools and/or teachers are changing the gender/sexuality of children without parental consent? Specific names and dates of said actions, please.


We will wait…

This is just going to generate more ABDS

AunBear89 said:

---

Which schools and/or teachers are changing the gender/sexuality of children without parental consent? Specific names and dates of said actions, please.


We will wait…

---

This took me 3 seconds to Google.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna102559

Do you know how to search the internet?

Here is a guide for you:

https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/134479?hl=en

Nice try, moron. Words have meaning. From the very first paragraph of your linked article:

"A California school district has paid $100,000 to settle a lawsuit over administrators' alleged support for a student's gender transition, which purportedly unfolded without the knowledge of the child's mother, according to court documents."


This was a settlement rather than an award - the district paid the parents to get them to go away. I guess they were only $100,000 worth of upset.

Also: the words "alleged" and "purportedly " are doing a good amount of work in this statement.

Also from the article that you obviously did not read:

"An independent investigation the school district commissioned by a law firm last year found that the teachers named in Konen's lawsuit did not "coach" students in changing their gender identities or deceive administrators or parents.

"The executive summary of the investigation which was based on more than 1,600 pages of documents and interviews with 21 witnesses is no longer available on the school district's website, but NBC News viewed an archival copy of it."

So, I ask you again: can you provide specific names of teachers and districts that are actively changing students's gender and sexuality (you might want to clarify the specific definitions of these words before you continue to use them incorrectly) without parent knowledge. A school using a student's preferred pronouns or name is not what you are claiming.

California School District Emails Reveal Students Were Secretly Gender Transitioned

A parental rights group in Orange County, California, claims 23 students began social gender transitioning at a local school district without informed parental consent.https://t.co/8t09fU880O

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 18, 2023

California School District Emails Reveal Students Were Secretly Gender Transitioned

A parental rights group in Orange County, California, claims that 23 studentseight of them elementary school agebegan social gender transitioning at a local school district without informed parental consent from January 2020 to October 2022.
The group, California Alliance for Education, obtained hundreds of pages of emails and documents from the Newport-Mesa Unified School District, which oversees pre-K through grade 12 schools for Newport Beach and Costa Mesa.
A parental rights advocate involved with the alliance who goes by the pseudonym Kim Davis for fear of retaliation told The Epoch Times that in all 23 cases, parents were either not informed about the initiation of their child's "gender support plan," known as a GSP, or were told and didn't consent.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/california-school-district-emails-reveal-students-were-secretly-gender-transitioned-5131093

AunBear89 said:

---

Nice try, moron. Words have meaning. From the very first paragraph of your linked article:

"A California school district has paid $100,000 to settle a lawsuit over administrators' alleged support for a student's gender transition, which purportedly unfolded without the knowledge of the child's mother, according to court documents."


This was a settlement rather than an award - the district paid the parents to get them to go away. I guess they were only $100,000 worth of upset.

Also: the words "alleged" and "purportedly " are doing a good amount of work in this statement.

Also from the article that you obviously did not read:

"An independent investigation the school district commissioned by a law firm last year found that the teachers named in Konen's lawsuit did not "coach" students in changing their gender identities or deceive administrators or parents.

"The executive summary of the investigation which was based on more than 1,600 pages of documents and interviews with 21 witnesses is no longer available on the school district's website, but NBC News viewed an archival copy of it."

So, I ask you again: can you provide specific names of teachers and districts that are actively changing students's gender and sexuality (you might want to clarify the specific definitions of these words before you continue to use them incorrectly) without parent knowledge. A school using a student's preferred pronouns or name is not what you are claiming.

---

I still stand by this story. You don't need an actual court verdict to understand that what happened here is not okay with parents. Again, that was a two second Google.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna102559

Bad, bad, loony liberals.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna162080

Christ. That pic of him kissing the fire fighter outfit is just disturbing.

They refused to wear a mask during COVID-19 but were quick to put one over their ear—make it make sense. pic.twitter.com/uqbOR4DU3B

— Kenny Akers (@KeneAkers) July 18, 2024

It’s always a good sign when the pro war establishment is uncomfortable.

— Craig Chamberlin (@CraigChamberlin) July 19, 2024

Nice! Did Fox News board member, Paul Ryan, even show up?

Naw, Ladybugs just wanted it to end so he could meet his Grindr date.

going4roses said:

---

They refused to wear a mask during COVID-19 but were quick to put one over their ear—make it make sense. pic.twitter.com/uqbOR4DU3B

— Kenny Akers (@KeneAkers) July 18, 2024

---

They have zero to do with each other. They are doing this symbolically and willingly. It doesn't inconvenience you like a mask does (make it harder to breath and fog up glasses, etc...). It makes absolute sense. With that in mind, I wore masks indoors for about a year because it was the right thing to do.

