Who's paying for the damage caused by the riots and looting?

30,459 Views | 247 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by BearForce2
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


I'm sorry 93, but you are being inconsistent here and I ask you to consider your inconsistency. Just two days ago you told me I shouldn't waste energy on what the President of the United States says on this issue. Now you are "wasting time" on a tweet by a random guy on Twitter. I think this is actually an important discussion to have.

I'll start by saying the guy acted like an idiot.

But I think you should ask yourself why you think I shouldn't be upset over the President's comments but you should be upset over this guy's comments. I'll explain why i think it is the opposite.

The President has power to make policy. He represents America. He is the leader of his political group. Millions follow his lead. What he says has an impact.

Your guy is one voice in a crowd of 330 million. There are roughly 100 million Democrats and liberals out there. If 1 percent say something stupid, that is a million stupid comments that you can be outraged by. That others can spoon feed to their target audience to stoke anger. Both sides do it. I implore you to see reason in this because pointing outrage at one side or the other over comments by random people just leads to a never ending cycle of outrage. I can't even stop a few hundred people in this board from being idiots in whether to fire or support a coach. I certainly can't get 100 million people to speak in unison.

I think it is fair to criticize and get upset with a group for the words of their leaders. If Joe Biden did this, you'd have good reason to be angry. I think I have good reason to be angry at what my president says. Former Bleacherreport reporter? I don't see it.

You just can't tell me not to waste energy on the words of POTUS and then waste energy on this guy. And I don't think you are being hypocrite. But I do think you are letting your emotions get the better of you between Saturday and today

calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


I'm sorry 93, but you are being inconsistent here and I ask you to consider your inconsistency. Just two days ago you told me I shouldn't waste energy on what the President of the United States says on this issue. Now you are "wasting time" on a tweet by a random guy on Twitter. I think this is actually an important discussion to have.

I'll start by saying the guy acted like an idiot.

But I think you should ask yourself why you think I shouldn't be upset over the President's comments but you should be upset over this guy's comments. I'll explain why i think it is the opposite.

The President has power to make policy. He represents America. He is the leader of his political group. Millions follow his lead. What he says has an impact.

Your guy is one voice in a crowd of 330 million. There are roughly 100 million Democrats and liberals out there. If 1 percent say something stupid, that is a million stupid comments that you can be outraged by. That others can spoon feed to their target audience to stoke anger. Both sides do it. I implore you to see reason in this because pointing outrage at one side or the other over comments by random people just leads to a never ending cycle of outrage. I can't even stop a few hundred people in this board from being idiots in whether to fire or support a coach. I certainly can't get 100 million people to speak in unison.

I think it is fair to criticize and get upset with a group for the words of their leaders. If Joe Biden did this, you'd have good reason to be angry. I think I have good reason to be angry at what my president says. Former Bleacherreport reporter? I don't see it.

You just can't tell me not to waste energy on the words of POTUS and then waste energy on this guy. And I don't think you are being hypocrite. But I do think you are letting your emotions get the better of you between Saturday and today


Oak - I will explain why my current outrage is directed at the likes of Chris Palmer, going4roses, calpoly, and dajo.

I have never been unequivocal about Trump. Even before the 2016 election, I expressed my views that Hillary will make a much better president and was shocked that someone like Trump could win. This isn't a question of how I feel about Trump generally.

However, I can put aside my feelings for Trump and consider the riots that are burning our cities. Trump isn't justifying the rioters or confusing the black community with anarchists and Antifa. So, I am not interested in adding to my already immense disdain for him

No, in this situation, my disdain lies for people like Chris Palmer (who is not some random twitter but is a former NBA player and current ESPN reporter) who thinks it's all great that neighborhoods are burning down until it comes too close to his neighborhood. Then he calls them "animals". Or people like going4roses thinking justifying rioting by referring to slavery is valid.

So, in this instance, my outrage is for those who are too stupid to be unable to separate the black community's outrage against police brutality from criminals who just want to steal and burn. There is no justification for the destruction to local neighborhood. When someone say "I don't condone property damage" and then proceeds to explain and justify it, they are excusing it. And although I am fully aware we need to move on from this failure of an administration, it does disgust me that I have to stand with the likes of dajo and going4roses and Chris Palmer to do so.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

OaktownBear said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


I'm sorry 93, but you are being inconsistent here and I ask you to consider your inconsistency. Just two days ago you told me I shouldn't waste energy on what the President of the United States says on this issue. Now you are "wasting time" on a tweet by a random guy on Twitter. I think this is actually an important discussion to have.

I'll start by saying the guy acted like an idiot.

But I think you should ask yourself why you think I shouldn't be upset over the President's comments but you should be upset over this guy's comments. I'll explain why i think it is the opposite.

The President has power to make policy. He represents America. He is the leader of his political group. Millions follow his lead. What he says has an impact.

Your guy is one voice in a crowd of 330 million. There are roughly 100 million Democrats and liberals out there. If 1 percent say something stupid, that is a million stupid comments that you can be outraged by. That others can spoon feed to their target audience to stoke anger. Both sides do it. I implore you to see reason in this because pointing outrage at one side or the other over comments by random people just leads to a never ending cycle of outrage. I can't even stop a few hundred people in this board from being idiots in whether to fire or support a coach. I certainly can't get 100 million people to speak in unison.

I think it is fair to criticize and get upset with a group for the words of their leaders. If Joe Biden did this, you'd have good reason to be angry. I think I have good reason to be angry at what my president says. Former Bleacherreport reporter? I don't see it.

You just can't tell me not to waste energy on the words of POTUS and then waste energy on this guy. And I don't think you are being hypocrite. But I do think you are letting your emotions get the better of you between Saturday and today


And although I am fully aware we need to move on from this failure of an administration, it does disgust me that I have to stand with the likes of dajo and going4roses and Chris Palmer to do so.
You might not want to look under the rocks to see all the different kinds of people who you would have to stand with to vote for Trump. I don't think you would like what you find. If you need to feel good about who you vote with, it appears that you aren't going to like this election.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

calbear93 said:

OaktownBear said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


I'm sorry 93, but you are being inconsistent here and I ask you to consider your inconsistency. Just two days ago you told me I shouldn't waste energy on what the President of the United States says on this issue. Now you are "wasting time" on a tweet by a random guy on Twitter. I think this is actually an important discussion to have.

