Story Poster
Photo by Twitter / Cal basketball
Cal Basketball

Mark Fox, Bears Look For Big Step Forward

September 27, 2022
22,242

Late September, into October, is a sports fan’s dream season. Baseball heads to its playoffs. Football, both college and the NFL, are in full swing and seasons are beginning to take shape. And, hockey and basketball are beginning their camps, with all the hope that exists when every team is still undefeated. So many sports, so little time and attention to offer each.

The 2022-2023 Cal Men’s basketball squad began their regular-season practice sessions Monday.  Everyone, in every program, is positive and confident in their prospects for the upcoming season, of course, but in the case of Golden Bears hoops, that confidence might just be well-placed.

Monday also featured a Zoom-only availability with head coach Mark Fox, now in his fourth year at Haas Pavilion, along with seniors Lars Thiemann and Kuany Kuany, known to his teammates as “2K”.  All seemed genuinely excited for what their futures hold.

Thiemann spoke at some length about the team’s opportunity to play games in Europe this past summer. He was very pleased to show his teammates the culture, history and architecture of his home country and continent, but also happy to do some exploring on his own, as he had never been either to Paris, or to the part of Belgium the team visited.

“For me,” Thiemann said, “what was most exciting was to go to Düsseldorf, almost my home city, for the guys to see where I’m from, and then we had a game there and played against my old team. I thought it was a great trip for us, as teammates, to bond and to get closer – the shared experience I think will help us become closer, more of a brotherhood.”

Asked what new things he saw, Thiemann noted, “I’d never seen Paris, it was cool, such a beautiful city, even the touristy sights were cool to see.”

Kuany echoed those sentiments, with the additional note that it was ALL new for him: “The trip was a great experience because I’d never been to Europe, getting to bond with my teammates on a long flight. The coolest thing I saw was the PSG (Paris Saint-Germain) Stadium,  (Les Parc des Princes), because I’m pretty big on soccer and just to see that stadium was really cool, especially for my teammates to be able to share the moment.”

2K went on to say that the experience of playing two games together in the summer would be very beneficial going forward, noting, “We’ve got a lot of new players.” That might be an understatement, actually.

Cal has four complete newcomers, plus a fifth player who redshirted last season, all of whom are expected to be contributors in Fox’s rotation, which he expects to be 9, but possibly 10 players once the season settles in.  “I would like to be able to play nine,” Fox said, “can we get to 10? We’ll see. We’ve got a lot of competition for minutes right now – it’s kind of fun to see every day. We’ve got a lot of guys battling, and a month to figure it out.”

The four newcomers are Irishman ND Okafor (6’-9”, 235 lbs.); 6’-8”, 220 lb. freshman Grant Newell, from Chicago but with an extra year at IMG Academy in Brandenton, Florida; and transfers Devin Askew and DeJuan Clayton.  Okafor, who has extensive international experience, is a “5”, like Thiemann, but both Thiemann and Fox think Okafor might see the floor with Thiemann at various times during the year. Fox actually said, “I can play ND at any position from the 2 up to the 5 if I need to,” although that’s no guarantee we will see the big man spotting up on the wing very often.

When asked who has surprised him the most so far this year, Fox immediately said, “there’s no doubt, it’s Grant Newell. He came in and, from Day 1, he’s been impressive with how he works, how he finishes, with how responsible he is. He just has a lot of positive traits on and off the court. I don’t think there’s anyone on our staff who would say differently; Grant has been a tremendous surprise out of the gate.”

Asked if the 2022-23 squad would play a quicker tempo than recent squads have, Fox said, “I think in the past we’ve played a slower tempo than we wanted to because of the talent. Now that we have more depth, I think you’ll see us play a faster pace and see more balance offensively. Obviously, it’s an area we have worked hard on this summer. I think the two transfer guards will impact that area immediately.”

We asked Coach Fox who would be able to lead the team when they really want to run the floor, and he said, “I’d say Joel (returning senior Joel Brown) and Devin (Askew) are the best in that area. They are really good on the open floor and are fast on the dribble.”

Askew left high school a year early and enrolled at Kentucky. He was projected as the #1 point guard in the nation with his graduating class, but experienced expected growing pains jumping to an elite program in Lexington. Fox was asked about his confidence level as he has transferred to now his third NCAA program: “I think that’s a good question. Obviously, he took on something that, when I recruited him, I recommended he NOT skip his senior year. But he’s a talented player. We’ve worked hard (for him) to regain his confidence and aggressiveness. I think he would admit he got a little heavy in those previous places, and we’ve trimmed him down. It starts with approach – he’s VERY coachable, and I think he’s got a lot of his confidence back, and it’s about getting him comfortable in a system of play that I think fits him better.

Fox admitted that prior seasons have not been the easiest to watch. “We’ve not had an athletic front line, and that’s hard to overcome in a game with 60+ possessions. Lars, I think, finally got comfortable last year and everyone was excited about how he finished last year. But, Sam Alajiki played really well last season and for his national team (Ireland) this summer. He’s got a strong and athletic body, and you combine him with Grant and we have length and a physicality in the paint that, quite honestly, we’ve not had (during my tenure).”

Fox noted that the program has been rebuilding, itself a hurdle, and also had to work through the challenges of the pandemic. He feels he’s now got a roster that can play aggressively, and hopes they can learn to do so while playing mistake-free basketball. He’s excited to go to practice because he “has been getting a ton of cooperation, and don’t have to fight them every day.”

The Golden Bears open the 2022-23 season with non-conference action against UC Davis, putting their 33-0 all-time record against the Aggies on the line at Haas Pavilion November 7.

Other stories:

Bears’ Weekly Pac-12 Pairings Unveiled

Discussion from...

