Is this a relative of yours?
The Official BI MAGA INVADES THE CITY OF ANGELS THREAD
17,422 Views |
577 Replies |
Last: 36 min ago by movielover
I bet you were jumping up and down in front of your TV set watching Fox News on Jan 6th.
Did you enjoy seeing Capitol Police Officers being maced and getting their ass kicked?
These are your Law & Order buddies right Minot?
Did you enjoy seeing Capitol Police Officers being maced and getting their ass kicked?
These are your Law & Order buddies right Minot?
What would anyone expect from an Ashli Babbit apologist.
Yup, definitely sounds like someone from the Law & Order crowd.
A 14-year USAF vet who got her brains splattered because she was clueless about the security threat she posed in a restricted area during a massive mob penetration of the Capitol that overran police.
You just can't fix stupid.
Yup, definitely sounds like someone from the Law & Order crowd.
MinotStateBeav said:
You got your facts mixed up a bit. She was unarmed climbing through a broken window, literally in the window frame while shot. At the point she was shot she posed no threat. If you're where she is, do you think you can hear the murdering cop yell anything? I didn't hear anything through this audio
A 14-year USAF vet who got her brains splattered because she was clueless about the security threat she posed in a restricted area during a massive mob penetration of the Capitol that overran police.
You just can't fix stupid.
At some point a person might pick up on the fact I won't engage with their dishonest framing and pure deflection, but I gave you too much credit.DiabloWags said:
What would anyone expect from an Ashli Babbit apologist.
Yup, definitely sounds like someone from the Law & Order crowd.MinotStateBeav said:
You got your facts mixed up a bit. She was unarmed climbing through a broken window, literally in the window frame while shot. At the point she was shot she posed no threat. If you're where she is, do you think you can hear the murdering cop yell anything? I didn't hear anything through this audio
Crocodile tears.
I expect no better from you...truly a horrible person.
MinotStateBeav said:
I expect no better from you...truly a horrible person.
Least surprising news on this thread.DiabloWags said:I like to yank myself to sleepMinotStateBeav said:
I expect no better from you...truly a horrible person.
Fits just about every Trumpanzee I've met.
J6 was cool.
LA is bad.
J6 was cool.
LA is bad.
DiabloWags said:
You're one of those LAW & ORDER bros right?
Hypocrite much?
6/10, 6/9, 6/8....it's every day for the left....
MinotStateBeav said:
I expect no better from you...truly a horrible person.
Nope this one was the truth
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
bear2034 said:DiabloWags said:
You're one of those LAW & ORDER bros right?
Hypocrite much?
6/10, 6/9, 6/8....it's every day for the left....
F u F the right F the left
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
Mayor Karen Bass is imposing a curfew on Los Angeles to manage the out of control but mostly peacefulness.
You do realize the exact opposite is equally true, right?DiabloWags said:
Fits just about every Trumpanzee I've met.
J6 was cool.
LA is bad.
Hanging out together at a store creates reasonable suspicion numb n u t t e r? Lol
MAGAts, not at all smart
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
MAGAts, not at all smart
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
Newsom says Trump purposely 'fanned the flames' of L.A. protests - Los Angeles Times
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-06-10/newsom-says-about-immigration-l-a-raids
"Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities they're traumatizing our communities," Newsom said. "And that seems to be the entire point."
Newsom's assertion that state and local law enforcement were successfully keeping the peace before federal authorities deployed "tear gas," "flash-bang grenades" and "rubber bullets" on Angelenos exercising their constitutional right to free speech and assembly
This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk," Newsom said. "That's when the downward spiral began. He doubled down on his dangerous National Guard deployment by fanning the flames even harder. And the president, he did it on purpose."
The governor, who has become a target for Republicans and a central figure in the political and legal battle over the protests, has said for days that an "unhinged" Trump deployed troops to intentionally incite violence and chaos, seeking to divert attention away from his actions in Washington and assert his "dictatorial tendencies."
On Monday, Trump said his top border policy advisor Tom Homan should follow through on threats to arrest the governor. Newsom immediately jumped on the comment, comparing the federal administration to an "authoritarian regime."
"I never thought I'd hear those words. Honestly, Democrat, Republican. Never thought I'd hear those in my lifetime to threaten a political opponent who happens to be sitting governor," Newsom said.
Newsom took a shot at Johnson during his address, saying the speaker has "completely abdicated" his responsibility for Congress to serve as a check on the White House. He warned that "other states are next."
