Breaking News

2,098,549 Views | 17391 Replies | Last: 10 min ago by cal83dls79
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:02p, 11/19/25
Source: The Berkeley Scanner UC Berkeley student, 19, dead after frat party drowning report https://share.google/buPnoyIUmIq7lHfPH
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 4:04p, 11/19/25
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:

It would make more sense to you if you were living in California and saw an ad nearly every TV break saying that Prop 50 is a temporary measure needed to counter Texas redistricting. Obama told me so!


Wrong again.



Hopefully, the above helps you understand things that you simply don't understand.


Sadly, your reading comprehension is just as bad as your hearing.
Obama never said that it was a temporary measure.

I caught you lying again.
Shocker.

Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 4:22p, 11/19/25
movielover said:
San Ramon High Schools are looking to copy Dublin High, and others, in adding "Equity Grading". A missed test equals a 50% score, homework isn't graded, tests can be taken multiple times, etc.

Reply Quote
4
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 4:45p, 11/19/25
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:

It would make more sense to you if you were living in California and saw an ad nearly every TV break saying that Prop 50 is a temporary measure needed to counter Texas redistricting. Obama told me so!


Wrong again.



Hopefully, the above helps you understand things that you simply don't understand.


Sadly, your reading comprehension is just as bad as your hearing.
Obama never said that it was a temporary measure.

I caught you lying again.
Shocker.



Sadly, your understanding of the bill is just as bad as your memory.
What does Obama mean when he says it preserves independent redistricting in the long term?

Please make an effort to connect the dots between the verbiage of the bill in the ballot, the CA Democrat website description of the bill, and Obama's message.

I caught you lying again.
Shocker. And Thanks again!
Reply Quote
4
LudwigsFountain
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 4:52p, 11/19/25
BearlySane88 said:


If you're not for this, you're a snake.

I'd settle for a prohibition against trading options, unless related to owned stock. It's one thing to buy a 1,000 shares of X, it's another to buy a 1,000 short dated-call options a few weeks before a major positive announcement. I take the latter as prima facie evidence of corruption.
Reply Quote
4
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 5:49p, 11/19/25
sycasey said:
dajo9 said:
Democrats lose so much because of all the Surrendur Democrats

It is not feasible to have California election law determined by Texas outcomes. If Texas changes something at the last minute then CA plans are invalidated? Be serious.

If Texas changed plans before CA voted then Team Newsom could have pulled Prop 50 (subject to those laws). Now CA has voted. Stand strong and stop being whimpering Surrendur Democrats.

Yeah, but it was sold to voters as a law with a trigger that would reverse if Texas reversed. If it turns out it's not that way then at least some subset of voters will feel misled. This kind of switcheroo loses trust.


I definitely agree with you here. It probably wouldn't matter locally as I don't see California turning red anytime soon but it could hurt Gavy if he actually runs for president
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bearister • 5:52p, 11/19/25
bearister said:
Source: The Berkeley Scanner UC Berkeley student, 19, dead after frat party drowning report https://share.google/buPnoyIUmIq7lHfPH


Very sad. I'm sure we all had our moments of over indulgence in college, assuming that was a factor in this.

Side note: why tf is your "safety" coordinator a 19 year old freshman (maybe sophomore)
Reply Quote
4
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 9:44p, 11/19/25
BearlySane88 said:
sycasey said:
dajo9 said:
Democrats lose so much because of all the Surrendur Democrats

It is not feasible to have California election law determined by Texas outcomes. If Texas changes something at the last minute then CA plans are invalidated? Be serious.

If Texas changed plans before CA voted then Team Newsom could have pulled Prop 50 (subject to those laws). Now CA has voted. Stand strong and stop being whimpering Surrendur Democrats.

Yeah, but it was sold to voters as a law with a trigger that would reverse if Texas reversed. If it turns out it's not that way then at least some subset of voters will feel misled. This kind of switcheroo loses trust.


