Political polls. Trump approval thread

10,639 Views | 167 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by DiabloWags
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:49p, 5/5/26
"I am popular as AF"



Reply Quote
1
1 edit
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 3:13p, 5/6/26
DiabloWags said:
"I am popular as AF"

If they didn't try to shoot him....
Reply Quote
2
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:13p, 5/6/26
Reply Quote
2
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 7:13p, 5/7/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?

Reply Quote
3
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:15p, 5/7/26
By summer, look for that to dip into the teens...

Reply Quote
5
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 7:29p, 5/7/26
MAGA Youth Vote Getting CRUSHED.
Among other age groups.

Economist/ You Gov Poll

https://d3nkl3psvxxpe9.cloudfront.net/documents/econTabReport_i4K4elJ.pdf
Reply Quote
6
2 edits
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:21a, 5/8/26
Reply Quote
4
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 9:25a, 5/8/26
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.
Reply Quote
4
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 10:58a, 5/8/26
Cal88 said:
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.


Feel free to if it happens the way you predict
Reply Quote
5
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 12:37p, 5/8/26
Cal88 said:
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.


Careful.

There are some here that posted back in early April that gas would NEVER go above $4.00 in the U.S. because we produce so much oil. It was as if I was reading right from Trump's "Truth Social" account.

Lmfao.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 12:53p, 5/8/26
DiabloWags said:
Cal88 said:
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.


Careful.

There are some here that posted back in early April that gas would NEVER go above $4.00 in the U.S. because we produce so much oil. It was as if I was reading right from Trump's "Truth Social" account.

Lmfao.

BINGO
Reply Quote
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 12:54p, 5/8/26
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 1:05p, 5/8/26
DiabloWags said:
Cal88 said:
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.


Careful.

There are some here that posted back in early April that gas would NEVER go above $4.00 in the U.S. because we produce so much oil. It was as if I was reading right from Trump's "Truth Social" account.

Lmfao.


Nobody ever said it will never go above $4. It's foolish that you keep putting that out there when it's not accurate
Reply Quote
5
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 1:07p, 5/8/26
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope
Reply Quote
4
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 1:26p, 5/8/26
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


Biff Tenner.
Reply Quote
2
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 1:27p, 5/8/26
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope


Yes, of course, BearlySane88, no relation whatsoever, nu-uh.
Reply Quote
1
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 1:29p, 5/8/26
Cal88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


Biff Tenner.

Hilarious! LOL
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 1:32p, 5/8/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope


Yes, of course, BearlySane88, no relation whatsoever, nu-uh.


They were two different things. Two different sets of data asking two different questions
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 1:39p, 5/8/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope


Yes, of course, BearlySane88, no relation whatsoever, nu-uh.


They were two different things. Two different sets of data asking two different questions


Splitting hairs can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.
Reply Quote
1
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 1:55p, 5/8/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope


Yes, of course, BearlySane88, no relation whatsoever, nu-uh.


They were two different things. Two different sets of data asking two different questions


Splitting hairs can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.


Arguing a point just to argue it can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.

One asked about youth identifying as democrats. One asked about youth identifying as MAGA. Two very different questions and the answer could be no to both of them
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 2:30p, 5/8/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope


Yes, of course, BearlySane88, no relation whatsoever, nu-uh.


They were two different things. Two different sets of data asking two different questions


Splitting hairs can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.


Arguing a point just to argue it can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.

One asked about youth identifying as democrats. One asked about youth identifying as MAGA. Two very different questions and the answer could be no to both of them


And you're arguing that the two questions are unrelated.

Reply Quote
1
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 2:42p, 5/8/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope


Yes, of course, BearlySane88, no relation whatsoever, nu-uh.


They were two different things. Two different sets of data asking two different questions


Splitting hairs can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.


Arguing a point just to argue it can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.

One asked about youth identifying as democrats. One asked about youth identifying as MAGA. Two very different questions and the answer could be no to both of them


And you're arguing that the two questions are unrelated.



