Players aren't stupid, we may lose more if he stays.Nofado said:
If we lose Wilcox, we'll probably lose half the team to the transfer portal. Unless we have a star coach, it's just not gonna be pretty.
The Official 127th Big Game Game Thread
48,705 Views |
590 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by JimSox
Carton has had about 8 sack chances and over committed on every single one.
Wrong angle over and over.bearsandgiants said:
Carton has had about 8 sack chances and over committed on every single one.
If he wasn't out of bounds, that should have been grounding.
BearGoggles said:
If he wasn't out of bounds, that should have been grounding.
He's outside the pocket.
Mendozaaaaaa
hahaha finally found your alamaaaaar replacement yell?touchdownbears43 said:
Mendozaaaaaa
So bad
Mendoza is ll balls, zero brains.
Quite possibly the dumbest decision making I've seen in years.
Quite possibly the dumbest decision making I've seen in years.
Could have run for the first
Doesn't the ball need to go past the line of scrimmage?01Bear said:BearGoggles said:
If he wasn't out of bounds, that should have been grounding.
He's outside the pocket.
Oh my God. Run it Mendoza!!!!!!
Mendoza has to recognize that he needs to run… there was a good 20 yd of green field for him.
Mendoza's decisionmaking has been so bad the last couple of games.
BearGoggles said:Doesn't the ball need to go past the line of scrimmage?01Bear said:BearGoggles said:
If he wasn't out of bounds, that should have been grounding.
He's outside the pocket.
It went about twenty yards past
BearGoggles said:Doesn't the ball need to go past the line of scrimmage?01Bear said:BearGoggles said:
If he wasn't out of bounds, that should have been grounding.
He's outside the pocket.
Pretty sure it made it pass the LOS. But also, the QB has to be in the pocket.
It was out of bounds from the minute it left his hand. I believe it is not where the ball lands but where it goes out of bounds.01Bear said:BearGoggles said:Doesn't the ball need to go past the line of scrimmage?01Bear said:BearGoggles said:
If he wasn't out of bounds, that should have been grounding.
He's outside the pocket.
Pretty sure it made it pass the LOS. But also, the QB has to be in the pocket.
Clearly more talent on Cal, and yet poor play calling, mistakes, and lack of fire...
Wide right, even from the left. lol.
Take a knee? Pathetic. I don't want him as our coach either. Embarrassing.
Take a knee? Pathetic. I don't want him as our coach either. Embarrassing.
What an ugly game!
That entire drive was so Cal
BearGoggles said:It was out of bounds from the minute it left his hand. I believe it is not where the ball lands but where it goes out of bounds.01Bear said:BearGoggles said:Doesn't the ball need to go past the line of scrimmage?01Bear said:BearGoggles said:
If he wasn't out of bounds, that should have been grounding.
He's outside the pocket.
Pretty sure it made it pass the LOS. But also, the QB has to be in the pocket.
Nope. Draw a line from where it hits out of bounds to the sideline.
re: Intentional grounding
It's where the ball lands irrespective of whether it is inbounds/out of bounds.
There's an imaginary line drawn across the field that extends outside the field of play.
It's where the ball lands irrespective of whether it is inbounds/out of bounds.
There's an imaginary line drawn across the field that extends outside the field of play.
We should fake every field goal.
Man this game is totally different if we call a QB sneak on 4th and Mendoza runs for that first down. Just lame.
That half was painful to watch (and to listen to the announcers).
If you believe in forever
Then life is just a one-night stand
If there's a rock and roll heaven
Well you know they've got a hell of a band
Then life is just a one-night stand
If there's a rock and roll heaven
Well you know they've got a hell of a band
01Bear said:BearGoggles said:Doesn't the ball need to go past the line of scrimmage?01Bear said:BearGoggles said:
If he wasn't out of bounds, that should have been grounding.
He's outside the pocket.
Pretty sure it made it pass the LOS. But also, the QB has to be in the pocket.
Has to be in the pocket (tackle box):
https://www.vivathematadors.com/2015/11/3/9664024/ncaa-rules-101-intentional-grounding
Is Mendoza drunk?
Ok. I stand corrected. ThxGrigsby said:
re: Intentional grounding
It's where the ball lands irrespective of whether it is inbounds/out of bounds.
There's an imaginary line drawn across the field that extends outside the field of play.
I missed the first half, caught the last 2 minutes. Wow, we are explosive on offense! Just missed that FG, that's rare.
Anarchistbear said:
Is Mendoza drunk?
Mendoza's still trying to run the plays that the coaches are calling. Unfortunately, there's not much there. Cal's best plays of the first half have come from when Nando has improvised.
Hard to draw any conclusions watching two terrible teams play. We can't run the ball. Can't kick. And can't stop 4th down conversions. Same can be said about Stanford with the exception of their 4th down prowess. Turnover margin will decide second half.
The one conclusion is that Stanford is a much better coached team. Cal has a significant talent advantage but . . . here we are.trueblue22 said:
Hard to draw any conclusions watching two terrible teams play. We can't run the ball. Can't kick. And can't stop 4th down conversions. Same can be said about Stanford with the exception of their 4th down prowess. Turnover margin will decide second half.
Tedford's in the stadium, so Mendoza didn't want to pull a Riley at the end of the01Bear said:Anarchistbear said:
Is Mendoza drunk?
Mendoza's still trying to run the plays that the coaches are calling. Unfortunately, there's not much there. Cal's best plays of the first half have come from when Nando has improvised.
Featured Stories
See All
Ole Miss Corner Ricky Fletcher Likes What He Sees at Cal
by Jim McGill
The Rodcast: Cal-UNC Video Breakdown
by Rod Benson
Oregon LB Kamar Mothudi Picks the Bears
by Jim McGill