the OFFICIAL Game thread against Westwood Community College

35,362 Views | 388 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 01Bear
AuBear81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We don't seem to have any speed on offence. No separation for receivers and RBs are just plowing into the (poorly blocked) line. Its like our players are 10% slower across the board.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskioski said:

what's the scientific rationale for coaches wearing masks, when they've all been tested? absolutely insane.
Because you can test negative and still be an asymptomatic spreader or have an incorrect test result and because you are an ADULT and should set a good example for young men, and because you are well paid to not be an ignorant ass. No, it's not insane, but your post was a little.

"The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!"
touchdownbears43
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's bad tackling and we've seem to have brought 2011 Tedford back out of retirement. Musgrave today has zero flow
oursdor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AuBear81 said:

We don't seem to have any speed on offence. No separation for receivers and RBs are just plowing into the (poorly blocked) line. Its like our players are 10% slower across the board.

O athleticism / talent remains a glaring issue for this staff
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Big C said:


So far, I'd have to give our coaching staff an "F" for game preparation. WHAT GIVES?!? What else have they had to do since January except get the team ready for the first game?

Not to point out the obvious, but we weren't going to play ucla this season. The decision was made - two days ago? How do you prepare for an opponent in two days. During a PANDEMIC?!?

Yea - the baby bears have the same issue, but they've also had a game. They are a bit more prepared.

And Cal is not the kind of team that can just out-talent opponents. Under Wilcox we've succeeded by being disciplined and well-coached. No practice and no prep kind of throws that out the window.

UCLA probably has more raw talent than we do.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why can't we protect QB?
txwharfrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"It's been a good drive by Cal so far" .... LOL

Let's see ... two roughing the QB penalties and two scrambles.... good drive .... LOL
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Remember from last year: Garbers always looks a lot better after he gets a couple of games under his belt!
BearChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:


Remember from last year: Garbers always looks a lot better after he gets a couple of games under his belt!
Do we get a couple of games this year?
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txwharfrat said:

"It's been a good drive by Cal so far" .... LOL

Let's see ... two roughing the QB penalties and two scrambles.... good drive .... LOL
Can't blame the announcers when their top responsibility at this point is to encourage viewers not to change the channel.
juarezbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have no speed on offense. They're bringing the house every okay. A trap or screen should work but the o-line can't hold them up at all.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess installing a new offense in 4 weeks just ain't happening
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
juarezbear said:

We have no speed on offense. They're bringing the house every okay. A trap or screen should work but the o-line can't hold them up at all.
Wasn't o-line supposed to be a strength this year?
BearChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why not just kick FG? It's a 3 possession game anyways.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearChemist said:

Why not just kick FG? It's a 3 possession game anyways.


We're gonna need touchdowns to win.
pingpong2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearChemist said:

Why not just kick FG? It's a 3 possession game anyways.


Do you know how many times this game our offense has gotten us this close to the endzone? One other time
touchdownbears43
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PI AND a stupid fcking play call on 4th
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That is friggin PI!

"The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!"
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OK that was stupid.
txwharfrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Polk was totally covered on the 4th down play.

They only needed three yards.... smdh....
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chapman_is_Gone said:

STFU. If you've already checked out mentally, leave the rest of us alone who haven't.
Are you also waiting for a Trump 2020 comeback?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Big C said:


So far, I'd have to give our coaching staff an "F" for game preparation. WHAT GIVES?!? What else have they had to do since January except get the team ready for the first game?

Not to point out the obvious, but we weren't going to play ucla this season. The decision was made - two days ago? How do you prepare for an opponent in two days. During a PANDEMIC?!?

Yea - the baby bears have the same issue, but they've also had a game. They are a bit more prepared.

Sorry, I am using sarcasm as a self-defense mechanism to keep me from going nuts in 2020. In a calmer state of reflection, I will readily admit that the players and staff are giving it their all in trying times and it's actually pretty amazing that we were able to schedule this game at the last minute and actually pull it off.
AuBear81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txwharfrat said:

Polk was totally covered on the 4th down play.

They only needed three yards.... smdh....


And they had 2 minutes to call that play...
pingpong2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Get ready for a 14 minute drive that puts us out of our misery
oursdor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
for this personnel that was a crazy low percentage play. just zero separation anywhere. looked like Garbers could have walked to a first down.
MiltyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No in game audience right? Weird that they're using playstation crowd noise machine.
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thank god this disaster started first thing in the morning rather than spending all day to be excited and then watch this show
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearChemist said:

Big C said:


Remember from last year: Garbers always looks a lot better after he gets a couple of games under his belt!
Do we get a couple of games this year?

Probably not, so there's that...


Over/under on how many games we will play this year, after today, is "one"... and I might take the under.
Efini
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garbers had the 1st down wide open underneath to his RB who trickled out late. He went with his first read (again)
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearChemist said:

Should have declared victory when up 3-0.
Echoes of Trump at midnight: Stop The Count!
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat_slice said:

Thank god this disaster started first thing in the morning rather than spending all day to be excited and then watch this show

Besides being the only available TV slot, playing the game in the afternoon would've just made a bigger window for players to test positive.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No fire. No confidence. This is not a Wilcox team.

"The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!"
txwharfrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this the worst game of the Wilcox era?
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pingpong2 said:

Get ready for a 14 minute drive that puts us out of our misery
No. It was four minutes and 15 seconds. Misery continues.
goldenchild
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd like to see the stats for yards after contact. SMH.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.