Do you have a more reputable source than The Epoch Times? Maybe The Babylon Bee has a story about it too?


You righteous righties are a bunch of pearl clutching culture warriors.

AunBear89 said:

---

Do you have a more reputable source than The Epoch Times? Maybe The Babylon Bee has a story about it too?


You righteous righties are a bunch of pearl clutching culture warriors.

---

The twat can't debate facts so he calls folks pearl clutching culture warriors. How adorable.

AunBear89 said:

---

Which schools and/or teachers are changing the gender/sexuality of children without parental consent? Specific names and dates of said actions, please.


We will wait…

---

More cases from CA:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-09-02/school-district-settles-100-000-lawsuit-that-claimed-it-supported-secret-transitioning-of-student


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/california-school-district-accused-secretly-counseling-child-transition-gender-parents-wrath

California school district accused of secretly counseling child to transition gender faces parents' wrath

Under district's so-called 'Parental Secret Policy,' schools will only inform parents of children pursuing or considering gender transition with student's prior written consent

A California school district being sued for allegedly violating parental rights by transitioning an 11-year-old's gender in secret is facing the wrath of local parents, who this week demanded transparency and for school officials not to keep them in the dark on matters of importance to their children's' lives.



Eleven year old, these people are nuts. The Khmer Rainbow wants to raise your kids.



This is not going to play in Peoria come November if Newsom is the choice of Democrat oligarchs.

🚨 Trump just sent a message to the Deep State

Just after Trumps speech, Opera Singer Sings “Nessun Dorma”

Nessun Dorma is played at the end of the film The Sum of All Fears, in which time ALL the traitors & Deep State Actors were executed.

The Sum of All Fears is mentioned… pic.twitter.com/OpTnt2Rq8X

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) July 19, 2024

None shall sleep! None shall sleep!
Even you, oh Princess,
In your cold room,
Watch the stars,
That tremble with love and with hope.
But my secret is hidden within me,
No one will know my name!
No, no, I shall say it on your mouth,
When the light shines.
And my kiss will dissolve the silence that makes you mine!
No one will know his name,
And we shall have to, alas, die, die!
Disperse, oh night!
Vanish, oh stars!
At dawn, I shall win! I shall win!
I will win!

bearister said:

---

Big C said:

---

bearister said:

---

bear2034 said:

---

Bearister, you missed your chance. You would have had a blast at this year's RNC.

---

….not as fun as the woman behind tRump in this video.

What’s going on behind Trump pic.twitter.com/cnTjmYK4QZ

— Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) July 18, 2024

Looks like it was Guilfoyle petting the cat behind tRump. They say she's a goer.

Of course it was 🤣 https://t.co/KPQyzOCAxR

— Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) July 18, 2024

---

She can't contain herself since her fiance's father dodged that bullet and came up fighting! OMG, I can't stop laughing. Glad I finished my coffee earlier. And she probably tells Don Jr. that she saving herself for after the're married.

---

OMG. Don Jr’s girlfriend is dumber than I thought.

Kimberly Guilfoyle: “The Heroes who stormed Normandy and faced down communism"
pic.twitter.com/W8oXwztIRZ

— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) July 19, 2024

Guilfoyle is a 3D printer created version of the perfect MAGA female: horny, surgically enhanced and not good at stuff like that history thingy.

---

Wow, what are all the capabilities of 3D printers nowadays? Asking for a friend...

Trump ignores Tiffany (?). I don't think he knew who she was.

https://www.threads.net/@rickydavila/post/C9niTWry38Y/?xmt=AQGzsR7lLJI8bF5yK5gthL5qmq53e0kx1JSmVtY9nNpK1w

The physical manifestation of moral rot:

The startling MAGAfication of Matt Gaetz and Kimberly Guilfoyle. (Daily Mail) pic.twitter.com/75MPh2a46r

— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) July 19, 2024

bearister said:

---

The physical manifestation of moral rot:

The startling MAGAfication of Matt Gaetz and Kimberly Guilfoyle. (Daily Mail) pic.twitter.com/75MPh2a46r

— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) July 19, 2024

---

MAGA is rot

bearister said:

---

The physical manifestation of moral rot:

---

Judging by your unhinged posts removed by the mods, would you agree this was the best RNC ever?

dajo9 said:

---

bearister said:

---

The physical manifestation of moral rot:

The startling MAGAfication of Matt Gaetz and Kimberly Guilfoyle. (Daily Mail) pic.twitter.com/75MPh2a46r

— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) July 19, 2024

---

MAGA is rot

---

Which is worse, the physical rot or the mental rot?