I'll start by saying the guy acted like an idiot.

But I think you should ask yourself why you think I shouldn't be upset over the President's comments but you should be upset over this guy's comments. I'll explain why i think it is the opposite.

The President has power to make policy. He represents America. He is the leader of his political group. Millions follow his lead. What he says has an impact.

Your guy is one voice in a crowd of 330 million. There are roughly 100 million Democrats and liberals out there. If 1 percent say something stupid, that is a million stupid comments that you can be outraged by. That others can spoon feed to their target audience to stoke anger. Both sides do it. I implore you to see reason in this because pointing outrage at one side or the other over comments by random people just leads to a never ending cycle of outrage. I can't even stop a few hundred people in this board from being idiots in whether to fire or support a coach. I certainly can't get 100 million people to speak in unison.

I think it is fair to criticize and get upset with a group for the words of their leaders. If Joe Biden did this, you'd have good reason to be angry. I think I have good reason to be angry at what my president says. Former Bleacherreport reporter? I don't see it.

You just can't tell me not to waste energy on the words of POTUS and then waste energy on this guy. And I don't think you are being hypocrite. But I do think you are letting your emotions get the better of you between Saturday and today


And although I am fully aware we need to move on from this failure of an administration, it does disgust me that I have to stand with the likes of dajo and going4roses and Chris Palmer to do so.
You might not want to look under the rocks to see all the different kinds of people who you would have to stand with to vote for Trump. I don't think you would like what you find. If you need to feel good about who you vote with, it appears that you aren't going to like this election.
No doubt. It is inconceivable that I would vote for Trump, but, even if were to vote for Trump, I wouldn't engage in "rah rah" with those type hiding under the rock. No, I am more along the lines of the founders of the Lincoln Project that my conservative views and respect for the rule of law demand we move on from Trump. Those were the same reason I voted for Hillary and have never been anything but disdainful toward Trump. Beyond that one commonality of wanting to move on from this disaster of an administration, I have nothing in common with those who think it is clever or intelligent to excuse rioters.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

Or people like going4roses thinking justifying rioting by referring to slavery is valid.
I'm trying to find the post where going4roses justified rioting. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, just that I seem to have missed it. Can you provide a link?
calpoly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


Is this idiot rando tweeting the reason for your reduced passion in removing Trump?

Folks like the wacky Professor always said anti-Trump conservatives would not be reliable allies in the fight to remove Trump. Maybe he was right about that.


Kind of like you advocating for higher taxes than whining about your higher taxes. I may disagree with true liberals like sycasey and oaktownbear, but I have no patience for fake ass liberals like you. I am not your ally, and you are not mine. There is nothing about you I respect. You and I may end up voting for the same candidate, but that is more about how crappy Trump is than an implication that you are any better.
I have no doubt that you will vote for tRump. You say he is an idiot and yet you bend over backwards to defend him. What does defending an idiot make you? An Idiot?


No, I think you are an idiot. Your feeble mind cannot comprehend that people like me can be at the same time against criminals destroying businesses in local neighborhoods and still be against Trump. In your weak mind, only fake socialist, anarchist typing from the comforts of their gated community can be against Trump.

Why don't you **** off and protect your Starbucks while promoting that other neighborhoods should burn down?

I have no doubt, if anyone from Antifa came within 20 miles of your neighborhood, you will be wearing a MAGA hat and mocking someone like me for being against Trump.
Oh my feelings are hurt. Snowflakes are so mean!
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


Is this idiot rando tweeting the reason for your reduced passion in removing Trump?

Folks like the wacky Professor always said anti-Trump conservatives would not be reliable allies in the fight to remove Trump. Maybe he was right about that.


Kind of like you advocating for higher taxes than whining about your higher taxes. I may disagree with true liberals like sycasey and oaktownbear, but I have no patience for fake ass liberals like you. I am not your ally, and you are not mine. There is nothing about you I respect. You and I may end up voting for the same candidate, but that is more about how crappy Trump is than an implication that you are any better.
I have no doubt that you will vote for tRump. You say he is an idiot and yet you bend over backwards to defend him. What does defending an idiot make you? An Idiot?


No, I think you are an idiot. Your feeble mind cannot comprehend that people like me can be at the same time against criminals destroying businesses in local neighborhoods and still be against Trump. In your weak mind, only fake socialist, anarchist typing from the comforts of their gated community can be against Trump.

Why don't you **** off and protect your Starbucks while promoting that other neighborhoods should burn down?

I have no doubt, if anyone from Antifa came within 20 miles of your neighborhood, you will be wearing a MAGA hat and mocking someone like me for being against Trump.
Oh my feelings are hurt. Snowflakes are so mean!
Wow, a true man of substance. And "snowflake" - wow that is mind blowing. I knew you were intelligent and genuine, but coming up with something so clever and original? I am nonplussed by the greatness. Dumb *****
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

calbear93 said:

Or people like going4roses thinking justifying rioting by referring to slavery is valid.
I'm trying to find the post where going4roses justified rioting. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, just that I seem to have missed it. Can you provide a link?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/95942/replies/1758583
calpoly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


Is this idiot rando tweeting the reason for your reduced passion in removing Trump?

Folks like the wacky Professor always said anti-Trump conservatives would not be reliable allies in the fight to remove Trump. Maybe he was right about that.


Kind of like you advocating for higher taxes than whining about your higher taxes. I may disagree with true liberals like sycasey and oaktownbear, but I have no patience for fake ass liberals like you. I am not your ally, and you are not mine. There is nothing about you I respect. You and I may end up voting for the same candidate, but that is more about how crappy Trump is than an implication that you are any better.
I have no doubt that you will vote for tRump. You say he is an idiot and yet you bend over backwards to defend him. What does defending an idiot make you? An Idiot?


