Newsom

38,959 Views | 384 Replies | Last: 15 hrs ago by Aunburdened
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Cal88 said:

That doesn't seem to be hurting the Dodgers.

In any case, Newsom scoring major points today by calling out the bombing of the Iranian school which has killed over 175 schoolgirls yesterday:



Trump and his people have actually managed to make him look good.


Not really. " Iran shouldn't have a nuclear weapon but we shouldn't kill children" is just Newsom trying to find some mythical middle ground.


Wasn't that mythical middle ground the JCPOA?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wait, it is confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Wait, it is confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?


Like I said, shades of the early Gaza eradication campaign, where the first hospitals hit were blamed on Hamas, and the dead babies weren't real, then the narrative shifted to those schools/hospitals were secret bases with tunnels, until all this became a moot point after the second or third dozen hospitals and schools reduced with their occupants to rubble.

So now we're already past the first school/hospital stage in Iran and working our way up the numbers.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

Wait, it is confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?


Like I said, shades of the early Gaza eradication campaign, where the first hospitals hit were blamed on Hamas, and the dead babies weren't real, then the narrative shifted to those schools/hospitals were secret bases with tunnels, until all this became a moot point after the second or third dozen hospitals and schools reduced with their occupants to rubble.

So now we're already past the first school/hospital stage in Iran and working our way up the numbers.




I am well aware that Hamas embedded into Hospitals and Israel hit a major one.

However, is it confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

Wait, it is confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?


Like I said, shades of the early Gaza eradication campaign, where the first hospitals hit were blamed on Hamas, and the dead babies weren't real, then the narrative shifted to those schools/hospitals were secret bases with tunnels, until all this became a moot point after the second or third dozen hospitals and schools reduced with their occupants to rubble.

So now we're already past the first school/hospital stage in Iran and working our way up the numbers.




I am well aware that Hamas embedded into Hospitals and Israel hit a major one.

However, is it confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?


Was Hamas also embedded inside the brains of the hundreds of kids that Israeli snipers shot?

As to the school, there seems to be some confusion in your infobubble about whether to move from stage 1 denial (it wasn't us) to stage 2 (it was us, but they were human shields), however the rest of the world, including the leading Democrat, have already moved on.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

Wait, it is confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?


Like I said, shades of the early Gaza eradication campaign, where the first hospitals hit were blamed on Hamas, and the dead babies weren't real, then the narrative shifted to those schools/hospitals were secret bases with tunnels, until all this became a moot point after the second or third dozen hospitals and schools reduced with their occupants to rubble.

So now we're already past the first school/hospital stage in Iran and working our way up the numbers.




I am well aware that Hamas embedded into Hospitals and Israel hit a major one.

However, is it confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?


Was Hamas also embedded inside the brains of the hundreds of kids that Israeli snipers shot?

As to the school, there seems to be some confusion in your infobubble about whether to move from stage 1 denial (it wasn't us) to stage 2 (it was us, but they were human shields), however the rest of the world, including the leading Democrat, have already moved on.




I wouldn't be surprised if these children the snipers shot were soldiers fighting for Hamas, which is sad and unfortunate. I cannot confirm that though, just like you can't confirm that it wasn't an Iranian missile that hit the school. Thanks.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, it isn't.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

oski003 said:

Wait, it is confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?


Like I said, shades of the early Gaza eradication campaign, where the first hospitals hit were blamed on Hamas, and the dead babies weren't real, then the narrative shifted to those schools/hospitals were secret bases with tunnels, until all this became a moot point after the second or third dozen hospitals and schools reduced with their occupants to rubble.

So now we're already past the first school/hospital stage in Iran and working our way up the numbers.




I am well aware that Hamas embedded into Hospitals and Israel hit a major one.

However, is it confirmed we struck the school and it wasn't an Iranian missile?


Was Hamas also embedded inside the brains of the hundreds of kids that Israeli snipers shot?

As to the school, there seems to be some confusion in your infobubble about whether to move from stage 1 denial (it wasn't us) to stage 2 (it was us, but they were human shields), however the rest of the world, including the leading Democrat, have already moved on.




I wouldn't be surprised if these children the snipers shot were soldiers fighting for Hamas, which is sad and unfortunate. I cannot confirm that though, just like you can't confirm that it wasn't an Iranian missile that hit the school. Thanks.


