Breaking News

978,101 Views | 11763 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by movielover
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

"Subpoenaed witnesses have got to show up!"

Senator Joe Biden (2007)
Hunter Biden showed up to the capitol today

In the Capitol or outside the Capitol?

You know Biden's DOJ arrested J6ers who weren't even anywhere near the Capitol.
Are you a bot or a human?

The only connection between the GOP insurrection in 2021 and their paralyzing fear of Hunter Biden testifying publicly is that both are the product of the GOP recognizing they can never win a national election with their anti-American unpopular policies and politicians. There simply aren't enough deplorables for you guys to ever win on the merits so you have to resort to voter suppression, weaponizing the government (like Trump did with his DOJ against Hunter and others and like Comer is doing with congress), gerrymandering and fraud.

Good luck forcing Hunter to testify privately after spending years telling us that congressional subpoenas don't count.

I don't know if Swalwell thinks he's going to get some brownie points from the Biden White House or the DOJ for supporting Hunter or maybe he's desperate for attention after he was fired from his intel committee assignment? Either way, it makes Hunter look even more guilty. lol.
Your guy has been indicted on 91 counts, just lost an appeal today in a defamation lawsuit from that time he sexually assaulted a lady (because his lawyers are terrible), is on trial in NY for years of fraud and I'm barely scratching the surface.

No one really cares about Hunter Biden. You pretend to care because any distraction from your dumpster fire of a party feels like a win. Democrats don't care about Hunter - his biggest fan appear to be GOP incels and people like Marge 3 toes who parade his pornographic material openly in congressional hearings.

Good luck in 2024, I think you guys have done enough to prevent Hunter from winning election lolololol.

Not exactly, Joe needs Hunter to get paid. Hunter's dead brother's wife, needs Hunter for love.. Hunter's daughter with his prostitute needs Hunter for child support. Democrat donors need Hunter's artwork for inspiration. Foreign adversaries need Hunter for access to the Big Guy.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

America in 2023
https://www.threads.net/@keithedwards/post/C0xpx6aO4LV/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==


The American economy "put up quite a performance in 2023" Fed Chair Powell says
https://www.threads.net/@jeannasmialek/post/C0zlBzjg4ad/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
"They're eating the pets"
3 time Republican nominee for President
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

"Subpoenaed witnesses have got to show up!"

Senator Joe Biden (2007)
Hunter Biden showed up to the capitol today

In the Capitol or outside the Capitol?

You know Biden's DOJ arrested J6ers who weren't even anywhere near the Capitol.
Are you a bot or a human?

The only connection between the GOP insurrection in 2021 and their paralyzing fear of Hunter Biden testifying publicly is that both are the product of the GOP recognizing they can never win a national election with their anti-American unpopular policies and politicians. There simply aren't enough deplorables for you guys to ever win on the merits so you have to resort to voter suppression, weaponizing the government (like Trump did with his DOJ against Hunter and others and like Comer is doing with congress), gerrymandering and fraud.

Good luck forcing Hunter to testify privately after spending years telling us that congressional subpoenas don't count.

I don't know if Swalwell thinks he's going to get some brownie points from the Biden White House or the DOJ for supporting Hunter or maybe he's desperate for attention after he was fired from his intel committee assignment? Either way, it makes Hunter look even more guilty. lol.
Your guy has been indicted on 91 counts, just lost an appeal today in a defamation lawsuit from that time he sexually assaulted a lady (because his lawyers are terrible), is on trial in NY for years of fraud and I'm barely scratching the surface.

No one really cares about Hunter Biden. You pretend to care because any distraction from your dumpster fire of a party feels like a win. Democrats don't care about Hunter - his biggest fan appear to be GOP incels and people like Marge 3 toes who parade his pornographic material openly in congressional hearings.

Good luck in 2024, I think you guys have done enough to prevent Hunter from winning election lolololol.

