Looperbear;842820100 said:
Screw Larry K, he acted like a douche last week.
TexWoodyGiants;842820419 said:
Coach K argues every call. Good coach but I always dislike coaches who do that.
bipolarbear;842820405 said:
+1. The Sheriff checks all the boxes and we can afford him.
http://www.seminoles.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=209573179
DrDanger;842820422 said:
Like Monty?
TexWoodyGiants;842820424 said:
Yep. But for some reason I forgave Monty.
oskidunker;842820432 said:
How about a woman coach?? Might as well try something different
grandmastapoop;842820228 said:
His time with the Warriors was intriguing. His time with the Kings was a disaster, but there were extenuating circumstances (and he didn't get off on the right foot, getting busted for DUI before his first game). He seemed to be a vagabond for a while and I recall he badly wanted the Cal job when Monty left. I haven't followed him at Nevada.
I have concerns, though they are mostly based on my perception and nothing concrete. First, his personality always seemed prickly and I don't trust his ability to recruit. I don't trust his ability to deal with Cal admin/academic restrictions. He's a basketball junky. He only cares about basketball. He will get frustrated, quickly, when he can't get guys he wants into school.
But he certainly does seem to know how to coach.
tsubamoto2001;842820450 said:
He's recruited pretty well in his two years at Nevada. Granted most of his incoming players have been transfers, which is what you have to do at a place like Nevada. But his trajectory is something. He took over a 9-22 team and was 24-14 in Year 1, 28-6 this year, and most of his team is expected to be back next season and he adds 4 more high-major transfers. He's hired good recruiters (Dave Rice, Yanni) so it seems to me that he's aware that it's necessary to surround yourself with guys that can get players.
Whether he's a fit for Cal and can manage the academic component is a fair question. Otherwise, he checks off a lot of the boxes.
tsubamoto2001;842820450 said:
He's recruited pretty well in his two years at Nevada. Granted most of his incoming players have been transfers, which is what you have to do at a place like Nevada. But his trajectory is something. He took over a 9-22 team and was 24-14 in Year 1, 28-6 this year, and most of his team is expected to be back next season and he adds 4 more high-major transfers. He's hired good recruiters (Dave Rice, Yanni) so it seems to me that he's aware that it's necessary to surround yourself with guys that can get players.
Whether he's a fit for Cal and can manage the academic component is a fair question. Otherwise, he checks off a lot of the boxes.
grandmastapoop;842820498 said:
The fact he's done it with transfers is even more concerning. Transfer students are easier to recruit - they often have very few options, and they are less easily swayed by personality. They often feel chewed up and spit out, and have gone through some disappointment. It's not remotely the same as recruiting high school kids.
CalEnviroLaw;842820473 said:
I like Brian Shaw. East Bay guy. NBA playing and coaching experience. Apparently, he is interested. Would be an upgrade over Martin.
ducky23;842820513 said:
Shaw would be a coup. There's no doubt he will be able to recruit and he's a major upgrade X's and O's wise over cuonzo. The guy can coach. Plus, maybe he brings Theo with him as I believe they are both currently w the lakers.
If we had Shaw, I can't picture an Oakland recruit saying no to him.
ducky23;842820513 said:
Shaw would be a coup. There's no doubt he will be able to recruit and he's a major upgrade X's and O's wise over cuonzo. The guy can coach. Plus, maybe he brings Theo with him as I believe they are both currently w the lakers.
If we had Shaw, I can't picture an Oakland recruit saying no to him.
ducky23;842820458 said:
Here's my biggest issue with randy Bennett.
He's been able to exploit a market inefficiency. But like all market inefficienies, it won't last forever. The rest of your competition inevitably catches up.
philbert;842820091 said:
Larry K also gets paid over $2.5M/year. I doubt if Cal is going to pay more than that to lure him here.
Webster has interviewed for several HC positions, and probably will end-up a HC somewhere.TheSouseFamily;842820035 said:
Webster would follow Cuonzo, I assume. Not sure about the rest but I wouldn't want to retain any of them anyways. A new coach will need to start with a clean slate even if it means losing some guys from the class. In basketball, a team can be built up much faster than in, say, football. Plus, I've been unimpressed with the staff. anyway. S&C has been a huge weakness imo. And this is a very fundamentally unsound team and that falls, in large part, on the current assistants.
philbert;842820091 said:
Larry K also gets paid over $2.5M/year. I doubt if Cal is going to pay more than that to lure him here.
wifeisafurd;842820524 said:
He averages %2.4 over 10 years, and that is too much for Cal. Next candidate....
ducky23;842820513 said:
Shaw would be a coup. There's no doubt he will be able to recruit and he's a major upgrade X's and O's wise over cuonzo. The guy can coach. Plus, maybe he brings Theo with him as I believe they are both currently w the lakers.
If we had Shaw, I can't picture an Oakland recruit saying no to him.
OneTopOneChickenApple;842820530 said:
All true, but I don't the impression that he would stay at Cal long. He is an NBA guy.
wifeisafurd;842820533 said:
Very good NBA coach. The issue is how much transfers over to college. Can he coach-up college players? Academics?
ducky23;842820539 said:
True true. He won't be a legacy coach. But I could see him being happy here for awhile. He loves Oakland. Still lives here.
rathokan;842820547 said:
I'd be all in on Brian Shaw if he were interested. Imagine that dude recruiting in SoCal and walking into a household.
oskidunker;842820432 said:
How about a woman coach?? Might as well try something different