California....affirmed.
Breaking News
864,715 Views |
10903 Replies |
Last: 5 hrs ago by bearister
#3 All-Time in the 400m Hurdles on the Track now.
Britton Wilson .... going for the extremely RARE 400/400 hurdles final.
ESPN2
DiabloWags said:movielover said:
"Beginning in 2017, first one, and then two, biological male athletes began competing in girls' high school track in Connecticut. In just three years, those two males broke 17 girls' track meet records, deprived girls of more than 85 opportunities to advance to the next level of competition and took 15 girls' state track championship titles."
Sounds like a Title IX issue.
And will most likely head to the Supreme Court.
But let's be honest, the marks out of CT are so slow that I probably could have made the Girls 100m State Final.
The winning time this year was 12.07 and the High Jump was won at 5-04
Aside from Tess Sherry who ran 4:48/10:47 no one from that Girls State Championship is going D-1.
CALIFORNIA BLOWS THOSE MARKS AWAY.
Have you thought about filing an amicus brief in the lawsuit? Better yet, you should transition to a high school girl and actually beat their marks!
DiabloWags said:
#3 All-Time in the 400m Hurdles on the Track now.
Britton Wilson .... going for the extremely RARE 400/400 hurdles final.
ESPN2
Why do so many track and field athletes wear jewelry?
Seems like it would slow them down, tangle them up, etc
dimitrig said:DiabloWags said:
#3 All-Time in the 400m Hurdles on the Track now.
Britton Wilson .... going for the extremely RARE 400/400 hurdles final.
ESPN2
Why do so many track and field athletes wear jewelry?
Seems like it would slow them down, tangle them up, etc
In high school, wearing jewelry is a DQ.
In college, it's about your own style and is allowed.
DiabloWags said:dimitrig said:DiabloWags said:
#3 All-Time in the 400m Hurdles on the Track now.
Britton Wilson .... going for the extremely RARE 400/400 hurdles final.
ESPN2
Why do so many track and field athletes wear jewelry?
Seems like it would slow them down, tangle them up, etc
In high school, wearing jewelry is a DQ.
In college, it's about your own style and is allowed.
Okay, but why would you?
It seems like it would only slow you down or get in the way.
20 feet 4.50 inches.
That's a mind boggling height to be clearing! Amazing!DiabloWags said:
20 feet 4.50 inches.
😂😂😂 Man of the people. https://t.co/rR5zvTZ8rm
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) June 11, 2023
Eastern Oregon Bear said:That's a mind boggling height to be clearing! Amazing!DiabloWags said:
20 feet 4.50 inches.
Yup.
Been following his career for awhile.
You should see his training videos on You Tube with his Dad from high school in Louisiana. Competes for his Mom's home country of Sweden. Named after the all-weather track surface ...MONDO.
One of the greatest athletes of our time.
An entire police department is being investigate for sexual misconduct
The ENTIRE West Virginia State Police department is under sexual misconduct investigation. Here's a 6/8/2023 update. https://t.co/OBe4id1vpR
— Carol Fenton (@cfpdx) June 10, 2023
Closer to home . . . guess you havent heard of Antioch, Ca.
Case dismissed against men accused of burning Antioch woman's body; DA cites police racist text scandal - CBS San Francisco (cbsnews.com)
Antioch police, mired in racist text scandal, target of state investigation - Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)
A police department filled with WHITE SUPREMACISTS.
I heard they all voted for a guy named Chump.
California AG Rob Bonta now investigating.
Case dismissed against men accused of burning Antioch woman's body; DA cites police racist text scandal - CBS San Francisco (cbsnews.com)
Antioch police, mired in racist text scandal, target of state investigation - Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)
A police department filled with WHITE SUPREMACISTS.
I heard they all voted for a guy named Chump.
California AG Rob Bonta now investigating.
