Texas Southern Tigers vs the Golden Bears Game Thread

18,029 Views | 241 Replies | Last: 12 days ago by Rushinbear
cccbear04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That call made infinitely more sense than the earlier roughing
cccbear04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't agree with the targeting
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.
pingpong2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Jinxed it
eastcoastcal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cccbear04 said:

Don't agree with the targeting

Sorry, I think it was the right call. Bad, bad, bad hit by Cade. Idiotic mistake
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad


As it happened I told my wife he would get ejected for targeting.

Still soft refs. Cal wouldn't get that call.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Uluave out for the rest of the game and the first half against Minnesota for targeting? UGH!
LarsBear74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

cccbear04 said:

Don't agree with the targeting

Sorry, I think it was the right call. Bad, bad, bad hit by Cade. Idiotic mistake


I don't know how many times we've seen stoopid stuff like that from our team over the years. Just ridiculous.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

cccbear04 said:

Don't agree with the targeting

Sorry, I think it was the right call. Bad, bad, bad hit by Cade. Idiotic mistake

Up 25-0 on Texas Southern you don't chance it, you stay well on this side of the line.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LarsBear74 said:

eastcoastcal said:

cccbear04 said:

Don't agree with the targeting

Sorry, I think it was the right call. Bad, bad, bad hit by Cade. Idiotic mistake


That's what crappy coaching gets you.

I don't know how many times we've seen stoopid stuff like that from our team over the years. Just ridiculous.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cccbear04 said:

Don't agree with the targeting

The targeting rule does not make sense to me and never has. Always inconsistently applied.
falseintellect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Lmao, Minn is gonna stomp this team. Cade or no.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another drop
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Get this man some receivers.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Okay, the WR drops are getting weird now.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unbelieveable how poor our WR's are. Way too many dropped balls by this team.
LarsBear74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

Another drop


Jeez, right in there!
falseintellect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

Get this man some receivers.


Eh, our coaches would just run em out of town
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
falseintellect said:

bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Lmao, Minn is gonna stomp this team. Cade or no.


Cal has ALWAYS played to the opponent under Wilcox. Always plays down to garbage teams, always plays up to good teams.

Cal might lose, but it's pretty rare for a Wilcox team to get stomped. They lost 30 games last year by a combined 1 point.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

cccbear04 said:

Don't agree with the targeting

The targeting rule does not make sense to me and never has. Always inconsistently applied.
you can't hit someone else's head with your head. You can't lower your head to do it. He did BOTH! You can't forcibly hit the head OR neck area even if you don't use your head. It was textbook targeting and dumb as hell.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

falseintellect said:

bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Lmao, Minn is gonna stomp this team. Cade or no.


Cal has ALWAYS played to the opponent under Wilcox. Always plays down to garbage teams, always plays up to good teams.

Cal might lose, but it's pretty rare for a Wilcox team to get stomped. They lost 30 games last year by a combined 1 point.


Huh?
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

falseintellect said:

bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Lmao, Minn is gonna stomp this team. Cade or no.


Cal has ALWAYS played to the opponent under Wilcox. Always plays down to garbage teams, always plays up to good teams.

Cal might lose, but it's pretty rare for a Wilcox team to get stomped. They lost 30 games last year by a combined 1 point.
feels like it. Lol
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

falseintellect said:

bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Lmao, Minn is gonna stomp this team. Cade or no.


Cal has ALWAYS played to the opponent under Wilcox.

Cal might lose, but it's pretty rare for a Wilcox team to get stomped. They lost 30 games last year by a combined 1 point.

Yup, this is just par for the course in FCS games under Wilcox. We never look good and it doesn't mean anything.
Wang24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thats what Auburn thought when the played Alabama A&M last year. Beating N'western state proves nothing, they also struggled to beat Buffalo. Bears will be fine.
falseintellect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

falseintellect said:

bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Lmao, Minn is gonna stomp this team. Cade or no.


Cal has ALWAYS played to the opponent under Wilcox. Always plays down to garbage teams, always plays up to good teams.

Cal might lose, but it's pretty rare for a Wilcox team to get stomped. They lost 30 games last year by a combined 1 point.


He hasn't a team this devoid of talent.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

Unbelieveable how poor our WR's are. Way too many dropped balls by this team.

But hey,WR blocking in the run game (when all our runs are inside) is what it is all about!

Can you imagine Sagapolutele throwing to last year's WRs, TEs and RBs?
falseintellect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I swear people are so delusional. Wilcox is taking us to the championship!!!!!
Joegeo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Were we watching the same WR group last year?? Other than Hunter did anyone who leave really dominated at all
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why is #3 in booty shorts?
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Cal has ALWAYS played to the opponent under Wilcox. Always plays down to garbage teams, always plays up to good teams.

Cal might lose, but it's pretty rare for a Wilcox team to get stomped. They lost 30 games last year by a combined 1 point.

More like 60 games by a combined 0.25 point! Unreal.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
falseintellect said:

LunchTime said:

falseintellect said:

bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Lmao, Minn is gonna stomp this team. Cade or no.


Cal has ALWAYS played to the opponent under Wilcox. Always plays down to garbage teams, always plays up to good teams.

Cal might lose, but it's pretty rare for a Wilcox team to get stomped. They lost 30 games last year by a combined 1 point.


He hasn't a team this devoid of talent.



This has been said every season since like 2012.

A couple good players but otherwise no talent has been said consistently for a generation.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Way too many penalties against Cal today. Poor coaching.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

LunchTime said:

falseintellect said:

bearsandgiants said:

eastcoastcal said:

For roughing the passet?? Lucky if he's not ejected that was bad
lost for first half of Minnesota would be awful. Just freaking dumb. Really stooopid.


Lmao, Minn is gonna stomp this team. Cade or no.


Cal has ALWAYS played to the opponent under Wilcox. Always plays down to garbage teams, always plays up to good teams.

Cal might lose, but it's pretty rare for a Wilcox team to get stomped. They lost 30 games last year by a combined 1 point.


Huh?


So, Cal didn't play 30 games. I thought that would tip everyone off to the hyperbole... Cal did lose 6 games by 9 points last year IIRC.

If that's not evidence that wicox keeps games close, not sure how to convince y'all.
LarsBear74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

Way too many penalties against Cal today. Poor coaching.


Yep, sloppy
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why is Saga still in? Put in Brown.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.