"At this moment, we all need to stand up and be held to account, a higher level of accountability," Newsom said, imploring protesters to exercise free-speech rights peacefully. "I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and anxiety.
Newsom took a shot at Johnson during his address, saying the speaker has "completely abdicated" his responsibility for Congress to serve as a check on the White House. He warned that "other states are next."
"At this moment, we all need to stand up and be held to account, a higher level of accountability," Newsom said, imploring protesters to exercise free-speech rights peacefully. "I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and anxiety."
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-06-10/newsom-says-about-immigration-l-a-raids
"Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities they're traumatizing our communities," Newsom said. "And that seems to be the entire point."
Newsom's assertion that state and local law enforcement were successfully keeping the peace before federal authorities deployed "tear gas," "flash-bang grenades" and "rubber bullets" on Angelenos exercising their constitutional right to free speech and assembly
This brazen abuse of power by a sitting president inflamed a combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our National Guard at risk," Newsom said. "That's when the downward spiral began. He doubled down on his dangerous National Guard deployment by fanning the flames even harder. And the president, he did it on purpose."
The governor, who has become a target for Republicans and a central figure in the political and legal battle over the protests, has said for days that an "unhinged" Trump deployed troops to intentionally incite violence and chaos, seeking to divert attention away from his actions in Washington and assert his "dictatorial tendencies."
On Monday, Trump said his top border policy advisor Tom Homan should follow through on threats to arrest the governor. Newsom immediately jumped on the comment, comparing the federal administration to an "authoritarian regime."
"I never thought I'd hear those words. Honestly, Democrat, Republican. Never thought I'd hear those in my lifetime to threaten a political opponent who happens to be sitting governor," Newsom said.
Newsom took a shot at Johnson during his address, saying the speaker has "completely abdicated" his responsibility for Congress to serve as a check on the White House. He warned that "other states are next."
"At this moment, we all need to stand up and be held to account, a higher level of accountability," Newsom said, imploring protesters to exercise free-speech rights peacefully. "I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and anxiety.
Newsom took a shot at Johnson during his address, saying the speaker has "completely abdicated" his responsibility for Congress to serve as a check on the White House. He warned that "other states are next."
"At this moment, we all need to stand up and be held to account, a higher level of accountability," Newsom said, imploring protesters to exercise free-speech rights peacefully. "I know many of you are feeling deep anxiety, stress and fear. But I want you to know that you are the antidote to that fear and anxiety."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
concordtom said:chazzed said:
(Sorry if this is a booth.)BREAKING: In shocking footage of Trump in 2020 that is now going viral, Trump says it’s against the law for a president to call in the National Guard on his own: “We can't call in the National Guard unless we're requested by a governor.” MAGA = 🤡.
— CALL TO ACTIVISM (@CalltoActivism) June 9, 2025
pic.twitter.com/cxYMfYEqay
Sure.
So he thought twice and called in the Marines.
As we all know at this point, he has no principles. Unless you consider monetary gain a principle.
SBGold said:
Hanging out together at a store creates reasonable suspicion numb n u t t e r? Lol
MAGAts, not at all smart
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
No, it takes more than that, and I am glad to have given you a legal education. You sorely needed it. Legal Zoom only gets you so far.
I'm a pretty big law & order guy. For example, I believe convicted felons should serve time in prison.
Where do you practice?oski003 said:SBGold said:
Hanging out together at a store creates reasonable suspicion numb n u t t e r? Lol
MAGAts, not at all smart
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
No, it takes more than that, and I am glad to have given you a legal education. You sorely needed it. Legal Zoom only gets you so far.
LOL
MAGAts, still a joke
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
But did you know that the avg GPA to get into Minot State is only 3.42 ?
SBGold said:Where do you practice?oski003 said:SBGold said:
Hanging out together at a store creates reasonable suspicion numb n u t t e r? Lol
MAGAts, not at all smart
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
No, it takes more than that, and I am glad to have given you a legal education. You sorely needed it. Legal Zoom only gets you so far.
LOL
MAGAts, still a joke
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
How many posts today? Get a life, you ****ing loser.
It's like a real community. We have a hall monitor and everything.
Chapman_is_Gone said:
How many posts today? Get a life, you ****ing loser.
Speaking of losers.
