UNITY OVER DIVISION
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
This will haunt this demon on the campaign trail forever. pic.twitter.com/mkmQ1fjMc3
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 12, 2025
STEPHEN MILLER IS A FASCIST!
— Governor Newsom Press Office (@GovPressOffice) September 27, 2025
PAC-10-BEAR said:STEPHEN MILLER IS A FASCIST!
— Governor Newsom Press Office (@GovPressOffice) September 27, 2025
ALL CAPS? The interns working for Newsom aren't messing around this time.
bearister said:PAC-10-BEAR said:STEPHEN MILLER IS A FASCIST!
— Governor Newsom Press Office (@GovPressOffice) September 27, 2025
ALL CAPS? The interns working for Newsom aren't messing around this time.
Kinda confused why MAGA wouldn't be proud to own the fascism here because that is where Miller drew his inspiration from, including the Goebbels "money shot" word "Storm."
29 Californians died and 16,000+ homes burned to the ground due to the criminal negligence of this sanctimonious prick. How dare he even stand in the same room with our brave firefighters.
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 28, 2025
Newsom is an opportunistic parasite. pic.twitter.com/0i2QST4XiF
Nicole Shanahan condemns Gavin Newsom for openly calling for Stephen Miller’s assassination on X: “This is evil. This is darkness":
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 29, 2025
"Pray for his soul. This is not a person, this is a marxist machine. Pray for him to break free of this. This is dangerous and evil. This is a call… pic.twitter.com/iCOSMBSznh
Why would the Press Office of a sitting Governor post rhetoric like what was scrawled on shell casings at the scene of two separate killings? https://t.co/4HnZE3BEwQ
— HARRISFAULKNER (@HARRISFAULKNER) September 28, 2025
movielover said:29 Californians died and 16,000+ homes burned to the ground due to the criminal negligence of this sanctimonious prick. How dare he even stand in the same room with our brave firefighters.
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 28, 2025
Newsom is an opportunistic parasite. pic.twitter.com/0i2QST4XiF
movielover said:
He became governor in 2018 and could have made fire suppression a top priority, not orthodoxy. Yes, there still would have been some damage.
- he exaggerated fuel reduction efforts at least one year
- fire / hiking trails haven't been maintained in PP for years
- he released a SoCal trained volunteer wildfire crew for political reasons; precious time was lost as our National Guard went through basic fire training
- he could have increased the numbers of trained wildfire personnel
- he released prisoners early who were trained to fight wildfires
- he could have pushed President Trump and Biden to clear / maintain State Federal lands
- he could have pushed Karen Bass to do more
- he could have changed state policy temporarily, or permanently, to allow outside crews to immediately attack the fire; not have to travel to Sacramento for certification! Wave the requirement, or put the Inspectors onsite
- we could have bought one or two giant super soaker airplanes
- he could have relaxed state rules for home owners to remove trees on their own property
- same for animal grazing (goat crew $500, human crew $28,000); goats helped save the Reagan Library!
Newsom wasn't proactive; Arnold Schwarzenegger was on some issues.
BREAKING: Gov. Gavin Newsom approved a new agency to oversee reparations for descendants of slaves.
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) October 11, 2025
Democrats never cared about you and never will pic.twitter.com/pC3mR0GhoU
— Amazon Piss Jugs (@JeremyWard33) October 15, 2025
movielover said:
Loon.
Cal88 said:
Idiot!
I wonder why everyone on the left is so upset about President Trump‘s expansion of the White House that is being 100% funded by donations, but have zero interest in the $1.6 billion expansion of Gavin Newsom‘s California Capitol that is 100% taxpayer funded and 100% cloaked in… pic.twitter.com/PCwS98oiED
— Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) October 20, 2025
Also that Trump started demolition without dealing with niceties like approval from oversight boards.Cal88 said:
The main criticism about the new WH ballroom is that it dwarfs the White House, arguably the most iconic landmark building in the US. They should have built it somewhere else in DC.
Eastern Oregon Bear said:Also that Trump started demolition without dealing with niceties like approval from oversight boards.Cal88 said:
The main criticism about the new WH ballroom is that it dwarfs the White House, arguably the most iconic landmark building in the US. They should have built it somewhere else in DC.
The claim is made that it is all privately funded. Have they released any details? Privately funded by who?
BearlySane88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Also that Trump started demolition without dealing with niceties like approval from oversight boards.Cal88 said:
The main criticism about the new WH ballroom is that it dwarfs the White House, arguably the most iconic landmark building in the US. They should have built it somewhere else in DC.
The claim is made that it is all privately funded. Have they released any details? Privately funded by who?
