Newsom

60,600 Views | 529 Replies | Last: 57 min ago by movielover
Big C
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 3:04p, 5/5/26

I will bet you that Kamala Harris is not the Dem candidate for POTUS in 2028. I'll give you 2-1 odds. Two cyber bucks to one. You down?

Whether the nominee is Newsom or not, I don't know. I tend to think it will be somebody else entirely.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:06p, 5/5/26
Graham Platner 2028.

Too soon?
Reply Quote
3
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 3:06p, 5/5/26
Big C said:

I will bet you that Kamala Harris is not the Dem candidate for POTUS in 2028. I'll give you 2-1 odds. Two cyber bucks to one. You down?


No thanks, not the venue.
Reply Quote
5
Big C
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 3:11p, 5/5/26
movielover said:
Big C said:

I will bet you that Kamala Harris is not the Dem candidate for POTUS in 2028. I'll give you 2-1 odds. Two cyber bucks to one. You down?


No thanks, not the venue.

For the best. Now we don't have to figure out what a cyber buck is. But do you really think it will be Kamala Harris? I don't.
Reply Quote
1
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 6:35p, 5/5/26
Big C said:

I will bet you that Kamala Harris is not the Dem candidate for POTUS in 2028. I'll give you 2-1 odds. Two cyber bucks to one. You down?

Whether the nominee is Newsom or not, I don't know. I tend to think it will be somebody else entirely.

She ain't raising no billion dollars this time around, I guarantee you that.
Reply Quote
4
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 6:35p, 5/5/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
Graham Platner 2028.

Too soon?

It wasn't for Obummer
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 8:29p, 5/5/26
movielover said:
Big C said:

I will bet you that Kamala Harris is not the Dem candidate for POTUS in 2028. I'll give you 2-1 odds. Two cyber bucks to one. You down?


No thanks, not the venue.

MACO
Reply Quote
1
HawaiiBear33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:32p, 5/5/26


Spade; but not comedy and facts confirmed

Who could possibly support newsom
Reply Quote
6
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HawaiiBear33 • 8:34p, 5/5/26
ME FOR ONE

VOTE GAVIN AND VOTE BLUE
Reply Quote
2
Big C
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 10:33p, 5/5/26

ME FOR TWO

(he'd be great; albeit some shortcomings... added bonus of getting to watch some MAGA folks' heads' explode... figuratively)
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 10:52p, 5/5/26
Big C said:

ME FOR TWO

(he'd be great; albeit some shortcomings... added bonus of getting to watch some MAGA folks' heads' explode... figuratively)

If Newsom is the one, Democrats would have selected him to be Kamala's running mate instead of Tim Walz.
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 11:26p, 5/5/26
I wanted the KY governor
Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 3:27p, 5/6/26
Big C said:

ME FOR TWO

(he'd be great; albeit some shortcomings... added bonus of getting to watch some MAGA folks' heads' explode... figuratively)

Gavin needs to co-opt a Kid Rock or country song for his rallies to confuse MAGA.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
smh
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 9:52a, 5/7/26
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.
sighned, not dead yet # funk trunk; i.c.e. too
Reply Quote
1
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to smh • 10:04a, 5/7/26
smh said:
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.

Movielover always chickens out, this time on a bet offered to him
Reply Quote
1
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 10:43a, 5/7/26
SBGold said:
smh said:
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.

Movielover always chickens out, this time on a bet offered to him


Biff Tannen says hi.
Reply Quote
6
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 11:20a, 5/7/26
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
smh said:
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.

Movielover always chickens out, this time on a bet offered to him


Biff Tannen says hi.

Yeah, the Back to Future references seem very dated and not really applicable.

Choose Kindness not put downs 3
Reply Quote
1
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 11:30a, 5/7/26
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
smh said:
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.

Movielover always chickens out, this time on a bet offered to him


Biff Tannen says hi.

Yeah, the Back to Future references seem very dated and not really applicable.

Choose Kindness not put downs 3


Let Cal88 know
Reply Quote
4
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 12:15p, 5/7/26
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
smh said:
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.

Movielover always chickens out, this time on a bet offered to him


Biff Tannen says hi.

Yeah, the Back to Future references seem very dated and not really applicable.

Choose Kindness not put downs 3


The references would not appear applicable to somebody blinded by partisanship.
Reply Quote
5
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 12:26p, 5/7/26
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
smh said:
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.

Movielover always chickens out, this time on a bet offered to him


Biff Tannen says hi.

Yeah, the Back to Future references seem very dated and not really applicable.

Choose Kindness not put downs 3


The references would not appear applicable to somebody blinded by partisanship.