I definitely agree with you here. It probably wouldn't matter locally as I don't see California turning red anytime soon but it could hurt Gavy if he actually runs for president

Could also matter on the margins, like the next time Democrats want support on a controversial measure the public will not give them the same percentages.

If the state Republican party could get their s*** together they could maybe take advantage of things like this, but that hasn't been the case for a long time.
Reply Quote
Big C
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 11:17p, 11/19/25
concordtom said:
Big C said:
tequila4kapp said:
movielover said:
San Ramon High Schools are looking to copy Dublin High, and others, in adding "Equity Grading". A missed test equals a 50% score, homework isn't graded, tests can be taken multiple times, etc.

I can't remember the details but there was news a little while back about some school district in CA adopting a grading scale where A's went all the way down to like 80%; F's started at like 50%. Cray cray.

I am a recently retired high school teacher and my kids are currently in 8th and 11th grade.

Grading by strict percentages (no matter what they are) can be problematic.

If one of your softball players is batting .450, that's probably good, right? Well, 45% is actually an "F" by many measures.

If an airline pilot lands his plane safely 95% of the time, he gets an "A", but I'm not going near his flight.

These are extreme examples to prove a point, but you get the idea. More to the point, I can make up a multiple choice test to get most any scores I want by manipulating the "distractors" (wrong answers).

Society wants percentage-based grading because it seems objective. It can be, in theory, but oftentimes it is not.



https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/81358/replies/2589206

In a post above I mentioned grade inflation.
I then mentioned the problem with pushing kids to perform.

Two different issues, but as a teacher and a parent I'd love to hear your thoughts on both.

Is grade inflation real? What percentage of kids get (got) A's in your classes, school? What should the (a) curve look like?

If one school were to implement a strict curve and others don't, that F's up the first school's kids college application competitiveness. So then it should be mandated statewide?

When I graduated HS, I understood that 3 kids had straight A's all 4 years. But now it may be as high as 10%, a teacher estimated to me. They award two valedictorians:

One by the AP adjusted GPA method, the other by the non-adjusted method so that kids who take welding or FFA can be honored - not just STEM kids. In either case, A+'s matter, A's won't cut it.
My second daughter had more A+'s than regular A's and was a runner up. Imagine that.


concordtom, maybe I will start a new thread on this or something. I like to reserve the Breaking News thread for stupid links to right wing propaganda breaking news.
Reply Quote
1
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:35a, 11/20/25
$105 per share

Reply Quote
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 6:57a, 11/20/25
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 6:59a, 11/20/25
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.


You own it at $150?
Still trying to break even?

lol

Reply Quote
1 edit
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 7:04a, 11/20/25
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.


You own it at $150?
Still trying to break even?

lol



No, I didn't buy it when you first recommended it.
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 7:16a, 11/20/25
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.


You own it at $150?
Still trying to break even?

lol



No, I didn't buy it when you first recommended it.


Cool story.
Do you ever stop lying?
Reply Quote
2
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 7:18a, 11/20/25
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.


You own it at $150?
Still trying to break even?

lol



No, I didn't buy it when you first recommended it.


Cool story.
Do you ever stop lying?


Do you ever get tired of lying?
lol
Reply Quote
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 7:34a, 11/20/25
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.


Yes, and my account is up now up over $8 million.
Thanks for "following" every post of mine.

How you doing buddy?



Reply Quote
1
1 edit
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 7:42a, 11/20/25
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.


Yes, and my account is up now up over $8 million.
Thanks for "following" every post of mine.

How you doing buddy?





I am doing fine. Thanks for asking.
Reply Quote
1
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 7:43a, 11/20/25
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.


Yes, and my account is up now up over $8 million.
Thanks for "following" every post of mine.

How you doing buddy?





I am doing fine. Thanks for asking.


That's great to hear.
Kind of weird that someone that was "following" me and everyone of my posts this last year only made $10.

I guess "stalking" doesn't pay.