This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
ICYMI: 🇺🇲US infrastructure is collapsing as trillions of $ of public money is recycled through arms companies who lobby Congress.#ukraine #Afghanistan #Syria #Iraq
— Afshin Rattansi (@afshinrattansi) June 12, 2023
See Pulitzer Prize Winner Sy Hersh on where the cash is going:https://t.co/uND2yfte2K pic.twitter.com/mQ9Hmi0w1B
Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
calbear93 said:Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
They're not smarter. It's defacto age discrimination - cheaper wages, and cheaper health care.
calbear93 said:Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
If we need more smarts we should be cultivating it here instead of importing cheap labor to hurt the livelihoods of Americans.
Soon it will be AI taking our jobs and then what? A lot of discontent is what.
You think we have not raised our education level and smarts because we didn't want to? You don't think immigration has been a boon to our economic growth in the past?dimitrig said:calbear93 said:Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
If we need more smarts we should be cultivating it here instead of importing cheap labor to hurt the livelihoods of Americans.
Soon it will be AI taking our jobs and then what? A lot of discontent is what.
I am a strong believer in legal immigrations and our history of what talented immigrants have brought to our quality of life.
Age discrimination?movielover said:calbear93 said:Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
They're not smarter. It's defacto age discrimination - cheaper wages, and cheaper health care.
In this global economy, if their extended history have not added value to their level of contribution, why should private organization have to supplement the employee's income beyond the value they add? How is it fair to the younger generation that their unemployment rate remains high despite their talent because we want to pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency? What are we, France?
I honestly think experience and wisdom that comes from experience is worth it, but if not, we should not artificially exclude younger folks from employment to protect more expensive and less efficient older employees.
And younger employees are not getting paid less. Most of the highest paying jobs in the tech industry (which is the highest paying industry) are populated by younger folks.
It doesn't matter who the Republican candidate for president is. They will all get the same treatment. https://t.co/gVT8NXcpTZ
— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) June 12, 2023
Meanwhile, many are moving from NY to her home state of Florida where the KKK grand wizard resides.
calbear93 said:Age discrimination?movielover said:calbear93 said:Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
They're not smarter. It's defacto age discrimination - cheaper wages, and cheaper health care.
In this global economy, if their extended history have not added value to their level of contribution, why should private organization have to supplement the employee's income beyond the value they add? How is it fair to the younger generation that their unemployment rate remains high despite their talent because we want to pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency? What are we, France?
I honestly think experience and wisdom that comes from experience is worth it, but if not, we should not artificially exclude younger folks from employment to protect more expensive and less efficient older employees.
And younger employees are not getting paid less. Most of the highest paying jobs in the tech industry (which is the highest paying industry) are populated by younger folks.
Big word salad. Dr. Norman Matloff at UC Davis has written extensively on the topic and is an acknowledged expert. He asserts it is clear age discrimination. I know of a QA professional who had to conduct a taped "knowledge transfer" to the two (2) QA staff who would replace him, at half the salary.
"pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency?" - source please.
"What are we, France?" - non sequiter.
Those that are "artificially exclude[d]" are often older workers who can't even get by HR for an interview. Or stupid criteria like knowing Python, which an experienced developer can quickly pick up, plus his / her decades of experience.
I guess younger workers are also more likely to do drugs and experiment with the swinging lifestyle which some Silicon Valley execs imbibe.
So, companies are so inefficient that they are firing more efficient senior employees who add more value than younger employees who are on a per dollar basis less efficient? Is that the crux of your argument if we went beyond your word salad? And companies that fire more efficient senior employees will not lose competitive positioning? Is that your take?movielover said:calbear93 said:Age discrimination?movielover said:calbear93 said:Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
They're not smarter. It's defacto age discrimination - cheaper wages, and cheaper health care.
In this global economy, if their extended history have not added value to their level of contribution, why should private organization have to supplement the employee's income beyond the value they add? How is it fair to the younger generation that their unemployment rate remains high despite their talent because we want to pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency? What are we, France?
I honestly think experience and wisdom that comes from experience is worth it, but if not, we should not artificially exclude younger folks from employment to protect more expensive and less efficient older employees.
And younger employees are not getting paid less. Most of the highest paying jobs in the tech industry (which is the highest paying industry) are populated by younger folks.
