The Official BI MAGA INVADES THE CITY OF ANGELS THREAD

17,876 Views | 586 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by dajo9
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearinsider said:



*Trump's immigration publicity stunt is falling apart in any event. He says he is backing off kidnapping workers in the hospitality and agricultural industries and construction industry will be next. He will be forced to go after actual criminals. He won't need the Guard for that. No one will ruckus for them.


Does anyone really think that Trump isnt employing undocumented housekeepers at his Hotels?

I think he just gave himself an "exemption".
Hypocrite.
Mostly Peaceful
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Taibbi banger:


Quote:

The current Los Angeles riots have revived "mostly peaceful" in a big way. American officials and commentators are avoiding the infamous "mostly" construction and returning with "largely peaceful" (New York Times), "overwhelmingly peaceful" (a rebranded "Kamala D. Harris") or just "peaceful protests" (Cory Booker). Go overseas, though, or down a peg to the don't-give-a-damn tier of propagandists, and you'll see "mostly peaceful" back word-for-word.

This episode's coverage hysterics (lowlights below) have somehow already lapped the Summer of Floyd. Once again, the public is being trained in distinctions between illegitimate and legitimate protest, regressive force versus righteous resistance. You can agree with it or not, but anyone who's been to college knows what this is, and we should stop trying to hide it
Clearly he's not talking about the Dems on this board
https://media.tenor.com/uARaKFpSkaMAAAAC/anger-management-jack-nicholson.gif

Quote:

This is the critical part of every Trump news cycle. Instead of accepting political reality (Trump got elected, Trump nominated a judge, Trump got elected again, Trump started executing a promised immigration policy), press and elected opposition rally behind protests that are encouraged to spread everywhere, not-so-subtly pining for an administration-toppling Disorder Event, even if we just had an election. The same national security experts who ten seconds ago wanted to tear up the Constitution to stop "extremism" or "authoritarianism" now say throwing rocks at cops or burning **** is "legal protest" with a "little unrest," the First Amendment with a citrus twist of revolt. Usual Suspects like John Heilemann pop up to tell us there's nothing to see here, just people chanting "This is what democracy looks like!" in front of burning vehicles.
Quote:

This is the moment when the previously disinterested voter looks up, notices governors and mayors and congresspersons expressing apparently limitless support for illegal immigration, tax evasion, even crime, and wonders what the deal is. As in, a civilian protester can hold signs saying "No one is illegal" or "Abolish ICE Now" or even wave the Mexican flag on seized highways, but officials who command police forces or are charged with immigration enforcement probably shouldn't cheer unless they harbor utopian notions about a borderless world, which they inevitably do because they went to college in America. This zone of realization is where Trump cleans up every time. I used to think it was unfortunate, now I think it's deserved. These idiots can't muster the energy to even pretend to care at even a baseline level about mundane patriotic concerns like not letting absolutely everyone over the border, or drawing some kind of line when it comes to vandalism or school standards. Even the most liberal voter reaches a moment of exhaustion with this bull*****
Quote:

I imagine I'm not alone in feeling trapped between two political brands outside my comfort zone. Trump is in office in significant part because the goofball principles of the last "mostly peaceful" revolution made the majority want to puke its guts out. Why run it back? Are there really no other ideas?

HKBear97!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

The Zapruder Film of 2025. There was a third US Senator standing on the toilet
Yeah, looks like this one is just going to be an inkblot test.
Sadly, it does. I was watching and the camera angle was on the far left side of the room - Noem was speaking, the reporters were all sitting taking notes and the camera/mic men were all standing in the back. Then you can see this figure at the far wall moving forward to the podium which is when the secret service(?) agents reacted and moved him backwards. It was a pretty tame, normal press conference until Padilla decided to make a scene. The politicians are going to make this a big deal, but this is all theater.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Female protestor trampled by horses gets up and gets struck on head (and shot?)

