The Official Democrats Lack of Self-Reflection As To Why They Lost Thread

5,894 Views | 94 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by bear2034
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HKBear97! said:

LudwigsFountain said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

The problem wasn't the messaging; the problem was the product. Nobody wants what the Dems are selling.

Virtually nobody


False statement.

72,372,902 votes (48.1%)
and growing, as #1 population state CA votes continue to be counted.



-misinformation police
Context ... I don't know who was buying what she was selling except "I'm not as bad as trump"


As I said, 72,372,902 votes (48.1%).
That's who.

Update: 73,115,813 votes , 48.2%
I was curious what things looked like outside of California and New York and was surprised by result. I knew it would have a big effect, but without them, Trump won the popular vote by 6.8 million. In 2020 Biden and Trump were essentially tied without these two. That happened because of the 8 million + votes the Democrats 'lost' in 2024, 7.1 million were in CA and NY. The pro Trump impact of Texas and Florida was substantially less.

Have no idea what this means; maybe less focus on the 'sure' states. I guess without the electoral college the campaigning would basically happen in CA, NY, FL and TX


Personally, my takeaway is I honestly question the true voter support for the Democrats current platform. I don't understand how so many supposed voters for Harris just disappeared from 2020. Moreover, the fact that the majority of the Democratic support came from states without voter ID laws is concerning. To me, that implies the current 73 million Harris vote tally is likely somewhat inflated.


Did you insert into your calculus the fact she ran for like 100 days, and is a woman who some do not perceive as capable?

Otherwise, brilliant logic, everyone who added on here!
HKBear97!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

HKBear97! said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

The problem wasn't the messaging; the problem was the product. Nobody wants what the Dems are selling.

Virtually nobody


False statement.

72,372,902 votes (48.1%)
and growing, as #1 population state CA votes continue to be counted.



-misinformation police
Context ... I don't know who was buying what she was selling except "I'm not as bad as trump"


As I said, 72,372,902 votes (48.1%).
That's who.

Update: 73,115,813 votes , 48.2%
I do find this amusing because I made the same case in 2020 when 74.2 million people voted for Trump, but the media and many liberals where I live kept saying nobody wanted Trump. I suppose the hashtag #notmypresident will be returning then?

By the way, does no one find it odd that Harris is missing nearly 8 million votes that went to Biden in 2020? Where did those go? And oddity #2, the only states Harris won required no voter ID. Very strange indeed.


Gosh, you must be on to something.
Biden cheated, right?

Pffft.


Probably not worth responding since you clearly have your views, but I originally did not subscribe to the idea that 2020 was stolen. Now, seeing the numbers and results after there was a renewed focus on election integrity, I do believe the Democratic Party manipulated votes in 2020 and I imagine did so again in states where voter IDs are not required.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HKBear97! said:

concordtom said:

HKBear97! said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

The problem wasn't the messaging; the problem was the product. Nobody wants what the Dems are selling.

Virtually nobody


False statement.

72,372,902 votes (48.1%)
and growing, as #1 population state CA votes continue to be counted.



-misinformation police
Context ... I don't know who was buying what she was selling except "I'm not as bad as trump"


As I said, 72,372,902 votes (48.1%).
That's who.

Update: 73,115,813 votes , 48.2%
I do find this amusing because I made the same case in 2020 when 74.2 million people voted for Trump, but the media and many liberals where I live kept saying nobody wanted Trump. I suppose the hashtag #notmypresident will be returning then?

By the way, does no one find it odd that Harris is missing nearly 8 million votes that went to Biden in 2020? Where did those go? And oddity #2, the only states Harris won required no voter ID. Very strange indeed.


Gosh, you must be on to something.
Biden cheated, right?

Pffft.


Probably not worth responding since you clearly have your views, but I originally did not subscribe to the idea that 2020 was stolen. Now, seeing the numbers and results after there was a renewed focus on election integrity, I do believe the Democratic Party manipulated votes in 2020 and I imagine did so again in states where voter IDs are not required.

1, There was a huge Dem voter turnout in 2020 to stop Trump. This was back when he was fresh on everybody's mind, wondering if people ingesting disinfectant would help against COVID. This year, he got the nostalgia vote, for those inclined to vote for him. Others stayed home.

2. States where ID is not required (I'm in favor of IDs to vote, btw) tend to be the very blue states.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

HKBear97! said:

concordtom said:

HKBear97! said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

The problem wasn't the messaging; the problem was the product. Nobody wants what the Dems are selling.

Virtually nobody


False statement.

72,372,902 votes (48.1%)
and growing, as #1 population state CA votes continue to be counted.



-misinformation police
Context ... I don't know who was buying what she was selling except "I'm not as bad as trump"


As I said, 72,372,902 votes (48.1%).
That's who.

Update: 73,115,813 votes , 48.2%
I do find this amusing because I made the same case in 2020 when 74.2 million people voted for Trump, but the media and many liberals where I live kept saying nobody wanted Trump. I suppose the hashtag #notmypresident will be returning then?

