bearister said:

---

I hope that you and SFCB have already read or will read, this book:


My son and his wife recently moved to the district that, I believe, Gary referred to in the book as "The Edge of America."

---

movielover said:

---

New molten salt nuclear power reactor to be tested.

https://www.thecooldown.com/green-business/us-nuclear-test-reactor-permit-salt/

---

82gradDLSdad said:

---

movielover said:

---

New molten salt nuclear power reactor to be tested.

https://www.thecooldown.com/green-business/us-nuclear-test-reactor-permit-salt/

---

What great news in these whacky, sad times.

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

I wonder why this mass killing has received no wall-to-wall coverage.

---

. . . it has, though?

---

Who are the mass shooters?

---

These came to mind. Along with the Sandy hook guy.

But Wikipedia says:


According to The New York Times, there is no common profile of people who carry out mass shootings in the United States, except that they are mostly men. By race, according to a study, the proportion of mass shooters in the United States who are white is about equal to the overall proportion of white people in the general population of the US.[50][51] According to the same study, Asians are overrepresented in mass shootings, having perpetrated 6.06% of attacks despite being 5.7% of the population.[52] The proportion of male mass shooters is considerably larger than the proportion of males in the general population.[51] According to the Associated Press, white men comprise nearly 50% of all mass shooters in the US.[53] According to the National Institute of Justice/The Violence project study, the demographics of shooters were 97.7% male, with an average age of 34.1 years, 52.3% white, 20.9% black, 8.1% Latino, 6.4% Asian, 4.2% middle eastern, and 1.8% native American.[30]

According to the Center for Inquiry, mass shootings of family members (the most common) are usually carried out by white, middle-aged males. Felony-related mass shootings (connected with a previous crime) tend to be committed by young Black or Hispanic males with extensive criminal records, typically against people of the same ethnic group. Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole.[54][55] Other than gender, the demographic profiles of public mass shooters are too varied to draw firm conclusions.[54] In its 2014 active shooter incidents review, the FBI found that the perpetrator was female in only 6 of the 160 incidents (4%) and that in only 2 incidents (1%) was there more than one perpetrator.[42] Analogously, in December 2013, the Journal of Forensic Sciences published a sociodemographic network characteristics and antecedent behaviors survey of 119 lone-actor terrorists in the United States and Europe that found that 96.6% were male.

---

I agree that white people are proportional to their population in premeditated mass shootings, like school shootings. Is that what happened here? This seems more like a gang shooting, which is predominantly done by minorities, despite being less of the population. We really don't know what race the shooters are because the media is being incredibly tight-lipped about it; far from simply naming names.

---

There is a widely viewed video of bystanders tackling one of the shooters. You can feed your obsession with race by going through that video frame by frame to determine his race. As for whether it was gang related, the news stories I saw described it as a personal dispute between a few people. That could be gang related or it could be a "you stole my girlfriend" or "you clowned me on Tik Tok" situation.

---

I don't have an obsession with race. I rarely post about it in a vacuum. 95% of the time it is in response to someone here asking for reparations, disparaging white people or Asians, or at least already in a racial discussion.

---

Hmmm.
Allow me to guess.
This otherwise "vacuum" you live in is a white bubble, right? Engaging in such discussions here on BI is getting out there and mixing with the crowd, right?

---

No, the vacuum would be me bringing up race without folks here already bringing up race. That should be clear for folks who objectively read my post. I live far from a white bubble. As I type this, the last 3 folks I just spoke to at my work were not white. I live in a big city and employ many workers, many of which are not white. My life is integrated with many races. I do not live in a gated community. I see folks of all races work hard and succeed or sometimes struggle. I also see folks of all races who don't have the drive to succeed, are incredibly immature, yet expect things to be given to them. I am on or at least near the front line.

---

Touche!
From one fund manager to one non-"white-bubble" worker, you win this point!
Good on you!


PS: although, maybe that "front line" bit gives you away. Is that what makes you, uh, shall we say, "race focused"?

---

Your interpretation of what I posted certainly reinforces that you are race focused.

Frontline workers:
Frontline workers are employees in an organization that provide some essential service to the general public. Not all essential workers are considered frontline workers.

The distinction is based on how much interaction they have with people, and whether they're customers or recipients of the service provided. For example, frontline workers have a higher rate of face-to-face interactions than essential workers, who aren't necessarily required to work in public-facing roles.