Not exactly, Joe needs Hunter to get paid. Hunter's dead brother's wife, needs Hunter for love.. Hunter's daughter with his prostitute needs Hunter for child support. Democrat donors need Hunter's artwork for inspiration. Foreign adversaries need Hunter for access to the Big Guy.
You seem more obsessed with Hunter than the GOP does Trump. Maybe you guys should vote for Hunter instead.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

"Subpoenaed witnesses have got to show up!"

Senator Joe Biden (2007)
Hunter Biden showed up to the capitol today

In the Capitol or outside the Capitol?

You know Biden's DOJ arrested J6ers who weren't even anywhere near the Capitol.
Are you a bot or a human?

The only connection between the GOP insurrection in 2021 and their paralyzing fear of Hunter Biden testifying publicly is that both are the product of the GOP recognizing they can never win a national election with their anti-American unpopular policies and politicians. There simply aren't enough deplorables for you guys to ever win on the merits so you have to resort to voter suppression, weaponizing the government (like Trump did with his DOJ against Hunter and others and like Comer is doing with congress), gerrymandering and fraud.

Good luck forcing Hunter to testify privately after spending years telling us that congressional subpoenas don't count.

I don't know if Swalwell thinks he's going to get some brownie points from the Biden White House or the DOJ for supporting Hunter or maybe he's desperate for attention after he was fired from his intel committee assignment? Either way, it makes Hunter look even more guilty. lol.
Your guy has been indicted on 91 counts, just lost an appeal today in a defamation lawsuit from that time he sexually assaulted a lady (because his lawyers are terrible), is on trial in NY for years of fraud and I'm barely scratching the surface.

No one really cares about Hunter Biden. You pretend to care because any distraction from your dumpster fire of a party feels like a win. Democrats don't care about Hunter - his biggest fan appear to be GOP incels and people like Marge 3 toes who parade his pornographic material openly in congressional hearings.

Good luck in 2024, I think you guys have done enough to prevent Hunter from winning election lolololol.

Not exactly, Joe needs Hunter to get paid. Hunter's dead brother's wife, needs Hunter for love.. Hunter's daughter with his prostitute needs Hunter for child support. Democrat donors need Hunter's artwork for inspiration. Foreign adversaries need Hunter for access to the Big Guy.
You seem more obsessed with Hunter than the GOP does Trump. Maybe you guys should vote for Hunter instead.
You don't know what love is until you love your sister in law as deeply as Hunter Biden does.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

bear2034 said:

"Subpoenaed witnesses have got to show up!"

Senator Joe Biden (2007)
Hunter Biden showed up to the capitol today

In the Capitol or outside the Capitol?

You know Biden's DOJ arrested J6ers who weren't even anywhere near the Capitol.
Are you a bot or a human?

The only connection between the GOP insurrection in 2021 and their paralyzing fear of Hunter Biden testifying publicly is that both are the product of the GOP recognizing they can never win a national election with their anti-American unpopular policies and politicians. There simply aren't enough deplorables for you guys to ever win on the merits so you have to resort to voter suppression, weaponizing the government (like Trump did with his DOJ against Hunter and others and like Comer is doing with congress), gerrymandering and fraud.

Good luck forcing Hunter to testify privately after spending years telling us that congressional subpoenas don't count.

I don't know if Swalwell thinks he's going to get some brownie points from the Biden White House or the DOJ for supporting Hunter or maybe he's desperate for attention after he was fired from his intel committee assignment? Either way, it makes Hunter look even more guilty. lol.
Your guy has been indicted on 91 counts, just lost an appeal today in a defamation lawsuit from that time he sexually assaulted a lady (because his lawyers are terrible), is on trial in NY for years of fraud and I'm barely scratching the surface.

No one really cares about Hunter Biden. You pretend to care because any distraction from your dumpster fire of a party feels like a win. Democrats don't care about Hunter - his biggest fan appear to be GOP incels and people like Marge 3 toes who parade his pornographic material openly in congressional hearings.

Good luck in 2024, I think you guys have done enough to prevent Hunter from winning election lolololol.