Mark Fox, Bears Look For Big Step Forward

21,272 Views | 108 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by SFCityBear
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

eastcoastcal said:

Where do we stand with respect to shooting ability?
Mostly unknown, except we can guess. We have two three point shooters for sure. Alajiki, made 3's at a phenomenal 50%, but the sample is too small to already call him a great shooter. Celestine may be a little better than average, but likely won't be playing. Most of the others are unknown. Askew scored a bunch in high school, but has had to play point in two very tough conferences, and took few shots, probably focusing on point guard responsibilities. Clayton's stats in lesser leagues, show him to be a scorer, not a long range shooter. He has a good 2pt percentage, and a good FT percentage, leading me to believe he can shoot inside the 3pt line. I prefer scorers to shooters anyway. Foreman proved to be able to make a 3pt shot, but against bigger and quicker defenders of a P5 conference, he had trouble getting good shots off. Shepherd came from a lesser conference and was able to shoot and score in the PAC12. Betley came with good numbers from a lesser conference, and he shot very well through the first half of the season and then got exhausted in PAC12 season. South was another player from a small conference who shot well in the first half of the season at Cal, and lost it in PAC12 play.

Newell is very unknown, except for the reports from Europe that he scored well, and can make some threes. That is 2 games against weak opponents, probably. Up front, Lars has developed some shots he can make, but I'm still waiting for Kuany to show some ability to get shots. He shoots OK, but at such a low volume. Okafor is unknown. Bowser is unknown. Hyder can't shoot a lick, but people say some of that might be due to nagging injury. I doubt Roberson can shoot, but all it takes for some kids is one good summer with a good coach to develop a shot or two. I probably missed someone.

My bigger concern is our defense. Other than Brown, Anyanwu, and Roberson, do we have any players who can get after it, get up in an opponent's face, stick to him like glue, beat him to his favorite spots, shut him down? Can we protect the rim? Can we get some steals? And my biggest concern is rebounds, which is what you need first to win, whether you play fast or slow.

With all that negativity and uncertainty, I like the little I do hear, and I'm looking forward to seeing the team this season.

Its early but the starting 5 based on just today would be: Askew at pt, Clayton at the 2, KK at the 3, Sam or Newell at the 4 (Newell has been the biggest surprise to the coaches - they were high on him to help this season, but make an impact the next season) Lars at the 5. And Joel is in a neck and neck battle for the pt. So 7 guys with the edge, but Roberson, Bowser, ND and Obinna all competing hard in practice. Coaches are excited because the players are really competing hard in practice and the improved quality of depth means the team will play with more "force". Meaning defensive pressure will be better, transition opportunities will be sought and overall intensity will be better. Hyder back improving but still away from full tilt and Jalen is progressing well on his PT, with a target to return early January (but just a target). ND is the clear best athlete with a huge upside, but extremely raw(offensive moves and learning the game at this level). The slow pace the last several years was by design to give the team a chance to win in last 5 minutes of the games. Simply put, having a 6' 7" 265 lb center in the Pac12 is a disadvantage despite the good offensive footwork. That coupled with limited athletes, and quality depth restricted the flexibility of the staff to play more of an uptempo. Will also add that from my observation the team is tight/supportive of each other and believes in the staff. There is trust and not just cya. HC's often take on the role of a "father figure' and that requires that there is straight talk, support and belief in the teaching of skills and development of the team. I along with the majority of the posters have a legitimate "show me" feeling, but Fox and staff are building (albeit long time in coming) an improved team with quality depth and the players have bought in to their teaching and overall development. So the point is, be objective, and let's see where the team is come January. Let's not count the patient as comatose, without revival as a possibility. Just my thoughts based on some direct interaction. Go Bears and hoping the guys can have a successful season, as there has been a long dry spell which has greatly weighed on the upperclassmen. Would be great for them to taste some success given the tremendous sacrifices made by the players.
Huh. So he is exactly the player I said he was. It turns out you can watch video and make inferences about players. I am not sure about upside because it is usually too late to develop basic skills at the college level.

I think the coaches are backward on KK, who should be a 4. The less the ball is in his hands the better. Alajiki is much more confident with the ball in his hands as he showed this summer. Interested to see where Newell fits.

I guess they will both play, but Brown is a much better athlete than Askew, so if the team is going to be based on defensive pressure, it is surprising to start someone without that skill.

I too was surprised at the early assessment between the two at point, but since the staff said its literally "neck and neck" likely will go back and forth. Each brings different skill sets. The staff also said that KK is more comfortable with the ball and is making good decisions - just maturing, more confident and his body is stronger now. Sam has the talent, his shooting thus far a bit erratic, but its more the quick progress by Newell.
bluesaxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm torn on what results I want. I can't root against the team but I want Fox gone. An NIT appearance would probably keep him around.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

calumnus said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

eastcoastcal said:

Where do we stand with respect to shooting ability?
Mostly unknown, except we can guess. We have two three point shooters for sure. Alajiki, made 3's at a phenomenal 50%, but the sample is too small to already call him a great shooter. Celestine may be a little better than average, but likely won't be playing. Most of the others are unknown. Askew scored a bunch in high school, but has had to play point in two very tough conferences, and took few shots, probably focusing on point guard responsibilities. Clayton's stats in lesser leagues, show him to be a scorer, not a long range shooter. He has a good 2pt percentage, and a good FT percentage, leading me to believe he can shoot inside the 3pt line. I prefer scorers to shooters anyway. Foreman proved to be able to make a 3pt shot, but against bigger and quicker defenders of a P5 conference, he had trouble getting good shots off. Shepherd came from a lesser conference and was able to shoot and score in the PAC12. Betley came with good numbers from a lesser conference, and he shot very well through the first half of the season and then got exhausted in PAC12 season. South was another player from a small conference who shot well in the first half of the season at Cal, and lost it in PAC12 play.

Newell is very unknown, except for the reports from Europe that he scored well, and can make some threes. That is 2 games against weak opponents, probably. Up front, Lars has developed some shots he can make, but I'm still waiting for Kuany to show some ability to get shots. He shoots OK, but at such a low volume. Okafor is unknown. Bowser is unknown. Hyder can't shoot a lick, but people say some of that might be due to nagging injury. I doubt Roberson can shoot, but all it takes for some kids is one good summer with a good coach to develop a shot or two. I probably missed someone.