Some essential workers can work from home, while frontline workers usually have to report in-person to complete their job responsibilities. Both essential and frontline workers help society function and contribute to the economic growth of the communities in which they live and serve.

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

I wonder why this mass killing has received no wall-to-wall coverage.

---

. . . it has, though?

---

Who are the mass shooters?

---

These came to mind. Along with the Sandy hook guy.

But Wikipedia says:


According to The New York Times, there is no common profile of people who carry out mass shootings in the United States, except that they are mostly men. By race, according to a study, the proportion of mass shooters in the United States who are white is about equal to the overall proportion of white people in the general population of the US.[50][51] According to the same study, Asians are overrepresented in mass shootings, having perpetrated 6.06% of attacks despite being 5.7% of the population.[52] The proportion of male mass shooters is considerably larger than the proportion of males in the general population.[51] According to the Associated Press, white men comprise nearly 50% of all mass shooters in the US.[53] According to the National Institute of Justice/The Violence project study, the demographics of shooters were 97.7% male, with an average age of 34.1 years, 52.3% white, 20.9% black, 8.1% Latino, 6.4% Asian, 4.2% middle eastern, and 1.8% native American.[30]

According to the Center for Inquiry, mass shootings of family members (the most common) are usually carried out by white, middle-aged males. Felony-related mass shootings (connected with a previous crime) tend to be committed by young Black or Hispanic males with extensive criminal records, typically against people of the same ethnic group. Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole.[54][55] Other than gender, the demographic profiles of public mass shooters are too varied to draw firm conclusions.[54] In its 2014 active shooter incidents review, the FBI found that the perpetrator was female in only 6 of the 160 incidents (4%) and that in only 2 incidents (1%) was there more than one perpetrator.[42] Analogously, in December 2013, the Journal of Forensic Sciences published a sociodemographic network characteristics and antecedent behaviors survey of 119 lone-actor terrorists in the United States and Europe that found that 96.6% were male.

---

I agree that white people are proportional to their population in premeditated mass shootings, like school shootings. Is that what happened here? This seems more like a gang shooting, which is predominantly done by minorities, despite being less of the population. We really don't know what race the shooters are because the media is being incredibly tight-lipped about it; far from simply naming names.

---

There is a widely viewed video of bystanders tackling one of the shooters. You can feed your obsession with race by going through that video frame by frame to determine his race. As for whether it was gang related, the news stories I saw described it as a personal dispute between a few people. That could be gang related or it could be a "you stole my girlfriend" or "you clowned me on Tik Tok" situation.

---

I don't have an obsession with race. I rarely post about it in a vacuum. 95% of the time it is in response to someone here asking for reparations, disparaging white people or Asians, or at least already in a racial discussion.

---

Hmmm.
Allow me to guess.
This otherwise "vacuum" you live in is a white bubble, right? Engaging in such discussions here on BI is getting out there and mixing with the crowd, right?

---

No, the vacuum would be me bringing up race without folks here already bringing up race. That should be clear for folks who objectively read my post. I live far from a white bubble. As I type this, the last 3 folks I just spoke to at my work were not white. I live in a big city and employ many workers, many of which are not white. My life is integrated with many races. I do not live in a gated community. I see folks of all races work hard and succeed or sometimes struggle. I also see folks of all races who don't have the drive to succeed, are incredibly immature, yet expect things to be given to them. I am on or at least near the front line.

---

Touche!
From one fund manager to one non-"white-bubble" worker, you win this point!
Good on you!


PS: although, maybe that "front line" bit gives you away. Is that what makes you, uh, shall we say, "race focused"?

---

Your interpretation of what I posted certainly reinforces that you are race focused.

Frontline workers:
Frontline workers are employees in an organization that provide some essential service to the general public. Not all essential workers are considered frontline workers.

The distinction is based on how much interaction they have with people, and whether they're customers or recipients of the service provided. For example, frontline workers have a higher rate of face-to-face interactions than essential workers, who aren't necessarily required to work in public-facing roles.

Some essential workers can work from home, while frontline workers usually have to report in-person to complete their job responsibilities. Both essential and frontline workers help society function and contribute to the economic growth of the communities in which they live and serve.

---

Good morning,

I want to commend you for your decorum.
You have exhibited significant restraint in typing toxic barbs at your detractors.
I respect that.

Thank you for explaining that you mean "public facing" where you used "front line".