Big word salad. Dr. Norman Matloff at UC Davis has written extensively on the topic and is an acknowledged expert. He asserts it is clear age discrimination. I know of a QA professional who had to conduct a taped "knowledge transfer" to the two (2) QA staff who would replace him, at half the salary.
"pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency?" - source please.
"What are we, France?" - non sequiter.
Those that are "artificially exclude[d]" are often older workers who can't even get by HR for an interview. Or stupid criteria like knowing Python, which an experienced developer can quickly pick up, plus his / her decades of experience.
I guess younger workers are also more likely to do drugs and experiment with the swinging lifestyle which some Silicon Valley execs imbibe.
Wow, I am sure that board of directors are dying to hire you as the CHROs since you clearly know the better way for companies to compete.
Tired of big government, anti-capitalism, union-loving, economic nationalist, anti-immigration MAGAs who are no different from the 80's Bernie Sanders. You are no conservative.
"I guess younger workers are also more likely to do drugs and experiment with the swinging lifestyle which some Silicon Valley execs imbibe." That definitely was not a "non sequitur".
movielover said:calbear93 said:Age discrimination?movielover said:calbear93 said:Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
They're not smarter. It's defacto age discrimination - cheaper wages, and cheaper health care.
In this global economy, if their extended history have not added value to their level of contribution, why should private organization have to supplement the employee's income beyond the value they add? How is it fair to the younger generation that their unemployment rate remains high despite their talent because we want to pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency? What are we, France?
I honestly think experience and wisdom that comes from experience is worth it, but if not, we should not artificially exclude younger folks from employment to protect more expensive and less efficient older employees.
And younger employees are not getting paid less. Most of the highest paying jobs in the tech industry (which is the highest paying industry) are populated by younger folks.
Big word salad. Dr. Norman Matloff at UC Davis has written extensively on the topic and is an acknowledged expert. He asserts it is clear age discrimination. I know of a QA professional who had to conduct a taped "knowledge transfer" to the two (2) QA staff who would replace him, at half the salary.
"pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency?" - source please.
"What are we, France?" - non sequiter.
Those that are "artificially exclude[d]" are often older workers who can't even get by HR for an interview. Or stupid criteria like knowing Python, which an experienced developer can quickly pick up, plus his / her decades of experience.
I guess younger workers are also more likely to do drugs and experiment with the swinging lifestyle which some Silicon Valley execs imbibe.
I agree with movielover for once.
We as a society should not churn and burn employees like they are commodities. People work hard and make big contributions for low salaries when young with the expectations that they will be rewarded later after they slow down as they age. That's normal. I don't have the energy to stay up all night reading literature or playing with new tech like I did when I was 25 and even if I did my family and other life responsibilities that I have acquired over time would make it difficult.
Are some older, expensive employees coasting or past their peak productivity? Yes, they are. However, I would say they have earned that with all the contributions they made over their careers.
I am not saying to keep deadweight around, but you might find out how it ruins the morale and motivation of younger employees if they see older ones treated poorly or replaced as everyone knows what the future has in store.
Bringing in a constant stream of young people who are working harder than they should because they are desperate to come here takes advantage of them as well.
This is an area where pure capitalism needs to be restrained or else there will be societal problems.
I don't think employee engagement surveys bear out your guesses.dimitrig said:movielover said:calbear93 said:Age discrimination?movielover said:calbear93 said:Why do you hate competition and efficiency?Goldener Bar said:This year, Microsoft laid off 10k, Meta laid off 21k, Amazon laid off 27k.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) June 12, 2023
Now, the same tech firms are pushing for more high tech visas to replace American workers.
Metadata shows Microsoft's lawyers helped craft an industry letter to the Biden admin https://t.co/jSjzggn0X4
Would you rather tech millionaires create unions and demand non-competitive, even-more inflated wages?
If smart immigrants are coming to do a better job for more efficient pay on their path to becoming US citizens and raising the standard of living for America, why is this not better than protecting less efficient employees (who may or may not have also been immigrants previously)?
I am all for broad legal immigrations that will raise the IQ and talent level of our country. We desperately need more smarts in this country.