No, I think you are an idiot. Your feeble mind cannot comprehend that people like me can be at the same time against criminals destroying businesses in local neighborhoods and still be against Trump. In your weak mind, only fake socialist, anarchist typing from the comforts of their gated community can be against Trump.

Why don't you **** off and protect your Starbucks while promoting that other neighborhoods should burn down?

I have no doubt, if anyone from Antifa came within 20 miles of your neighborhood, you will be wearing a MAGA hat and mocking someone like me for being against Trump.
Oh my feelings are hurt. Snowflakes are so mean!
Wow, a true man of substance. And "snowflake" - wow that is mind blowing. I knew you were intelligent and genuine, but coming up with something so clever and original? I am nonplussed by the greatness. Dumb *****
What an eloquent response!
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


Is this idiot rando tweeting the reason for your reduced passion in removing Trump?

Folks like the wacky Professor always said anti-Trump conservatives would not be reliable allies in the fight to remove Trump. Maybe he was right about that.


Kind of like you advocating for higher taxes than whining about your higher taxes. I may disagree with true liberals like sycasey and oaktownbear, but I have no patience for fake ass liberals like you. I am not your ally, and you are not mine. There is nothing about you I respect. You and I may end up voting for the same candidate, but that is more about how crappy Trump is than an implication that you are any better.
I have no doubt that you will vote for tRump. You say he is an idiot and yet you bend over backwards to defend him. What does defending an idiot make you? An Idiot?


No, I think you are an idiot. Your feeble mind cannot comprehend that people like me can be at the same time against criminals destroying businesses in local neighborhoods and still be against Trump. In your weak mind, only fake socialist, anarchist typing from the comforts of their gated community can be against Trump.

Why don't you **** off and protect your Starbucks while promoting that other neighborhoods should burn down?

I have no doubt, if anyone from Antifa came within 20 miles of your neighborhood, you will be wearing a MAGA hat and mocking someone like me for being against Trump.
Oh my feelings are hurt. Snowflakes are so mean!
Wow, a true man of substance. And "snowflake" - wow that is mind blowing. I knew you were intelligent and genuine, but coming up with something so clever and original? I am nonplussed by the greatness. Dumb *****
What an eloquent response!


Why would you expect a respectful response? **** person like you deserves a **** response. Stupid pissant thinking using "snowflake" is clever.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

sycasey said:

calbear93 said:

Or people like going4roses thinking justifying rioting by referring to slavery is valid.
I'm trying to find the post where going4roses justified rioting. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, just that I seem to have missed it. Can you provide a link?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/95942/replies/1758583
Fair enough. I don't agree with that sentiment.
LMK5
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

LMK5 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

LMK5 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

LMK5 said:

As our cities burn, while no doubt sipping one of his home-delivered mixed cocktails, let the record show that Unit2Sucks proclaimed: "and I have to say from what I've seen on TV the mask compliance was pretty good." Classic.
I would think you would appreciate a freedom delivered by a democrat mayor. That is the lens through which you evaluate everything, is it not?

Home delivery of cocktails is one of the few benefits of SIP, I mean other than preventing millions of deaths (according to Trump).

For what it's worth, I haven't had a drink. I spent the day at home with my young children, as I have every day for the last 12 weeks or so. I managed to survive yet another day without a haircut proving that what appears to be your biggest challenge is in fact surmountable, even if you not fell the need to weapon up and storm the capitol.


I'm going to double down on the mixed cocktail theory because you have spelling errors in your post, a rarity.

After the Covid responses and now the riots, if one cannot detect the vast difference in effectiveness between Democrat and Republican leadership then the only prescription left is a lobotomy. They were considered sound science for many years BTW.
I know you are desperate for a haircut but there are safer ways to get one without resorting to a lobotomy.

By the way, my typos typically result from my iPad which has some malevolent autocorrect behavior.
I'm triple-downing on the cocktail theory. You know I got a haircut in Arizona last week as you've been pointing out in your posts. California has since followed Arizona's lead as there were no reported mass deaths at metro Phoenix Supercuts stores. Once again, Gavin is going with the science and data LOL.
Too soon to tell. Arizona's case counts are on the rise and hit a new high on Friday. If the heat prevents COVID spread, Arizona should be the front lines.



And in case you think the increased case count is just from increased testing:


As predicted. But the main thing is to soldier on as they have done and as we must. Their universities will open in the fall and they will give the California politicians the confidence and the CYA to follow in their footsteps. We may even play some CFB because ASU and UofA jump in the pool first.
The truth lies somewhere between CNN and Fox.
calpoly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


Is this idiot rando tweeting the reason for your reduced passion in removing Trump?

Folks like the wacky Professor always said anti-Trump conservatives would not be reliable allies in the fight to remove Trump. Maybe he was right about that.


Kind of like you advocating for higher taxes than whining about your higher taxes. I may disagree with true liberals like sycasey and oaktownbear, but I have no patience for fake ass liberals like you. I am not your ally, and you are not mine. There is nothing about you I respect. You and I may end up voting for the same candidate, but that is more about how crappy Trump is than an implication that you are any better.
I have no doubt that you will vote for tRump. You say he is an idiot and yet you bend over backwards to defend him. What does defending an idiot make you? An Idiot?


No, I think you are an idiot. Your feeble mind cannot comprehend that people like me can be at the same time against criminals destroying businesses in local neighborhoods and still be against Trump. In your weak mind, only fake socialist, anarchist typing from the comforts of their gated community can be against Trump.

Why don't you **** off and protect your Starbucks while promoting that other neighborhoods should burn down?

I have no doubt, if anyone from Antifa came within 20 miles of your neighborhood, you will be wearing a MAGA hat and mocking someone like me for being against Trump.
Oh my feelings are hurt. Snowflakes are so mean!
Wow, a true man of substance. And "snowflake" - wow that is mind blowing. I knew you were intelligent and genuine, but coming up with something so clever and original? I am nonplussed by the greatness. Dumb *****
What an eloquent response!