I hope you have a good day today.
See you in other threads shortly, I'm sure.

---

I used Frontline when I meant Frontline. It is common terminology, especially post covid. Look it up.

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

I wonder why this mass killing has received no wall-to-wall coverage.

---

. . . it has, though?

---

Who are the mass shooters?

---

These came to mind. Along with the Sandy hook guy.

But Wikipedia says:


According to The New York Times, there is no common profile of people who carry out mass shootings in the United States, except that they are mostly men. By race, according to a study, the proportion of mass shooters in the United States who are white is about equal to the overall proportion of white people in the general population of the US.[50][51] According to the same study, Asians are overrepresented in mass shootings, having perpetrated 6.06% of attacks despite being 5.7% of the population.[52] The proportion of male mass shooters is considerably larger than the proportion of males in the general population.[51] According to the Associated Press, white men comprise nearly 50% of all mass shooters in the US.[53] According to the National Institute of Justice/The Violence project study, the demographics of shooters were 97.7% male, with an average age of 34.1 years, 52.3% white, 20.9% black, 8.1% Latino, 6.4% Asian, 4.2% middle eastern, and 1.8% native American.[30]

According to the Center for Inquiry, mass shootings of family members (the most common) are usually carried out by white, middle-aged males. Felony-related mass shootings (connected with a previous crime) tend to be committed by young Black or Hispanic males with extensive criminal records, typically against people of the same ethnic group. Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole.[54][55] Other than gender, the demographic profiles of public mass shooters are too varied to draw firm conclusions.[54] In its 2014 active shooter incidents review, the FBI found that the perpetrator was female in only 6 of the 160 incidents (4%) and that in only 2 incidents (1%) was there more than one perpetrator.[42] Analogously, in December 2013, the Journal of Forensic Sciences published a sociodemographic network characteristics and antecedent behaviors survey of 119 lone-actor terrorists in the United States and Europe that found that 96.6% were male.

---

I agree that white people are proportional to their population in premeditated mass shootings, like school shootings. Is that what happened here? This seems more like a gang shooting, which is predominantly done by minorities, despite being less of the population. We really don't know what race the shooters are because the media is being incredibly tight-lipped about it; far from simply naming names.

---

There is a widely viewed video of bystanders tackling one of the shooters. You can feed your obsession with race by going through that video frame by frame to determine his race. As for whether it was gang related, the news stories I saw described it as a personal dispute between a few people. That could be gang related or it could be a "you stole my girlfriend" or "you clowned me on Tik Tok" situation.

---

I don't have an obsession with race. I rarely post about it in a vacuum. 95% of the time it is in response to someone here asking for reparations, disparaging white people or Asians, or at least already in a racial discussion.

---

Hmmm.
Allow me to guess.
This otherwise "vacuum" you live in is a white bubble, right? Engaging in such discussions here on BI is getting out there and mixing with the crowd, right?

---

No, the vacuum would be me bringing up race without folks here already bringing up race. That should be clear for folks who objectively read my post. I live far from a white bubble. As I type this, the last 3 folks I just spoke to at my work were not white. I live in a big city and employ many workers, many of which are not white. My life is integrated with many races. I do not live in a gated community. I see folks of all races work hard and succeed or sometimes struggle. I also see folks of all races who don't have the drive to succeed, are incredibly immature, yet expect things to be given to them. I am on or at least near the front line.

---

Touche!
From one fund manager to one non-"white-bubble" worker, you win this point!
Good on you!


PS: although, maybe that "front line" bit gives you away. Is that what makes you, uh, shall we say, "race focused"?

---

Your interpretation of what I posted certainly reinforces that you are race focused.

Frontline workers:
Frontline workers are employees in an organization that provide some essential service to the general public. Not all essential workers are considered frontline workers.

The distinction is based on how much interaction they have with people, and whether they're customers or recipients of the service provided. For example, frontline workers have a higher rate of face-to-face interactions than essential workers, who aren't necessarily required to work in public-facing roles.

Some essential workers can work from home, while frontline workers usually have to report in-person to complete their job responsibilities. Both essential and frontline workers help society function and contribute to the economic growth of the communities in which they live and serve.

---

Good morning,

I want to commend you for your decorum.
You have exhibited significant restraint in typing toxic barbs at your detractors.
I respect that.

Thank you for explaining that you mean "public facing" where you used "front line".