By the way, does no one find it odd that Harris is missing nearly 8 million votes that went to Biden in 2020? Where did those go? And oddity #2, the only states Harris won required no voter ID. Very strange indeed.


Gosh, you must be on to something.
Biden cheated, right?

Pffft.


Probably not worth responding since you clearly have your views, but I originally did not subscribe to the idea that 2020 was stolen. Now, seeing the numbers and results after there was a renewed focus on election integrity, I do believe the Democratic Party manipulated votes in 2020 and I imagine did so again in states where voter IDs are not required.

1, There was a huge Dem voter turnout in 2020 to stop Trump. This was back when he was fresh on everybody's mind, wondering if people ingesting disinfectant would help against COVID. This year, he got the nostalgia vote, for those inclined to vote for him. Others stayed home.

2. States where ID is not required (I'm in favor of IDs to vote, btw) tend to be the very blue states.




Trump never said that. He was referring to actual light disinfecting the body, which actually has been experimented with as a cure for disease.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HKBear97! said:

concordtom said:

HKBear97! said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

concordtom said:

going4roses said:

The problem wasn't the messaging; the problem was the product. Nobody wants what the Dems are selling.

Virtually nobody


False statement.

72,372,902 votes (48.1%)
and growing, as #1 population state CA votes continue to be counted.



-misinformation police
Context ... I don't know who was buying what she was selling except "I'm not as bad as trump"


As I said, 72,372,902 votes (48.1%).
That's who.

Update: 73,115,813 votes , 48.2%
I do find this amusing because I made the same case in 2020 when 74.2 million people voted for Trump, but the media and many liberals where I live kept saying nobody wanted Trump. I suppose the hashtag #notmypresident will be returning then?

By the way, does no one find it odd that Harris is missing nearly 8 million votes that went to Biden in 2020? Where did those go? And oddity #2, the only states Harris won required no voter ID. Very strange indeed.


Gosh, you must be on to something.
Biden cheated, right?

Pffft.


Probably not worth responding since you clearly have your views, but I originally did not subscribe to the idea that 2020 was stolen. Now, seeing the numbers and results after there was a renewed focus on election integrity, I do believe the Democratic Party manipulated votes in 2020 and I imagine did so again in states where voter IDs are not required.


Wow.
I don't know which is worse:

A) thinking 2020 election fraud happened then, because Trump said so,

Or

B) thinking, now, 2020 election fraud happened because you saw the numbers and it doesn't make sense to you.

Sterling analysis!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Oprah risked her reputation she spent a lifetime to build to say some ridiculous things for a measly million dollars? Doesn't she know the internet is forever? Doesn't she know Beyonce got paid $10 million for saying less ridiculous things?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

So... "Edited by Staff" was edited by staff?!?

The world is a fun, interesting place!
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


So... "Edited by Staff" was edited by staff?!?

The world is a fun, interesting place!

Username checks out.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

oski003 said:

philly1121 said:

AunBear89 said:

Classic whataboutism. What a bunch of liars, hypocrites, and morons.
I love how Roevember and others are constantly posting Twitter posts, justifying their vote. See! She shoved Joe out of the way and look what happened! As if any of them cared or predicted this.

This is interesting to me because I can't get one of them to admit anything about Project 2025. I can't get 003 to admit that Kamala has legal recourse to remand the electoral college counts back to state legislatures.

I don't mind the football being spiked but at least own what got you the W.


I looked back to see what you asked. I suppose as VP Kamala has a role in the vote certification process. I don't know why it is relevant nor why you are making a big deal out of it.
It is going to be pure comedic gold watching Kamala certify the electoral win of the guy she called a fascist.


Why is that funny?

Why wasn't Mike Pence on Trump's ticket this time?
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This pretty much sums up the Left these days.

https://www.thefp.com/p/seth-moulton-democrats-trans-issues-trump?r=aiop6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

"We've worked so hard at becoming tolerant that we've become intolerant," Moulton, who represents the suburbs north of Boston, told me Wednesday.
The hate started exactly two weeks ago, when Moulton told The New York Times, in an article explaining why Kamala Harris lost, that the Democratic Party had become overly focused on trans issues.
"Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone rather than being brutally honest about the challenges many Americans face," Moulton told the Times. "I have two little girls, I don't want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I'm supposed to be afraid to say that."
Moulton's daughters are 6 and 3, and he told me he was talking about team sports they might play when they're older. When I asked what prompted him to make comments that he must have known would antagonize his fellow Democratswho have long adhered to the orthodoxy that trans women are women who should be able to compete in women's sportshe replied: "I was speaking authentically as a dad about a concern that I know other dads share, and we just ought to be able to debate it."
Since then, progressives have called him a "Nazi cooperator," "transphobic," and "offensive." Democrats have said he should resign. His campaign manager has stepped down. Massachusetts Democratic governor Maura Healey, who is gay, attacked Moulton for "playing politics." Even Jake Auchincloss, who, like Moulton, is a former Marine and now a Democratic congressman from Massachusetts, has distanced himself from Moulton's trans remarks. (Moulton declined to comment on Auchincloss.)
Meanwhile, the chair of Tufts University's political science department threatened to bar students from interning in Moulton's office, which prompted the college's high command to assure the congressman they still like him (Tufts is a major recipient of National Institutes of Health grants; probably not wise to lash out at a member of the Massachusetts congressional delegation.) Which prompted the editorial board at The Tufts Daily, predictably, to condemn Moulton.
"[W]e believe that cutting ties with Moulton's office is not a suppression of speech," the board wrote. "In fact, it is quite the opposite. It is our way of expressing our disgust with Moulton's brazen scapegoating of an already oppressed community."
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