Not exactly, Joe needs Hunter to get paid. Hunter's dead brother's wife, needs Hunter for love.. Hunter's daughter with his prostitute needs Hunter for child support. Democrat donors need Hunter's artwork for inspiration. Foreign adversaries need Hunter for access to the Big Guy.
You seem more obsessed with Hunter than the GOP does Trump. Maybe you guys should vote for Hunter instead.
You don't know what love is until you love your sister in law as deeply as Hunter Biden does.
Your love for Hunter seems almost as great as Trump's for his daughter.

Quote:

"Aides said he talked about Ivanka Trump's breasts, her backside, and what it might be like to have sex with her, remarks that prompted Kelly to remind the president that Ivanka was his daughter," writes Miles Taylor, a former chief of staff at the Department of Homeland Security, in his new book, according to Newsweek.
Quote:

When asked how he would react if Ivanka, a former teen model, posed for Playboy, Trump replied, "It would be really disappointing not really but it would depend on what's inside the magazine."

He added: "I don't think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Congratulations, you just gave Aunbear more pictures to save on his desktop.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump's lawyers apparently only hire the best as well.

Michael Cohen's attorney cited 3 cases to support ending Cohen's supervised release early and the judge can't find any record of these cases. He's asking the attorney to provide the opinions and if he can't, explain why the judge shouldn't sanction him.

Michael Cohen's attorney threatened with sanctions for citing cases that don't exist





Michael Cohen hasn't been Trump's lawyer in about 6 years. Is this something else you pretend not to be aware of?
True, but he was Trump's lawyer for the 12 years before that. He was also vice president of the Trump Organization, co-president of Trump Entertainment and was a board member of the Eric Trump Foundation. Trump also picked him to be deputy finance chairman of the Republic National Committee. He's not someone you pretend not be aware of because he doesn't work for Trump anymore.



He was fired in the middle of 2018. He is not Trump's lawyer. Period. All of the other things you are now saying are true. Nobody was pretending to not be aware of him. Can you point to where I was unaware of him?
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump's lawyers apparently only hire the best as well.

Michael Cohen's attorney cited 3 cases to support ending Cohen's supervised release early and the judge can't find any record of these cases. He's asking the attorney to provide the opinions and if he can't, explain why the judge shouldn't sanction him.

Michael Cohen's attorney threatened with sanctions for citing cases that don't exist





Michael Cohen hasn't been Trump's lawyer in about 6 years. Is this something else you pretend not to be aware of?
True, but he was Trump's lawyer for the 12 years before that. He was also vice president of the Trump Organization, co-president of Trump Entertainment and was a board member of the Eric Trump Foundation. Trump also picked him to be deputy finance chairman of the Republic National Committee. He's not someone you pretend not be aware of because he doesn't work for Trump anymore.



He was fired in the middle of 2018. He is not Trump's lawyer. Period. All of the other things you are now saying are true. Nobody was pretending to not be aware of him. Can you point to where I was unaware of him?
I wasn't implying that you were unaware of him. I was fully aware that Cohen no longer works for Trump but you decided that you could distract from my post by claiming I thought Cohen still worked for Trump. Just because you make ridiculous assertions doesn't mean that I do.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?


tRump is in congestive heart failure. EXPLOSION TIME!

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump's lawyers apparently only hire the best as well.

Michael Cohen's attorney cited 3 cases to support ending Cohen's supervised release early and the judge can't find any record of these cases. He's asking the attorney to provide the opinions and if he can't, explain why the judge shouldn't sanction him.

Michael Cohen's attorney threatened with sanctions for citing cases that don't exist





Michael Cohen hasn't been Trump's lawyer in about 6 years. Is this something else you pretend not to be aware of?
True, but he was Trump's lawyer for the 12 years before that. He was also vice president of the Trump Organization, co-president of Trump Entertainment and was a board member of the Eric Trump Foundation. Trump also picked him to be deputy finance chairman of the Republic National Committee. He's not someone you pretend not be aware of because he doesn't work for Trump anymore.