My bigger concern is our defense. Other than Brown, Anyanwu, and Roberson, do we have any players who can get after it, get up in an opponent's face, stick to him like glue, beat him to his favorite spots, shut him down? Can we protect the rim? Can we get some steals? And my biggest concern is rebounds, which is what you need first to win, whether you play fast or slow.

With all that negativity and uncertainty, I like the little I do hear, and I'm looking forward to seeing the team this season.

Its early but the starting 5 based on just today would be: Askew at pt, Clayton at the 2, KK at the 3, Sam or Newell at the 4 (Newell has been the biggest surprise to the coaches - they were high on him to help this season, but make an impact the next season) Lars at the 5. And Joel is in a neck and neck battle for the pt. So 7 guys with the edge, but Roberson, Bowser, ND and Obinna all competing hard in practice. Coaches are excited because the players are really competing hard in practice and the improved quality of depth means the team will play with more "force". Meaning defensive pressure will be better, transition opportunities will be sought and overall intensity will be better. Hyder back improving but still away from full tilt and Jalen is progressing well on his PT, with a target to return early January (but just a target). ND is the clear best athlete with a huge upside, but extremely raw(offensive moves and learning the game at this level). The slow pace the last several years was by design to give the team a chance to win in last 5 minutes of the games. Simply put, having a 6' 7" 265 lb center in the Pac12 is a disadvantage despite the good offensive footwork. That coupled with limited athletes, and quality depth restricted the flexibility of the staff to play more of an uptempo. Will also add that from my observation the team is tight/supportive of each other and believes in the staff. There is trust and not just cya. HC's often take on the role of a "father figure' and that requires that there is straight talk, support and belief in the teaching of skills and development of the team. I along with the majority of the posters have a legitimate "show me" feeling, but Fox and staff are building (albeit long time in coming) an improved team with quality depth and the players have bought in to their teaching and overall development. So the point is, be objective, and let's see where the team is come January. Let's not count the patient as comatose, without revival as a possibility. Just my thoughts based on some direct interaction. Go Bears and hoping the guys can have a successful season, as there has been a long dry spell which has greatly weighed on the upperclassmen. Would be great for them to taste some success given the tremendous sacrifices made by the players.


Appreciate the information. Don't appreciate your characterization of Andre Kelly. He was our best player and will be missed.
You are welcome, but correction, the characterization of AK was not from me (sentiment w/in the program). I personally highly liked him and was available to him during his research/decision of other programs. I am pulling for him and Joe P at UCSB is extremely happy to have him.


Ok, thanks. I misunderstood your post. Appreciate your relaying Fox's opinion. That makes sense as Fox didn't even make Kelly the confirmed starter until his last season at Cal even though he was our most productive big man on the team all along (by far). Fox is the guys in Moneyball that go off of appearance instead of results. A lot of coaches made the same mistake with Charles Barkley. St Mary's great center Samahan was similar great find, passed up because he didn't look the part. From the write ups at Santa Barbara it is clear they appreciate the player they are getting. Bradley is the star at SDSU and Sueing is the star at Ohio State. Great young men and good basketball players all. Would form the nucleus of a a really good team this year.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

calumnus said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

eastcoastcal said:

Where do we stand with respect to shooting ability?
Mostly unknown, except we can guess. We have two three point shooters for sure. Alajiki, made 3's at a phenomenal 50%, but the sample is too small to already call him a great shooter. Celestine may be a little better than average, but likely won't be playing. Most of the others are unknown. Askew scored a bunch in high school, but has had to play point in two very tough conferences, and took few shots, probably focusing on point guard responsibilities. Clayton's stats in lesser leagues, show him to be a scorer, not a long range shooter. He has a good 2pt percentage, and a good FT percentage, leading me to believe he can shoot inside the 3pt line. I prefer scorers to shooters anyway. Foreman proved to be able to make a 3pt shot, but against bigger and quicker defenders of a P5 conference, he had trouble getting good shots off. Shepherd came from a lesser conference and was able to shoot and score in the PAC12. Betley came with good numbers from a lesser conference, and he shot very well through the first half of the season and then got exhausted in PAC12 season. South was another player from a small conference who shot well in the first half of the season at Cal, and lost it in PAC12 play.

Newell is very unknown, except for the reports from Europe that he scored well, and can make some threes. That is 2 games against weak opponents, probably. Up front, Lars has developed some shots he can make, but I'm still waiting for Kuany to show some ability to get shots. He shoots OK, but at such a low volume. Okafor is unknown. Bowser is unknown. Hyder can't shoot a lick, but people say some of that might be due to nagging injury. I doubt Roberson can shoot, but all it takes for some kids is one good summer with a good coach to develop a shot or two. I probably missed someone.

My bigger concern is our defense. Other than Brown, Anyanwu, and Roberson, do we have any players who can get after it, get up in an opponent's face, stick to him like glue, beat him to his favorite spots, shut him down? Can we protect the rim? Can we get some steals? And my biggest concern is rebounds, which is what you need first to win, whether you play fast or slow.

With all that negativity and uncertainty, I like the little I do hear, and I'm looking forward to seeing the team this season.

