SmellinRoses said:

---

FremontBear said:

---

Piss poor debut for Bill Musgrave's WC Offense. Let's hope this crap is an exception.

---

Piss poor - is giving Musgrave too much credit. Worst coordinator debut can remember.

---

01Bear said:

---

SmellinRoses said:

---

FremontBear said:

---

Piss poor debut for Bill Musgrave's WC Offense. Let's hope this crap is an exception.

---

Piss poor - is giving Musgrave too much credit. Worst coordinator debut can remember.

---

Worse than Buh's defense?

---

01Bear said:

---

SmellinRoses said:

---

FremontBear said:

---

Piss poor debut for Bill Musgrave's WC Offense. Let's hope this crap is an exception.

---

Piss poor - is giving Musgrave too much credit. Worst coordinator debut can remember.

---

Worse than Buh's defense?

---

Golden One said:

---

01Bear said:

---

SmellinRoses said:

---

FremontBear said:

---

Piss poor debut for Bill Musgrave's WC Offense. Let's hope this crap is an exception.

---

Piss poor - is giving Musgrave too much credit. Worst coordinator debut can remember.

---

Worse than Buh's defense?

---

Yes.

---

HoopDreams said:

---

Extremely irritating commercial

---

dimitrig said:

---

Why is this game at 9am again?

---

GranadaHillsBear said:

---

Has Chip Kelly worn his mask once? There should be a penalty for mask violations.

---

LunchTime said:

---

******* gosh darn pop-ups on EVERY SINGLE click on this site are obnoxious.

---

Golden One said:

---

We'just given up.

---

concordtom said:

---

I imagine I am not the 4th person to say that this piped in crowd noise sucks, and is very annoying.

---

concordtom said:

---

OldenBear said:

---

when does basketball start?

---

Midnight Madness, October 2021

---

bipolarbear said:

---

It's just one thing, but I thought Garbers face looked extremely pale. I hope he's not sick.

---

hanky1 said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

After all the complaining about games being cancelled and just wanting to see the play, I'm surprised at all the whining. Just enjoy it for what it is, like so many of you said you would.

This is an intersquad scrimmage agreed to at the last minute. It's not a bowl game or a referendum on our coaches or players.

---

I'm glad our players were trying to win the game, unlike our fans, who were content on a participation trophy.

---

smh said:

---

HoopDreams said:

---

Extremely irritating commercial

---

Yet nowhere near as bad as the fake crowd noise added by the broadcast team on every fark'n play.

---

blungld said:

---

oskioski said:

---

what's the scientific rationale for coaches wearing masks, when they've all been tested? absolutely insane.

---

Because you can test negative and still be an asymptomatic spreader or have an incorrect test result and because you are an ADULT and should set a good example for young men, and because you are well paid to not be an ignorant ass. No, it's not insane, but your post was a little.

---

pingpong2 said:

---

I'm proud of how much social distancing I'm seeing from our guys on the field.

---

oskioski said:

---

blungld said:

---

oskioski said:

---

what's the scientific rationale for coaches wearing masks, when they've all been tested? absolutely insane.

---

Because you can test negative and still be an asymptomatic spreader or have an incorrect test result and because you are an ADULT and should set a good example for young men, and because you are well paid to not be an ignorant ass. No, it's not insane, but your post was a little.

---

then what's the point of testing. your argument unravels.

as an adult you should treat the players in your charge to think critically.

you would like china, or 1970s ussr.

---

blungld said:

---

oskioski said:

---

blungld said:

---

oskioski said:

---

what's the scientific rationale for coaches wearing masks, when they've all been tested? absolutely insane.

---

Because you can test negative and still be an asymptomatic spreader or have an incorrect test result and because you are an ADULT and should set a good example for young men, and because you are well paid to not be an ignorant ass. No, it's not insane, but your post was a little.

---

then what's the point of testing. your argument unravels.

as an adult you should treat the players in your charge to think critically.

you would like china, or 1970s ussr.

---

Dude, spare yourself. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

---

Quote:

---

A paper that analyzed the results of a massive post-lockdown Covid-19 testing drive that included nearly every eligible resident of Wuhan, China has found no evidence that positive cases without symptoms spread the disease.

---

blungld said:

---

You said coaches should teach their players to think critically. How in the world is it "thinking critically" to ignore the health precautions around wearing a mask for yourself, your team, and your community? That is not critical thinking that is making a vague denial of science and partisan public statement that has nothing to do with being an adult.

The coach and his players are nor experts on the virus and so any position taken that is counter to the scientific community is the coach editorializing and/or pushing his politics on the team. That too is not critical thinking.