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/11816637/usa_today_10376139.jpg)
Big C said:HKBear97! said:"bored young men looking for a little action" - that's how you would describe them? No, these are dangerous individuals with no regard for human life.Big C said:HKBear97! said:
About time. Anyone watching these idiots on the streets? So many are not peaceful protesters - they are showing up with padding, helmets, goggles, masks, backpacks with who knows what - they are anarchists taking advantage of the chaos. Last night it was basically just looting, not protesting. Enough is enough. I'm all for peaceful protests and those are absolutely welcome and needed in our society. What many of these morons are doing is not that and they should be arrested as domestic terrorists.
When Trump does his Trump thing, it's like throwing gasoline on the fire. Now we're seeing the Antifa types -- bored young men looking for a little action -- come out of the woodwork.
But that's Trump for you. Any publicity is good publicity. Any time this or transgender issues are the lead news story, that's keeping people from maybe seeing Trump using the Presidency to enrich himself.
Both descriptions can be true. I guess what I meant was that these are people who have no ideology or cause to speak of.
Hey, there can be major problems caused by bored young men looking for a little action. Believe me, I taught high school for 20 years. I was also a teenager myself.
I thought he was describing the J6 people.
I wonder, did he think they were peaceful protestors who were there in support of freeing a stolen election?
And they were invited into the Capitol by the police?
I love teachers! Under appreciated, by FAR!!
tequila4kapp said:First I would say they are illegal AND criminals.concordtom said:
Tequila will say "but they are ILLEGAL!"
But it goes far beyond who holds a piece of paper and who doesn't. We've always known that.
Then I would say they are illegal.
Then I would say for the vast overwhelming majority of Americans - who are good decent people - it's about law and order, absolutely not skin color.
(Insert clips of Trump rally violence, Jan6 coup d'etat participants. )
Do you see what's going now as similar to the Rodney king LA unrest
How (are) you gonna win when you ain’t right within…
DiabloWags said:
4 arrested in CONCORD Tom.
ICE clashes with protestors in Concord, 4 arrested at immigration court | KRON4
Wow. Thx.
I'm 2.5 miles from there now.
I didn't know what that building was.
So, I asked ChatGPT to read the article and then engaged in a Q&A. Interesting!!!
"So, what's he deal… a person appears in USA and seeks asylum so they obtain a court hearing - but then Trump's agents swoop in and take them away regardless of the outcome of the hearing?"
Yes, that's essentially what happened in several recent cases and it's caused major legal and ethical backlash.
Here's the breakdown:
The Usual Process for Asylum Seekers
1. Enter the U.S. (either legally or irregularly).
2. Apply for asylum, claiming a credible fear of persecution in their home country.
3. Receive a hearing date at an immigration court.
4. Await decisionthis could take months or years, and many are released into the community in the meantime.
What's Happening Now (Especially Under Trump-Era Policy Revivals)
In May 2024, ICE agents began arresting asylum seekers outside immigration courts, even when those individuals were complying with the system showing up for hearings or check-ins.
At least 4 asylum seekers in San Francisco and another 4 in Concord were detained by ICE even though they:
Had no criminal record,
Were not fugitives,
And were actively participating in the legal process.
Why This Is Controversial
Due process concerns: These people weren't fugitives or absconding. They were obeying the law.
Undermines the asylum process: It signals that even cooperation with U.S. authorities might lead to detention or deportation.
Immigration courts vs. ICE: Immigration judges are part of DOJ. ICE is part of DHS. Arrests at court may bypass what the judge was about to decide.
Legal experts call it a violation of longstanding norms, and immigrant advocates describe it as "entrapment by process."
Trump-Era Policy Influence
While President Biden has been in office, ICE leadership has occasionally reverted to more aggressive enforcement tactics from the Trump administration, especially under pressure or political shifts. Some fear that a full return to Trump-era rulesor Trump himself returningwould make such raids routine.
Summary
Yes, asylum seekers can be detained even while following all legal procedures, and even before the judge rules on their case. This practice, while legally permitted in many cases, is heavily criticized for violating the spirit of due process and humanitarian law.
Would you like more background on how ICE justifies these actions or on what happens after someone is detained this way?
PS
I love the new pavement and center plantings on Treat near Lime Ridge!
I love the new pavement and center plantings on Treat near Lime Ridge!
DiabloWags said:
Again, you're just not the sharpest "tool" in the shed.
There's no way you attended CAL.
Within 48 hours of the release of a long-awaited immigration and foreign aid bill he had championed, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's Republican conference rejected his pitch to support it, knifed the deal and left it for dead.
Just four Republicans voted for it. In the end, even McConnell backtracked and voted against the package that he had helped develop.