Trump, who also offered $100 mil for the project during the Obama administration.
Google is paying $22 mil from a lawsuit and $5mil on their own
Lockheed Martin is paying $10 mil+
Blackstone is paying an undisclosed amount. Others as well
dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Also that Trump started demolition without dealing with niceties like approval from oversight boards.Cal88 said:
The main criticism about the new WH ballroom is that it dwarfs the White House, arguably the most iconic landmark building in the US. They should have built it somewhere else in DC.
The claim is made that it is all privately funded. Have they released any details? Privately funded by who?
Trump, who also offered $100 mil for the project during the Obama administration.
Google is paying $22 mil from a lawsuit and $5mil on their own
Lockheed Martin is paying $10 mil+
Blackstone is paying an undisclosed amount. Others as well
Reading Albert Speers memoir is a pretty good how-to on what is happening these days. Speers talks about how Hitler would force industrialists and business people to fund his pet projects. This is nothing new in the authoritarian world.
BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Cal88 said:
The main criticism about the new WH ballroom is that it dwarfs the White House, arguably the most iconic landmark building in the US. They should have built it somewhere else in DC.
Also that Trump started demolition without dealing with niceties like approval from oversight boards.
The claim is made that it is all privately funded. Have they released any details? Privately funded by who?
Trump, who also offered $100 mil for the project during the Obama administration.
Google is paying $22 mil from a lawsuit and $5mil on their own
Lockheed Martin is paying $10 mil+
Blackstone is paying an undisclosed amount. Others as well
Reading Albert Speers memoir is a pretty good how-to on what is happening these days. Speers talks about how Hitler would force industrialists and business people to fund his pet projects. This is nothing new in the authoritarian world.
Again with the Hitler references. The left surely does love bringing that guy up.
Forced? What evidence do you have of Trump forcing anyone to pay for this?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Cal88 said:
The main criticism about the new WH ballroom is that it dwarfs the White House, arguably the most iconic landmark building in the US. They should have built it somewhere else in DC.
Also that Trump started demolition without dealing with niceties like approval from oversight boards.
The claim is made that it is all privately funded. Have they released any details? Privately funded by who?
Trump, who also offered $100 mil for the project during the Obama administration.
Google is paying $22 mil from a lawsuit and $5mil on their own
Lockheed Martin is paying $10 mil+
Blackstone is paying an undisclosed amount. Others as well
Reading Albert Speers memoir is a pretty good how-to on what is happening these days. Speers talks about how Hitler would force industrialists and business people to fund his pet projects. This is nothing new in the authoritarian world.
Again with the Hitler references. The left surely does love bringing that guy up.
Forced? What evidence do you have of Trump forcing anyone to pay for this?
You are naive, aren't you?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Cal88 said:
The main criticism about the new WH ballroom is that it dwarfs the White House, arguably the most iconic landmark building in the US. They should have built it somewhere else in DC.
Also that Trump started demolition without dealing with niceties like approval from oversight boards.
The claim is made that it is all privately funded. Have they released any details? Privately funded by who?
Trump, who also offered $100 mil for the project during the Obama administration.
Google is paying $22 mil from a lawsuit and $5mil on their own
Lockheed Martin is paying $10 mil+
Blackstone is paying an undisclosed amount. Others as well
Reading Albert Speers memoir is a pretty good how-to on what is happening these days. Speers talks about how Hitler would force industrialists and business people to fund his pet projects. This is nothing new in the authoritarian world.
Again with the Hitler references. The left surely does love bringing that guy up.
Forced? What evidence do you have of Trump forcing anyone to pay for this?
You are naive, aren't you?


dajo9 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Cal88 said:
The main criticism about the new WH ballroom is that it dwarfs the White House, arguably the most iconic landmark building in the US. They should have built it somewhere else in DC.
Also that Trump started demolition without dealing with niceties like approval from oversight boards.
The claim is made that it is all privately funded. Have they released any details? Privately funded by who?
Trump, who also offered $100 mil for the project during the Obama administration.
Google is paying $22 mil from a lawsuit and $5mil on their own
Lockheed Martin is paying $10 mil+
Blackstone is paying an undisclosed amount. Others as well
Reading Albert Speers memoir is a pretty good how-to on what is happening these days. Speers talks about how Hitler would force industrialists and business people to fund his pet projects. This is nothing new in the authoritarian world.
Again with the Hitler references. The left surely does love bringing that guy up.
Forced? What evidence do you have of Trump forcing anyone to pay for this?
You are naive, aren't you?
You could ask the same about Hitler and the word "force". Hitler just asked. Hitler also was known to punish people who said no to him. Sound familiar?