Iran. Oh, the irony...

312,635 Views | 3140 Replies | Last: 4 min ago by BearlySane88
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TrumpBear said:



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


Iran's navy has never been heralded as a key military asset.
Moreover, it's questionable just how "degraded" their drone capacity is.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...


And that goal is nearly achieved.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Trump TACOs again. This time with a whimper of an economic DDay.


The "D" in Trump's Economic D-Day stands for Dud.

On 'Economic D-Day,' the Trump administration overpromised and underdelivered (again)
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...


And that goal is nearly achieved.

Soon we will all be able to congratulate the government for getting something we already had before the war started!
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...


And that goal is nearly achieved.

Soon we will all be able to congratulate the government for getting something we already had before the war started!


We did not have control of the strait before hand so I don't understand your post.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Trump TACOs again. This time with a whimper of an economic DDay.


The "D" in Trump's Economic D-Day stands for Dud.

On 'Economic D-Day,' the Trump administration overpromised and underdelivered (again)



Well done Trump. The threat will hopefully be enough for bad actors to get their **** together. Love this decision
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...


And that goal is nearly achieved.

Soon we will all be able to congratulate the government for getting something we already had before the war started!


And when gas prices finally go down, it will no longer be Biden's fault.




8/28/26
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...


And that goal is nearly achieved.

Soon we will all be able to congratulate the government for getting something we already had before the war started!


And when gas prices finally go down, it will no longer be Biden's fault.




8/28/26


In your other post you said you got gas for much cheaper than this picture. Posting this alone is very misleading.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For those that are unaware of why Chevron gasoline is more expensive . . .

Some people think that gasoline is all the same.
It isn't, given the addiitive packages that usually find their way into Top Tier gasoline.

And then of course with Chevron, there is a Techron patented fuel additive with powerful detergents to help keep engine parts clean by fighting deposits in an engines fuel intake system and also minimizes contributing to harmful combustion chamber deposits.

Why is Chevron with Techron more expensive & is gas with Techron worth the extra cost? - Alt Car news



cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

cbbass1 said:

BearlySane88 said:

MTG has no clue what's going on. This is really funny that she claims to know anything that's happening. Even funnier that people believe it



No. MTG's comments are accurate. The Trump administration has been discussing the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Iran, because that's the only way for either the U.S. or Israel to defeat Iran militarily.




That's a nice fantasy world you live in.

I've never depended on MTG to make my argument or support my assertions.

All I'm saying is that MTG's take is consistent with a broad collection of courageous experts in intelligence, military affairs, arms control, international relations, and economics who are willing to tell the truth about current events.

These experts are [now] outside of the Trump administration, U.S. Intelligence, the Military-Industrial Complex, the American Empire, the Israel Lobby, the Epstein Class, and outside the U.S. / Western corporate media propaganda complex -- so they're [ideally] free to tell the truth without losing their jobs.

Most of the Truth-Tellers receive death threats on a regular basis. Scott Ritter is on a U.S.-sponsored Ukrainian 'kill list'. He still visits Russia and Ukraine in his search for the truth.

The Trump administration and the Tech Bros are planning a crackdown on independent media, anti-war or anti-genocide opinions, and the civil liberties (1st, 4th, & 5th Amendment) of Americans after the midterm elections.

So you're welcome to call reality a fantasy, and vice versa. That's your right.

But at least look at the track record of all the people who lied us into wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine, and now Iran. The same people & the same institutions have been lying to all of us for years, and have never been held to account.

You might want to reach outside your bubble for some news, information, & analysis, compare it to what you're consuming on the inside, and get an honest reconciliation of the differences.

Unless you enjoy repeatedly being proven wrong, that is.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:


So you're welcome to call reality a fantasy, and vice versa. That's your right.

But at least look at the track record of all the people who lied us into wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine, and now Iran. The same people & the same institutions have been lying to all of us for years, and have never been held to account.

You might want to reach outside your bubble for some news, information, & analysis, compare it to what you're consuming on the inside, and get an honest reconciliation of the differences.

Unless you enjoy repeatedly being proven wrong, that is.




Sound advice!
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm still waiting for you to prove me wrong. I live in the Bay Area bro, my bubble is liberal lol.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So Much WINNING!



Trump declares 'mission accomplished' in Iran as conflict drags on
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
General Bone Spurs Gaslighting the American Public.

cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Trump TACOs again. This time with a whimper of an economic DDay.


The "D" in Trump's Economic D-Day stands for Dud.

On 'Economic D-Day,' the Trump administration overpromised and underdelivered (again)


The official name given to this "Economic D-Day" is "Operation Economic Outcast".

Treasury Secretary Bessent was apparently unaware that his scheme of secondary sanctions would result in the U.S. and Israel being the Outcasts, while the USD loses its status as the world's reserve currency, and the BRICS economic alliance, with currencies backed by precious metals and commodities, strengthens.

smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
> And then of course with Chevron, there is a Techron patented fuel additive with powerful detergents to help keep engine parts clean by fighting deposits in an engines fuel intake system and also minimizes contributing to harmful combustion chamber deposits.

huh, thanks DW; and all this time i thought smelly gas came from eating too many beans
# f*rt joke,, get it? sorry / not sorry bear
not dead yet # funk trunk and i.c.e. too (allergic to AI)
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

I'm still waiting for you to prove me wrong. I live in the Bay Area bro, my bubble is liberal lol.