I hope you have a good day today.
See you in other threads shortly, I'm sure.

---

I used Frontline when I meant Frontline. It is common terminology, especially post covid. Look it up.

---

Frontline does a fine job of protecting my cats from fleas and ticks.

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

I wonder why this mass killing has received no wall-to-wall coverage.

---

. . . it has, though?

---

Who are the mass shooters?

---

These came to mind. Along with the Sandy hook guy.

But Wikipedia says:


According to The New York Times, there is no common profile of people who carry out mass shootings in the United States, except that they are mostly men. By race, according to a study, the proportion of mass shooters in the United States who are white is about equal to the overall proportion of white people in the general population of the US.[50][51] According to the same study, Asians are overrepresented in mass shootings, having perpetrated 6.06% of attacks despite being 5.7% of the population.[52] The proportion of male mass shooters is considerably larger than the proportion of males in the general population.[51] According to the Associated Press, white men comprise nearly 50% of all mass shooters in the US.[53] According to the National Institute of Justice/The Violence project study, the demographics of shooters were 97.7% male, with an average age of 34.1 years, 52.3% white, 20.9% black, 8.1% Latino, 6.4% Asian, 4.2% middle eastern, and 1.8% native American.[30]

According to the Center for Inquiry, mass shootings of family members (the most common) are usually carried out by white, middle-aged males. Felony-related mass shootings (connected with a previous crime) tend to be committed by young Black or Hispanic males with extensive criminal records, typically against people of the same ethnic group. Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole.[54][55] Other than gender, the demographic profiles of public mass shooters are too varied to draw firm conclusions.[54] In its 2014 active shooter incidents review, the FBI found that the perpetrator was female in only 6 of the 160 incidents (4%) and that in only 2 incidents (1%) was there more than one perpetrator.[42] Analogously, in December 2013, the Journal of Forensic Sciences published a sociodemographic network characteristics and antecedent behaviors survey of 119 lone-actor terrorists in the United States and Europe that found that 96.6% were male.

---

I agree that white people are proportional to their population in premeditated mass shootings, like school shootings. Is that what happened here? This seems more like a gang shooting, which is predominantly done by minorities, despite being less of the population. We really don't know what race the shooters are because the media is being incredibly tight-lipped about it; far from simply naming names.

---

There is a widely viewed video of bystanders tackling one of the shooters. You can feed your obsession with race by going through that video frame by frame to determine his race. As for whether it was gang related, the news stories I saw described it as a personal dispute between a few people. That could be gang related or it could be a "you stole my girlfriend" or "you clowned me on Tik Tok" situation.

---

I don't have an obsession with race. I rarely post about it in a vacuum. 95% of the time it is in response to someone here asking for reparations, disparaging white people or Asians, or at least already in a racial discussion.

---

Hmmm.
Allow me to guess.
This otherwise "vacuum" you live in is a white bubble, right? Engaging in such discussions here on BI is getting out there and mixing with the crowd, right?

---

No, the vacuum would be me bringing up race without folks here already bringing up race. That should be clear for folks who objectively read my post. I live far from a white bubble. As I type this, the last 3 folks I just spoke to at my work were not white. I live in a big city and employ many workers, many of which are not white. My life is integrated with many races. I do not live in a gated community. I see folks of all races work hard and succeed or sometimes struggle. I also see folks of all races who don't have the drive to succeed, are incredibly immature, yet expect things to be given to them. I am on or at least near the front line.

---

Touche!
From one fund manager to one non-"white-bubble" worker, you win this point!
Good on you!


PS: although, maybe that "front line" bit gives you away. Is that what makes you, uh, shall we say, "race focused"?

---

Your interpretation of what I posted certainly reinforces that you are race focused.

Frontline workers:
Frontline workers are employees in an organization that provide some essential service to the general public. Not all essential workers are considered frontline workers.

The distinction is based on how much interaction they have with people, and whether they're customers or recipients of the service provided. For example, frontline workers have a higher rate of face-to-face interactions than essential workers, who aren't necessarily required to work in public-facing roles.

Some essential workers can work from home, while frontline workers usually have to report in-person to complete their job responsibilities. Both essential and frontline workers help society function and contribute to the economic growth of the communities in which they live and serve.

---

Good morning,

I want to commend you for your decorum.
You have exhibited significant restraint in typing toxic barbs at your detractors.
I respect that.

Thank you for explaining that you mean "public facing" where you used "front line".