They're not smarter. It's defacto age discrimination - cheaper wages, and cheaper health care.
In this global economy, if their extended history have not added value to their level of contribution, why should private organization have to supplement the employee's income beyond the value they add? How is it fair to the younger generation that their unemployment rate remains high despite their talent because we want to pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency? What are we, France?
I honestly think experience and wisdom that comes from experience is worth it, but if not, we should not artificially exclude younger folks from employment to protect more expensive and less efficient older employees.
And younger employees are not getting paid less. Most of the highest paying jobs in the tech industry (which is the highest paying industry) are populated by younger folks.
Big word salad. Dr. Norman Matloff at UC Davis has written extensively on the topic and is an acknowledged expert. He asserts it is clear age discrimination. I know of a QA professional who had to conduct a taped "knowledge transfer" to the two (2) QA staff who would replace him, at half the salary.
"pay more for longer tenured employees who add less efficiency?" - source please.
"What are we, France?" - non sequiter.
Those that are "artificially exclude[d]" are often older workers who can't even get by HR for an interview. Or stupid criteria like knowing Python, which an experienced developer can quickly pick up, plus his / her decades of experience.
I guess younger workers are also more likely to do drugs and experiment with the swinging lifestyle which some Silicon Valley execs imbibe.
I agree with movielover for once.
We as a society should not churn and burn employees like they are commodities. People work hard and make big contributions for low salaries when young with the expectations that they will be rewarded later after they slow down as they age. That's normal. I don't have the energy to stay up all night reading literature or playing with new tech like I did when I was 25 and even if I did my family and other life responsibilities that I have acquired over time would make it difficult.
Are some older, expensive employees coasting or past their peak productivity? Yes, they are. However, I would say they have earned that with all the contributions they made over their careers.
I am not saying to keep deadweight around, but you might find out how it ruins the morale and motivation of younger employees if they see older ones treated poorly or replaced as everyone knows what the future has in store.
Bringing in a constant stream of young people who are working harder than they should because they are desperate to come here takes advantage of them as well.
This is an area where pure capitalism needs to be restrained or else there will be societal problems.
One of the most disengaging characteristics in those surveys is seeing other employees who are being rewarded for less contribution.
And who is it for you to decide that corporation should pay for your belief that employees, after having put in a number of years, are entitled to be compensated for coasting in their later parts of their career? What are you doing to pay for that belief or is it that everyone else needs to lose our competitive position against the likes of China and India so that we can be more generous to coasting employees while harming younger employees who are being blocked from employment and with our products more expensive and less value-add than those from China and India?
Huge. Does he survive the summer?
BREAKING: Burisma executive who allegedly paid Hunter and Joe Biden has 17 recordings of them as ‘insurance policy’, GOP Senator revealshttps://t.co/cKCdSNdmei
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) June 12, 2023
Biden modestly strong with one group... Liberal Athiests. Another reason they had to indict him.
From WaPo-ABC #poll: "Biden’s approval rating is underwater among a slew of groups that supported him by wide margins in 2020. He stands at 26 percent approval among Americans under age 30, 42 percent among non-White adults, 41 percent among urban residents and 46 percent of…
— Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) May 7, 2023
WaPo-ABC #poll devastating for Biden. Losing to Trump by 6%, losing to Trump in suburbs, among Independents, on handling the economy, on mental sharpness & physical health "to serve effectively as president."
— Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) May 7, 2023
Biden job approval "slipped to a new low" https://t.co/jlpUhFTw2r
The nuclear documents cited by Jack Smith are:
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) June 12, 2023
1. Letter from Obama to Trump telling him DPRK nuke status is grave national security threat.
and
2. Letter from Chairman Kim noting no intent to use DPRK nukes offensively.
There's your friggin' DEFENSE security threat docs! pic.twitter.com/peqoB9jOKW
Prayers for John Amos.
'Good Times' actor John Amos hospitalized amid abuse allegations https://t.co/RGhUdvDnm2
— Fox News (@FoxNews) June 13, 2023
Word games by DC Democrats. And dirty archivist. Two personal letters to President Trump aren't classified documents worthy of note! "Lawfare".