He was fired in the middle of 2018. He is not Trump's lawyer. Period. All of the other things you are now saying are true. Nobody was pretending to not be aware of him. Can you point to where I was unaware of him?
I wasn't implying that you were unaware of him. I was fully aware that Cohen no longer works for Trump but you decided that you could distract from my post by claiming I thought Cohen still worked for Trump. Just because you make ridiculous assertions doesn't mean that I do.


Either learn to write better or stop being purposely misleading.
calpoly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump's lawyers apparently only hire the best as well.

Michael Cohen's attorney cited 3 cases to support ending Cohen's supervised release early and the judge can't find any record of these cases. He's asking the attorney to provide the opinions and if he can't, explain why the judge shouldn't sanction him.

Michael Cohen's attorney threatened with sanctions for citing cases that don't exist





Michael Cohen hasn't been Trump's lawyer in about 6 years. Is this something else you pretend not to be aware of?
True, but he was Trump's lawyer for the 12 years before that. He was also vice president of the Trump Organization, co-president of Trump Entertainment and was a board member of the Eric Trump Foundation. Trump also picked him to be deputy finance chairman of the Republic National Committee. He's not someone you pretend not be aware of because he doesn't work for Trump anymore.



He was fired in the middle of 2018. He is not Trump's lawyer. Period. All of the other things you are now saying are true. Nobody was pretending to not be aware of him. Can you point to where I was unaware of him?
I wasn't implying that you were unaware of him. I was fully aware that Cohen no longer works for Trump but you decided that you could distract from my post by claiming I thought Cohen still worked for Trump. Just because you make ridiculous assertions doesn't mean that I do.


Either learn to write better or stop being purposely misleading.
Says the one that is misleading 24/7.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump's lawyers apparently only hire the best as well.

Michael Cohen's attorney cited 3 cases to support ending Cohen's supervised release early and the judge can't find any record of these cases. He's asking the attorney to provide the opinions and if he can't, explain why the judge shouldn't sanction him.

Michael Cohen's attorney threatened with sanctions for citing cases that don't exist





Michael Cohen hasn't been Trump's lawyer in about 6 years. Is this something else you pretend not to be aware of?
True, but he was Trump's lawyer for the 12 years before that. He was also vice president of the Trump Organization, co-president of Trump Entertainment and was a board member of the Eric Trump Foundation. Trump also picked him to be deputy finance chairman of the Republic National Committee. He's not someone you pretend not be aware of because he doesn't work for Trump anymore.



He was fired in the middle of 2018. He is not Trump's lawyer. Period. All of the other things you are now saying are true. Nobody was pretending to not be aware of him. Can you point to where I was unaware of him?
I wasn't implying that you were unaware of him. I was fully aware that Cohen no longer works for Trump but you decided that you could distract from my post by claiming I thought Cohen still worked for Trump. Just because you make ridiculous assertions doesn't mean that I do.


Either learn to write better or stop being purposely misleading.
You need to find a better schtick.This one sucks.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Trump's lawyers apparently only hire the best as well.

Michael Cohen's attorney cited 3 cases to support ending Cohen's supervised release early and the judge can't find any record of these cases. He's asking the attorney to provide the opinions and if he can't, explain why the judge shouldn't sanction him.

Michael Cohen's attorney threatened with sanctions for citing cases that don't exist
Ooof, not good. I don't think I've ever heard of that happening before.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
California to allow Toilet to Tap projects in landmark water rule
https://www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/water-reuse-recycling-18545323.php

Welp thats super progressive lol. I can picture a new bottled water company "Urethra Springs"
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But the corporate news told us this would be a disappointing holiday season - lol

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-14/us-retail-sales-unexpectedly-rise-in-solid-start-to-holidays?srnd=premium
"They're eating the pets"
3 time Republican nominee for President
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

California to allow Toilet to Tap projects in landmark water rule
https://www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/water-reuse-recycling-18545323.php

Welp thats super progressive lol. I can picture a new bottled water company "Urethra Springs"
I had an environmental sciences professor advocate for this about 40 years ago. It seems no less crazy to me now.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Boston Mayor creates a Christmas party for people of color only. She apologizes - not for being racist - for accidentally sending the invites to whites. And (amazingly) says this: "It is my intention that we can, again, be a city that lives our values and create space for all kinds of communities to come together," she added. [emphasis added]
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

