Underwriting professionals expect corporations to borrow about $125 BILLION through US high-grade bond sales in the month of September.
Well pronouns for pretend characters is a start I think. Do you think children care about the sexuality of video game characters?sycasey said:What makes this game a "woke" game?MinotStateBeav said:
OUCH, Sony game development studio just took the largest loss in gaming history with this game called, Concord, that they released 3 weeks ago for PS5 and PC. It was a woke game apparently. 8 Years in development and they spent $200 million only to see it flushed down the drain in record time.
https://blog.playstation.com/2024/09/03/an-important-update-on-concord/
sycasey said:
Seriously? Pronouns and the women aren't attractive enough? That's it?
Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
I should also say: it might be that this game is just bad anyway. I'll probably never play it, but a lot of the criticism seems to revolve around it being very similar to other games that are better and more popular. That would seem to me the more likely reason the new one failed. The "wokeness" claims seem petty.Big C said:sycasey said:
Seriously? Pronouns and the women aren't attractive enough? That's it?
Well, that's about half their agenda right there, isn't it? Just throw in a little DEIB hate and you're there.
Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
What? None of your fake Time and Newsweek covers from the 1970s?Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
Even if that was true, so what? Science based thoughts have frequently changed over time as more facts and data are uncovered. We know far more about climate both recent and historic than we did 50 years ago.Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
Eastern Oregon Bear said:What? None of your fake Time and Newsweek covers from the 1970s?Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
1970s was all about global COOLING! Top scientists and US government's weather organizations (like NOAA and NASA) talked about the coming new ice age and the resulting disaster (like no food)!
— S.L. Kanthan (@Kanthan2030) December 30, 2022
And the reason for climate change was... man! Newsweek 1975 article...👇 pic.twitter.com/9RT4vQ69WR
Dieser Artikel erschien im Juni 1974 vor 50 Jahren. Die durchschnittlichen globalen Temperaturen waren innerhalb von 30 Jahren um 1,5 °C (2,7 °F) gefallen. Satellitendaten zeigten, dass die Eis- und Schneebedeckung der Nördlichen Hemisphäre um 12% angewachsen war. Das Wetter… pic.twitter.com/iYEILsfJUV
— Künstliche Intelligenz (@1234Fit) June 14, 2024
Eastern Oregon Bear said:Even if that was true, so what? Science has always changed over time as more facts and data are uncovered.Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
I think this policy might help us… pic.twitter.com/HQg8lx4EhG
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
movielover said:I think this policy might help us… pic.twitter.com/HQg8lx4EhG
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
sycasey said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Even if that was true, so what? Science has always changed over time as more facts and data are uncovered.Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
And it wasn't true. Yes, some scientists speculated that global cooling was coming (hence what you'll see in some of these articles). Others thought warming. There was no consensus. The "warming" consensus arrived later.
Quote:
It is evident from Figure 2 that, for the 1965-1979 reference period used by PCF-08, the number of cooling papers significantly outnumbers the number of warming papers. It is also apparent that there are two distinct sub-periods contained within the reference period, namely:
1. The 1968-1976 period when cooling papers greatly outnumber the warming papers (85% to 15%), if we ignore the neutral papers (as was done in the Cook et al (2103). The 85% to 15% majority is an overwhelming cooling consensus. Additionally, this is probably the period when the 1970s "global cooling consensus" originated because cooling was clearly an established scientific consensus not the myth that PCF-08 contend.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/11/19/the-1970s-global-cooling-consensus-was-not-a-myth/
This article is full of motivated reasoning and actually includes the fake Time Magazine cover as an image at the top! Not your most convincing work here.Cal88 said:sycasey said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Even if that was true, so what? Science has always changed over time as more facts and data are uncovered.Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
And it wasn't true. Yes, some scientists speculated that global cooling was coming (hence what you'll see in some of these articles). Others thought warming. There was no consensus. The "warming" consensus arrived later.
