movielover said:
O'Keefe busts the DEI pass-through contracts which are an open secret.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQDDcr3AaSH/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
$100 Billion Federal Contracting Scam Exposed: 8(a) Firm Admits to Violating Federal Law, Using Minority-Owned Status as a Front to Obtain $100M+ No-Bid Government Contracts While Outsourcing 80% of the Work.
— O’Keefe Media Group (@OKeefeMedia) October 20, 2025
ATI Government Solutions Contract Manager, Melayne Cromwell Admits to… pic.twitter.com/Jxvkb2vNOA
The Left is a cult pic.twitter.com/UOpHteJULL
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) October 19, 2025
HAMMER of JUSTICE: The fact that the FBI has been breaking records arresting violent criminals and child predators makes me wonder what they were doing before Trump took office. Were they really just going after J6ers, political opponents, parents, and Catholics? pic.twitter.com/7Vj3vl3xA3
— @amuse (@amuse) October 20, 2025
I am beyond thrilled you are moving forward with Grokepedia... 💯😎🔥 https://t.co/0VTJZsuGBg
— Teresa N (@msunc1985) September 30, 2025
BearlySane88 said:The Left is a cult pic.twitter.com/UOpHteJULL
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) October 19, 2025
Exclusive: FEMA Workers Improperly Collected Data About Politics of Disaster Victims
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) October 20, 2025
Politicized distribution of hurricane aid money before the 2024 election was no "isolated incident," a Homeland Security follow-up report sadly concludeshttps://t.co/KfqEu59FEY pic.twitter.com/HieH9km2za
Cal88 said:
I am not sure if the Democrats, should they manage to win back the White House in 28, would reverse the anti-China and tariff policies. Once a multibillion tax revenue stream is set up, it is very hard to undo it.
Cal88 said:
I think Brazil, Argentina, Russia are lower-cost soybean producers and there seems to be a supply glut, otherwise US producers would have found other markets besides China. But the Trump move to subsidize Argentinian exports to China through the $40 billion bailout for his buddies Milei and hedge funds investors losing on their bets on Argentina at the expense of US soy farmers is something else.
As well the policies of Trump and the Democrats before him seem to favor the big agricultural conglomerates at the expense of small farmers, who are getting wiped out.
right, tariffs for tariffs sake with no alignment with he real worldDiabloWags said:Cal88 said:
I think Brazil, Argentina, Russia are lower-cost soybean producers and there seems to be a supply glut, otherwise US producers would have found other markets besides China. But the Trump move to subsidize Argentinian exports to China through the $40 billion bailout for his buddies Milei and hedge funds investors losing on their bets on Argentina at the expense of US soy farmers is something else.
As well the policies of Trump and the Democrats before him seem to favor the big agricultural conglomerates at the expense of small farmers, who are getting wiped out.
Agreed.
And in just about every one of Trump's ridiculously stupid tariffs is the assumption that the U.S. has leverage and that there is no other possible substitution available.
Particularly in the case of SOYBEANS he couldn't be more wrong.
Brazil's soybean exports are expected to reach 102.2 million tons through end of October, surpassing annual volumes for the whole of 2024 and 2023.
The previous export record set by Brazil was 101.3 million tons in 2023.
CHINA imported 6.5 million tons from Brazil in September, representing 93% of the export total.
BRAZIL LOVES TRUMP TARIFFS ON CHINA!
MAGA for MORONS.
Brazil's soybean exports to hit record as US out of market, Chinese demand strong | Reuters
movielover said:
I prefer radical Left, or even Marxists / Socialists.
Big C said:
Questions to you political experts who have recently posted on this thread:
What is a loose policy framework that you would characterize as "radical left", or "Marxist / socialist"?
Who among the politicians that you characterize as being "radical left" identify themselves as centrist, moderate or independent?
Cal88 said:
I think Brazil, Argentina, Russia are lower-cost soybean producers and there seems to be a supply glut, otherwise US producers would have found other markets besides China. But the Trump move to subsidize Argentinian exports to China through the $40 billion bailout for his buddies Milei and hedge funds investors losing on their bets on Argentina at the expense of US soy farmers is something else.
As well the policies of Trump and the Democrats before him seem to favor the big agricultural conglomerates at the expense of small farmers, who are getting wiped out.
