The ECONOMY Part Deux

20,110 Views | 317 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by ProBonoBear415
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

reposting misleading stuff again. So if housing affordability is so important why kill the housing affordability bill that both houses support? Oh I know why. Because trump is a baby.




Yes, Trump essentially vetoed it after Republicans defied his demands to reform voting laws.
He cries like a Baby.



Trump kills bipartisan bill to punish Republicans for defying him

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

cal83dls79 said:

BearlySane88 said:



reposting misleading stuff again. So if housing affordability is so important why kill the housing affordability bill that both houses support? Oh I know why. Because trump is a baby.




He didn't kill it. Please keep the discussions truthful.

He absolutely canceled and killed it. It was shameful
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:


Hard to believe these are Cal alums.




More personal attacks.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

cal83dls79 said:

reposting misleading stuff again. So if housing affordability is so important why kill the housing affordability bill that both houses support? Oh I know why. Because trump is a baby.




Yes, Trump essentially vetoed it after Republicans defied his demands to reform voting laws.
He cries like a Baby.



Trump kills bipartisan bill to punish Republicans for defying him




No, that is not essentially vetoing it.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

oski003 said:

cal83dls79 said:

BearlySane88 said:



reposting misleading stuff again. So if housing affordability is so important why kill the housing affordability bill that both houses support? Oh I know why. Because trump is a baby.




He didn't kill it. Please keep the discussions truthful.

He absolutely canceled and killed it. It was shameful


He cancelled a signing ceremony. It is shameful to double down and claim that it is the same as cancelling and killing the bill. Please try to keep things truthful and evidence based. Thank you.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

oski003 said:

cal83dls79 said:

BearlySane88 said:



reposting misleading stuff again. So if housing affordability is so important why kill the housing affordability bill that both houses support? Oh I know why. Because trump is a baby.




He didn't kill it. Please keep the discussions truthful.

He absolutely canceled and killed it. It was shameful


You are correct.

Interestingly enough, Trump declared the ROAD to Housing Act was of "minor importance" compared to lowering interest rates and the Save America Act.

I wonder how long his honeymoon period with Kevin Warsh lasts before he starts attacking another one of his Fed Chair appointments just like how he attacked Jerome Powell.

He's such a cry Baby.
And a Moron.






BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:


Hard to believe these are Cal alums.




More personal attacks.



How is that a personal attack? It was not targeted towards anyone.

You seem to like spamming that in multiple threads. It's weird and you are just trying to bait again.


Please lay off the personal attacks. This post has been flagged.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please lay off the personal attacks. They are unnecessary.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muckieeye said:

BearlySane88 said:





Oooo I look handsome.

Have a great day!!
GhostRideTheCart
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muckieeye said:

https://www.wackybuttons.com/designcodes/0/111/1119525.png


Isn't this exactly what the mods said would get you banned for 3 months? I hope they hold true to their word with you.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

cal83dls79 said:

BearlySane88 said:


reposting misleading stuff again. So if housing affordability is so important why kill the housing affordability bill that both houses support? Oh I know why. Because trump is a baby.




He didn't kill it. Please keep the discussions truthful.
dude, this sub thread all started with an untruthful and misleading post (remember the whole 20% 30% thing ????) where were you then? MIA. Trump "blanked" the bill. Whatever.
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

More often than not, the ignore feature works fairly well.
But every now and then I get exposed to posts like the one you have copied and replied to.

A "6-star" post of pure basic math failure.
Hard to believe these are Cal alums.

Try 6 stars vs. millions of illegals math.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

More often than not, the ignore feature works fairly well.
But every now and then I get exposed to posts like the one you have copied and replied to.

A "6-star" post of pure basic math failure.
Hard to believe these are Cal alums.

Try 6 stars vs. millions of illegals math.


Is that the same math that was used to calculate buying BITCOIN back in January at $95,000?
Surprisingly, there were no stars on that post.

Dedollarisation | Bear Insider






cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

More often than not, the ignore feature works fairly well.
But every now and then I get exposed to posts like the one you have copied and replied to.

A "6-star" post of pure basic math failure.
Hard to believe these are Cal alums.

Try 6 stars vs. millions of illegals math.


Is that the same math that was used to calculate buying BITCOIN back in January at $95,000?







we know immigrants ran up the value of homes 20 percent alone per these guys but did they also cause the collapse of bitcoin? Seems mired right now
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Millions and millions and millions of illegals.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:




Here's Bearly88 reposting John Solomon and linked below is Bearly88 saying he doesn't know anything about John Solomon

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134442/replies/2700237
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:




Here's Bearly88 reposting John Solomon and linked below is Bearly88 saying he doesn't know anything about John Solomon

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134442/replies/2700237


Lmao is this some gotcha? I posted Rand Paul and if you know how X works it also shows what he was quoting.