Why would you expect a respectful response? **** person like you deserves a **** response. Stupid pissant thinking using "snowflake" is clever.
I see. We are expected to respect your views but when they are questioned by act like a jerk that you are.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

calpoly said:

calbear93 said:

dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


Is this idiot rando tweeting the reason for your reduced passion in removing Trump?

Folks like the wacky Professor always said anti-Trump conservatives would not be reliable allies in the fight to remove Trump. Maybe he was right about that.


Kind of like you advocating for higher taxes than whining about your higher taxes. I may disagree with true liberals like sycasey and oaktownbear, but I have no patience for fake ass liberals like you. I am not your ally, and you are not mine. There is nothing about you I respect. You and I may end up voting for the same candidate, but that is more about how crappy Trump is than an implication that you are any better.
I have no doubt that you will vote for tRump. You say he is an idiot and yet you bend over backwards to defend him. What does defending an idiot make you? An Idiot?


No, I think you are an idiot. Your feeble mind cannot comprehend that people like me can be at the same time against criminals destroying businesses in local neighborhoods and still be against Trump. In your weak mind, only fake socialist, anarchist typing from the comforts of their gated community can be against Trump.

Why don't you **** off and protect your Starbucks while promoting that other neighborhoods should burn down?

I have no doubt, if anyone from Antifa came within 20 miles of your neighborhood, you will be wearing a MAGA hat and mocking someone like me for being against Trump.
Oh my feelings are hurt. Snowflakes are so mean!
Wow, a true man of substance. And "snowflake" - wow that is mind blowing. I knew you were intelligent and genuine, but coming up with something so clever and original? I am nonplussed by the greatness. Dumb *****
What an eloquent response!


Why would you expect a respectful response? **** person like you deserves a **** response. Stupid pissant thinking using "snowflake" is clever.
I see. We are expected to respect your views but when they are questioned by act like a jerk that you are.
Did you really get the sense that I want or care about your respect? Did my insults somehow intimate that I want to have a substantive discussion with someone like you who thinks "snowflake" is a clever retort? Well, let me clarify it for you. I don't care about your views or what you think about my views. I am not trying to reach understanding with you. Others who are willing to discuss logically and also give on certain points are worth corresponding with and possibly learning from. You and dajo, not so much. So, the most I can expect from you are knee jerk terms like snowflake and emotional and the most you are going to get from me are insults.
sp4149
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:



A cop who actually belongs to a community!
Sheriffs are politicians (aka elected)
Police aren't elected and frequently ignore the sheriff.
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:





No, I think you are an idiot. Your feeble mind cannot comprehend that people like me can be at the same time against criminals destroying businesses in local neighborhoods and still be against Trump. In your weak mind, only fake socialist, anarchist typing from the comforts of their gated community can be against Trump.

Why don't you **** off and protect your Starbucks while promoting that other neighborhoods should burn down?

I have no doubt, if anyone from Antifa came within 20 miles of your neighborhood, you will be wearing a MAGA hat and mocking someone like me for being against Trump.
But but but calpoly is a PROFESSOR. They are temperate people who don't have agendas.
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

calbear93 said:

sycasey said:

calbear93 said:

Or people like going4roses thinking justifying rioting by referring to slavery is valid.
I'm trying to find the post where going4roses justified rioting. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, just that I seem to have missed it. Can you provide a link?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/95942/replies/1758583
Fair enough. I don't agree with that sentiment.
You disagree with it so much you've spent all your energy on racism and LE brutality. Feigning agreement with the most basic moral questions like "is it wrong to loot and destroy cities?" to avoid ridicule and convey balance to the audience only to spend all your time empathizing with and apologizing for it, and misdirecting towards LE is gaslighting. I SEE YOU. You are completely full of donkey sh*t.
sp4149
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This all started over a liquor store employee calling the police over a 'counterfeit $20'.
The police responded pulled Floyd out of his vehicle, the rest seems well documented.

Now a week later I have a few questions about what started this crisis.
Is the counterfeit $20 bill with Floyd's prints on it safely in evidence?
Was the liquor store torched?
Is the clerk who called the police in protective custody?

I can see that if the Answer to #1 is 'NO'
Then the liquor store has some explaining to do, and that may be reflected in the answers to # 2 & 3.

If the answer to #1 is 'Yes' then the blame for what has transpired shifts outside the liquor store.

If the counterfeit bill does not exist then the liquor seems to have initiated the chain of events and may have criminal liability.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

OaktownBear said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


I'm sorry 93, but you are being inconsistent here and I ask you to consider your inconsistency. Just two days ago you told me I shouldn't waste energy on what the President of the United States says on this issue. Now you are "wasting time" on a tweet by a random guy on Twitter. I think this is actually an important discussion to have.

I'll start by saying the guy acted like an idiot.

But I think you should ask yourself why you think I shouldn't be upset over the President's comments but you should be upset over this guy's comments. I'll explain why i think it is the opposite.

The President has power to make policy. He represents America. He is the leader of his political group. Millions follow his lead. What he says has an impact.

Your guy is one voice in a crowd of 330 million. There are roughly 100 million Democrats and liberals out there. If 1 percent say something stupid, that is a million stupid comments that you can be outraged by. That others can spoon feed to their target audience to stoke anger. Both sides do it. I implore you to see reason in this because pointing outrage at one side or the other over comments by random people just leads to a never ending cycle of outrage. I can't even stop a few hundred people in this board from being idiots in whether to fire or support a coach. I certainly can't get 100 million people to speak in unison.

I think it is fair to criticize and get upset with a group for the words of their leaders. If Joe Biden did this, you'd have good reason to be angry. I think I have good reason to be angry at what my president says. Former Bleacherreport reporter? I don't see it.

You just can't tell me not to waste energy on the words of POTUS and then waste energy on this guy. And I don't think you are being hypocrite. But I do think you are letting your emotions get the better of you between Saturday and today


Oak - I will explain why my current outrage is directed at the likes of Chris Palmer, going4roses, calpoly, and dajo.