Its early but the starting 5 based on just today would be: Askew at pt, Clayton at the 2, KK at the 3, Sam or Newell at the 4 (Newell has been the biggest surprise to the coaches - they were high on him to help this season, but make an impact the next season) Lars at the 5. And Joel is in a neck and neck battle for the pt. So 7 guys with the edge, but Roberson, Bowser, ND and Obinna all competing hard in practice. Coaches are excited because the players are really competing hard in practice and the improved quality of depth means the team will play with more "force". Meaning defensive pressure will be better, transition opportunities will be sought and overall intensity will be better. Hyder back improving but still away from full tilt and Jalen is progressing well on his PT, with a target to return early January (but just a target). ND is the clear best athlete with a huge upside, but extremely raw(offensive moves and learning the game at this level). The slow pace the last several years was by design to give the team a chance to win in last 5 minutes of the games. Simply put, having a 6' 7" 265 lb center in the Pac12 is a disadvantage despite the good offensive footwork. That coupled with limited athletes, and quality depth restricted the flexibility of the staff to play more of an uptempo. Will also add that from my observation the team is tight/supportive of each other and believes in the staff. There is trust and not just cya. HC's often take on the role of a "father figure' and that requires that there is straight talk, support and belief in the teaching of skills and development of the team. I along with the majority of the posters have a legitimate "show me" feeling, but Fox and staff are building (albeit long time in coming) an improved team with quality depth and the players have bought in to their teaching and overall development. So the point is, be objective, and let's see where the team is come January. Let's not count the patient as comatose, without revival as a possibility. Just my thoughts based on some direct interaction. Go Bears and hoping the guys can have a successful season, as there has been a long dry spell which has greatly weighed on the upperclassmen. Would be great for them to taste some success given the tremendous sacrifices made by the players.


Appreciate the information. Don't appreciate your characterization of Andre Kelly. He was our best player and will be missed.
You are welcome, but correction, the characterization of AK was not from me (sentiment w/in the program). I personally highly liked him and was available to him during his research/decision of other programs. I am pulling for him and Joe P at UCSB is extremely happy to have him.
I think blaming AK's shortcomings is sour grapes on the part of the staff. He got plenty of defensive rebounds and frequently passed well upcourt to JB or Shepherd. That's the start of your up tempo offense, should you choose to employ one. On those occasions when they had a 2v1 or 3v2, they generally chose not to exploit it (per coach's strategy) or messed it up because the ball handler did not draw defenders and pass, but rather took it to the hoop and prayed for the best. When they did make it work, Shepherd generally had the ball in his hands - too bad his shot was inconsistent, but I liked watching him play. And as you say, best of luck to Andre and Go Gouchos!.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice

HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
with Fox making the big comments about Newell, I looked back at some of his tape

long, athletic, bouncy who can score on all 3 levels

my understanding was he had an injury so hasn't played competitive basketball for 2 years (kinda like Celestine when he was coming to Cal)

assuming he's 100% now we may have a gem



sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Last year he was injured. I think his high school took a covid year the year before.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The staff is infallible. It is the players, the administration, covid, Trump, Biden, Newsom, and Taylor Swift who are fault if anything goes wrong.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

The staff is infallible. It is the players, the administration, covid, Trump, Biden, Newsom, and Taylor Swift who are fault if anything goes wrong.


You forgot the City of Berkeley, Telegraph Avenue, homelessness and poverty, the fans posting on message boards, our facilities, Cal's academics….
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

sluggo said:

The staff is infallible. It is the players, the administration, covid, Trump, Biden, Newsom, and Taylor Swift who are fault if anything goes wrong.


You forgot the City of Berkeley, Telegraph Avenue, homelessness and poverty, the fans posting on message boards, our facilities, Cal's academics….

Not just the fans who post on message boards, but all fans. Because we don't "demand winning". Case in point: I went to the UCLA game at Haas last season. At no time while I was there did I demand that we win. And we didn't! So that one was on me and I'm sure many others here can relate similar stories.
BC Calfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

calumnus said:

sluggo said:

The staff is infallible. It is the players, the administration, covid, Trump, Biden, Newsom, and Taylor Swift who are fault if anything goes wrong.


You forgot the City of Berkeley, Telegraph Avenue, homelessness and poverty, the fans posting on message boards, our facilities, Cal's academics….

Not just the fans who post on message boards, but all fans. Because we don't "demand winning". Case in point: I went to the UCLA game at Haas last season. At no time while I was there did I demand that we win. And we didn't! So that one was on me and I'm sure many others here can relate similar stories.
So true, other fan bases are never negative about their coaches, players, leadership, etc. That's why they're good.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


SFCityBear
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
SFCityBear
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Player Rankings in Advanced Metrics (Offense and Defense) and Number of Starts by Year (min 100 min)

18-19 (Jones)
1. Sueing 30
2. Vanover 15
3. Kelly 18
4. Bradley 19
5. Austin 29
6. McNeil 28
7. Anticevich 4
8. Harris-Dyson 9
9. Gordon 1
10. Davis 2

19-20 (Fox)
1. Bradley 30
2. Kuany 2
3. Kelly 11
4. Austin 18
5. South 27
6. Anticevich 32
7. Thorpe 2
8. Thiemann 18
9. Harris-Dyson 1
10. Gordon 0
11 Brown 17

20-21 (Fox)
1. Kelly 23
2. Bradley 19
3. Thorpe 1
4. Thiemann 11
5. Celestine 5
6. Brown 21
7. Anticevich 21
8. Foreman 14
9. Kuany 3
10. Betley 23
11. Hyder 4
12. Bowser 0

21-22 (Fox)
1. Kelly 21
2. Thiemann 11
3. Kuany 16
4. Alajiki 4
5. Shepherd 32
6. Celestine 16
7. Foreman 4
8. Anywanu 0
9. Anticevich 29
10. Brown 24
11. Hyder 2


One key way to get the most from your team is to play the best players/players that are playing well (at their respective positions).

In 2018-19 Jones should have played :
1. Austin
2. Bradley
3. Sueing
4. Kelly
5. Vanover

That was a good young starting 5, who if we kept them together, 4 plus a PG to replace Austin, would be a very good Cal team this year.

I won't say anything again about Fox's subsequent choices for minutes and starts (and shots). The stats speak for themselves.