Republicans kill border bill in a sign of Trump's strength and McConnell's waning influence
I asked ChatGPT about this, too:
Yes, that story is accurate and here's what happened:
What Actually Went Down
1. Bill Unveiled
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell co-led a bipartisan package that combined border/immigration reforms with foreign aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. It was unveiled in early February 2024.
2. Initial Support, Then Swift Collapse
Although initially backed by McConnell and other leaders, within 48 hours, McConnell's own conference pulled the plug. Most Senate Republicansaligned with Trumpopposed the deal nearly en masse.
3. Only Four Republicans Voted "Yes"
The procedural vote failed 4950. Only four Senate Republicans voted to advance itSenators Collins, Murkowski, Romney, and Lankfordwhile McConnell, despite helping shape the bill, voted against it due to collapse of GOP support .
4. McConnell's U-Turn
McConnell explicitly backtracked, acknowledging defeat, saying the deal was "dead" once his party yanked support even though he had publicly championed it just days earlier .
Why It Fell Apart
Trump-aligned opposition: Trump and MAGA-aligned senators campaigned against it, calling it weak on border policy .
Hard-right pressure: Senators like Mike Lee and Ted Cruz galvanized the revolt.
House GOP resistance: Plus, Speaker Johnson and House Republicans rejected any version linking immigration reforms to foreign aid .
Internal GOP chaos: Commentators said the revolt showed "no one is in charge" in McConnell's conference
Hi, Minot:
I wanted to check in on you today after that thorough beat down you took yesterday.
Are you okay?
I wanted to check in on you today after that thorough beat down you took yesterday.
Are you okay?
I wonder if these are people subject to Biden's expanded Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. That extension was subsequently terminated by Trump. The termination was challenged in court, lower court(s) issued TRO and appellate/SCOTUS overturned the TRO, meaning the administration would be within its legal rights to proceed with detention/deportation.
EDIT: per a story in yesterday's Oregonian, 3 detained asylum seekers were from Venezuela (yes, TPS), Mexico and Ecuador (No TPS). The administration claims they were improperly admitted into the country, and their asylum claims can still move forward if they demonstrate a "credible fear" of being returned to their home countries.
EDIT: per a story in yesterday's Oregonian, 3 detained asylum seekers were from Venezuela (yes, TPS), Mexico and Ecuador (No TPS). The administration claims they were improperly admitted into the country, and their asylum claims can still move forward if they demonstrate a "credible fear" of being returned to their home countries.
going4roses said:
Do you see what's going now as similar to the Rodney king LA unrest
Not really.
tequila4kapp said:
I wonder if these are people subject to Biden's expanded Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. That extension was subsequently terminated by Trump. The termination was challenged in court, lower court(s) issued TRO and appellate/SCOTUS overturned the TRO, meaning the administration would be within its legal rights to proceed with detention/deportation.
EDIT: per a story in yesterday's Oregonian, 3 detained asylum seekers were from Venezuela (yes, TPS), Mexico and Ecuador (No TPS). The administration claims they were improperly admitted into the country, and their asylum claims can still move forward if they demonstrate a "credible fear" of being returned to their home countries.
Well that means horsechit to me. SCOTUS has ruled that he can do whatever he wants so long as he claims it is an official act.
So, your reasoning may be legal, but it's still total hogwash nonetheless.
Sleep well, though. You were only following orders, right?
(Sometimes you have to think for yourself in this life.)
Trump v. United States, decided by the Supreme Court on July1,2024. In a 63 ruling, the Court held:
What the Decision Means
Absolute immunity for a former President's "core constitutional" actions, such as:
Issuing pardons
Vetoing bills
Appointing officials
Using the Department of Justice in line with executive authority .
Presumptive immunity for other official actsthat is, immunity applies unless prosecutors can show that holding the President criminally accountable for those acts wouldn't undermine the functioning of the executive branch .
No immunity for any unofficial or private actions. These remain prosecutable.
Ramifications
This ruling gives future presidents broad legal cover for official actionspotentially, even controversial or ethically dubious onesunless they clearly fall outside the ambit of official duties .
Critics argue it sets a dangerous precedent, placing the President above legal accountability and threatening the balance of power .
Even some moderate conservatives, such as Justice Amy Coney Barrett, cautioned that the Court's broad interpretation might shield misconduct by interweaving official and private motives .
Featured Stories
See All
Jim Knowlton Announces Retirement
by Cal Athletics
2nd Official Visit Weekend Another Success for the Bears
by Jim McGill
Bears Pick Up NFL Academy Tight End Luca Wolf
by Jim McGill