The late 60s/70s scientific consensus for global cooling was of the order of 85%, so clearly there was a consensus.Quote:
It is evident from Figure 2 that, for the 1965-1979 reference period used by PCF-08, the number of cooling papers significantly outnumbers the number of warming papers. It is also apparent that there are two distinct sub-periods contained within the reference period, namely:
1. The 1968-1976 period when cooling papers greatly outnumber the warming papers (85% to 15%), if we ignore the neutral papers (as was done in the Cook et al (2103). The 85% to 15% majority is an overwhelming cooling consensus. Additionally, this is probably the period when the 1970s "global cooling consensus" originated because cooling was clearly an established scientific consensus not the myth that PCF-08 contend.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/11/19/the-1970s-global-cooling-consensus-was-not-a-myth/
sycasey said:This article is full of motivated reasoning and actually includes the fake Time Magazine cover as an image at the top! Not your most convincing work here.Cal88 said:sycasey said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Even if that was true, so what? Science has always changed over time as more facts and data are uncovered.Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
And it wasn't true. Yes, some scientists speculated that global cooling was coming (hence what you'll see in some of these articles). Others thought warming. There was no consensus. The "warming" consensus arrived later.
The late 60s/70s scientific consensus for global cooling was of the order of 85%, so clearly there was a consensus.Quote:
It is evident from Figure 2 that, for the 1965-1979 reference period used by PCF-08, the number of cooling papers significantly outnumbers the number of warming papers. It is also apparent that there are two distinct sub-periods contained within the reference period, namely:
1. The 1968-1976 period when cooling papers greatly outnumber the warming papers (85% to 15%), if we ignore the neutral papers (as was done in the Cook et al (2103). The 85% to 15% majority is an overwhelming cooling consensus. Additionally, this is probably the period when the 1970s "global cooling consensus" originated because cooling was clearly an established scientific consensus not the myth that PCF-08 contend.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/11/19/the-1970s-global-cooling-consensus-was-not-a-myth/
A couple of my coworkers have communicated with wattsupwiththat a couple of times trying to update outdated weather station information on his site. He's total slime. He told them he was keeping the old information because it fit the agenda he was pushing. Not his exact words, but that's what it boiled down to. If he told me the sun rose in the east, I'd still get up early and confirm it. I certainly wouldn't trust any 1970s global cooling literature search he came up with as being complete and unbiased.sycasey said:This article is full of motivated reasoning and actually includes the fake Time Magazine cover as an image at the top! Not your most convincing work here.Cal88 said:sycasey said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Even if that was true, so what? Science has always changed over time as more facts and data are uncovered.Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
And it wasn't true. Yes, some scientists speculated that global cooling was coming (hence what you'll see in some of these articles). Others thought warming. There was no consensus. The "warming" consensus arrived later.
The late 60s/70s scientific consensus for global cooling was of the order of 85%, so clearly there was a consensus.Quote:
It is evident from Figure 2 that, for the 1965-1979 reference period used by PCF-08, the number of cooling papers significantly outnumbers the number of warming papers. It is also apparent that there are two distinct sub-periods contained within the reference period, namely:
1. The 1968-1976 period when cooling papers greatly outnumber the warming papers (85% to 15%), if we ignore the neutral papers (as was done in the Cook et al (2103). The 85% to 15% majority is an overwhelming cooling consensus. Additionally, this is probably the period when the 1970s "global cooling consensus" originated because cooling was clearly an established scientific consensus not the myth that PCF-08 contend.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/11/19/the-1970s-global-cooling-consensus-was-not-a-myth/
LA is a mess. No arrests. pic.twitter.com/2wYXFHUFHZ
— @amuse (@amuse) September 4, 2024
Big Fani Willis testified she had ended her relationship with her very special prosecutor Nathan Wade. Here she is caught on police body cam footage with Wade after her pregnant daughter was arrested. pic.twitter.com/lLjle4zBeg
— @amuse (@amuse) September 4, 2024
Eastern Oregon Bear said:A couple of my coworkers have communicated with wattsupwiththat a couple of times trying to update outdated weather station information on his site. He's total slime. He told them he was keeping the old information because it fit the agenda he was pushing. Not his exact words, but that's what it boiled down to. If he told me the sun rose in the east, I'd still get up early and confirm it. I certainly wouldn't trust any 1970s global cooling literature search he came up with as being complete and unbiased.sycasey said:This article is full of motivated reasoning and actually includes the fake Time Magazine cover as an image at the top! Not your most convincing work here.Cal88 said:sycasey said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Even if that was true, so what? Science has always changed over time as more facts and data are uncovered.Cal88 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Radio Times? Everyone knows the groundbreaking cutting edge climate journalism is found in the PennySaver.movielover said:Scientists don’t know why the ocean is rapidly cooling - what are the chances they got it right back in the 70s.