DiabloWags said:
The Farmers and Ranchers are getting ROYALLY SCREWED by your guy.
Just like in his first term.
They never learn. Lots of suckers and losers in the Midwest.
MAGA FOR MORONS!
MinotStateBeav said:
Well it's good for consumers because the price of beef goes down, but not great for the cattlemen. I have a feeling they will get a lot of considerations in the next few months.
MinotStateBeav said:Cal88 said:
I think Brazil, Argentina, Russia are lower-cost soybean producers and there seems to be a supply glut, otherwise US producers would have found other markets besides China. But the Trump move to subsidize Argentinian exports to China through the $40 billion bailout for his buddies Milei and hedge funds investors losing on their bets on Argentina at the expense of US soy farmers is something else.
As well the policies of Trump and the Democrats before him seem to favor the big agricultural conglomerates at the expense of small farmers, who are getting wiped out.
I'm very mixed on the issue, I know why Trump is helping Argentina, its because he doesn't want to see them back down the path of the socialists as well as have an ally in South America that hasn't sold out to China (that is a real reason). Now the 40billion bailout I was kind of ok with, but not a huge fan of selling out our cattlemen. If Congress was smart they'd put a bill out that would put country labels on beef.
Cal88 said:MinotStateBeav said:Cal88 said:
I think Brazil, Argentina, Russia are lower-cost soybean producers and there seems to be a supply glut, otherwise US producers would have found other markets besides China. But the Trump move to subsidize Argentinian exports to China through the $40 billion bailout for his buddies Milei and hedge funds investors losing on their bets on Argentina at the expense of US soy farmers is something else.
As well the policies of Trump and the Democrats before him seem to favor the big agricultural conglomerates at the expense of small farmers, who are getting wiped out.
I'm very mixed on the issue, I know why Trump is helping Argentina, its because he doesn't want to see them back down the path of the socialists as well as have an ally in South America that hasn't sold out to China (that is a real reason). Now the 40billion bailout I was kind of ok with, but not a huge fan of selling out our cattlemen. If Congress was smart they'd put a bill out that would put country labels on beef.
Argentine beef is free-range grass-fed, non-NGO feed, a high-quality healthier premium product, so labeling the country of origin might be counterproductive for American beef.
Milei's neoliberal policies are going to force Argentina to export its cash crops and cattle to pay for its IMF multi-billion loans, which is going to price locals out of meat and wine. Argentina has always had a large class of working poor, but in the past they were always able to afford a great steak paired with the best wines of their continent, they're now going to have to switch to rice and beans and mate' tea thanks to Milei's policies.
BREAKING: Men are reportedly leaving the left at an alarming rate, according to The Hill.
— Leading Report (@LeadingReport) October 22, 2025
MinotStateBeav said:Cal88 said:MinotStateBeav said:Cal88 said:
I think Brazil, Argentina, Russia are lower-cost soybean producers and there seems to be a supply glut, otherwise US producers would have found other markets besides China. But the Trump move to subsidize Argentinian exports to China through the $40 billion bailout for his buddies Milei and hedge funds investors losing on their bets on Argentina at the expense of US soy farmers is something else.
As well the policies of Trump and the Democrats before him seem to favor the big agricultural conglomerates at the expense of small farmers, who are getting wiped out.
I'm very mixed on the issue, I know why Trump is helping Argentina, its because he doesn't want to see them back down the path of the socialists as well as have an ally in South America that hasn't sold out to China (that is a real reason). Now the 40billion bailout I was kind of ok with, but not a huge fan of selling out our cattlemen. If Congress was smart they'd put a bill out that would put country labels on beef.
Argentine beef is free-range grass-fed, non-NGO feed, a high-quality healthier premium product, so labeling the country of origin might be counterproductive for American beef.
Milei's neoliberal policies are going to force Argentina to export its cash crops and cattle to pay for its IMF multi-billion loans, which is going to price locals out of meat and wine. Argentina has always had a large class of working poor, but in the past they were always able to afford a great steak paired with the best wines of their continent, they're now going to have to switch to rice and beans and mate' tea thanks to Milei's policies.
yeah that's not due to Mileis policies, that's due to decades of socialism.
18,000 pesos for 4 pieces of steak in Argentina.
