DoubtfulBear said:
Sebastabear said:
Oh yeah, and Jaydn Ott is still here. Just saying.
It's amazing that we are able to retain Ott, but he's very much the exception rather than the rule. I can't imagine many RBs of his caliber watching Blake Corum playing lights out on the national stage and not wanting a chance to do the same.
Also, where do you see the On3 rankings of 11? I'm seeing #22
https://www.on3.com/transfer-portal/team-rankings/football/2024/
I'm new to reviewing transfer portal class rankings, but if you read the On3 methodology on the page you linked, it is not a ranking of the class. It says:
Quote:
On3's Team Transfer Portal Index utilizes the On3 (P)erformance score to measure a team's production during the transfer process, compared relative against its roster and not a comparison against other schools. This proprietary algorithm determines if a school has improved its overall team talent, stayed the same, or declined in talent during the transfer window.
In other words, it is not a measure of how good your class was, but how it improved your team. So, if you sucked before, you can improve more with a lesser class and score higher on their ranking.
For instance, on their list, USC has 8 players coming in at an average of 82.88 and they rank 31st. We have 7 players coming in at an average of 78.57 and we rank 22nd. Oklahoma has 7 players averaging 80.71 and is ranked 42nd. West Virginia has 6 players coming in ranked on average at 72 and is 17th.
And hard to know under the circumstances whether something like Texas having 3 players ranked 91 is better.
But in any case, this ranking does not seem to indicate that a top 20 or top 10 class on the ranking means anything similar to a traditional top 10 or top 20 recruiting ranking.