California to allow Toilet to Tap projects in landmark water rule
https://www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/water-reuse-recycling-18545323.php

Welp thats super progressive lol. I can picture a new bottled water company "Urethra Springs"


Oh, the Kardashians are definitely selling their own 'water'.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

MinotStateBeav said:

California to allow Toilet to Tap projects in landmark water rule
https://www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/water-reuse-recycling-18545323.php

Welp thats super progressive lol. I can picture a new bottled water company "Urethra Springs"
I had an environmental sciences professor advocate for this about 40 years ago. It seems no less crazy to me now.
It's not crazy. It's science. The water is cleaned and purified. I have drunk recycled water (queue the that's what's wrong with dajo9 jokes). The issue is purely a mental hurdle for people. It is the future for the American southwest though non-tap water uses will go first.
"They're eating the pets"
3 time Republican nominee for President
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

tequila4kapp said:

MinotStateBeav said:

California to allow Toilet to Tap projects in landmark water rule
https://www.sfchronicle.com/california/article/water-reuse-recycling-18545323.php

Welp thats super progressive lol. I can picture a new bottled water company "Urethra Springs"
I had an environmental sciences professor advocate for this about 40 years ago. It seems no less crazy to me now.
It's not crazy. It's science. The water is cleaned and purified. I have drunk recycled water (queue the that's what's wrong with dajo9 jokes). The issue is purely a mental hurdle for people. It is the future for the American southwest though non-tap water uses will go first.


You are exactly right. I wish I knew more about science because it sure SEEMS like we should just be able to make water. What's the big deal combining hydrogen and oxygen? I'm sure the science guys on BI will tell me.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"It is not easy to make water because the combination of hydrogen and oxygen atoms is accompanied by the release of tremendous amount of energy."
https://www.scienceabc.com/pure-sciences/why-dont-we-just-make-water-chemically-in-a-lab-hydrogen-oxygen.html#


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"It is not easy to make water because the combination of hydrogen and oxygen atoms is accompanied by the release of tremendous amount of energy."
https://www.scienceabc.com/pure-sciences/why-dont-we-just-make-water-chemically-in-a-lab-hydrogen-oxygen.html#





Don't we need energy? Ok, maybe not all at one time but still...
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

bearister said:

"It is not easy to make water because the combination of hydrogen and oxygen atoms is accompanied by the release of tremendous amount of energy."
https://www.scienceabc.com/pure-sciences/why-dont-we-just-make-water-chemically-in-a-lab-hydrogen-oxygen.html#





Don't we need energy? Ok, maybe not all at one time but still...


Thanks for linking the article. Informative.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


It appears that allowing the government to spy on citizens is something that's popular among both Democrats and Republicans.

147 Worthless Republicans Vote to Reauthorize FISA Program So DOJ-FBI Can Spy on President Trump Again.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bush Jr. started it with the Patriot Act, and Obama and Holder turned those new powers on their domestic political opponents.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Bush Jr. started it with the Patriot Act, and Obama and Holder turned those new powers on their domestic political opponents.

I wonder why Obama, Clinton, or Biden never complained about Trump's DOJ spying on them?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

movielover said:

Bush Jr. started it with the Patriot Act, and Obama and Holder turned those new powers on their domestic political opponents.

I wonder why Obama, Clinton, or Biden never complained about Trump's DOJ spying on them?


Holder purged a once (supposedly) non-ideological DOJ of non believers, and hired hard-core proven Progressives. Attorney ShipwreckedCrew has written about it. He had over 20 years in the DOJ, saw the writing on the wall - like many - and left the DOJ to hang his own shingle. He's currently representing numerous J6 Defendants.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

But the corporate news told us this would be a disappointing holiday season - lol

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-14/us-retail-sales-unexpectedly-rise-in-solid-start-to-holidays?srnd=premium

Corporate news had not accounted for Cal getting into the Radiance Technologies Independence Bowl in Shreveport, Louisiana, which has ignited a euphoria that is spreading throughout the land.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

But the corporate news told us this would be a disappointing holiday season - lol

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-14/us-retail-sales-unexpectedly-rise-in-solid-start-to-holidays?srnd=premium


Yes, retail sales rose 0.3%. Break out the bubbly.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

dajo9 said:

But the corporate news told us this would be a disappointing holiday season - lol

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-14/us-retail-sales-unexpectedly-rise-in-solid-start-to-holidays?srnd=premium


Yes, retail sales rose 0.3%. Break out the bubbly.



