OaktownBear said:
concordtom said:
oski003 said:
Just an opinion on a major contributor to the devastation of these fires:
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/aoc-california-wildfires-government-climate-change-daniel-turner.amp
This article is bull*****
The writer rips efforts to assign causal attribution and accompanying solutions simply because he is against "big government".
Full of nonsense facts, like saying that we have had irresponsible water management because the Sierras had record snowfall - so therefore a fire should not have happened in Healdsburg or in Canyon Country???
*****g Fool!
Here's the writer's brief bio:
Daniel Turner
Daniel Turner is the executive director of Power The Future, a national nonprofit organization that advocates for American energy jobs.
That's all one needs to know to understand the motivation. California has strict air pollution policies and is full of liberal environmentalists. Energy industry hates our political clout due to size and wealth and cultural and technological trendsetting, and so the Right is constantly trashing California to steal our image as on the forefront of Leadership for the nation.
Hillbillies and yesteryear regretters who put their heads in the sand and lead stupid followers into darkness, both in terms of knowledge and attitudinally. In other words, The Right is full of ignorance and hate.
I think AOC's statement is very ill advised as I think when you are making a scientific claim you should have more evidence to back it up. With so many people denying even the most rock solid science on the subject and looking for any ammunition, jumping to that conclusion is unwise.
Wildfires are the natural state of things in California. We have had large ones almost every year of my life. I think there are two major issues leading to a perception of the state burning - 1 national cable news reporting stories to fill time that didn't used to be national stories and 2. People moving more and more into areas that were not populated before. For instance. We aren't being overrun by mountain lions, we are moving to them.
That said, absolutely everything that opinion piece said about government failure causing the fire situation is nonsense and demonstrates complete and utter ignorance of the situation in California and how water management works. These places are naturally dry and snow pack has nothing to do with anything. The writer didn't care one bit about any accuracy. Just wanted to right something that sounded good to people who want to politically blame California.
Frankly I'm getting sick of conservative areas asking for money for god fearing people when they have disasters and turning around and saying California brings things on themselves. This isn't new. It happened with Loma Prieta, the East Bay Hills Fire, and the rash of fires in LA in the early 90's.
I agree with the second part of what you wrote, but not the first. There, you said:
* We've had large fires every year of your life. Sure, but the fires are way bigger and more frequent now. Look up a list of CA's biggest fires and the last decade dominates the list, big time! You could say it's because there are more people causing more fires in spaces where the brush is of the same dryness. What percentage of these fires ate man-made?
*AOC's comment was unwise? All she said was this:
"This is what climate change looks like" Ms. Ocasio-Cortez tweeted with the hashtag "#GreenNewDeal".
That's not a far stretch, at all, IMHO. In his film, An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore predicted bigger fires in the west and harsher hurricanes in the southeast and more tornadoes in the Midwest. It sure looks like he was right. And I thank him tremendously for that film which woke many people up.
* "With so many people denying even the most rock solid science on the subject"...
Are you giving credence to the nonbelievers? Or are you saying that "politically" it's unwise to make AOC's claim without backing up evidence?
The truth is, more and more scientists agree with Gore's posit all the time. Meanwhile the "many" people who deny global warming are pretty much ignorant and turning away from the mountain of evidence that the scientists have already presented.
I put the deniers into 3 camps:
1) vested interest: oil, coals, etc jobs or investments. Developer in Florida. Resident in New Orleans. Money.
2) emotionally wish to return to a time when such weighty issues didn't exist. Pleasantville.
3) ignorance. Education.
In all 3 cases, presenting more "evidence" isn't likely to change many of these people's minds. And you certainly can't present that evidence in 140 characters.
PS: AOC wasn't making a scientific claim. She was making a political one.