I have never been unequivocal about Trump. Even before the 2016 election, I expressed my views that Hillary will make a much better president and was shocked that someone like Trump could win. This isn't a question of how I feel about Trump generally.

However, I can put aside my feelings for Trump and consider the riots that are burning our cities. Trump isn't justifying the rioters or confusing the black community with anarchists and Antifa. So, I am not interested in adding to my already immense disdain for him

No, in this situation, my disdain lies for people like Chris Palmer (who is not some random twitter but is a former NBA player and current ESPN reporter) who thinks it's all great that neighborhoods are burning down until it comes too close to his neighborhood. Then he calls them "animals". Or people like going4roses thinking justifying rioting by referring to slavery is valid.

So, in this instance, my outrage is for those who are too stupid to be unable to separate the black community's outrage against police brutality from criminals who just want to steal and burn. There is no justification for the destruction to local neighborhood. When someone say "I don't condone property damage" and then proceeds to explain and justify it, they are excusing it. And although I am fully aware we need to move on from this failure of an administration, it does disgust me that I have to stand with the likes of dajo and going4roses and Chris Palmer to do so.


Outrage? Outrage? Outrage?
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

wifeisafurd said:

calbear93 said:

dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

dajo9 said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


Is this idiot rando tweeting the reason for your reduced passion in removing Trump?

Folks like the wacky Professor always said anti-Trump conservatives would not be reliable allies in the fight to remove Trump. Maybe he was right about that.


Kind of like you advocating for higher taxes than whining about your higher taxes. I may disagree with true liberals like sycasey and oaktownbear, but I have no patience for fake ass liberals like you. I am not your ally, and you are not mine. There is nothing about you I respect. You and I may end up voting for the same candidate, but that is more about how crappy Trump is than an implication that you are any better.


Listen Angry93 - I support higher taxes on myself to fund progressive goals that help people. But for a more equitable society we need to tax capital more heavily, which would also raise taxes on me.

I also support the SALT tax deduction for reasons i have covered but you refuse to hear and just want to insult me instead and move forward with strawmen.

But to the point, you made a claim about progressives defending rioting and looting. I'm asking for you to provide names to your claim.


Sure, fake ass liberal. We would all be more for taxes if it was used effectively in the manner we wanted. So it's not about income inequality but making sure you have an excuse for not acting the way you say you believe. You want your money to be spent for your causes, and don't want to pay otherwise? Make a ****ing donation, but, of course, you think that does nothing. I guess we are all liberal as long the government just taxes the other guys. We will say we are for more taxes as long as we actually don't have to pay. Look how liberal I am! I am a Pelosi type of liberal! Unlike you, I have never complained about me having to pay taxes at any historical rate or thought it was a good idea to reduce personal income tax. I just have no patience for people like you who are for paying taxes as long as it's the other guys paying.

I would be more than happy to have a substantive discussion with people I suspect actually believe what they say they believe. As I stated, I have no respect for fakes like you, and my response to you will reflect the lack of respect I have for you.
Love it. Liberals talking about who really wants to raise taxes as the tax base in Los Angeles collapses from COVID, looting and destruction.
Your comprehension of context is breathtakingly bad.
Oh pardon me, the irony that you and others having a pissing contest about who is the truest liberal baed on raising taxes on a thread dealing with how to pay for the costs of riots while the tax base is being hammered seems to be beyond YOUR comprehension.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
**** a political party !!!

You are either for Right or Wrong.

Neither party represents unity/equality/fairness/respect for ALL People.
Both parties are jokes playing games on the have nots (mentally and economically) directed by those of wealth and means aka political power(capital)
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

OaktownBear said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


I'm sorry 93, but you are being inconsistent here and I ask you to consider your inconsistency. Just two days ago you told me I shouldn't waste energy on what the President of the United States says on this issue. Now you are "wasting time" on a tweet by a random guy on Twitter. I think this is actually an important discussion to have.

I'll start by saying the guy acted like an idiot.

But I think you should ask yourself why you think I shouldn't be upset over the President's comments but you should be upset over this guy's comments. I'll explain why i think it is the opposite.

The President has power to make policy. He represents America. He is the leader of his political group. Millions follow his lead. What he says has an impact.

Your guy is one voice in a crowd of 330 million. There are roughly 100 million Democrats and liberals out there. If 1 percent say something stupid, that is a million stupid comments that you can be outraged by. That others can spoon feed to their target audience to stoke anger. Both sides do it. I implore you to see reason in this because pointing outrage at one side or the other over comments by random people just leads to a never ending cycle of outrage. I can't even stop a few hundred people in this board from being idiots in whether to fire or support a coach. I certainly can't get 100 million people to speak in unison.

I think it is fair to criticize and get upset with a group for the words of their leaders. If Joe Biden did this, you'd have good reason to be angry. I think I have good reason to be angry at what my president says. Former Bleacherreport reporter? I don't see it.

You just can't tell me not to waste energy on the words of POTUS and then waste energy on this guy. And I don't think you are being hypocrite. But I do think you are letting your emotions get the better of you between Saturday and today


Oak - I will explain why my current outrage is directed at the likes of Chris Palmer, going4roses, calpoly, and dajo.

I have never been unequivocal about Trump. Even before the 2016 election, I expressed my views that Hillary will make a much better president and was shocked that someone like Trump could win. This isn't a question of how I feel about Trump generally.

However, I can put aside my feelings for Trump and consider the riots that are burning our cities. Trump isn't justifying the rioters or confusing the black community with anarchists and Antifa. So, I am not interested in adding to my already immense disdain for him

No, in this situation, my disdain lies for people like Chris Palmer (who is not some random twitter but is a former NBA player and current ESPN reporter) who thinks it's all great that neighborhoods are burning down until it comes too close to his neighborhood. Then he calls them "animals". Or people like going4roses thinking justifying rioting by referring to slavery is valid.

