Breaking News

1,107,659 Views | 12351 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by movielover
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav said:

dajo9 said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Wow, Biden sides with Trump?




Do you mean, Trump sides with Biden? I'm sure in 2007 Trump had put zero thought into what a Sanctuary city is.

I don't know dude, I'm just another moron MAGAt. .


FIFY
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is nice to see a clip of him before his mental decline.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

Big C said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Jon Stewart is coming back to The Daily Show during election season. I think it's going to be a propaganda effort now, it won't be like the old Daily Show where Jon could fairly and effectively roast both parties politicians. I use to love his show. Then during Covid Jon went on Colbert's show and got roasted for saying Covid was likely made in the Wuhan lab. Then when Jon's new apple show debuted he went on this weird white privilege kick and focused his ire at republicans. I think that will be the direction of his return. If he could return to his old show, that would rock, but I doubt that's what's coming.

My ire is focused on Republicans. And yet, I think there is a pretty good chance that this COVID was born in the Wuhan labs. Sometimes the left goes too far with their bs, but Republicans are way worse, IMO. Not even close.

There is almost no chance COVID came from the Wuhan lab.

What evidence is there for that?



I won't go so far as to say it probably came from the lab, just that that is entirely possible. And obviously, I don't know. The only "evidence" is purely circumstantial: of all the places on planet earth for COVID-19 to start... and it happens to be where a bio-lab like that is located.

To be honest, I'm not even up on the latest news. (I used to be a COVID news junkie, but after a couple of years, that got old.) Is there a "latest"? Are some experts still trying to figure this out?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

dimitrig said:

Big C said:

MinotStateBeav said:

Jon Stewart is coming back to The Daily Show during election season. I think it's going to be a propaganda effort now, it won't be like the old Daily Show where Jon could fairly and effectively roast both parties politicians. I use to love his show. Then during Covid Jon went on Colbert's show and got roasted for saying Covid was likely made in the Wuhan lab. Then when Jon's new apple show debuted he went on this weird white privilege kick and focused his ire at republicans. I think that will be the direction of his return. If he could return to his old show, that would rock, but I doubt that's what's coming.

My ire is focused on Republicans. And yet, I think there is a pretty good chance that this COVID was born in the Wuhan labs. Sometimes the left goes too far with their bs, but Republicans are way worse, IMO. Not even close.

There is almost no chance COVID came from the Wuhan lab.

What evidence is there for that?



I won't go so far as to say it probably came from the lab, just that that is entirely possible. And obviously, I don't know. The only "evidence" is purely circumstantial: of all the places on planet earth for COVID-19 to start... and it happens to be where a bio-lab like that is located.

To be honest, I'm not even up on the latest news. (I used to be a COVID news junkie, but after a couple of years, that got old.) Is there a "latest"? Are some experts still trying to figure this out?


A level 4 biolab studying coronaviruses designed by the company led by Moderna's CEO, which was the first company to sequence the Covid vaccine (in partnership with the NIH whose scientists made money from their IP on Moderna's vaccine). Nope, nothing to see here!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:



There is almost no chance COVID came from the Wuhan lab.

What evidence is there for that?

In the words of comedian Jon Stewart, "the name of the virus is on the lab."
Lets Go Brandon 2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:


Quote:

My ire is focused on Republicans. And yet, I think there is a pretty good chance that this COVID was born in the Wuhan labs. Sometimes the left goes too far with their bs, but Republicans are way worse, IMO. Not even close.
There is almost no chance COVID came from the Wuhan lab.

What evidence is there for that?


Article:
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/scientists-proposed-making-viruses-with-unique-features-of-sars-cov-2-in-wuhan/



bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Endless Civil War? America's 160-year wound that won't heal


https://news.yahoo.com/endless-civil-war-americas-160-013209995.html


He could have ended it.


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We can't burn Atlanta again, we're in the ACC now.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

We can't burn Atlanta again, we're in the ACC now.


Let's burn Seattle instead.
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

We can't burn Atlanta again, we're in the ACC now.


Let's burn Seattle instead.


Too rainy
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

We can't burn Atlanta again, we're in the ACC now.

Keep Atlanta and Savanna - torch the rest.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

We can't burn Atlanta again, we're in the ACC now.


Let's burn Seattle instead.


How about Seattle and Portland?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

We can't burn Atlanta again, we're in the ACC now.


Let's burn Seattle instead.


Too rainy

Global warming.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Cal88 said:

We can't burn Atlanta again, we're in the ACC now.

Let's burn Seattle instead.


Maybe we should.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Andy has never been a trustworthy source. But you do you.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who do you consider a trustworthy source?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Edit.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Who do you consider a trustworthy source?


Certainly none of the sources you use.

And nothing from social media of any kind.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Name one.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Andy has never been a trustworthy source. But you do you.
I watched Andy get beaten to a pulp by a mob at the Portland BLM/Antifa riot, all on live TV, simply for being a journalist. Or maybe for being Asian. Or both. He is trustworthy enough for me, until I see a reliable "trustworthy" source show me differently.
SFCityBear
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

AunBear89 said:

Andy has never been a trustworthy source. But you do you.
I watched Andy get beaten to a pulp by a mob at the Portland BLM/Antifa riot, all on live TV, simply for being a journalist. Or maybe for being Asian. Or both. He is trustworthy enough for me, until I see a reliable "trustworthy" source show me differently.


He's just another biased source. He'll report a gay person raping a kid but won't report a pastor raping a kid. We all, to some degree, choose the sources that tell us what we want to hear about.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

SFCityBear said:

AunBear89 said:

Andy has never been a trustworthy source. But you do you.
I watched Andy get beaten to a pulp by a mob at the Portland BLM/Antifa riot, all on live TV, simply for being a journalist. Or maybe for being Asian. Or both. He is trustworthy enough for me, until I see a reliable "trustworthy" source show me differently.