— @amuse (@amuse) September 3, 2024
h/t @JamesMelville pic.twitter.com/0HOeudQtX8
That Radio Times was a magazine published by the BBC, not some supermarket tabloid:
https://www.bbc.com/historyofthebbc/research/radio-times
In any case,
New York Times. 1975:
"A new ice age is on the way... Sooner or later a major cooling of the climate is widely considered as inevitable"
The 1970s global cooling consensus was real.
And it wasn't true. Yes, some scientists speculated that global cooling was coming (hence what you'll see in some of these articles). Others thought warming. There was no consensus. The "warming" consensus arrived later.
The late 60s/70s scientific consensus for global cooling was of the order of 85%, so clearly there was a consensus.Quote:
It is evident from Figure 2 that, for the 1965-1979 reference period used by PCF-08, the number of cooling papers significantly outnumbers the number of warming papers. It is also apparent that there are two distinct sub-periods contained within the reference period, namely:
1. The 1968-1976 period when cooling papers greatly outnumber the warming papers (85% to 15%), if we ignore the neutral papers (as was done in the Cook et al (2103). The 85% to 15% majority is an overwhelming cooling consensus. Additionally, this is probably the period when the 1970s "global cooling consensus" originated because cooling was clearly an established scientific consensus not the myth that PCF-08 contend.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/11/19/the-1970s-global-cooling-consensus-was-not-a-myth/
seriously. trump is out control with the grinning and photo ops pic.twitter.com/MOk3wOiGnG
— kinni (@saykrolik) September 4, 2024
movielover said:
Benny Johnson robbed at Oakland In-N-Out Burger while shooting segment about it closing due to robberies
"Oakland has seen a 43 percent increase in strong-armed robberies within the last year, according to stats from Nov. 2023. The city's violent crime reached its highest numbers since the crime wave of the 90s. "
https://thepostmillennial.com/benny-johnson-crew-robbed-while-filming-shooting-video-about-in-n-out-burger-closing-in-oakland-due-to-robberies
oski003 said:
Proof that baseball is a more injurious sport than soccer.
https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/41128757/usa-croix-bethune-suffers-season-ending-knee-injury
White nationalist Nick Fuentes blasts Trump for admitting that he lost the 2020 election: "So, why did we do Stop the Steal? ... It would have been good to know that before 1,600 people got charged." https://t.co/DjioPbSm44 pic.twitter.com/cMZFU4VC58
— Right Wing Watch (@RightWingWatch) September 4, 2024
🚨🇺🇸 “The 8 Men wiped out the Store which has been going for 24 years in a matter of minutes”
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) September 4, 2024
Jewellery Store in Denver robbed by Venezuelan Gang
The whole World needs to understand what’s happening in Colorado - it will spread in time towards cities near you. pic.twitter.com/FJ2oLrDL8n
Joe Rogan to Climate Czars: “F—k You!”
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) September 5, 2024
This blunt message comes in response to the fact that the proposed solutions to solve the “climate crisis” somehow end up being “all profitable.”
“I think it's completely unfair if you're still… pic.twitter.com/pgD2uq4Cmx
DiabloWags said:
I'm surprised that the Kool-Aid Drinking Cult hasn't posted this yet . . .
Hunter Biden pleads guilty (Alford plea) to misdemeanor and felony charges for $1.4 million in tax evasion.
Without even the benefit of a deal with prosecutors, hours after jury selection was supposed to begin.
Looks like we won't learn anything about Hunter's overseas "dealings".
Shucks!
BREAKING: DOJ Chief of Public Affairs Admits Trump Indictments Are a Politically Motivated "Perversion of Justice"; Reveals Lawfare Involved in Making Former President a "Convicted Felon" Backfired on Democrats; Claims His Former Colleague Alvin Bragg's Case is "Nonsense" And… pic.twitter.com/IQhR0ax2pw
— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) September 5, 2024