So, in this instance, my outrage is for those who are too stupid to be unable to separate the black community's outrage against police brutality from criminals who just want to steal and burn. There is no justification for the destruction to local neighborhood. When someone say "I don't condone property damage" and then proceeds to explain and justify it, they are excusing it. And although I am fully aware we need to move on from this failure of an administration, it does disgust me that I have to stand with the likes of dajo and going4roses and Chris Palmer to do so.
93 I hope you will understand that my words in this post are not meant to vilify you or point fingers at you, so if I get sloppy with my language and it seems that way, understand I do not mean it that way. These are very difficult and very emotional issues.

Let me clear less important issues first. Democrats have Farrakhan. Republicans have David Duke. It is a two party system. There are repugnant people who support each side for strategic purposes because their view can't win a majority. Neither of us stands with these people. I think your real frustration is you have become a man without a party because your party, hopefully temporarily, but I fear not, has abandoned you. You are essentially forced to side with those who have been political adversaries all your life. I welcome anyone of good conscience to my "side", not because I need your vote let's face it, Trump isn't winning California. Honestly, I hope you can return to the Republican Party soon and bring decency that in my opinion is lacking right now.

I think you need more empathy for opposing views on this one. I think you normally have that empathy and I think emotion has got the better of you on this one.

I get that you are done talking about Trump. But more than that you told me I shouldn't. I drastically disagree with that. I'm sorry, but Chris Palmer is a nobody and has no impact on anybody. I don't care if he played in the NBA or is a sports reporter. As I said, he is an idiot. The President, no matter how much you may be done with him is our leader. What he says is relevant. You said you agreed with almost everything I said about his statements but I shouldn't waste my energy on them. This is where I think you need to try for more empathy.

I am not the right person to be writing this. I'm not Black and I can't begin to understand being Black in America from an emotional perspective. But I can try from an intellectual perspective and I feel I owe that much with the privilege I have enjoyed. So I'm going to do my best to paint the picture that I paint in my head to give myself SOME understanding.

So I'm going to start at 2016 and try and put myself in the shoes of a Black person. Let's fast forward through slavery, KKK, lynchings, segregation, poverty, all of that. We are in 2016. We are coming to the end of the term of the first Black president. And a candidate rises up who is a total buffoon (in my view). His political claim to fame is spending years deriding the first Black president and doing what no one has done to any other president challenged his legitimacy as an American citizen against all evidence. In my mind, that is what he is known for being a racist asshat to the first Black president. Then he goes to town staking out the racist low ground. In my view, he is making people like me the enemy as a foil to play off of. Many of his followers love it and they love the freedom to in their words not be PC, but in my words revel in racism. And this guy wins. And he has the staunch support of about 40% of the people and a majority of the White people. They either like what he is saying about me or they don't give a damn that he is saying it. That is what my country is telling me.

In the meantime, in an issue that has been in the news for a number of years already, Blacks are too often being abused and killed by police. And the perpetrators are rarely charged, always undercharged, and almost never convicted. And their acts are supported and/or excused by a large percentage of the people. The President, with all the support of his 40%, not only doesn't do anything to help right this injustice. He uses it by pointing at a football player who protests the injustice and goes to war with those who protest the injustice, egging on his 40% all the way.

And in the following years more people are profiled, more people are abused, more people die. We talk and protest and nothing is changing. And then we have a video of a cop kneeling on the neck of a handcuffed Black man for 9 minutes until he dies. Unequivocal horror. No reasonable person could think otherwise. And I get a weak ass statement from the president with no statement that he is going to do anything about it, but a day later he reaches back to the sixties to quote an anti-civil rights leader who ordered law enforcement to shoot Black protesters. That is what I get. And 43% of America think he's doing a good job. So I ask you. Do you really think that person should not waste their energy on what the president says. Do you really think there is more justification for you to be outraged by Chris Palmer?

93, I know you are horrified by what happened to Floyd. I know you do not like Trump. I know you can be outraged by both and be outraged by Chris Palmer and by looters. As can I. Here is the rub. This country needs good men like you to be MORE outraged by what happened to Floyd than by Chris Palmer. It needs to be more than intellectual. It needs to be visceral and emotional. You have been calm and logical in your condemnation of the cops who killed Floyd. You have been emotional and outraged by the protests and by people like Palmer. That needs to flip. We need to be moved viscerally by the former. Enough to make our leaders change. Not just bring charges against one guy. Change things so it doesn't happen again.

As for going4roses. He and I have had our differences, mostly on the sports side. On this issue I think we have had fruitful conversations. I think I am on the same side of the spectrum as he is, but I often disagree with the extent to which he goes and I think some of the instances he posts may be questionable. But I value his contribution because I think people like me need to see it. I think we need to see the frustration. I think we need to see how people like him view the world. I think he has bias, (as we all do) but I think that bias is hard earned. I can't say that I wouldn't be there with him if I had his experience. And I've always been able to get to a reasonable point with him, which I appreciate especially given we have had history going after each other pretty hard on Sonny Dykes. I'll say this, based on the conversations I've had, if I were a cop on trial for shooting a Black suspect, I'd be fine with him on my jury. Push comes to shove he is fair. And from the beginning, I cannot bring myself to condemn him for any of the stances he has taken. I haven't walked in his shoes. I have never had to come close to my breaking point. On occasion my wife and/or my daughters experience discrimination that is nothing close to what a Black person has to face and it outrages me. If that were every day. If that were more severe. I don't know when I'd break.

going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Respect head nod
BearForce2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Police: Rioters Set Fire to Home with Child Inside, Then Block Firefighters in Richmond, VA

https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2020/06/01/police-rioters-set-fire-home-child-inside-block-firefighters/
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://twitter.com/BOUNCE_COMIC/status/1267535269357588480/photo/1
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


I'm sorry 93, but you are being inconsistent here and I ask you to consider your inconsistency. Just two days ago you told me I shouldn't waste energy on what the President of the United States says on this issue. Now you are "wasting time" on a tweet by a random guy on Twitter. I think this is actually an important discussion to have.

I'll start by saying the guy acted like an idiot.

But I think you should ask yourself why you think I shouldn't be upset over the President's comments but you should be upset over this guy's comments. I'll explain why i think it is the opposite.