This year a lot of minutes will by necessity go to guys we have not seen or seen little of.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on
eastcoastcal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can someone with a little more technical knowledge of basketball tell me if Fox is likely spewing coach-speak when he talks about the benefit of having more athletic, longer players this year

To my limited knowledge, I've always been hesitant with a team thats "raw, athletic, long" because honestly genuine shooting ability & basketball skills seem to usually be a lot better & translate to more wins

A professional example of this being Fizdale's NY knicks teams some years ago
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
SFCityBear
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

Can someone with a little more technical knowledge of basketball tell me if Fox is likely spewing coach-speak when he talks about the benefit of having more athletic, longer players this year

To my limited knowledge, I've always been hesitant with a team thats "raw, athletic, long" because honestly genuine shooting ability & basketball skills seem to usually be a lot better & translate to more wins

A professional example of this being Fizdale's NY knicks teams some years ago
without explicitly answering your question, I'll give an example of my viewpoint:

when I play pickup at the gym or RSF and see a women player, I always want to play with them for two reasons... (1) if a women steps onto the court she is usually a pretty experienced and skilled player, with at least HS playing experience. (2) because I expect they can shoot, know how to move without the ball, and handle and pass well

defensively they are typically smaller and not as athletic, although that's not always true, but they do know the fundamentals of defending ... where to be, how to stand, when to help, etc

if I'm playing point, I'll look to pass to them because they are typically open and will hit the shot. I've even called a play for them for the game winner and of course she ran it perfectly, was wide open and hit the shot (mind you, no one calls plays in pickup)

however defensively I look to cheat off my man to play help defense on their man

the point is the women who play basketball at a gym are usually skilled and fundamental so can be effective offensively, but despite their fundamental defense, they struggle to defend, bigger, taller, stronger players

.... with that said, if they are playing against a player 2 levels above them in size, skills, and athleticism that is intent on locking them down, they can rarely even get a good shot up

4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
Didn't mean to leave out Sam - He will certainly help as well, hopefully he can be consistent with his shooting and overall toughness. Bottom line, the team is deep and thus will play with force (without pacing themselves at either end). They will look to push the ball, but that is easier said than accomplished. Fox does want to pick the pace up and he feels he has the depth to do.
eastcoastcal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
Didn't mean to leave out Sam - He will certainly help as well, hopefully he can be consistent with his shooting and overall toughness. Bottom line, the team is deep and thus will play with force (without pacing themselves at either end). They will look to push the ball, but that is easier said than accomplished. Fox does want to pick the pace up and he feels he has the depth to do.
Regarding Devin & DeJuan:

- Any sense as to why Devin just couldn't put it together at Kentucky/UT? He was so highly rated out of HS. What is the staff doing to rectify whatever went wrong at his previous two stops.

- Can DeJuan handle the increased level of competition? He is coming in from facing significantly lesser opposition in-conference
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

4thGenCal said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
Didn't mean to leave out Sam - He will certainly help as well, hopefully he can be consistent with his shooting and overall toughness. Bottom line, the team is deep and thus will play with force (without pacing themselves at either end). They will look to push the ball, but that is easier said than accomplished. Fox does want to pick the pace up and he feels he has the depth to do.
Regarding Devin & DeJuan:

- Any sense as to why Devin just couldn't put it together at Kentucky/UT? He was so highly rated out of HS. What is the staff doing to rectify whatever went wrong at his previous two stops.

- Can DeJuan handle the increased level of competition? He is coming in from facing significantly lesser opposition in-conference
Devin - says working with Cal coaches his confidence levels are much better and coaches have also been working on his conditioning. Devin very much trusts the staff and has bonded well with the players. He and Joel are competing very hard every practice and upping each other's game. Likely a situation, where He was not ready on the physical and emotional aspects(on his own) that Big Time programs demand. Here he sees the clear opportunity to play and grow where he is appreciated.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

Can someone with a little more technical knowledge of basketball tell me if Fox is likely spewing coach-speak when he talks about the benefit of having more athletic, longer players this year

To my limited knowledge, I've always been hesitant with a team thats "raw, athletic, long" because honestly genuine shooting ability & basketball skills seem to usually be a lot better & translate to more wins

A professional example of this being Fizdale's NY knicks teams some years ago


Fox has always emphasized physical, man to man defense and if given the choice will take long and athletic even if low skill players (often new to the game, from Nigerian immigrant families) over skilled players with less athleticism. He Inherited some players that maybe didn't fit with his vision and there were obvious conflicts. Now that all the Jones recruits gone he has assembled a team that greatly resembles his Georgia teams.

You can see this reflected in our Pts/G and Pts Allowed/G Ranking under Fox:

2020 #332 O #170 D
2021 #310 O #142 D
2022 #338 O #81 D

So you can see the trend, he wants to continue to improve our defense, even if at the expense of offense.

This is his Georgia teams Rankings in Pts/G and PA/G:

2010 #184 O #199 D
2011 #173 O #70 D
2012 #306 O #68 D
2013 #308 O #52 D
2014 #232 O #84 D
2015 #152 O #119 D
2016 #239 O #118 D
2017 #216 O #125 D
2018 #301 D #43 D

So you can see how he is following the same model he used at Georgia and is hoping to improve on defense.

In each of his previous jobs, Nevada and Georgia, he followed good recruiters and his best teams were early, using the players he inherited and getting them to play harder on defense by being a hard ass. His teams dropped off as the roster filled will his recruits. They didn't have the transfer portal back then so that transition happened sooner at Cal and is now complete. Cal will be a 100% Mark Fox team this year.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

4thGenCal said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
Didn't mean to leave out Sam - He will certainly help as well, hopefully he can be consistent with his shooting and overall toughness. Bottom line, the team is deep and thus will play with force (without pacing themselves at either end). They will look to push the ball, but that is easier said than accomplished. Fox does want to pick the pace up and he feels he has the depth to do.
Regarding Devin & DeJuan:

- Any sense as to why Devin just couldn't put it together at Kentucky/UT? He was so highly rated out of HS. What is the staff doing to rectify whatever went wrong at his previous two stops.

