The legal community is a funny place. They think because they write the rules in a certain way that a payoff isn't a payoff.wifeisafurd said:Now Bearsiter you should know better. The Justices, unlike say the Clintons, can't accept payments for speeches. They can and do accept money for college teaching positions, and they can accept travel expenses. For example, 6 of the 9 Justices regularly participate in legal conferences in Europe in places like Florence or Costa Brava (I'm sure a lot of legal work gets done). They also can accept money for books they write, though historically the royalties are not material (the books are snoozes).bearister said:Anarchistbear said:
Kavanaugh is not qualified to be on the Court because he will champion those issues that will further advance and maintain state capitalist control over our lives. Of course the Democrats are not going to say this so we have this farce of a hearing.
There is only one thing that can stop Kavanaugh now and it is this woman. If she is credible he is likely pulled. Of course we may get someone equally worse but roll that dice. It was brave of her to come forward. She doesn't need more time or more investigation. It's a hearing . She only needs to be heard.
Kavanaugh can take Scalia's place as Clarence Thomas' travel buddy on the Koch Brothers' sponsored convention circuit where they talk for pay.
Click here to view the Supreme Court justices' complete disclosures.
Clarence Thomas activities:
A 4 day paid vacation for a speech in Palm Springs is a payoff, in the eyes of anybody except a lawyer, apparently.
Not to mention having a wife that works for right wing thinktanks recieving payment of $680k over 5 years. Then Clarence Thomas lied about it on his financial disclosures.
Corruption.
https://www.salon.com/2011/02/20/adler_supreme_court/
https://abovethelaw.com/2011/01/clarence-thomas-and-his-wifes-680000-of-unreported-income/
American Vermin