The President has power to make policy. He represents America. He is the leader of his political group. Millions follow his lead. What he says has an impact.

Your guy is one voice in a crowd of 330 million. There are roughly 100 million Democrats and liberals out there. If 1 percent say something stupid, that is a million stupid comments that you can be outraged by. That others can spoon feed to their target audience to stoke anger. Both sides do it. I implore you to see reason in this because pointing outrage at one side or the other over comments by random people just leads to a never ending cycle of outrage. I can't even stop a few hundred people in this board from being idiots in whether to fire or support a coach. I certainly can't get 100 million people to speak in unison.

I think it is fair to criticize and get upset with a group for the words of their leaders. If Joe Biden did this, you'd have good reason to be angry. I think I have good reason to be angry at what my president says. Former Bleacherreport reporter? I don't see it.

You just can't tell me not to waste energy on the words of POTUS and then waste energy on this guy. And I don't think you are being hypocrite. But I do think you are letting your emotions get the better of you between Saturday and today


Ha, Oaktownbear piggybacking off my work again. Angry93 has lost passion for beating Trump because of a couple of nobodies and going4roses (and me - always me).
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
F$ckin A! Hostage negotiator.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

**** a political party !!!

You are either for Right or Wrong.

Neither party represents unity/equality/fairness/respect for ALL People.
Both parties are jokes playing games on the have nots (mentally and economically) directed by those of wealth and means aka political power(capital)


calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

calbear93 said:

OaktownBear said:

calbear93 said:

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nba/news/espn-nba-reporter-tweets-george-floyd-protests/1eefhr1gpdx791oxlllizoun9i


I'm sorry 93, but you are being inconsistent here and I ask you to consider your inconsistency. Just two days ago you told me I shouldn't waste energy on what the President of the United States says on this issue. Now you are "wasting time" on a tweet by a random guy on Twitter. I think this is actually an important discussion to have.

I'll start by saying the guy acted like an idiot.

But I think you should ask yourself why you think I shouldn't be upset over the President's comments but you should be upset over this guy's comments. I'll explain why i think it is the opposite.

The President has power to make policy. He represents America. He is the leader of his political group. Millions follow his lead. What he says has an impact.

Your guy is one voice in a crowd of 330 million. There are roughly 100 million Democrats and liberals out there. If 1 percent say something stupid, that is a million stupid comments that you can be outraged by. That others can spoon feed to their target audience to stoke anger. Both sides do it. I implore you to see reason in this because pointing outrage at one side or the other over comments by random people just leads to a never ending cycle of outrage. I can't even stop a few hundred people in this board from being idiots in whether to fire or support a coach. I certainly can't get 100 million people to speak in unison.

I think it is fair to criticize and get upset with a group for the words of their leaders. If Joe Biden did this, you'd have good reason to be angry. I think I have good reason to be angry at what my president says. Former Bleacherreport reporter? I don't see it.

You just can't tell me not to waste energy on the words of POTUS and then waste energy on this guy. And I don't think you are being hypocrite. But I do think you are letting your emotions get the better of you between Saturday and today


Oak - I will explain why my current outrage is directed at the likes of Chris Palmer, going4roses, calpoly, and dajo.

I have never been unequivocal about Trump. Even before the 2016 election, I expressed my views that Hillary will make a much better president and was shocked that someone like Trump could win. This isn't a question of how I feel about Trump generally.

However, I can put aside my feelings for Trump and consider the riots that are burning our cities. Trump isn't justifying the rioters or confusing the black community with anarchists and Antifa. So, I am not interested in adding to my already immense disdain for him

No, in this situation, my disdain lies for people like Chris Palmer (who is not some random twitter but is a former NBA player and current ESPN reporter) who thinks it's all great that neighborhoods are burning down until it comes too close to his neighborhood. Then he calls them "animals". Or people like going4roses thinking justifying rioting by referring to slavery is valid.

So, in this instance, my outrage is for those who are too stupid to be unable to separate the black community's outrage against police brutality from criminals who just want to steal and burn. There is no justification for the destruction to local neighborhood. When someone say "I don't condone property damage" and then proceeds to explain and justify it, they are excusing it. And although I am fully aware we need to move on from this failure of an administration, it does disgust me that I have to stand with the likes of dajo and going4roses and Chris Palmer to do so.
93 I hope you will understand that my words in this post are not meant to vilify you or point fingers at you, so if I get sloppy with my language and it seems that way, understand I do not mean it that way. These are very difficult and very emotional issues.

Let me clear less important issues first. Democrats have Farrakhan. Republicans have David Duke. It is a two party system. There are repugnant people who support each side for strategic purposes because their view can't win a majority. Neither of us stands with these people. I think your real frustration is you have become a man without a party because your party, hopefully temporarily, but I fear not, has abandoned you. You are essentially forced to side with those who have been political adversaries all your life. I welcome anyone of good conscience to my "side", not because I need your vote let's face it, Trump isn't winning California. Honestly, I hope you can return to the Republican Party soon and bring decency that in my opinion is lacking right now.

I think you need more empathy for opposing views on this one. I think you normally have that empathy and I think emotion has got the better of you on this one.

I get that you are done talking about Trump. But more than that you told me I shouldn't. I drastically disagree with that. I'm sorry, but Chris Palmer is a nobody and has no impact on anybody. I don't care if he played in the NBA or is a sports reporter. As I said, he is an idiot. The President, no matter how much you may be done with him is our leader. What he says is relevant. You said you agreed with almost everything I said about his statements but I shouldn't waste my energy on them. This is where I think you need to try for more empathy.

I am not the right person to be writing this. I'm not Black and I can't begin to understand being Black in America from an emotional perspective. But I can try from an intellectual perspective and I feel I owe that much with the privilege I have enjoyed. So I'm going to do my best to paint the picture that I paint in my head to give myself SOME understanding.