Let's just say for arguments sake the science around wearing a mask was in doubt (it's not), being in doubt is not the same as conclusive. So you're saying that the responsible adult critical thinking position is for the coach to err on the side of passing on a disease? Why? So no one can tell him what to do? Or he doesn't want to look like a Liberal? Or because Trump doesn't? There is not one good reason that an adult leader of other men would not teach them to respect the scientific consensus, to admit what you don't know and defer to experience, and to err on protecting their teammates. It is just as ludicrous to think Fauci should tell Wilcox how to run his defense as it would be for Wilcox to ignore Fauci's recommendation to wear a mask because he found an internet article that questions wearing a mask...or because one time Fauci questioned wearing a mask at the start of the pandemic (for reasons that have been explained).

---

Quote:

---

Because you can test negative and still be an asymptomatic spreader

---

Quote:

---

Let's just say for arguments sake the science around wearing a mask was in doubt (it's not),

---

oskioski said:

---

Quote:

---

Because you can test negative and still be an asymptomatic spreader

---

that is simply not true. unless you want to argue against the actual science. i like your posts. i like how you've treated my friend on here. you don't need to rude.

Quote:

---

Let's just say for arguments sake the science around wearing a mask was in doubt (it's not),

---

this also isn't true. it's very much doubted.

---

01Bear said:

---

oskioski said:

---

blungld said:

---

oskioski said:

---

blungld said:

---

oskioski said:

---

what's the scientific rationale for coaches wearing masks, when they've all been tested? absolutely insane.

---

Because you can test negative and still be an asymptomatic spreader or have an incorrect test result and because you are an ADULT and should set a good example for young men, and because you are well paid to not be an ignorant ass. No, it's not insane, but your post was a little.

---

then what's the point of testing. your argument unravels.

as an adult you should treat the players in your charge to think critically.

you would like china, or 1970s ussr.

---

Dude, spare yourself. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

---

Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China | Nature Communications

Quote:

---

A paper that analyzed the results of a massive post-lockdown Covid-19 testing drive that included nearly every eligible resident of Wuhan, China has found no evidence that positive cases without symptoms spread the disease.

---

not "it's" rare. rather NO NONE ZIP cases of asymptomatic spreading the disease. i know what i'm talking about. the weird thing you'd think people would be excited about this news. instead they argue to maintain an original position. weird.

---

Except that wasn't even the purpose of (let alone the conclusions drawn by) the study.

For starters, the study was focusing on how prevalent Covid-19 was in Wuhan after China had been locked down for months. It wasn't studying whether the virus was transmissible by asymptomatic carriers. Instead, the study's authors recognized that asymptomatic spread was possible. Finally, the authors recognized that the use of RNA could provide false positives by including people who actually never had Covid-19, but may have been exposed to the virus at low viral loads.

If anything, this study showed the efficacy of actual lockdowns. You know, the very thing you and many others are decrying.

---

oskioski said:

---

01Bear said:

---

oskioski said:

---

blungld said:

---

oskioski said:

---

blungld said:

---

oskioski said:

---

what's the scientific rationale for coaches wearing masks, when they've all been tested? absolutely insane.

---

Because you can test negative and still be an asymptomatic spreader or have an incorrect test result and because you are an ADULT and should set a good example for young men, and because you are well paid to not be an ignorant ass. No, it's not insane, but your post was a little.

---

then what's the point of testing. your argument unravels.

as an adult you should treat the players in your charge to think critically.

you would like china, or 1970s ussr.

---

Dude, spare yourself. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

---

Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China | Nature Communications

Quote:

---

A paper that analyzed the results of a massive post-lockdown Covid-19 testing drive that included nearly every eligible resident of Wuhan, China has found no evidence that positive cases without symptoms spread the disease.

---

not "it's" rare. rather NO NONE ZIP cases of asymptomatic spreading the disease. i know what i'm talking about. the weird thing you'd think people would be excited about this news. instead they argue to maintain an original position. weird.

---

Except that wasn't even the purpose of (let alone the conclusions drawn by) the study.

For starters, the study was focusing on how prevalent Covid-19 was in Wuhan after China had been locked down for months. It wasn't studying whether the virus was transmissible by asymptomatic carriers. Instead, the study's authors recognized that asymptomatic spread was possible. Finally, the authors recognized that the use of RNA could provide false positives by including people who actually never had Covid-19, but may have been exposed to the virus at low viral loads.

If anything, this study showed the efficacy of actual lockdowns. You know, the very thing you and many others are decrying.

---

no. this was post lock down. and no, the study showed that tests of close contacts of with 1,174 asymptomatic cases resulted in no new positives.

to quote the study: "no evidence that the identified asymptomatic positive cases were infectious.."

---