- Can DeJuan handle the increased level of competition? He is coming in from facing significantly lesser opposition in-conference
Askew is a savvy player with good vision and passing ability. He also has a nice left hand and can drive in either direction. But he has average quickness, at best, and below average jumping ability. So defenders know they can guard him tightly. He shot poorly at Kentucky, 28% from 3 and 35% overall. (I discount the Texas season.) I assume he got tired as the season went along because he was physically overmatched.

Dropping down a level to Cal could be good for him. But Cal does not have the roster for a pass first point guard. They also don't move very well away from the ball, so there won't be a lot of openings for him to pass into. I think the fit is bad.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
The issue that is much larger than any other is whether the team can score efficiently in order to stay in games. I would be shocked if they can given the personnel and coaching. But life is full of surprises.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
The issue that is much larger than any other is whether the team can score efficiently in order to stay in games. I would be shocked if they can given the personnel and coaching. But life is full of surprises.
if Cal has enough 3 point shooters we have a chance. unfortunately our best returning 3 point shooter (Celestine is out for all/most of the season).

most likely candidates are Sam, Bowser, KK, Newell - but if they will be the main 3 point shooters, many of them play the same position ... ideally we'd have a minimum of 2 shooters on the floor at the same time

calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

sluggo said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
The issue that is much larger than any other is whether the team can score efficiently in order to stay in games. I would be shocked if they can given the personnel and coaching. But life is full of surprises.
if Cal has enough 3 point shooters we have a chance. unfortunately our best returning 3 point shooter (Celestine is out for all/most of the season).

most likely candidates are Sam, Bowser, KK, Newell - but if they will be the main 3 point shooters, many of them play the same position ... ideally we'd have a minimum of 2 shooters on the floor at the same time




I don't think we have anyone recruited specifically for their 3 point shooting.

Last year we were #223 in 3Pt%. We were #199 in the country in made 3 pt shots per game. Further, we wont have the 4 players who made the most 3P shots: Anticevich, Shepherd, Celestine and Foreman.

Alajiki, Kuany and reportedly Newell are the hopes there.



sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

sluggo said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
The issue that is much larger than any other is whether the team can score efficiently in order to stay in games. I would be shocked if they can given the personnel and coaching. But life is full of surprises.
if Cal has enough 3 point shooters we have a chance. unfortunately our best returning 3 point shooter (Celestine is out for all/most of the season).

most likely candidates are Sam, Bowser, KK, Newell - but if they will be the main 3 point shooters, many of them play the same position ... ideally we'd have a minimum of 2 shooters on the floor at the same time


The three efficient ways to score are 3s, free throws and layups/dunks. Maybe there is the most hope for free throws. I don't see anyone expected to shoot over 35% from 3. Alajiki got hot at the beginning of the season last year, but he faded and did not show he could shoot over the summer.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree, Sam doesn't look like a natural 3 point shooter to me, but opponents can't leave him open as he can reliably hit an open 3

I think the reason his shooting went down later in the seasons is team's figured it out

Lots of teams say 'show me' before they extend their defense out when there is an unknown player



sluggo said:

HoopDreams said:

sluggo said:

4thGenCal said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

HoopDreams said:

Andre Kelly was a very good player for Cal and a very good player for the conference

by his junior year he was a solid defender, could score over longer, more athletic defenders, and a great team leader

he was not a rim protector

but lots of shot blockers, especially inexperienced players often don't play strong defensive fundamentals. For example, they leave their feet and go for the big block, or are just out of position to begin with

Kelly was a good example, as his defensive fundamentals were poor as a freshmen

anyone, including the coach who thinks we are better off giving the minutes to a freshmen either is a poor coach, or sees a very talented and fundamental freshmen in practice


Good post. I'm not quite sure what you meant in the last sentence. If you were referring to Kelly's first year as a freshman, Wyking had little choice, because Vanover, also a freshman, was not ready for major minutes at the beginning. If you were referring to Kelly's 2nd and sophomore year, when the freshman Lars was given more starts, but Kelly played the most minutes,and I think that was done for strategic purposes, game by game. If Kelly had a weakness, it was his physical conditioning, especially in his first couple of seasons. He was often exhausted, needing to go the bench for rest and sometimes for oxygen. Since Kelly was by far the more skilled player, Fox may have wanted to have him play more minutes at the end of the game than at the beginning. Neither Wyking Jones nor Fox has had outstanding options at center. Year by year, Kelly's stamina improved, as did his minutes, and due to giving Lars getting game experience early, and shown slow but steady improvement, he is now ready to give Cal what should be his best season. Both players have developed well under mark Fox.

I think Mark Fox has proven his coaching chops, as far as coaching players to improve individually, in both conditioning and basketball skills. Nearly all the Cal players who played for Mark Fox have shown marked improvement over his three years here, except for those players hampered by injury or illness. Ryan Betley and Kareem South, might be exceptions, as they both played well in the first half of their season, but their performance was poor in the 2nd half of the season. The reasons could be several. These players are shooters, and typically the team plays more road games and tougher teams on average in the PAC12 season. So better defenders and more strange rims can make for missed shots. Mark Fox at least tried to shoulder the blame for Betley's dropoff, by saying he played Betley too many minutes in the first half of the season, causing his exhaustion. And the PAC12 teams have a lot of film of Cal to work with by the time the PAC12 season starts, so they can scheme to stop our shooters. Darius McNeil suffered the same sort of dropoff in shooting from the first half of the season to the PAC12 season under Wyking Jones. It happens.
I wasn't clear

I meant a 5th year senior Kelly vs a Freshmen ND (Okafor)

