cal83dls79 said:

---

---

Well he wasn't president, the people in his cabinet were. He was a stand-in. Unless you want to pretend he was calling the shots?

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Unfortunately, no. There would have to be enormous pressure from the voters to shame them into it and not enough people pay attention.

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Unfortunately, no. There would have to be enormous pressure from the voters to shame them into it and not enough people pay attention.

---

Shame it is.

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Trump is doing more stock trading than all of Congress. You don't care about corruption. You still posted that tweet because it made the Democrats look bad. That's all you care about.

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Trump is doing more stock trading than all of Congress

---

Cool story, we were talking about Congress. You don't need to make every single thing about Trump even though I know that's your default.

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Trump is doing more stock trading than all of Congress. You don't care about corruption. You still posted that tweet because it made the Democrats look bad. That's all you care about.

---

I posted it to call out Congress. Not my fault it made the dems look bad in the process.

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Trump is doing more stock trading than all of Congress. You don't care about corruption. You still posted that tweet because it made the Democrats look bad. That's all you care about.

---

I posted it to call out Congress. Not my fault it made the dems look bad in the process.

---

Sure, Jan

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Trump is doing more stock trading than all of Congress. You don't care about corruption. You still posted that tweet because it made the Democrats look bad. That's all you care about.

---

I posted it to call out Congress. Not my fault it made the dems look bad in the process.

---

Sure, Jan

---

It's pretty easy to do. Just look at Becerra's debate from last night. He looked foolish and had no actual plan. Shockingly his most common word was "Trump"

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Trump is doing more stock trading than all of Congress. You don't care about corruption. You still posted that tweet because it made the Democrats look bad. That's all you care about.

---

I posted it to call out Congress. Not my fault it made the dems look bad in the process.

---

Sure, Jan

---

Yeah, that was a wild response, bad for Congress to do it, but let's ignore DJT

It's all a disaster and we have a President that doesn't lead or have any ethics at all

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE BECERRA

SBGold said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I'm assuming something was added to this for dems to all vote no. Or are they all that shady?

The Senate blocks legislation that would have banned members of Congress from trading stocks

Final Vote (60 votes needed):
🟢 Yes: 53
🔴 No: 47

Dem: 🟢 Yes: 0 | 🔴 No: 47
GOP: 🟢 Yes: 53 | 🔴 No: 0 pic.twitter.com/glBOdYH7MI

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) September 30, 2026

---

Added SAVE Act to the bill.

---

Thank you, still should have passed but the left isn't giving Trump that win right now.

---

If they had voted on it as a single bill, something else would have kept it from passing. Congress isn't going to get rid of stock trading.

---

Since we all know Congress won't, is there someone/something that could?

---

Trump is doing more stock trading than all of Congress. You don't care about corruption. You still posted that tweet because it made the Democrats look bad. That's all you care about.

---

I posted it to call out Congress. Not my fault it made the dems look bad in the process.

---

Sure, Jan

---

Yeah, that was a wild response, bad for Congress to do it, but let's ignore DJT

It's all a disaster and we have a President that doesn't lead or have any ethics at all

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE BECERRA

---

Wild? So dramatic.

Becerra got destroyed in the debate last night.

So, the country wasn't racist when they elected Obama, but they magically became racist after eight years of Obama to elect Trump?

The easier answer is that Hillary just sucked, but they can never admit that.

Obama operative Ben Rhodes is asked if that administration should bear any responsibility for the more polarized and partisan political climate post-Obama.

Short answer: No. It's because of racism.

"I truly believe in my bones that...it was because he was black."

"I make no… pic.twitter.com/CyHpeh9eil

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 1, 2026

Actually a lot of us mistakenly thought he was black but he served as a white

Aunburdened said:

---

So, the country wasn't racist when they elected Obama, but they magically became racist after eight years of Obama to elect Trump?

The easier answer is that Hillary just sucked, but they can never admit that.

Obama operative Ben Rhodes is asked if that administration should bear any responsibility for the more polarized and partisan political climate post-Obama.

Short answer: No. It's because of racism.

"I truly believe in my bones that...it was because he was black."

"I make no… pic.twitter.com/CyHpeh9eil

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 1, 2026

---

Hillary won the popular vote 48.2% to 46.1% over Trump.