Transgender biker leader of the Deviants - wants new trial over triple murder. Haircut also involved?
https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/06/12/transgender-activist-wants-a-new-trial-in-oakland-triple-murder-it-all-comes-down-to-biker-gangs-judicial-rulings-and-a-haircut/?utm_email=440D04DF4526A49954C5443CC4&g2i_eui=&g2i_source=newsletter&lctg=440D04DF4526A49954C5443CC4&active=no&utm_source=listrak&utm_medium=email&utm_term=https%3a%2f%2fwww.mercurynews.com%2f2023%2f06%2f12%2ftransgender-activist-wants-a-new-trial-in-oakland-triple-murder-it-all-comes-down-to-biker-gangs-judicial-rulings-and-a-haircut%2f&utm_campaign=bang-mult-nl-pm-report-nl&utm_content=curated
https://www.mercurynews.com/2023/06/12/transgender-activist-wants-a-new-trial-in-oakland-triple-murder-it-all-comes-down-to-biker-gangs-judicial-rulings-and-a-haircut/?utm_email=440D04DF4526A49954C5443CC4&g2i_eui=&g2i_source=newsletter&lctg=440D04DF4526A49954C5443CC4&active=no&utm_source=listrak&utm_medium=email&utm_term=https%3a%2f%2fwww.mercurynews.com%2f2023%2f06%2f12%2ftransgender-activist-wants-a-new-trial-in-oakland-triple-murder-it-all-comes-down-to-biker-gangs-judicial-rulings-and-a-haircut%2f&utm_campaign=bang-mult-nl-pm-report-nl&utm_content=curated
New song; Kari Lake seems to be positioning for VP slot.
#81MillionVotesMyAss is #1 on 2 billboard charts & is about to be #1 overall!
— Kari Lake (@KariLake) June 11, 2023
Let's keep it there & send a message to the swamp ⤵️https://t.co/wOtbLQKRp3 pic.twitter.com/aWFRJE9P5P
7 straight posts.
Another exciting night for the Trump Crowd.
Another exciting night for the Trump Crowd.
movielover said:
Biden modestly strong with one group... Liberal Athiests. Another reason they had to indict him.From WaPo-ABC #poll: "Biden’s approval rating is underwater among a slew of groups that supported him by wide margins in 2020. He stands at 26 percent approval among Americans under age 30, 42 percent among non-White adults, 41 percent among urban residents and 46 percent of…
— Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) May 7, 2023WaPo-ABC #poll devastating for Biden. Losing to Trump by 6%, losing to Trump in suburbs, among Independents, on handling the economy, on mental sharpness & physical health "to serve effectively as president."
— Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) May 7, 2023
Biden job approval "slipped to a new low" https://t.co/jlpUhFTw2r
Biden might not be the "popular" President (pretty hard with today's divisions), but he is the decent, competent President. No way in heck he loses to a clown like Trump in 2024, unless he totally starts to go to mush like Feinstein. Trump's support is ever-so-slowly eroding.
What's decent or competent about him?Big C said:movielover said:
Biden modestly strong with one group... Liberal Athiests. Another reason they had to indict him.From WaPo-ABC #poll: "Biden’s approval rating is underwater among a slew of groups that supported him by wide margins in 2020. He stands at 26 percent approval among Americans under age 30, 42 percent among non-White adults, 41 percent among urban residents and 46 percent of…
— Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) May 7, 2023WaPo-ABC #poll devastating for Biden. Losing to Trump by 6%, losing to Trump in suburbs, among Independents, on handling the economy, on mental sharpness & physical health "to serve effectively as president."
— Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) May 7, 2023
Biden job approval "slipped to a new low" https://t.co/jlpUhFTw2r
Biden might not be the "popular" President (pretty hard with today's divisions), but he is the decent, competent President.
Featured Stories
See All
New Bears in Town: Cal Frosh QB EJ Caminong
by Jim McGill
Cal Football Recruiting Update - June 29th
by Bear Insider