I'm dying laughing
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:




Here's Bearly88 reposting John Solomon and linked below is Bearly88 saying he doesn't know anything about John Solomon

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134442/replies/2700237


Lmao is this some gotcha? I posted Rand Paul and if you know how X works it also shows what he was quoting.


You've been told who John Solomon is and he is a serial liar MAGA journalist. If you see Rand Paul reposting John Solomon then you should know Rand Paul is in on the misinformation campaign. Now you're in on the misinformation campaign.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:




Here's Bearly88 reposting John Solomon and linked below is Bearly88 saying he doesn't know anything about John Solomon

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134442/replies/2700237


Lmao is this some gotcha? I posted Rand Paul and if you know how X works it also shows what he was quoting.


You've been told who John Solomon is and he is a serial liar MAGA journalist. If you see Rand Paul reposting John Solomon then you should know Rand Paul is in on the misinformation campaign. Now you're in on the misinformation campaign.


And what motive would you have to call him that? Sorry if I'm not taking you as gospel on this. I'm going to stay off your misinformation campaign.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:




Here's Bearly88 reposting John Solomon and linked below is Bearly88 saying he doesn't know anything about John Solomon

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134442/replies/2700237


Lmao is this some gotcha? I posted Rand Paul and if you know how X works it also shows what he was quoting.


You've been told who John Solomon is and he is a serial liar MAGA journalist. If you see Rand Paul reposting John Solomon then you should know Rand Paul is in on the misinformation campaign. Now you're in on the misinformation campaign.


And what motive would you have to call him that? Sorry if I'm not taking you as gospel on this. I'm going to stay off your misinformation campaign.


The words of his former employer

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/news/483600-the-hills-review-of-john-solomons-columns-on-ukraine/amp/
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:




Here's Bearly88 reposting John Solomon and linked below is Bearly88 saying he doesn't know anything about John Solomon

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134442/replies/2700237


Lmao is this some gotcha? I posted Rand Paul and if you know how X works it also shows what he was quoting.


You've been told who John Solomon is and he is a serial liar MAGA journalist. If you see Rand Paul reposting John Solomon then you should know Rand Paul is in on the misinformation campaign. Now you're in on the misinformation campaign.


And what motive would you have to call him that? Sorry if I'm not taking you as gospel on this. I'm going to stay off your misinformation campaign.


The words of his former employer

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/news/483600-the-hills-review-of-john-solomons-columns-on-ukraine/amp/


You seem to really like this guy. I don't read him or care at all what your opinion is of him lol. It matters zero to me because he is irrelevant to me.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:




Here's Bearly88 reposting John Solomon and linked below is Bearly88 saying he doesn't know anything about John Solomon

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134442/replies/2700237


Lmao is this some gotcha? I posted Rand Paul and if you know how X works it also shows what he was quoting.


You've been told who John Solomon is and he is a serial liar MAGA journalist. If you see Rand Paul reposting John Solomon then you should know Rand Paul is in on the misinformation campaign. Now you're in on the misinformation campaign.


And what motive would you have to call him that? Sorry if I'm not taking you as gospel on this. I'm going to stay off your misinformation campaign.


The words of his former employer

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/news/483600-the-hills-review-of-john-solomons-columns-on-ukraine/amp/


You seem to really like this guy. I don't read him or care at all what your opinion is of him lol. It matters zero to me because he is irrelevant to me.


Hear no evil
Speak no evil
See no evil

In the meantime, here is my 474 page poorly constructed indictment of Rachel Maddow
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:




Here's Bearly88 reposting John Solomon and linked below is Bearly88 saying he doesn't know anything about John Solomon

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134442/replies/2700237


Lmao is this some gotcha? I posted Rand Paul and if you know how X works it also shows what he was quoting.


You've been told who John Solomon is and he is a serial liar MAGA journalist. If you see Rand Paul reposting John Solomon then you should know Rand Paul is in on the misinformation campaign. Now you're in on the misinformation campaign.


And what motive would you have to call him that? Sorry if I'm not taking you as gospel on this. I'm going to stay off your misinformation campaign.


The words of his former employer

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/news/483600-the-hills-review-of-john-solomons-columns-on-ukraine/amp/


You seem to really like this guy. I don't read him or care at all what your opinion is of him lol. It matters zero to me because he is irrelevant to me.