Obama's presidency riled up racial resentment among a significant portion of the MAGA base…..which Trump II has acknowledged by pandering to these racially resentful and aggrieved MAGAs with policies specially targeting Blacks (i.e.Executive Order 14173: Signed early in his second term, this order aimed to end federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI); The administration targeted DEI-related positions and policies across federal agencies and the military; the administration removed or altered exhibits addressing slavery and systemic racism at locations like Independence Hall and national museum spaces; The administration moved to restore Confederate names to military bases that had been previously renamed through bipartisan efforts, and re-erected certain Confederate-associated monuments in Washington, D.C; National websites and park services faced directives to review or remove specific historical references and exhibits detailing the experiences of Black Americans with discrimination and slavery).

bearister said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

So, the country wasn't racist when they elected Obama, but they magically became racist after eight years of Obama to elect Trump?

The easier answer is that Hillary just sucked, but they can never admit that.

Obama operative Ben Rhodes is asked if that administration should bear any responsibility for the more polarized and partisan political climate post-Obama.

Short answer: No. It's because of racism.

"I truly believe in my bones that...it was because he was black."

"I make no… pic.twitter.com/CyHpeh9eil

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 1, 2026

---

Hillary won the popular vote 48.2% to 46.1% over Trump.

Obama's presidency riled up racial resentment among a significant portion of the MAGA base…..which Trump II has acknowledged by pandering to these racially resentful and aggrieved MAGAs with policies specially targeting Blacks (i.e.Executive Order 14173: Signed early in his second term, this order aimed to end federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI); The administration targeted DEI-related positions and policies across federal agencies and the military; the administration removed or altered exhibits addressing slavery and systemic racism at locations like Independence Hall and national museum spaces; The administration moved to restore Confederate names to military bases that had been previously renamed through bipartisan efforts, and re-erected certain Confederate-associated monuments in Washington, D.C; National websites and park services faced directives to review or remove specific historical references and exhibits detailing the experiences of Black Americans with discrimination and slavery).

---

Hillary sucked big time but clearly not enough for Bill.

DEI is bigotry by another name.

bearister said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

So, the country wasn't racist when they elected Obama, but they magically became racist after eight years of Obama to elect Trump?

The easier answer is that Hillary just sucked, but they can never admit that.

Obama operative Ben Rhodes is asked if that administration should bear any responsibility for the more polarized and partisan political climate post-Obama.

Short answer: No. It's because of racism.

"I truly believe in my bones that...it was because he was black."

"I make no… pic.twitter.com/CyHpeh9eil

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 1, 2026

---

Hillary won the popular vote 48.2% to 46.1% over Trump.

Obama's presidency riled up racial resentment among a significant portion of the MAGA base…..which Trump II has acknowledged by pandering to these racially resentful and aggrieved MAGAs with policies specially targeting Blacks (i.e.Executive Order 14173: Signed early in his second term, this order aimed to end federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI); The administration targeted DEI-related positions and policies across federal agencies and the military; the administration removed or altered exhibits addressing slavery and systemic racism at locations like Independence Hall and national museum spaces; The administration moved to restore Confederate names to military bases that had been previously renamed through bipartisan efforts, and re-erected certain Confederate-associated monuments in Washington, D.C; National websites and park services faced directives to review or remove specific historical references and exhibits detailing the experiences of Black Americans with discrimination and slavery).

---

Trump is famous for his identity politics that brought in millions of rural voters from the sidelines

This is what passes for inspirational speaking in the Democratic Party. More coherent than Kamala, but still says absolutely nothing of substance.

Jon Ossoff chats with longtime morning radio host Frank Ski:

I spoke to a group of young people yesterday and some of them told me they were feeling despair.

And I was very blunt with them that despair is an indulgence. Despair is a luxury that we can't afford. pic.twitter.com/qNDp784oWp

— Clipping Wings (@ClippingWings) October 2, 2026

Aunburdened said:

---

This is what passes for inspirational speaking in the Democratic Party. More coherent than Kamala, but still says absolutely nothing of substance.

Jon Ossoff chats with longtime morning radio host Frank Ski:

I spoke to a group of young people yesterday and some of them told me they were feeling despair.