I hope you have a good day today.
See you in other threads shortly, I'm sure.

---

I used Frontline when I meant Frontline. It is common terminology, especially post covid. Look it up.

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

I wonder why this mass killing has received no wall-to-wall coverage.

---

. . . it has, though?

---

Who are the mass shooters?

---

These came to mind. Along with the Sandy hook guy.

But Wikipedia says:


According to The New York Times, there is no common profile of people who carry out mass shootings in the United States, except that they are mostly men. By race, according to a study, the proportion of mass shooters in the United States who are white is about equal to the overall proportion of white people in the general population of the US.[50][51] According to the same study, Asians are overrepresented in mass shootings, having perpetrated 6.06% of attacks despite being 5.7% of the population.[52] The proportion of male mass shooters is considerably larger than the proportion of males in the general population.[51] According to the Associated Press, white men comprise nearly 50% of all mass shooters in the US.[53] According to the National Institute of Justice/The Violence project study, the demographics of shooters were 97.7% male, with an average age of 34.1 years, 52.3% white, 20.9% black, 8.1% Latino, 6.4% Asian, 4.2% middle eastern, and 1.8% native American.[30]

According to the Center for Inquiry, mass shootings of family members (the most common) are usually carried out by white, middle-aged males. Felony-related mass shootings (connected with a previous crime) tend to be committed by young Black or Hispanic males with extensive criminal records, typically against people of the same ethnic group. Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole.[54][55] Other than gender, the demographic profiles of public mass shooters are too varied to draw firm conclusions.[54] In its 2014 active shooter incidents review, the FBI found that the perpetrator was female in only 6 of the 160 incidents (4%) and that in only 2 incidents (1%) was there more than one perpetrator.[42] Analogously, in December 2013, the Journal of Forensic Sciences published a sociodemographic network characteristics and antecedent behaviors survey of 119 lone-actor terrorists in the United States and Europe that found that 96.6% were male.

---

I agree that white people are proportional to their population in premeditated mass shootings, like school shootings. Is that what happened here? This seems more like a gang shooting, which is predominantly done by minorities, despite being less of the population. We really don't know what race the shooters are because the media is being incredibly tight-lipped about it; far from simply naming names.

---

There is a widely viewed video of bystanders tackling one of the shooters. You can feed your obsession with race by going through that video frame by frame to determine his race. As for whether it was gang related, the news stories I saw described it as a personal dispute between a few people. That could be gang related or it could be a "you stole my girlfriend" or "you clowned me on Tik Tok" situation.

---

I don't have an obsession with race. I rarely post about it in a vacuum. 95% of the time it is in response to someone here asking for reparations, disparaging white people or Asians, or at least already in a racial discussion.

---

Hmmm.
Allow me to guess.
This otherwise "vacuum" you live in is a white bubble, right? Engaging in such discussions here on BI is getting out there and mixing with the crowd, right?

---

No, the vacuum would be me bringing up race without folks here already bringing up race. That should be clear for folks who objectively read my post. I live far from a white bubble. As I type this, the last 3 folks I just spoke to at my work were not white. I live in a big city and employ many workers, many of which are not white. My life is integrated with many races. I do not live in a gated community. I see folks of all races work hard and succeed or sometimes struggle. I also see folks of all races who don't have the drive to succeed, are incredibly immature, yet expect things to be given to them. I am on or at least near the front line.

---

Touche!
From one fund manager to one non-"white-bubble" worker, you win this point!
Good on you!


PS: although, maybe that "front line" bit gives you away. Is that what makes you, uh, shall we say, "race focused"?

---

Your interpretation of what I posted certainly reinforces that you are race focused.

Frontline workers:
Frontline workers are employees in an organization that provide some essential service to the general public. Not all essential workers are considered frontline workers.

The distinction is based on how much interaction they have with people, and whether they're customers or recipients of the service provided. For example, frontline workers have a higher rate of face-to-face interactions than essential workers, who aren't necessarily required to work in public-facing roles.

Some essential workers can work from home, while frontline workers usually have to report in-person to complete their job responsibilities. Both essential and frontline workers help society function and contribute to the economic growth of the communities in which they live and serve.

---

Good morning,

I want to commend you for your decorum.
You have exhibited significant restraint in typing toxic barbs at your detractors.
I respect that.

Thank you for explaining that you mean "public facing" where you used "front line".