Hear no evil
Speak no evil
See no evil

In the meantime, here is my 474 page poorly constructed indictment of Rachel Maddow


Hard pass.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

Here is the Urban Dictionary definition of the word ownage. It's use is considered a personal attack and it will be deleted. Length of suspension unknown.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ownage
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

DiabloWags said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

DiabloWags said:

More often than not, the ignore feature works fairly well.
But every now and then I get exposed to posts like the one you have copied and replied to.

A "6-star" post of pure basic math failure.
Hard to believe these are Cal alums.

Try 6 stars vs. millions of illegals math.


Is that the same math that was used to calculate buying BITCOIN back in January at $95,000?








we know immigrants ran up the value of homes 20 percent alone per these guys but did they also cause the collapse of bitcoin? Seems mired right now

I think it was Biden's fault.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT

Here is the Urban Dictionary definition of the word ownage. It's use is considered a personal attack and it will be deleted. Length of suspension unknown.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ownage

" shame and embarassment for the victim and his/her family until the end of time."

Shame shame shame and it never ends!

VOTE BLUE
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Labor force participation has fallen to 61.5% the lowest since 2021, erasing the entire post-pandemic recovery.

Since Trump's inauguration, over a million people have left the job market which explains part of the reason the unemployment rate dropped last month."

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yup, I posted this just after the June Unemployment Report. Interestingly enough, hospitality employment collapsed. So much for the World Cup effect.

Outside of the Covid period, this is the lowest LABOR PARTICIPATION RATE SINCE 1976.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134581/replies/2710639
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see. My bad.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Labor force participation overall isn't useful because of the Baby Boomers retiring. Best to look at prime age labor force participation.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Millions and millions and millions of illegals.


It's basic Supply & Demand. But imagine you're part of the Globalists that benefit from this multiple ways.

(Recall that President Trump has said the Biden Administration encouraged 20 million NEW illegal immigrants to enter the four prior years; others have estimated 10 million.)

Globalists benefit from:
- rents rising / newfangled REIT
- home prices spike / REIT
- increased Demand for everyday goods
- wages stagnate or decrease for service and blue collar workers employed by Globalists

This is partly facilitated by new immigrants living in high density (lower standard of living) and multi-generational households. One article I read said 22 immigrants were living in a one-bedroom apartment in The Mission. Stanford professor Victoria Davis Hanson said 65 immigrants were living in a two-bedroom house w a lean-too in the Central Valley.

This is further facilitated by government programs for health care, food, welfare, medical, etc., in addition to housing (HUD) and housing finance programs. Not to mention the Billions in fraud in all of these programs flooding the systems, along with Covid Trillions. Then politicians like Newsom cut oversight!

So if you're a Wall Street Globalist knowing they're gonna flood the zone, you can direct your investments accordingly.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Labor force participation overall isn't useful because of the Baby Boomers retiring. Best to look at prime age labor force participation.


Yes, that age group is helpful to look at.
June 2026 = 83.3%

Kind of weird how we never see an Amusing twitter post about this.

Labor Force Participation Rate - 25-54 Yrs. (LNS11300060) | FRED | St. Louis Fed
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Labor force participation overall isn't useful because of the Baby Boomers retiring. Best to look at prime age labor force participation.


Yes, that age group is helpful to look at.
June 2026 = 83.3%

Kind of weird how we never see an Amusing twitter post about this.

Labor Force Participation Rate - 25-54 Yrs. (LNS11300060) | FRED | St. Louis Fed


Because honest information would not be useful.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Labor force participation overall isn't useful because of the Baby Boomers retiring. Best to look at prime age labor force participation.


Yes, that age group is helpful to look at.
June 2026 = 83.3%

Kind of weird how we never see an Amusing twitter post about this.

Labor Force Participation Rate - 25-54 Yrs. (LNS11300060) | FRED | St. Louis Fed



They used to post about the declining labor force participation rate all the time in the Biden years - ignoring the retiring Baby Boomers.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

Labor force participation overall isn't useful because of the Baby Boomers retiring. Best to look at prime age labor force participation.


Yes, that age group is helpful to look at.
June 2026 = 83.3%

Kind of weird how we never see an Amusing twitter post about this.

Labor Force Participation Rate - 25-54 Yrs. (LNS11300060) | FRED | St. Louis Fed



They used to post about the declining labor force participation rate all the time in the Biden years - ignoring the retiring Baby Boomers.


The decline in foreign-born workers (think ICE) is also a component of this rates decline.

Digging Deeper Into Declining Labor Force Participation - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.