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HKBear97! said:

sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

The Zapruder Film of 2025. There was a third US Senator standing on the toilet
Yeah, looks like this one is just going to be an inkblot test.
Sadly, it does. I was watching and the camera angle was on the far left side of the room - Noem was speaking, the reporters were all sitting taking notes and the camera/mic men were all standing in the back. Then you can see this figure at the far wall moving forward to the podium which is when the secret service(?) agents reacted and moved him backwards. It was a pretty tame, normal press conference until Padilla decided to make a scene. The politicians are going to make this a big deal, but this is all theater.
Padilla most certainly was trying to make a scene, but he was no closer to the podium than any of the reporters. Claims that he was physically threatening to anyone are bulls***.

The best response would have been for Noem to address his question calmly (even if it's something like "We'll be happy to meet with you later, Senator.") and then continue with the conference as long as he remained calm as well. Instead they wrestled him to the ground and handcuffed him immediately, thereby giving up the moral high ground. As always, the Trump administration can't help but overreact to any perceived slight.
HKBear97!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

HKBear97! said:

sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

The Zapruder Film of 2025. There was a third US Senator standing on the toilet
Yeah, looks like this one is just going to be an inkblot test.
Sadly, it does. I was watching and the camera angle was on the far left side of the room - Noem was speaking, the reporters were all sitting taking notes and the camera/mic men were all standing in the back. Then you can see this figure at the far wall moving forward to the podium which is when the secret service(?) agents reacted and moved him backwards. It was a pretty tame, normal press conference until Padilla decided to make a scene. The politicians are going to make this a big deal, but this is all theater.
Padilla most certainly was trying to make a scene, but he was no closer to the podium than any of the reporters. Claims that he was physically threatening to anyone are bulls***.

The best response would have been for Noem to address his question calmly (even if it's something like "We'll be happy to meet with you later, Senator.") and then continue with the conference as long as he remained calm as well. Instead they wrestled him to the ground and handcuffed him immediately, thereby giving up the moral high ground. As always, the Trump administration can't help but overreact to any perceived slight.
It wasn't a Q&A session at that point in time - he interrupted her mid-sentence. The reporters were all quiet waiting for the prepared statements from Noem, followed by members of the FBI, local police, etc. He walked into the room while this was going on and interrupted the press conference mid-way.

As for wrestled, yes, because he kept going forward and thought he was more important than everyone else.

Again, like you said, an inkblot test. But what I saw was yet another elected politician acting like a child.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HKBear97! said:

sycasey said:

HKBear97! said:

sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

The Zapruder Film of 2025. There was a third US Senator standing on the toilet
Yeah, looks like this one is just going to be an inkblot test.
Sadly, it does. I was watching and the camera angle was on the far left side of the room - Noem was speaking, the reporters were all sitting taking notes and the camera/mic men were all standing in the back. Then you can see this figure at the far wall moving forward to the podium which is when the secret service(?) agents reacted and moved him backwards. It was a pretty tame, normal press conference until Padilla decided to make a scene. The politicians are going to make this a big deal, but this is all theater.
Padilla most certainly was trying to make a scene, but he was no closer to the podium than any of the reporters. Claims that he was physically threatening to anyone are bulls***.

The best response would have been for Noem to address his question calmly (even if it's something like "We'll be happy to meet with you later, Senator.") and then continue with the conference as long as he remained calm as well. Instead they wrestled him to the ground and handcuffed him immediately, thereby giving up the moral high ground. As always, the Trump administration can't help but overreact to any perceived slight.
It wasn't a Q&A session at that point in time - he interrupted her mid-sentence. The reporters were all quiet waiting for the prepared statements from Noem, followed by members of the FBI, local police, etc. He walked into the room while this was going on and interrupted the press conference mid-way.

As for wrestled, yes, because he kept going forward and thought he was more important than everyone else.

Again, like you said, an inkblot test. But what I saw was yet another elected politician acting like a child.
Nah, they put their hands on him immediately and he was trying to get out of their grip. Probably because he assumed that as a US Senator he would be allowed to speak without being dragged out.