And I was very blunt with them that despair is an indulgence. Despair is a luxury that we can't afford. pic.twitter.com/qNDp784oWp

— Clipping Wings (@ClippingWings) October 2, 2026

---

Trump said this: archivebuttons.com/articles?article=https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-expresses-sympathy-for-accused-cornell-seven-rapists/

He apparently "inspires" with this kind of rhetoric.

Give me Ossoff all day, you can have that garbage leader.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE KAMALA

SBGold said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

This is what passes for inspirational speaking in the Democratic Party. More coherent than Kamala, but still says absolutely nothing of substance.

Jon Ossoff chats with longtime morning radio host Frank Ski:

I spoke to a group of young people yesterday and some of them told me they were feeling despair.

And I was very blunt with them that despair is an indulgence. Despair is a luxury that we can't afford. pic.twitter.com/qNDp784oWp

— Clipping Wings (@ClippingWings) October 2, 2026

---

Trump said this: archivebuttons.com/articles?article=https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trump-expresses-sympathy-for-accused-cornell-seven-rapists/

He apparently "inspires" with this kind of rhetoric.

Give me Ossoff all day, you can have that garbage leader.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE KAMALA

---

You've convinced me. For the fourth time in a row, I won't vote for Trump in an election.

Will you vote at all? If one is Maga and in Cali, do they feel compelled to vote? I've always wondered.

Even Hilton the other night in the debate admitted he had no chance at winning. Not a competitor at all, just a fraud.

Vote blue and vote Kamala

SBGold said:

---

Even Hilton the other night in the debate admitted he had no chance at winning. Not a competitor at all, just a fraud.

---

What are you talking about? Hilton dominated that debate

You know what I'm talking about. He's toast and he admitted it.

Vote Blue and vote Becerra

SBGold said:

---

You know what I'm talking about. He's toast and he admitted it.

Vote Blue and vote Becerra

---

I don't because he's the only candidate worth voting for.

California likes to keep voting for its own demise. He's the only person offering up real ideas while his opponent is still stuck on Trump.

SBGold said:

---

Will you vote at all? If one is Maga and in Cali, do they feel compelled to vote? I've always wondered.

---

No need for you to troll. I can't help the reading impaired.

Caught in the wild

This is nonpartisan Special Counsel Jack Smith…

Wearing an anti-Trump shirt at an anti-Trump concert sponsored by an anti-Trump nonprofit which is funded by an anti-Trump billionaire.

What a scam. pic.twitter.com/mfbIp4rfpd

— C3 (@C_3C_3) October 4, 2026

The photo of former special counsel Jack Smith wearing the "No Kings" Bruce Springsteen concert T-shirt was taken on Saturday, October 3, 2026.

So after Trump launches a vindictive prosecution against him there is something wrong with that?

The case is a publicity stunt going nowhere.

bearister said:

---

The photo of former special counsel Jack Smith wearing the "No Kings" Bruce Springsteen concert T-shirt was taken on Saturday, October 3, 2026.

So after Trump launches a vindictive prosecution against him there is something wrong with that?

The case is a publicity stunt going nowhere.

---

You keep telling yourself that story.

I don't think they'll ever get over Macho Grande

Scott Galloway claims this is how you know America is sexist:

"Tell me, if Hillary Clinton had a p*nis and balls she wouldn't be President Clinton."

Audience applauds.

They're never going to get over 2016. pic.twitter.com/kOBb20QjP7

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 5, 2026

Aunburdened said:

---

I don't think they'll ever get over Macho Grande

Scott Galloway claims this is how you know America is sexist:

"Tell me, if Hillary Clinton had a p*nis and balls she wouldn't be President Clinton."

Audience applauds.

They're never going to get over 2016. pic.twitter.com/kOBb20QjP7

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) October 5, 2026

---

He's right. Same is true for Kamala. Opposite is true for Biden.

Oh this is just too good. One of you might need to redirect your fascist comments now.

Adolf Hitler Favorability Rating

🟢 Favorable: 6%
🔴 Unfavorable: 85%

Favorable By Party:
Democrats: 🟢 Favorable: 10%
Republicans: 🟢 Favorable: 5%

YouGov Poll pic.twitter.com/kYrL920Trx

— OSZ (@OpenSourceZone) October 7, 2026