I inferred from 4thGen's post that someone in the program was saying that losing Kelly wasn't that big a deal and that we have a more athletic and longer Center (ND) now

perhaps I inferred too much, but that's what I was commenting on

No, I think you were right. I should have thought about Okafor, instead of going down the path of past history. I think no matter who you believe about Okafor, 4thGen or Sluggo, Kelly, if he were still here, would start. My hope would have been that Kelly would have started, and if Okafor showed fast progress, to let him play his minutes at center, for some rim protection. Somebody will have to back up Lars, as he has not proven he can go 30-35 minutes. Kelly could slide over to PF, a more natural position for him. Cal is very thin up front now, with Kelly leaving and DJ retiring from basketball. Not having DJ last season hurt the team's chances somewhat. We are undersized, except for Lars. Anyanwu could become an important player.
Yes losing Dre was a loss and He would have started. The feeling from coaches to the returning players, is that this season's team will be better as compared to last year's team(not due to losing AK but due to the overall improvement). Devin, Newell, DeJuan are immediate impact players, JB, Lars, KK all have improved (I don't know about Obinna, MR, Monte one way or the other, but heard they have picked up their games as well). And ND while raw, will bring energy, block some shots and be able to run the court effectively. Its too bad that Dre moved on (myself and another passionate supporter were ready to assist with NIL if needed), as going against ND would have helped him develop additional moves, and expand his range some, since ND is a shot blocker. Plus his best position is the P4. But the issues are as stated, 1)can Lars play effectively for longer minutes (25+ minutes,) and will ND, Obinna, Newell be able to hold "the fort" vs bigger, athletic rebounding teams when inserted? 2) Can the team hit the "3" enough to force teams to respect/extend defenses on them and keep them in games, vs experienced talented teams in conference.
The issue that is much larger than any other is whether the team can score efficiently in order to stay in games. I would be shocked if they can given the personnel and coaching. But life is full of surprises.
if Cal has enough 3 point shooters we have a chance. unfortunately our best returning 3 point shooter (Celestine is out for all/most of the season).

most likely candidates are Sam, Bowser, KK, Newell - but if they will be the main 3 point shooters, many of them play the same position ... ideally we'd have a minimum of 2 shooters on the floor at the same time


The three efficient ways to score are 3s, free throws and layups/dunks. Maybe there is the most hope for free throws. I don't see anyone expected to shoot over 35% from 3. Alajiki got hot at the beginning of the season last year, but he faded and did not show he could shoot over the summer.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

with Fox making the big comments about Newell, I looked back at some of his tape

long, athletic, bouncy who can score on all 3 levels

my understanding was he had an injury so hasn't played competitive basketball for 2 years (kinda like Celestine when he was coming to Cal)

assuming he's 100% now we may have a gem




Gonna show my age here. Dreaming that the combination of Grant Newell and ND Okafor can become the second coming of Curtis Rowe and Sidney Wicks.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

HoopDreams said:

with Fox making the big comments about Newell, I looked back at some of his tape

long, athletic, bouncy who can score on all 3 levels

my understanding was he had an injury so hasn't played competitive basketball for 2 years (kinda like Celestine when he was coming to Cal)

assuming he's 100% now we may have a gem




Gonna show my age here. Dreaming that the combination of Grant Newell and ND Okafor can become the second coming of Curtis Rowe and Sidney Wicks.
I'd be happy with the second coming of Monty Buckley and Al Grigsby (I almost mentioned Lamond Murray, but I can't gin up quite that much optimism).
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mozilla...
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Player Rankings in Advanced Metrics (Offense and Defense) and Number of Starts by Year (min 100 min)

18-19 (Jones)
1. Sueing 30
2. Vanover 15
3. Kelly 18
4. Bradley 19
5. Austin 29
6. McNeil 28
7. Anticevich 4
8. Harris-Dyson 9
9. Gordon 1
10. Davis 2

19-20 (Fox)
1. Bradley 30
2. Kuany 2
3. Kelly 11
4. Austin 18
5. South 27
6. Anticevich 32
7. Thorpe 2
8. Thiemann 18
9. Harris-Dyson 1
10. Gordon 0
11 Brown 17

20-21 (Fox)
1. Kelly 23
2. Bradley 19
3. Thorpe 1
4. Thiemann 11
5. Celestine 5
6. Brown 21
7. Anticevich 21
8. Foreman 14
9. Kuany 3
10. Betley 23
11. Hyder 4
12. Bowser 0

21-22 (Fox)
1. Kelly 21
2. Thiemann 11
3. Kuany 16
4. Alajiki 4
5. Shepherd 32
6. Celestine 16
7. Foreman 4
8. Anywanu 0
9. Anticevich 29
10. Brown 24
11. Hyder 2


One key way to get the most from your team is to play the best players/players that are playing well (at their respective positions).

In 2018-19 Jones should have played :
1. Austin
2. Bradley
3. Sueing
4. Kelly
5. Vanover

That was a good young starting 5, who if we kept them together, 4 plus a PG to replace Austin, would be a very good Cal team this year.

I won't say anything again about Fox's subsequent choices for minutes and starts (and shots). The stats speak for themselves.

This year a lot of minutes will by necessity go to guys we have not seen or seen little of.


So I will comment on Fox. If you look at the above, he gave Thiemann too many starts and minutes his first two years, especially as a freshman, and played Anticevich far too much all along. All at the expense of Kelly. Fox and friends have developed Thiemann and last year our front line should have been Lars and Kelly. With Kuany getting the backup minutes. Thorpe previously when healthy.

Jumping to this year. Losing Kelly is big. Bigger than losing Bradley. Losing Celestine to injury hurts.

However, if Okafor can be great defender and rebounder and Newell is as reported, Lars, Kuany, Newell and Okafor can give us a more productive front line minutes than Fox played last year with Anticevich, Kelly, Lars and Kuany.

Similarly, it is not asking much for a combination of the new guards to be more productive at the guard positions than Brown, Shepherd, Foreman and Hyder.