If Gavin Newsom cares about Alex Jones supporters I'm all in. Newsom 2028.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Newsom cares about all supporters! Steve Bannon supporters! Fascism supporters!! Menendez Brothers supporters!!! Athletic supporters!!!! Stanfurd supporters!!!!!

The Gov in 2028!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Newsom didn't mention Elon Musk supporters.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

This pretty much sums up the Left these days.

https://www.thefp.com/p/seth-moulton-democrats-trans-issues-trump?r=aiop6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

"We've worked so hard at becoming tolerant that we've become intolerant," Moulton, who represents the suburbs north of Boston, told me Wednesday.
The hate started exactly two weeks ago, when Moulton told The New York Times, in an article explaining why Kamala Harris lost, that the Democratic Party had become overly focused on trans issues.
"Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone rather than being brutally honest about the challenges many Americans face," Moulton told the Times. "I have two little girls, I don't want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I'm supposed to be afraid to say that."
Moulton's daughters are 6 and 3, and he told me he was talking about team sports they might play when they're older. When I asked what prompted him to make comments that he must have known would antagonize his fellow Democratswho have long adhered to the orthodoxy that trans women are women who should be able to compete in women's sportshe replied: "I was speaking authentically as a dad about a concern that I know other dads share, and we just ought to be able to debate it."
Since then, progressives have called him a "Nazi cooperator," "transphobic," and "offensive." Democrats have said he should resign. His campaign manager has stepped down. Massachusetts Democratic governor Maura Healey, who is gay, attacked Moulton for "playing politics." Even Jake Auchincloss, who, like Moulton, is a former Marine and now a Democratic congressman from Massachusetts, has distanced himself from Moulton's trans remarks. (Moulton declined to comment on Auchincloss.)
Meanwhile, the chair of Tufts University's political science department threatened to bar students from interning in Moulton's office, which prompted the college's high command to assure the congressman they still like him (Tufts is a major recipient of National Institutes of Health grants; probably not wise to lash out at a member of the Massachusetts congressional delegation.) Which prompted the editorial board at The Tufts Daily, predictably, to condemn Moulton.
"[W]e believe that cutting ties with Moulton's office is not a suppression of speech," the board wrote. "In fact, it is quite the opposite. It is our way of expressing our disgust with Moulton's brazen scapegoating of an already oppressed community."


PCU

Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great clip! Very presicent. It reminded me of this clip.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Due to California's toxic political and business climate, should Elon relocate his Tesla factory in Fremont to a different state?
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Due to California's toxic political and business climate, should Elon relocate his Tesla factory in Fremont to a different state?


Weird. I see Chevron stations everywhere.

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

bear2034 said:


Due to California's toxic political and business climate, should Elon relocate his Tesla factory in Fremont to a different state?


Weird. I see Chevron stations everywhere.


They moved their corporate headquarters from San Ramon to Houston.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
An oil company moved their corporate offices to regulation free and petroleum friendly Texas? Why would they do that?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

An oil company moved their corporate offices to regulation free and petroleum friendly Texas? Why would they do that?

I think they moved because the regulations were too stringent and the state of California is too unfriendly to the petroleum industry.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Kamala has appeared.
1. Is there a secret encoded message within this message? If so, what is it?
2. Is she drunk?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Kamala has appeared.
1. Is there a secret encoded message within this message? If so, what is it?


"b e s u r e t o d r i n k y o u r o v a l t i n e"
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dimitrig said:

bear2034 said:


Due to California's toxic political and business climate, should Elon relocate his Tesla factory in Fremont to a different state?


Weird. I see Chevron stations everywhere.


They moved their corporate headquarters from San Ramon to Houston.


I understand but let's not confuse moving a HQ and a few hundred jobs with a company moving out of California. These companies love the sweet California cash flow. Their C-suite just doesn't want to pay California taxes. Who cares where the HQ is?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

The Deep State was "debanking" people and organizations that they deemed to be threats to their power.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

No one in the media is talking about this but I think Joe Biden would have done much better than Kamala.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Incredible nonsensical rant from Popovich.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.