He's just another biased source. He'll report a gay person raping a kid but won't report a pastor raping a kid. We all, to some degree, choose the sources that tell us what we want to hear about.

I will also give him the benefit of the doubt that the first time he got attacked was a legitimately spontaneous incident. But after he was recognized multiple times at these protests, he has to know that many of these activists know who he is and will directly react to his presence. At that point he's making himself the story and not just reporting the story.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

dajo9 said:

SFCityBear said:

AunBear89 said:

Andy has never been a trustworthy source. But you do you.
I watched Andy get beaten to a pulp by a mob at the Portland BLM/Antifa riot, all on live TV, simply for being a journalist. Or maybe for being Asian. Or both. He is trustworthy enough for me, until I see a reliable "trustworthy" source show me differently.


He's just another biased source. He'll report a gay person raping a kid but won't report a pastor raping a kid. We all, to some degree, choose the sources that tell us what we want to hear about.

I will also give him the benefit of the doubt that the first time he got attacked was a legitimately spontaneous incident. But after he was recognized multiple times at these protests, he has to know that many of these activists know who he is and will directly react to his presence. At that point he's making himself the story and not just reporting the story.


He should know these things just like women shouldn't wear short skirts. Am I right?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

dajo9 said:

SFCityBear said:

AunBear89 said:

Andy has never been a trustworthy source. But you do you.
I watched Andy get beaten to a pulp by a mob at the Portland BLM/Antifa riot, all on live TV, simply for being a journalist. Or maybe for being Asian. Or both. He is trustworthy enough for me, until I see a reliable "trustworthy" source show me differently.


He's just another biased source. He'll report a gay person raping a kid but won't report a pastor raping a kid. We all, to some degree, choose the sources that tell us what we want to hear about.

I will also give him the benefit of the doubt that the first time he got attacked was a legitimately spontaneous incident. But after he was recognized multiple times at these protests, he has to know that many of these activists know who he is and will directly react to his presence. At that point he's making himself the story and not just reporting the story.


He should know these things just like women shouldn't wear short skirts. Am I right?

In certain professional circumstances, no they shouldn't. Same goes for Andy Ngo. Doesn't mean any subsequent attacks are justified, but at some point . . . c'mon, you know what you're doing.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==


I am not sure, but it is a legal drug. Was it used inappropriately?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==


I am not sure, but it is a legal drug. Was it used inappropriately?


Pill mills are legal until proven otherwise, amirite?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==


I am not sure, but it is a legal drug. Was it used inappropriately?


Pill mills are legal until proven otherwise, amirite?


The fentanyl here wasn't even a pill. You do realize this list can include military medical treatment facilities and surgery happens there, right (as well as surgical procedures in the White House unit)? There are concerns with buying name brand drugs and other issues, but nowhere is there proof that this was a white house pill mill. Yw.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==


I am not sure, but it is a legal drug. Was it used inappropriately?


Pill mills are legal until proven otherwise, amirite?


The fentanyl here wasn't even a pill. You do realize this list can include military medical treatment facilities and surgery happens there, right (as well as surgical procedures in the White House unit)? There are concerns with buying name brand drugs and other issues, but nowhere is there proof that this was a white house pill mill. Yw.


From the investigation, "the White House medical unit provided a wide range of health care and pharmaceutical services to ineligible White House staff in violation of Federal law"

But, hey. I know cults shut thir eyes to obvious truths. It's part of the gig.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==


I am not sure, but it is a legal drug. Was it used inappropriately?


Pill mills are legal until proven otherwise, amirite?


The fentanyl here wasn't even a pill. You do realize this list can include military medical treatment facilities and surgery happens there, right (as well as surgical procedures in the White House unit)? There are concerns with buying name brand drugs and other issues, but nowhere is there proof that this was a white house pill mill. Yw.
You're claiming they do surgery inside the White House?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/119336
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==


I am not sure, but it is a legal drug. Was it used inappropriately?


Pill mills are legal until proven otherwise, amirite?


The fentanyl here wasn't even a pill. You do realize this list can include military medical treatment facilities and surgery happens there, right (as well as surgical procedures in the White House unit)? There are concerns with buying name brand drugs and other issues, but nowhere is there proof that this was a white house pill mill. Yw.


From the investigation, "the White House medical unit provided a wide range of health care and pharmaceutical services to ineligible White House staff in violation of Federal law"

But, hey. I know cults shut thir eyes to obvious truths. It's part of the gig.


And that makes it a fentanyl dispensing pill mill? The main gist of the investigation is based on improper benefits as well as spending on name brand items instead of generic products. Thanks.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

oski003 said:

dajo9 said:

Who was using fentanyl at Traitor Trump's White House?

https://www.threads.net/@jrpinet/post/C2pJ9r2ugmy/?igshid=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==


I am not sure, but it is a legal drug. Was it used inappropriately?


Pill mills are legal until proven otherwise, amirite?


The fentanyl here wasn't even a pill. You do realize this list can include military medical treatment facilities and surgery happens there, right (as well as surgical procedures in the White House unit)? There are concerns with buying name brand drugs and other issues, but nowhere is there proof that this was a white house pill mill. Yw.
You're claiming they do surgery inside the White House?


The fentanyl anesthetic dispensed during the Obama and Trump administrations was likely for surgery. Thanks.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Today I'm rooting for Jared Goff and Taylor Swift. How about the rest of you?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Today I'm rooting for Jared Goff and Taylor Swift. How about the rest of you?


Goff, yes. I am unaware of Swift being in any sort of competition today.
First Page Last Page
Page 268 of 353
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.