DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Wednesday was indeed a great day for Diablo Wags.
Maybe I will make a donation to Cal NIL

---

---

---

---

---

smh said:

---

a true story, maybe you heard it already: desperate lady in urgent need goes to one doctor after another, and they all tell her to drop dead, until she does.
https://www.propublica.org/article/arkansas-abortion-ban-miscarriage-care


snip..

Quote:

---

On the morning of Sept. 16, 2024, Emily Waldorf's preschooler found her curled on the bathroom floor. Waldorf had felt a strange pressure during a shower, like a balloon bulging into her vagina, and was now bleeding. "I can be your pillow, mommy," her daughter said, nuzzling into her neck.

Waldorf was 17 weeks pregnant. She and her husband, Justin, dropped their daughter off at her grandparents' and rushed to Washington Regional Hospital in Fayetteville, Arkansas, where Waldorf worked as an acute care physical therapist.

In a dark room, a doctor pointed to an hourglass shape glowing on the ultrasound screen: There was her amniotic sac, funneling into her dilated cervix, and there was their tiny daughter's foot, dipping out.
"Your body is about to miscarry," the doctor said.

Three doctors gathered and told the couple that the longer Waldorf's cervix remained open and her uterus exposed to bacteria, the higher her risk of developing a life-threatening infection. The standard of care, they explained, would be to quickly empty her womb.

But they couldn't do that, one doctor said apologetically, sighing deeply.. .. ..

For 40 hours, Barnica waited in the hospital for the heartbeat to stop, with her cervix exposed to bacteria. She died three days after she delivered.

---

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

oski003 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

SBGold said:

---

Sweet results!

---

Thanks Cal brotha.
Wednesday was indeed a great day for Diablo Wags.
Maybe I will make a donation to Cal NIL.

GO BEARS!

---

Yes, Cal Athletics would appreciate that you follow through with your promise. You can make it to swim if you'd like, considering you are a big fan. Thank you in advance.

---

I will be more than happy to match any donation that you have made.
Just let me know.

I'm having another great day today.
Am truly blessed.

---

Nowhere in your lost wager did I have to match the $100,000 you pledged to donate. I admittedly do not make tens of thousands of dollars on a daily basis. Please do the right thing.

---

Had another GREAT DAY today.
Go Bears!

---

Congrats on making money. I am already well aware that you can afford to not welch on your bets.

---

Perhaps what you aren't already aware of is the fact that your repeated harassment of me in this forum over the last year has left a real bad taste in my mouth.

Because of you, I will not be donating to Cal NIL anytime soon. Your petulant and pedantic behavior is terribly abusive and hurts anyone's good faith effort to post here.

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Staying on TOPIC.

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Staying on TOPIC.

---

The idea that some high court needs to decide this by divining the transgender philosophy of 18 th century framers is- unintentionally- the funniest thing ever

---

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

tequila4kapp said:

---

Moderators have needed to take some 30 actions by 9am this morning - all thanks to the exact same group of people. This is beyond absurd. Enough is enough - people and threads will go away if it doesn't stop.

---

tequila4kapp said:

---

Moderators have needed to take some 30 actions by 9am this morning - all thanks to the exact same group of people. This is beyond absurd. Enough is enough - people and threads will go away if it doesn't stop.

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

tequila4kapp said:

---

Moderators have needed to take some 30 actions by 9am this morning - all thanks to the exact same group of people. This is beyond absurd. Enough is enough - people and threads will go away if it doesn't stop.

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

These justices think they are all 3 branches of government.

---

GrinandBearit said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

These justices think they are all 3 branches of government.

---

Sounds like Biden when he didn't like the Supreme Court's decision.

---

tequila4kapp said:

---

Moderators have needed to take some 30 actions by 9am this morning - all thanks to the exact same group of people. This is beyond absurd. Enough is enough - people and threads will go away if it doesn't stop.

---

GhostRideTheCart said:

---

tequila4kapp said:

---

Moderators have needed to take some 30 actions by 9am this morning - all thanks to the exact same group of people. This is beyond absurd. Enough is enough - people and threads will go away if it doesn't stop.

---

Please make the people responsible go away. I stay quiet in the online world but it's become really hard to read this board and it seems like the same people just keep getting to come back with no real consequences. Some of them the most active people on this board, and I won't name them, are the worst offenders. It's astonishing that some of you point fingers and proceed to do it also.

Go Bears!

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

So-called birth tourism estimates range from 20,000 to 100,000 per year?

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

So-called birth tourism estimates range from 20,000 to 100,000 per year?

---

dajo9 said:

---

NOBODY calls me a hall monitor and gets away with it

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

So-called birth tourism estimates range from 20,000 to 100,000 per year?

---

At 17, Amy Tippins was dying of liver failure. A transplant saved her life.

After the surgery, she noticed “some of my traits had changed.”

Amy suddenly found herself drawn to hands-on home projects she’d never cared about.

“What gives?” she thought. So she tracked down the… pic.twitter.com/TnYvs5EAVG

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 29, 2026

dajo9 said:

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

So-called birth tourism estimates range from 20,000 to 100,000 per year?

---

Then put in a constitutional amendment

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

So-called birth tourism estimates range from 20,000 to 100,000 per year?

---

Then put in a constitutional amendment

---

Same as we should do because "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?"

---

movielover said:

---

Interesting thesis about organ transplant consequences.

At 17, Amy Tippins was dying of liver failure. A transplant saved her life.

After the surgery, she noticed “some of my traits had changed.”

Amy suddenly found herself drawn to hands-on home projects she’d never cared about.

“What gives?” she thought. So she tracked down the… pic.twitter.com/TnYvs5EAVG

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) June 29, 2026

---

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

So-called birth tourism estimates range from 20,000 to 100,000 per year?

---

Then put in a constitutional amendment

---

Same as we should do because "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?"

---

"A well regulated militia".

Look the meaning of birthright citizenship has never changed since it entered the Constitution. You can't say the same about the 2nd amendment.

---

DiabloWags said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

So-called birth tourism estimates range from 20,000 to 100,000 per year?

---

Then put in a constitutional amendment

---

Same as we should do because "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?"

---

"A well regulated militia".

Look the meaning of birthright citizenship has never changed since it entered the Constitution. You can't say the same about the 2nd amendment.

---

Bingo.
The 2nd Amendment has been amended 17x since it came into existence in 1791.

---

DiabloWags said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

movielover said:

---

sycasey said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Shot:

The decision appears to be about 5-4 or 6-3, with Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.

Justices Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts joined the Court's three liberal justices to form the majority. https://t.co/3DwcCPv2wk

— VoteHub (@VoteHub) June 30, 2026

Chaser:

The dissent from Neil Gorsuch in the birthright citizenship case is actually very interesting. He basically says that he would deny birthright citizenship to children of temporary visitors but not to illegal immigrants who lived here permanently. So on the question of whether… pic.twitter.com/vXjvwyp8Dh

— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) June 30, 2026

Gorsuch is an interesting guy.

---

Yup.
Would have essentially been 7 - 2.

---

I've seem some folks saying that Thomas' dissent also seems open to logic along similar lines as Gorsuch, so who knows? Seems like there is more appetite for maybe removing birthright citizenship for tourists or whatnot but not actual illegal immigrants who live here permanently.

---

So-called birth tourism estimates range from 20,000 to 100,000 per year?

---

Then put in a constitutional amendment

---

Same as we should do because "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?"

---

"A well regulated militia".

Look the meaning of birthright citizenship has never changed since it entered the Constitution. You can't say the same about the 2nd amendment.

---

Bingo.
The 2nd Amendment has been amended 17x since it came into existence in 1791.

---