So I'm going to start at 2016 and try and put myself in the shoes of a Black person. Let's fast forward through slavery, KKK, lynchings, segregation, poverty, all of that. We are in 2016. We are coming to the end of the term of the first Black president. And a candidate rises up who is a total buffoon (in my view). His political claim to fame is spending years deriding the first Black president and doing what no one has done to any other president challenged his legitimacy as an American citizen against all evidence. In my mind, that is what he is known for being a racist asshat to the first Black president. Then he goes to town staking out the racist low ground. In my view, he is making people like me the enemy as a foil to play off of. Many of his followers love it and they love the freedom to in their words not be PC, but in my words revel in racism. And this guy wins. And he has the staunch support of about 40% of the people and a majority of the White people. They either like what he is saying about me or they don't give a damn that he is saying it. That is what my country is telling me.

In the meantime, in an issue that has been in the news for a number of years already, Blacks are too often being abused and killed by police. And the perpetrators are rarely charged, always undercharged, and almost never convicted. And their acts are supported and/or excused by a large percentage of the people. The President, with all the support of his 40%, not only doesn't do anything to help right this injustice. He uses it by pointing at a football player who protests the injustice and goes to war with those who protest the injustice, egging on his 40% all the way.

And in the following years more people are profiled, more people are abused, more people die. We talk and protest and nothing is changing. And then we have a video of a cop kneeling on the neck of a handcuffed Black man for 9 minutes until he dies. Unequivocal horror. No reasonable person could think otherwise. And I get a weak ass statement from the president with no statement that he is going to do anything about it, but a day later he reaches back to the sixties to quote an anti-civil rights leader who ordered law enforcement to shoot Black protesters. That is what I get. And 43% of America think he's doing a good job. So I ask you. Do you really think that person should not waste their energy on what the president says. Do you really think there is more justification for you to be outraged by Chris Palmer?

93, I know you are horrified by what happened to Floyd. I know you do not like Trump. I know you can be outraged by both and be outraged by Chris Palmer and by looters. As can I. Here is the rub. This country needs good men like you to be MORE outraged by what happened to Floyd than by Chris Palmer. It needs to be more than intellectual. It needs to be visceral and emotional. You have been calm and logical in your condemnation of the cops who killed Floyd. You have been emotional and outraged by the protests and by people like Palmer. That needs to flip. We need to be moved viscerally by the former. Enough to make our leaders change. Not just bring charges against one guy. Change things so it doesn't happen again.

As for going4roses. He and I have had our differences, mostly on the sports side. On this issue I think we have had fruitful conversations. I think I am on the same side of the spectrum as he is, but I often disagree with the extent to which he goes and I think some of the instances he posts may be questionable. But I value his contribution because I think people like me need to see it. I think we need to see the frustration. I think we need to see how people like him view the world. I think he has bias, (as we all do) but I think that bias is hard earned. I can't say that I wouldn't be there with him if I had his experience. And I've always been able to get to a reasonable point with him, which I appreciate especially given we have had history going after each other pretty hard on Sonny Dykes. I'll say this, based on the conversations I've had, if I were a cop on trial for shooting a Black suspect, I'd be fine with him on my jury. Push comes to shove he is fair. And from the beginning, I cannot bring myself to condemn him for any of the stances he has taken. I haven't walked in his shoes. I have never had to come close to my breaking point. On occasion my wife and/or my daughters experience discrimination that is nothing close to what a Black person has to face and it outrages me. If that were every day. If that were more severe. I don't know when I'd break.




That is fair. And I don't disagree with anything here.

Just to be clear, my statements regarding Trump is just Trump fatigue. I don't expect him to say anything meaningful, intelligent or inspiring. He is the wrong man for the job at any time but oh boy is he not qualified for what we are facing in 2020. After four years, I am just so sick of talking about him. Th

And my outrage for Floyd was and is so high that I Could almost feel my blood literally boiling. The image of a man reduced to crying out for his mother while three animals were indifferent to his cries and allowed him to die in the middle of the street when he was not resisting was such an affront to our humanity, of course my blood boils. And if I had seen posting of people who were excusing that and justifying what happened to Floyd, it would have been apparent how outraged I was and am. But no one here is doing that.

I also can concurrently think about all of the small shop owners who were already devastated by the pandemic, the families and young kids in the family who need to feel secured but who now have to worry about economically surviving. For what? Again, I am not personally impacted by any of this directly but I am a member of this human race. And when I see people half heartily saying destruction of property is bad but excusing the misery created for the innocent, I am outraged. It is because some idiots here are excusing looters and not the police brutality that it may seem my anger is directed toward one versus the other. Trust me, it is not. But I am nonetheless angered by the suffering to innocent families. And understanding and feeling the outrage for what happened to Floyd does not mean I condone the additional suffering we are creating through senseless looting.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If it feels like this crisis was manufactured to pit Americans against each other, it's because that's probably what happened.

The Floyd murder was reprehensible - everyone seems to agree on that.

Peaceful protest is largely acceptable - everyone seems to agree on that (although some will note that we are in a pandemic and that mask compliance is still important).

Rioting and looting is unacceptable - everyone seems to agree on that. It's impossible to say at this point how to allocate the blame, but it's clear that much of it didn't originate out of Floyd outrage. You can't tell me that the looting of the patagonia store seen below is from people outraged about the Floyd murder.

We are obviously at a flashpoint of inequality, anxiety and anger as a population and I can't help but feel that this benefits only those who seek to do us harm as a nation.

smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
g4r's content done bigger..

muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tRump going full Ronnie Ray Gun vs Berserkeley in '69 in DC right now.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

tRump going full Ronnie Ray Gun vs Berserkeley in '69 in DC right now.
It's sad how many people in this country think this is okay.



Does anyone think that using excessive force against protestors is the best way to stop a protest against the use of excessive force?

Remember when POTUS believed in non-violent means to address protests?



Remember when he recommended a world leader meeting with protestors to find common ground?

GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:




Ha, Oaktownbear piggybacking off my work again. Angry93 has lost passion for beating Trump because of a couple of nobodies and going4roses (and me - always me).
You don't seriously think anybody does anything because of you, right?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.