No I didn't. I argued that they are asking different questions, which is in fact true
Reply Quote
4
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 3:19p, 5/8/26
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope


Yes, of course, BearlySane88, no relation whatsoever, nu-uh.


They were two different things. Two different sets of data asking two different questions


Splitting hairs can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.


Arguing a point just to argue it can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.

One asked about youth identifying as democrats. One asked about youth identifying as MAGA. Two very different questions and the answer could be no to both of them


And you're arguing that the two questions are unrelated.



No I didn't. I argued that they are asking different questions, which is in fact true


You're implying that these were unrelated questions, which is obviously false.

100% bad faith.



Keep hammering.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 5:11p, 5/8/26
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
SBGold said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Seriously, PAC-10-BEAR?


Intentional misinformation by Tenner?

Say it ain't so Joe


They were measuring two different things so nope


Yes, of course, BearlySane88, no relation whatsoever, nu-uh.


They were two different things. Two different sets of data asking two different questions


Splitting hairs can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.


Arguing a point just to argue it can definitely qualify as a case of bad faith.

One asked about youth identifying as democrats. One asked about youth identifying as MAGA. Two very different questions and the answer could be no to both of them


And you're arguing that the two questions are unrelated.



No I didn't. I argued that they are asking different questions, which is in fact true


You're implying that these were unrelated questions, which is obviously false.

100% bad faith.



Keep hammering.


I said they were different questions. You can keep hammering that peg as long as you like
Reply Quote
4
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:21p, 5/8/26
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
Cal88 said:
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.


Careful.

There are some here that posted back in early April that gas would NEVER go above $4.00 in the U.S. because we produce so much oil. It was as if I was reading right from Trump's "Truth Social" account.

Lmfao.


Nobody ever said it will never go above $4. It's foolish that you keep putting that out there when it's not accurate


Actually, you said it two months ago on March 6th.
On the "Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread"

I'm 100% accurate.
Thanks.









Reply Quote
1
4 edits
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:55p, 5/8/26
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
Cal88 said:
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.


Careful.

There are some here that posted back in early April that gas would NEVER go above $4.00 in the U.S. because we produce so much oil. It was as if I was reading right from Trump's "Truth Social" account.

Lmfao.


Nobody ever said it will never go above $4. It's foolish that you keep putting that out there when it's not accurate


I flagged it as hateful bullying. Repeatedly trolling someone with this statement is wrong.
Reply Quote
1
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 7:57p, 5/8/26
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
Cal88 said:
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.


Careful.

There are some here that posted back in early April that gas would NEVER go above $4.00 in the U.S. because we produce so much oil. It was as if I was reading right from Trump's "Truth Social" account.

Lmfao.


Nobody ever said it will never go above $4. It's foolish that you keep putting that out there when it's not accurate


Actually, you said it two months ago on March 6th.
On the "Operation Epic Furry Energy Crisis Thread"

I'm 100% accurate.
Thanks.





Thank you for confirming that he never said that gas will never go above $4. Now, please stop bullying him.
Reply Quote
1
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 8:00p, 5/8/26
oski003 said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
Cal88 said:
Show the same map, but with $6 gas in November.


Careful.

There are some here that posted back in early April that gas would NEVER go above $4.00 in the U.S. because we produce so much oil. It was as if I was reading right from Trump's "Truth Social" account.

Lmfao.


Nobody ever said it will never go above $4. It's foolish that you keep putting that out there when it's not accurate


I flagged it as hateful bullying. Repeatedly trolling someone with this statement is wrong.


Nothing hateful about my post.
I'm sorry that you are unable to accept FACTS.

My statement above in reply to Cal88 clearly mentioned no specific poster.
And as I further mentioned, some of these posts were as if I was reading Trump's Truth Social account.

If someone chose to reply after my post, that's their choice.
Not mine.



Reply Quote
3 edits
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.