We can start with, "That goal [of opening the Strait of Hormuz] is nearly achieved."

There's factual information to be had. That ain't it.


Then why do Trump & Bessent need the 'Operation Economic Isolation'?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

BearlySane88 said:

I'm still waiting for you to prove me wrong. I live in the Bay Area bro, my bubble is liberal lol.

We can start with, "That goal [of opening the Strait of Hormuz] is nearly achieved."

There's factual information to be had. That ain't it.




What other Iranian propaganda are you buying?

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kind of weird how our CENTCOM Commander said yesterday that it took SEVERAL MONTHS to clear the Strait of Hormuz of all of these mines. I guess there were actual mines there. Not just trash bags.





U.S. military says Strait of Hormuz has been cleared of mines
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Kind of weird how our CENTCOM Commander said yesterday that it took SEVERAL MONTHS to clear the Strait of Hormuz of all of these mines. I guess there were actual mines there. Not just trash bags.



U.S. military says Strait of Hormuz has been cleared of mines


It took them months because they had to check them all. You want them to assume they are fake?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

And then there's this information from our Allies.




"The mines are gone. You probably saw that we put it out yesterday all the mines, we got rid of the mines," he said on "The Glenn Beck Program."

US Central Command on Wednesday declined to comment on estimates on mines in Hormuz.

Trump has repeatedly insisted the strait is safe, as part of an administration-wide effort to calm energy markets as he looks to end the six-month war heading into midterm elections in November.

Allied officials believe the task also has become more complicated because many mines even those that have been identified and laid in clusters are likely to have drifted from their original position due to sea currents.

Mine-clearing though remains a painstaking and time-consuming process, particularly as Iran has likely laid harder-to-detect Maham mines. The US Navy is equipped with drones and other autonomous devices for mine detection, but has long been dependent on European allies who have advanced mine-hunting hardware.

"It is highly unlikely that all the mines in the strait have been cleared," said Becca Wasser, Bloomberg Economics defense lead. "Even if the mine threat was reduced, Iran could still escalate. Numerous commercial vessels are well in range of Iranian drones and short-range missiles and many are outside the range of US air defense cover."

US Allies Warn Hormuz Is Still Mined Despite Trump Claim

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nobody needs to prove that every square mile of Hormuz contains zero mines. The relevant question is whether the international shipping lanes have been cleared. CENTCOM now says they have, and nearly 1,500 commercial vessels have already transited with U.S. protection.

Independent analysts quoted by Al Jazeera also say there is good reason to have confidence that the main shipping lanes have been cleared.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/26/why-hormuz-remains-high-risk-for-ships-despite-us-claims-of-mine-clearing
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...


And that goal is nearly achieved.

Soon we will all be able to congratulate the government for getting something we already had before the war started!


We did not have control of the strait before hand so I don't understand your post.

No one needed to control it because no one was trying to block it . . . until we decided to start a war.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...


And that goal is nearly achieved.

Soon we will all be able to congratulate the government for getting something we already had before the war started!


We did not have control of the strait before hand so I don't understand your post.

No one needed to control it because no one was trying to block it . . . until we decided to start a war.


No truer words have ever been spoken.
The Strait was OPEN to all seaborne commerce . . . until TRUMP decided to start a war.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

DiabloWags said:

TrumpBear said:

dajo9 said:


In June, July, and August, and before, Trump said we already won the war.

He was correct. Time was still needed but the war is over and has been.


And yet Trump hasn't achieved any goals involving regime change or nuclear disarmament.
The goalposts kept getting moved to the point where there is no winning.



You're measuring success against regime change, which was never an official objective, and complete nuclear disarmament, which is broader than Trump's stated goal of preventing an Iranian bomb. Iran's military, naval and proxy capabilities have been substantially degraded, so claiming "nothing was achieved" is absolutely overstated.


I'm afraid you're terribly mistaken.
Regime change was clearly an official objective.




Trump says new call for regime change in Iran justified by 'imminent threats' to US - ABC News


Trump Talks Regime Change in Iran After Strikes, But History Shows That Could be Very Hard



You would be terribly mistaken, according to AI. He spoke about it but it was never made it an official objective.

Regime change was never an official U.S. war objective. Trump encouraged Iranians to challenge their government, but when initially explaining the campaign he identified preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon and degrading its missile program, not overthrowing the regime.

https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-he-ordered-iran-strikes-thwart-tehrans-missile-program-2026-03-02/


Yeah, at the beginning of the war the official goal was clearly stated: Open up the Strait of Hormuz!

Oh wait...


And that goal is nearly achieved.

Soon we will all be able to congratulate the government for getting something we already had before the war started!


We did not have control of the strait before hand so I don't understand your post.

No one needed to control it because no one was trying to block it . . . until we decided to start a war.


A country was threatening nuclear war on America before we started a war too. Now they are in shambles and we control the strait. Win win win.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.