I don't see "a big step forward" but winning as many (or as few) games as last year seems a reasonable prediction. Our games will likely be even more low scoring though.
eastcoastcal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

calumnus said:

Player Rankings in Advanced Metrics (Offense and Defense) and Number of Starts by Year (min 100 min)

18-19 (Jones)
1. Sueing 30
2. Vanover 15
3. Kelly 18
4. Bradley 19
5. Austin 29
6. McNeil 28
7. Anticevich 4
8. Harris-Dyson 9
9. Gordon 1
10. Davis 2

19-20 (Fox)
1. Bradley 30
2. Kuany 2
3. Kelly 11
4. Austin 18
5. South 27
6. Anticevich 32
7. Thorpe 2
8. Thiemann 18
9. Harris-Dyson 1
10. Gordon 0
11 Brown 17

20-21 (Fox)
1. Kelly 23
2. Bradley 19
3. Thorpe 1
4. Thiemann 11
5. Celestine 5
6. Brown 21
7. Anticevich 21
8. Foreman 14
9. Kuany 3
10. Betley 23
11. Hyder 4
12. Bowser 0

21-22 (Fox)
1. Kelly 21
2. Thiemann 11
3. Kuany 16
4. Alajiki 4
5. Shepherd 32
6. Celestine 16
7. Foreman 4
8. Anywanu 0
9. Anticevich 29
10. Brown 24
11. Hyder 2


One key way to get the most from your team is to play the best players/players that are playing well (at their respective positions).

In 2018-19 Jones should have played :
1. Austin
2. Bradley
3. Sueing
4. Kelly
5. Vanover

That was a good young starting 5, who if we kept them together, 4 plus a PG to replace Austin, would be a very good Cal team this year.

I won't say anything again about Fox's subsequent choices for minutes and starts (and shots). The stats speak for themselves.

This year a lot of minutes will by necessity go to guys we have not seen or seen little of.


So I will comment on Fox. If you look at the above, he gave Thiemann too many starts and minutes his first two years, especially as a freshman, and played Anticevich far too much all along. All at the expense of Kelly. Fox and friends have developed Thiemann and last year our front line should have been Lars and Kelly. With Kuany getting the backup minutes. Thorpe previously when healthy.

Jumping to this year. Losing Kelly is big. Bigger than losing Bradley. Losing Celestine to injury hurts.

However, if Okafor can be great defender and rebounder and Newell is as reported, Lars, Kuany, Newell and Okafor can give us a more productive front line minutes than Fox played last year with Anticevich, Kelly, Lars and Kuany.

Similarly, it is not asking much for a combination of the new guards to be more productive at the guard positions than Brown, Shepherd, Foreman and Hyder.

I don't see "a big step forward" but winning as many (or as few) games as last year seems a reasonable prediction. Our games will likely be even more low scoring though.
I cannot wait for the postgame presser where Fox comments on how we need to buckle down on defense and show more effort when we lose 36-44
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

calumnus said:

calumnus said:

Player Rankings in Advanced Metrics (Offense and Defense) and Number of Starts by Year (min 100 min)

18-19 (Jones)
1. Sueing 30
2. Vanover 15
3. Kelly 18
4. Bradley 19
5. Austin 29
6. McNeil 28
7. Anticevich 4
8. Harris-Dyson 9
9. Gordon 1
10. Davis 2

19-20 (Fox)
1. Bradley 30
2. Kuany 2
3. Kelly 11
4. Austin 18
5. South 27
6. Anticevich 32
7. Thorpe 2
8. Thiemann 18
9. Harris-Dyson 1
10. Gordon 0
11 Brown 17

20-21 (Fox)
1. Kelly 23
2. Bradley 19
3. Thorpe 1
4. Thiemann 11
5. Celestine 5
6. Brown 21
7. Anticevich 21
8. Foreman 14
9. Kuany 3
10. Betley 23
11. Hyder 4
12. Bowser 0

21-22 (Fox)
1. Kelly 21
2. Thiemann 11
3. Kuany 16
4. Alajiki 4
5. Shepherd 32
6. Celestine 16
7. Foreman 4
8. Anywanu 0
9. Anticevich 29
10. Brown 24
11. Hyder 2


One key way to get the most from your team is to play the best players/players that are playing well (at their respective positions).

In 2018-19 Jones should have played :
1. Austin
2. Bradley
3. Sueing
4. Kelly
5. Vanover

That was a good young starting 5, who if we kept them together, 4 plus a PG to replace Austin, would be a very good Cal team this year.

I won't say anything again about Fox's subsequent choices for minutes and starts (and shots). The stats speak for themselves.

This year a lot of minutes will by necessity go to guys we have not seen or seen little of.


So I will comment on Fox. If you look at the above, he gave Thiemann too many starts and minutes his first two years, especially as a freshman, and played Anticevich far too much all along. All at the expense of Kelly. Fox and friends have developed Thiemann and last year our front line should have been Lars and Kelly. With Kuany getting the backup minutes. Thorpe previously when healthy.

Jumping to this year. Losing Kelly is big. Bigger than losing Bradley. Losing Celestine to injury hurts.

However, if Okafor can be great defender and rebounder and Newell is as reported, Lars, Kuany, Newell and Okafor can give us a more productive front line minutes than Fox played last year with Anticevich, Kelly, Lars and Kuany.

Similarly, it is not asking much for a combination of the new guards to be more productive at the guard positions than Brown, Shepherd, Foreman and Hyder.

I don't see "a big step forward" but winning as many (or as few) games as last year seems a reasonable prediction. Our games will likely be even more low scoring though.
I cannot wait for the postgame presser where Fox comments on how we need to buckle down on defense and show more effort when we lose 36-44
Right? I remember him saying that after a 40-50 loss to UCLA and a 45-60 loss to Utah.

Back in 2011 when Cal played his Georgia team featuring his best recruit, McDonald's All American, SEC POY, future 1st Round Pick, we blew them out winning 70-46. He spent the postgame blaming his players' "lack of effort on defense." I though "what a jerk, did he think he could win 46-44? Sure glad he is not our coach."
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.