We're talking about toddlers and little children under 10 - Hamas soldiers?? That's pretty sick.

As to the school, several targets in the area were bombed in the same raid, and the mass killing of that scale could only have been done with precision bombing striking right through the middle of the structure which sits in a large empty lot. No way would Newsom run with this story if the evidence wasn't there.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/3/questions-over-minab-girls-school-strike-as-israel-us-deny-involvement
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You think Newsom only speaks facts? You really haven't been paying attention. He's gonna say whatever he thinks will get him the most votes. He's the slimiest.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

You think Newsom only speaks facts? You really haven't been paying attention. He's gonna say whatever he thinks will get him the most votes. He's the slimiest.


He's definitely an opportunist, for sure, and kind of too slick. But he's not an Epstein friend, client or entangled in blackmail. He's a normal upper class Catholic dude with a normal wife and family. I think all he needs to do to win in '30 is look like the least dirty shirt in the hamper and right now it's a pretty low bar but it is what it is.

The other thing here is that he was the first Democrat to criticize the Iran war. It's kind of amazing that no other major D figure has come out and done that before him, he or she would have scored a lot of political goodwill.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please tell me what is normal about him? Is it normal to cheat with your best friend's partner? Is it normal to be raised with Getty money?

He's criticized something that most Americans support according to recent polling. Real smart guy
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

You think Newsom only speaks facts? You really haven't been paying attention. He's gonna say whatever he thinks will get him the most votes. He's the slimiest.


He's definitely an opportunist, for sure, and kind of too slick. But he's not an Epstein friend, client or entangled in blackmail. He's a normal upper class Catholic dude with a normal wife and family. I think all he needs to do to win in '30 is look like the least dirty shirt in the hamper and right now it's a pretty low bar but it is what it is.

The other thing here is that he was the first Democrat to criticize the Iran war. It's kind of amazing that no other major D figure has come out and done that before him, he or she would have scored a lot of political goodwill.


He's criticizing Israel as an apartheid state ( his words) because he's caught up with the base which will make this a seminal issue in primaries- he didn't denounce Israel when they were conducting genocide, only when he realizes that being pro Israel is a losing issue with primary voters who are more anti- Israel.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

You think Newsom only speaks facts? You really haven't been paying attention. He's gonna say whatever he thinks will get him the most votes. He's the slimiest.


He's definitely an opportunist, for sure, and kind of too slick. But he's not an Epstein friend, client or entangled in blackmail. He's a normal upper class Catholic dude with a normal wife and family. I think all he needs to do to win in '30 is look like the least dirty shirt in the hamper and right now it's a pretty low bar but it is what it is.

The other thing here is that he was the first Democrat to criticize the Iran war. It's kind of amazing that no other major D figure has come out and done that before him, he or she would have scored a lot of political goodwill.


He's criticizing Israel as an apartheid state ( his words) because he's caught up with the base which will make this a seminal issue in primaries- he didn't denounce Israel when they were conducting genocide, only when he realizes that being pro Israel is a losing issue with primary voters who are more anti- Israel.


Yes of course, he is an opportunist. But I am also noticing that he was the first major Democrat to jump on that opportunity to score points with the base.

Neither AOC nor Bernie called Gaza a genocide, until fairly recently, and to my knowledge they did not come out and denounce the bombing of the girls school. This despite the fact that today over 3/4 of Democrats do not support the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

Ultimately, yes, Newsom has a large proportion of big donors who are rabid zionists, but unlike Trump or even Bill Clinton, I don't think he's compromised and potentially blackmailed. Newsom is a guy who grew up rich and had "normal" affairs with adult women, did not associate or get mentored by dark creeps like Roy Cohn, who was a kind of Epstein figure before Epstein, and also a pedo predator. Cohn was Trump's mentor, and Trump knew exactly who Cohn was, as he knows what Epstein is all about.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Please tell me what is normal about him? Is it normal to cheat with your best friend's partner? Is it normal to be raised with Getty money?

He's criticized something that most Americans support according to recent polling. Real smart guy


Being raised with money means that he didn't have wear makeup and go to 1970s NY parties as Roy Cohn's date, like young Donald here, who was very much Roy Cohn's type.

Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Anarchistbear said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

You think Newsom only speaks facts? You really haven't been paying attention. He's gonna say whatever he thinks will get him the most votes. He's the slimiest.