It's been established that I read (and have even posted) Fox News articles. Blinded by partisanship is not a thing with me 3

Choose Kindness not put downs 3
Reply Quote
1
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 12:47p, 5/7/26
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
smh said:
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.

Movielover always chickens out, this time on a bet offered to him


Biff Tannen says hi.

Yeah, the Back to Future references seem very dated and not really applicable.

Choose Kindness not put downs 3


The references would not appear applicable to somebody blinded by partisanship.

It's been established that I read (and have even posted) Fox News articles. Blinded by partisanship is not a thing with me 3

Choose Kindness not put downs 3


I disagree.
Reply Quote
6
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 1:18p, 5/7/26
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
smh said:
SBGold said:
MACO

i'm slow, always, just guessing the M above stands for some annoying poster here, dunno which.

Movielover always chickens out, this time on a bet offered to him


Biff Tannen says hi.

Yeah, the Back to Future references seem very dated and not really applicable.

Choose Kindness not put downs 3


The references would not appear applicable to somebody blinded by partisanship.

It's been established that I read (and have even posted) Fox News articles. Blinded by partisanship is not a thing with me 3

Choose Kindness not put downs 3


It's definitely a thing with you
Reply Quote
5
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 4:03p, 5/7/26
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
Well at least you moved on from your inaccurate posts about oil and energy issues.

Good on ya lover

Choose Kindness


Not only is this a flame post, it is an inaccurate, trolling flame post. Movielover's contributions to energy and oil discussions are much appreciated.


This is an interesting conclusion.
Do you also believe as Movielover does that REFINING is a key element of Crude Oil production?
Reply Quote
2
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 4:10p, 5/7/26
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
Well at least you moved on from your inaccurate posts about oil and energy issues.

Good on ya lover

Choose Kindness


Not only is this a flame post, it is an inaccurate, trolling flame post. Movielover's contributions to energy and oil discussions are much appreciated.


This is an interesting conclusion.
Do you also believe as Movielover does that REFINING is a key element of Crude Oil production?


Probably a minor error and definitely something I wouldn't act like an immature third grader about.
Reply Quote
4
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:20p, 5/7/26
Pedantic 101.

Apparently, when Trump supporters say that 2 + 2 = 5 they get a FREE PASS.

From other Trump supporters.
Shocker.

Reply Quote
1
2 edits
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 4:43p, 5/7/26
DiabloWags said:
Pedantic 101.

Apparently, when Trump supporters say that 2 + 2 = 5 they get a FREE PASS.

From other Trump supporters.
Shocker.



This post was a wonderful lesson into the new class you're teaching. It was a perfect example of being pedantic.
Reply Quote
6
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 4:47p, 5/7/26
I disagree.

99% of Cal alums are clearly aware of a fundamental fact that REFINING has nothing to do with crude oil PRODUCTION.

Thanks.
Reply Quote
4
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 5:13p, 5/7/26
Yes, extraction is important.
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 9:43p, 5/7/26
LOL
Reply Quote
2
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 9:44p, 5/7/26
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
Well at least you moved on from your inaccurate posts about oil and energy issues.

Good on ya lover

Choose Kindness


Not only is this a flame post, it is an inaccurate, trolling flame post. Movielover's contributions to energy and oil discussions are much appreciated.


This is an interesting conclusion.
Do you also believe as Movielover does that REFINING is a key element of Crude Oil production?


Probably a minor error and definitely something I wouldn't act like an immature third grader about.

dude keep repeating the error though
Reply Quote
2
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 10:33p, 5/7/26
SBGold said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
SBGold said:
Well at least you moved on from your inaccurate posts about oil and energy issues.

Good on ya lover

Choose Kindness


Not only is this a flame post, it is an inaccurate, trolling flame post. Movielover's contributions to energy and oil discussions are much appreciated.


This is an interesting conclusion.
Do you also believe as Movielover does that REFINING is a key element of Crude Oil production?


Probably a minor error and definitely something I wouldn't act like an immature third grader about.

dude keep repeating the error though

Not really. It was a minor error and definitely something I wouldn't act like an immature third grader about.
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 10:59p, 5/7/26
We won't forget
Reply Quote
2
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 9:43p, 5/9/26
Reply Quote
4
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:59a, 5/10/26
Newsom's "Golden State Start" is spending $20 million in tax money to buy diapers from his wife's friends at 50 cents each. The average person can get diapers at Costco for 18 cents each. Perhaps we can distribute these diapers on the train to nowhere?
Reply Quote
5
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:30a, 5/10/26
Diaper's at your local Ralph's are .34 cents each.

https://www.ralphs.com/p/millie-moon-luxury-diapers-size-3-13-24-ibs-/0081000541426?fulfillment=PICKUP
Reply Quote
3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.