0.3% would be 3.6% annually. In the 21st century we've only had 2 years of GDP above that. 1 was Biden's Covid bounceback in 2021 and 1 was WBush's housing and war bubble of 2004.
"They're eating the pets"
3 time Republican nominee for President
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DEI gonna DEI

Fox News: Former Facebook diversity head pleads guilty to stealing millions in kickback scheme, DOJ says

Barbara Furlow-Smiles, 38, had Facebook pay vendors for services never provided and she received a kickback, the Justice Department
said

$4 million in kickbacks. How much time will she serve?

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/former-facebook-diversity-head-pleads-guilty-stealing-millions-kickback-scheme-doj-says

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

bear2034 said:

movielover said:

Bush Jr. started it with the Patriot Act, and Obama and Holder turned those new powers on their domestic political opponents.

I wonder why Obama, Clinton, or Biden never complained about Trump's DOJ spying on them?

Holder purged a once (supposedly) non-ideological DOJ of non believers, and hired hard-core proven Progressives. Attorney ShipwreckedCrew has written about it. He had over 20 years in the DOJ, saw the writing on the wall - like many - and left the DOJ to hang his own shingle. He's currently representing numerous J6 Defendants.

I just saw his Twitter, he's a brave man considering he worked in both the Clinton and Obama administrations.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

dimitrig said:

dajo9 said:

But the corporate news told us this would be a disappointing holiday season - lol

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-12-14/us-retail-sales-unexpectedly-rise-in-solid-start-to-holidays?srnd=premium


Yes, retail sales rose 0.3%. Break out the bubbly.



0.3% would be 3.6% annually. In the 21st century we've only had 2 years of GDP above that. 1 was Biden's Covid bounceback in 2021 and 1 was WBush's housing and war bubble of 2004.


That is a lot of extrapolation.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I discovered @ShipwreckedCrew / attorney William Shipley by accident. I was following another attorney, Robert Barnes - who previously successfully defended Wesley Snipes against criminal charges. SWC comes out of nowhere and starts ripping Barnes a new orifice. I'm no attorney, but SWC seemed very sharp and highly experienced. I believe he went to law school at the Southern Branch.

Here's a snippet of him at about 2:00 explaining the pickle the QAnon Shaman is in bc he had incompetent counsel. (Video released late shows the Shaman being invited into the Capitol by LEO.) QAS got 41 months in prison before exculpatory Brady material was released.

He ocassionally writes various legal commentary, but he's been buried representing lots of J6 clients. He's worth following.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Attorneys Bill Shipley and Ron Coleman discussion

0 - 10:00 - Online background, boring
10:00 - Shipleys entry into Federal law / AUSA 20+ years
13:00 - Obama Administration ramps up hiring liberals - Sierra Club, ACLU, etc. DOJ and FBI ramp up, liberal hiring managers hire liberals. Add in mandatory FBI retirement at 57 (eligible at 50).
15:00 - FBI changes from hiring ex Military; to 2008 (Obama / Mueller) hiring off of college campuses (liberal). Change from J. Edgar Hoover ...
18:00 - FBI manager, first step - not based on competence, but poor agents volunteering themselves into management (first step) - WHY the FBI has become political poor agents becoming managers.
23:00 - Federal Court language and rules
30:00 - inexperienced young district attorneys being loaned to overwhelmed DC cases
31:00 - Shipley's success w the second Oathkeeper trial - pre-trial victories
51:00 - US vs Haldeman (jury selection)




First Page Last Page
Page 254 of 337
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.