He's definitely an opportunist, for sure, and kind of too slick. But he's not an Epstein friend, client or entangled in blackmail. He's a normal upper class Catholic dude with a normal wife and family. I think all he needs to do to win in '30 is look like the least dirty shirt in the hamper and right now it's a pretty low bar but it is what it is.

The other thing here is that he was the first Democrat to criticize the Iran war. It's kind of amazing that no other major D figure has come out and done that before him, he or she would have scored a lot of political goodwill.


He's criticizing Israel as an apartheid state ( his words) because he's caught up with the base which will make this a seminal issue in primaries- he didn't denounce Israel when they were conducting genocide, only when he realizes that being pro Israel is a losing issue with primary voters who are more anti- Israel.


Yes of course, he is an opportunist. But I am also noticing that he was the first major Democrat to jump on that opportunity to score points with the base.

Neither AOC nor Bernie called Gaza a genocide, until fairly recently, and to my knowledge they did not come out and denounce the bombing of the girls school. This despite the fact that today over 3/4 of Democrats do not support the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

Ultimately, yes, Newsom has a large proportion of big donors who are rabid zionists, but unlike Trump or even Bill Clinton, I don't think he's compromised and potentially blackmailed. Newsom is a guy who grew up rich and had "normal" affairs with adult women, did not associate or get mentored by dark creeps like Roy Cohn, who was a kind of Epstein figure before Epstein, and also a pedo predator. Cohn was Trump's mentor, and Trump knew exactly who Cohn was, as he knows what Epstein is all about.


The 3/4 of Democrats who don't support Israel aren't in Congress taking Israel money. On any issue, Democrats are beholding to money not voters coupled with their theater kid performance. AOC is an example - first day, sitting in Pelosi's office- flash forward, voting for genocide.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is having an affair a disqualifier now to political office? LOL
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never once said that. Just said that's not a normal person Especially when it's with your best friend's wife.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's dyslexic and self- admitted borderline ******- it's not fair to confuse him like this
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Uh.. oh..now he is feeding anti semitism. I expect to see Gavin at Saul's tomorrow morning eating latkes with the boys
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:



Uh.. oh..now he is feeding anti semitism. I expect to see Gavin at Saul's tomorrow morning eating latkes with the boys

Waste of his time. Progressives aren't going to vote for this obvious pandering.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm all in on Gavin. We need to start being more critical of Israel and stop the pandering
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I'm all in on Gavin. We need to start being more critical of Israel and stop the pandering


These two sentences don't go together. Gavin is the prime example of a politician who panders.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

I'm all in on Gavin. We need to start being more critical of Israel and stop the pandering


These two sentences don't go together. Gavin is the prime example of a politician who panders.


Newsom is not compromised. There is a difference between political pandering, and political blackmail.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

I'm all in on Gavin. We need to start being more critical of Israel and stop the pandering


These two sentences don't go together. Gavin is the prime example of a politician who panders.


Newsom is not compromised. There is a difference between political pandering, and political blackmail.


He floats with the wind. Whatever he thinks is gonna get him votes, he says.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Nobody likes low SAT tests, he needs to get a coach and retake these asap
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

I'm all in on Gavin. We need to start being more critical of Israel and stop the pandering


These two sentences don't go together. Gavin is the prime example of a politician who panders.


Newsom is not compromised. There is a difference between political pandering, and political blackmail.


He floats with the wind. Whatever he thinks is gonna get him votes, he says.


Much better situation than with the current guy, who will do whatever his blackmailers tell him to do, get it?



Trump has an Epstein button.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, I don't get it because I think you're stuck in your hatred for the Israeli state.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

I'm all in on Gavin. We need to start being more critical of Israel and stop the pandering


These two sentences don't go together. Gavin is the prime example of a politician who panders.


Newsom is not compromised. There is a difference between political pandering, and political blackmail.

Newsom doesn't have to be blackmailed to support horrible ideas. Campaign contributions more than suffice.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:



Uh.. oh..now he is feeding anti semitism. I expect to see Gavin at Saul's tomorrow morning eating latkes with the boys



Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?


It doesn't matter what you want.

It only matters what the Democrats wants.

If the Democrats want Newsom, then you'll get Newsom.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:



It doesn't matter what you want.

It only matters what the Democrats wants.

If the Democrats want Newsom, then you'll get Newsom.

Defenders of democracy. What a joke.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.