Also, my understanding is that Padilla was already in the room, having been escorted in by the FBI and already vetted because he has an office in the same building (and because he's a damn Senator). He certainly did interrupt, no argument there. But again, there is a proportional response to that and it is not "tackle and handcuff him."
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mostly Peaceful said:

Another Taibbi banger:

Taibbi is just going to take any opportunity to say "Democrats suck" at this point, but in this particular case he's right that the tactics of protestors who carry around Mexican flags and burn stuff are stupid and counterproductive. I've even seen some instances of people carrying Palestinian or even Hamas(!) flags/symbols. Look, I don't like what's happening in Gaza either but where is the message discipline here? These are two very different issues.

Unfortunately there is a small but visible subset of these folks who want to turn every protest into their own personal cosplay session, and an opportunity to air every grievance under the sun. I'm not sure what Democratic politicians are supposed to do about that, other than to say that they don't support violence or destruction (at which point I'm sure Taibbi and his ilk will criticize them for looking weak on the immigration issue). Cost of living in a free country and all that.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No two-tiered justice here. He disobeyed the directives of a LEO.

Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good thread but LA is over. Alex Padilla being cuffed was supposed to be the cliffhanger but series has been cancelled.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Perhaps this is what happens when "protesters" are paid employees - they just need to show up and make a scene to collect their money.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:


Amazing
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank goodness for Twitter.

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

Perhaps this is what happens when "protesters" are paid employees - they just need to show up and make a scene to collect their money.
I haven't seen any real evidence that these people are being paid. Seems much more likely to me that they are just random cranks.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

No two-tiered justice here. He disobeyed the directives of a LEO.


There is nothing to charge him with.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

No two-tiered justice here. He disobeyed the directives of a LEO.



The uppity Padilla seems to think he's a United States Senator or something. Perhaps he would enjoy an all-expenses-paid "vacation" in El Salvador.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Cavity search would be extreme, but a lot of Dems would enjoy that.

Classy post!
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

movielover said:

No two-tiered justice here. He disobeyed the directives of a LEO.



The uppity Padilla seems to think he's a United States Senator or something. Perhaps he would enjoy an all-expenses-paid "vacation" in El Salvador.
Charging people who breached the Capitol Building on Jan 6 was a grave miscarriage of justice, but Padilla needs to be jailed for this.

No two-tiered justice!
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

movielover said:

Cavity search would be extreme, but a lot of Dems would enjoy that.

Classy post!
Yeah, I rarely flag posts but that one was both pointless and over the line.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

57% approval.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

This story is over, say goodbye. Eric Swalwell, Corey Booker, on the other hand, are still outraged. It's their Rosa Parks moment.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Senate should censure Alex Padilla for creating a disturbance and resisting law enforcement.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Will the war overshadow the No Kings NGO rallies?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is Trump a king because he owns the libs?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Will the war overshadow the No Kings NGO rallies?

We've seen this before.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Big C said:

movielover said:

Cavity search would be extreme, but a lot of Dems would enjoy that.

Classy post!
Yeah, I rarely flag posts but that one was both pointless and over the line.

Apparently I didn't need to put "/s" after my post for you!

(just learned about "/s" on one of the other forums... maybe I'm the last to know, but at least I'm still learning)
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

No two-tiered justice here. He disobeyed the directives of a LEO.



Ok, and what say you about those J6 "patriots"?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

movielover said:

No two-tiered justice here. He disobeyed the directives of a LEO.

Ok, and what say you about those J6 "patriots"?

They spent time in prison unlike Padilla who hasn't even been censured since the Democrats see him as a victim of the highest order.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your slacking off today.
Nowhere near your 36 posts from yesterday.

Are you suffering from a cold or illness today?
Under the weather?

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

DiabloWags said:

movielover said:

No two-tiered justice here. He disobeyed the directives of a LEO.

Ok, and what say you about those J6 "patriots"?

They spent time in prison unlike Padilla who hasn't even been censured since the Democrats see him as a victim of the highest order.

Unlike the Jan 6 mob, Padilla didn't go anywhere he wasn't allowed to be. Essentially you're saying he should be jailed for speaking out of turn.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.