— S.L. Kanthan (@Kanthan2030) May 3, 2025
Another way to look at it: 5% of median monthly wage.
This in a country that’s the fourth largest producer of beef in the world.
Sad. pic.twitter.com/4C1E17NTUO
NEW:
— Megatron (@Megatron_ron) December 16, 2023
⚡ 🇦🇷 The Argentinians are enjoying the first days with their new president. They entered into even greater chaos.
Two days after Milei's Dec. 10 inauguration, the price of meat had risen by 30%, and the total price hike for the week is approaching 100%.
This has… pic.twitter.com/2k1OZOkHKh
The end of the extreme steak 🥩 geoarbitrage in #BuenosAires 🇦🇷?
— Jordan 🇦🇺 (@Geologo_Trader) December 20, 2023
We still have $10-15 #USD local barrio steaks…
Right? 😟 https://t.co/Bu36fncA85 pic.twitter.com/RTkaMQDStG
For those who do not understand WHY we are buying beef from Argentina, here...
— PhilC (@Atrebate67) October 22, 2025
Our inventory level is back to roughly 1958 levels, which is why the prices are so high..
Ranchers are forced to sell their inventory instead of breeding...
Do your work, RESEARCH!! pic.twitter.com/0To9bxEsdS
that's a menu from a tourist trap btw that no Argentinian would go to.. fyiCal88 said:MinotStateBeav said:Cal88 said:MinotStateBeav said:Cal88 said:
I think Brazil, Argentina, Russia are lower-cost soybean producers and there seems to be a supply glut, otherwise US producers would have found other markets besides China. But the Trump move to subsidize Argentinian exports to China through the $40 billion bailout for his buddies Milei and hedge funds investors losing on their bets on Argentina at the expense of US soy farmers is something else.
As well the policies of Trump and the Democrats before him seem to favor the big agricultural conglomerates at the expense of small farmers, who are getting wiped out.
I'm very mixed on the issue, I know why Trump is helping Argentina, its because he doesn't want to see them back down the path of the socialists as well as have an ally in South America that hasn't sold out to China (that is a real reason). Now the 40billion bailout I was kind of ok with, but not a huge fan of selling out our cattlemen. If Congress was smart they'd put a bill out that would put country labels on beef.
Argentine beef is free-range grass-fed, non-NGO feed, a high-quality healthier premium product, so labeling the country of origin might be counterproductive for American beef.
Milei's neoliberal policies are going to force Argentina to export its cash crops and cattle to pay for its IMF multi-billion loans, which is going to price locals out of meat and wine. Argentina has always had a large class of working poor, but in the past they were always able to afford a great steak paired with the best wines of their continent, they're now going to have to switch to rice and beans and mate' tea thanks to Milei's policies.
yeah that's not due to Mileis policies, that's due to decades of socialism.
Through decades of socialism, Argentines maintained the privilege of having access to high quality domestic beef and wine. That is now changing under Milei'a neoliberal globalist policies :18,000 pesos for 4 pieces of steak in Argentina.
— S.L. Kanthan (@Kanthan2030) May 3, 2025
Another way to look at it: 5% of median monthly wage.
This in a country that’s the fourth largest producer of beef in the world.
Sad. pic.twitter.com/4C1E17NTUONEW:
— Megatron (@Megatron_ron) December 16, 2023
⚡ 🇦🇷 The Argentinians are enjoying the first days with their new president. They entered into even greater chaos.
Two days after Milei's Dec. 10 inauguration, the price of meat had risen by 30%, and the total price hike for the week is approaching 100%.
This has… pic.twitter.com/2k1OZOkHKh
Before Milei:The end of the extreme steak 🥩 geoarbitrage in #BuenosAires 🇦🇷?
— Jordan 🇦🇺 (@Geologo_Trader) December 20, 2023
We still have $10-15 #USD local barrio steaks…
Right? 😟 https://t.co/Bu36fncA85 pic.twitter.com/RTkaMQDStG
Stateside, the problem lies here:For those who do not understand WHY we are buying beef from Argentina, here...
— PhilC (@Atrebate67) October 22, 2025
Our inventory level is back to roughly 1958 levels, which is why the prices are so high..
Ranchers are forced to sell their inventory instead of breeding...
Do your work, RESEARCH!! pic.twitter.com/0To9bxEsdS