Reply Quote
1
1 edit
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 9:00a
BearlySane88 said:


If you're not for this, you're a snake.


Passionate speech.
But there are a dozen staffers behind every one of him that hear about what he hears. Is his bill going to ban all of them from front running, too?

Congress has a thousand problems bigger than this.


He's grandstanding here, while feeding the beast elsewhere.




Tim Burchett has served in the U.S. House of Representatives since January3,2019.

CPAC gives Tim Burchett a 93% lifetime conservative rating.

According to a profile from "Republican Accountability," "voted against impeachment … and he objected to certifying the 2020 Electoral College vote."






Reply Quote
3 edits
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:07a
Nothing to see here.

S&P 140 points off the opening highs of the day as NVDA gives up its earnings rally and goes red.

Reply Quote
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 9:11a
S&P crashed 60% peak to trough (666).
Nasdaq dropped 80%, 5000 to 1000 March 2000

Are people able to fathom how it could go?
Reply Quote
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 9:15a
Big C said:


concordtom, maybe I will start a new thread on this or something. I like to reserve the Breaking News thread for stupid links to right wing propaganda breaking news.


Breaking News alert!
That was funny!
Reply Quote
1
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 9:16a
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
$105 per share



30% below $150.


Yes, and my account is up now up over $8 million.
Thanks for "following" every post of mine.

How you doing buddy?





I am doing fine. Thanks for asking.


That's great to hear.
Kind of weird that someone that was "following" me and everyone of my posts this last year only made $10.

I guess "stalking" doesn't pay.




Breaking News alert!
These two are still going at it.
Reply Quote
1
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:18a
Facebook: Bongino Inc:

" Yet ANOTHER Democrat arrested and EXPOSED

DOJ charges Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL) with stealing $5 million in FEMA funds, laundering the money, and using it to fund her 2021 Congressional campaign. She faces up to 53 years in prison."
Reply Quote
1
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 9:43a
concordtom said:
S&P crashed 60% peak to trough (666).
Nasdaq dropped 80%, 5000 to 1000 March 2000

Are people able to fathom how it could go?


That was before QE
Reply Quote
1
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 9:47a
dajo9 said:
concordtom said:
S&P crashed 60% peak to trough (666).
Nasdaq dropped 80%, 5000 to 1000 March 2000

Are people able to fathom how it could go?


That was before QE


Correct.
And to ignore this key concept would be terribly negligent.

Reply Quote
1 edit
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 9:51a
dajo9 said:
concordtom said:
S&P crashed 60% peak to trough (666).
Nasdaq dropped 80%, 5000 to 1000 March 2000

Are people able to fathom how it could go?


That was before QE


So you're nixing the 80% and going for 90?

September 3, 1929 DJIA reached 381.17 points.

July 8, 1932, at about 41.22 points.
That's a decline of nearly 89% from the 1929 peak.





What made the 20's roar?, asks the graphic.
Andrew Ross Sorkin talks about easy credit in his book 1929. Sound familiar?
Reply Quote
1 edit
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:51a
Reply Quote
2
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 9:56a
BearlySane88 said:



Ah ah ah!
Don't forget, your criteria is not accusations and circumstance.
You require a guilty verdict in a criminal court of law. 11 unanimous jurors.
Reply Quote
1
tequila4kapp
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 9:57a
See George Santos.
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 9:59a
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:



Ah ah ah!
Don't forget, your criteria is not accusations and circumstance.
You require a guilty verdict in a criminal court of law. 11 unanimous jurors.


No I don't…. I require proof. Keep trying though dearie

11 jurors?
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:03a
Only an 1100 point sell off.

Nothing to see here.

Anyone short?

Reply Quote
movielover
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:28a
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DRN3A-rjG19/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Reply Quote
1
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to movielover • 11:46a
Lots of good construction jobs…particularly given housing starts decline since '21
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
1 edit
First Page Refresh
Page 497 of 497 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.