I hope you have a good day today.
See you in other threads shortly, I'm sure.

---

I used Frontline when I meant Frontline. It is common terminology, especially post covid. Look it up.

---

Frontline does a fine job of protecting my cats from fleas and ticks.

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

DiabloWags said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

I thought he worked at a car wash.
Or was that movielover?

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

I thought he worked at a car wash.
Or was that movielover?

---

Nope. You and Biden both have dementia, apparently.

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

Are you the fluffer at the porn shoot?

---

AunBear89 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

Are you the fluffer at the porn shoot?

---

I think that's your wife's job.

---

AunBear89 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

Are you the fluffer at the porn shoot?

---

I think that's your wife's job.

---

DiabloWags said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

Are you the fluffer at the porn shoot?

---

I think that's your wife's job.

---

Hahahahahahahaaaaaa!

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

Are you the fluffer at the porn shoot?

---

I think that's your wife's job.

---

Hahahahahahahaaaaaa!

---

I am impressed that you have finally mastered the keyboard correctly enough to only capitalize the first letter. Nice job, Ebenezer.

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

So, you are the cashier at the convenience store, and not a stock boy?

---

Are you the fluffer at the porn shoot?

---

I think that's your wife's job.

---

Hahahahahahahaaaaaa!

---

I am impressed that you have finally mastered the keyboard correctly enough to only capitalize the first letter. Nice job, Ebenezer.

---

Already 14 posts today and it's barely 9AM
You sound lonely.

No friends?

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

I wonder why this mass killing has received no wall-to-wall coverage.

---

. . . it has, though?

---

Who are the mass shooters?

---

These came to mind. Along with the Sandy hook guy.

But Wikipedia says:


According to The New York Times, there is no common profile of people who carry out mass shootings in the United States, except that they are mostly men. By race, according to a study, the proportion of mass shooters in the United States who are white is about equal to the overall proportion of white people in the general population of the US.[50][51] According to the same study, Asians are overrepresented in mass shootings, having perpetrated 6.06% of attacks despite being 5.7% of the population.[52] The proportion of male mass shooters is considerably larger than the proportion of males in the general population.[51] According to the Associated Press, white men comprise nearly 50% of all mass shooters in the US.[53] According to the National Institute of Justice/The Violence project study, the demographics of shooters were 97.7% male, with an average age of 34.1 years, 52.3% white, 20.9% black, 8.1% Latino, 6.4% Asian, 4.2% middle eastern, and 1.8% native American.[30]

According to the Center for Inquiry, mass shootings of family members (the most common) are usually carried out by white, middle-aged males. Felony-related mass shootings (connected with a previous crime) tend to be committed by young Black or Hispanic males with extensive criminal records, typically against people of the same ethnic group. Public mass shootings of persons unrelated to the shooter, and for a reason not connected with a previous crime (the rarest but most publicized) are committed by men whose racial distribution closely matches that of the nation as a whole.[54][55] Other than gender, the demographic profiles of public mass shooters are too varied to draw firm conclusions.[54] In its 2014 active shooter incidents review, the FBI found that the perpetrator was female in only 6 of the 160 incidents (4%) and that in only 2 incidents (1%) was there more than one perpetrator.[42] Analogously, in December 2013, the Journal of Forensic Sciences published a sociodemographic network characteristics and antecedent behaviors survey of 119 lone-actor terrorists in the United States and Europe that found that 96.6% were male.

---

I agree that white people are proportional to their population in premeditated mass shootings, like school shootings. Is that what happened here? This seems more like a gang shooting, which is predominantly done by minorities, despite being less of the population. We really don't know what race the shooters are because the media is being incredibly tight-lipped about it; far from simply naming names.

---

There is a widely viewed video of bystanders tackling one of the shooters. You can feed your obsession with race by going through that video frame by frame to determine his race. As for whether it was gang related, the news stories I saw described it as a personal dispute between a few people. That could be gang related or it could be a "you stole my girlfriend" or "you clowned me on Tik Tok" situation.

---

Would you look at that…

Smirnov was a Confidential Human Source for the FBI who was authorized to engage in illegal activity for “investigative purposes”.

Now they are throwing him under the bus to protect the “big guy”.

Quelle surprise! https://t.co/d0SkWgsXIC pic.twitter.com/pmZ4IPPJyZ

— Viva Frei (@thevivafrei) February 21, 2024