Potential coaches...

87,152 Views | 519 Replies | Last: 9 yr ago by tsubamoto2001
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C_Cal;842821383 said:

To sum up thus far:

[U]No[/U]: Pasternack, Shaw, Howland

[U]Take a closer look[/U]: Musselman, Gates (take a REALLY closer look there, imo)

[U]Not yet[/U]: Theo

[U]Fall-back positions[/U]: DeCuire, Bennett, Turner

And the winner is...

NONE-OF-THE-ABOVE! (Our guy Mike Williams, as soon as he signed Wilcox, intensified his always-has-his-ear-to-the-ground search to get the new, improved version of Cuonzo Martin!


Seems right. I would bet ultimately on Turner but that is just doing some handicapping of the list submitted above.
PtownBear1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842821385 said:

Seems right. I would bet ultimately on Turner but that is just doing some handicapping of the list submitted above.


Who's Turner? Don't recall his name mentioned before
atoms
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Monty disciple Russell Turner at UCI
joe amos yaks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UCI HC. Assistant to Coach Monte at the Farm and former assistant of your GSW's.
bearchamp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People's preoccupation with 5* high school players is a bit misplaced. Steph Curry and Westbrook were both 3* out of high school. In the NBA:

5 Stars: 51
4 Stars: 35
3 Stars: 28
2 Stars: 1
0 Stars: 11
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;842821270 said:

Cal isn't the place for failed and fired coaches to resurrect their careers. So no Lavin, no Crean. If we were coming off a 7-23 season, they'd get consideration, maybe.

McDermott was at Iowa State and soft landed at Creighton.


McDermott has been very successful at Creighton, and the Big East is probably as tough a basketball conference as the Big XII. It's a school with reasonably high academic standards (albeit a private school) and you have to do something right to talk kids into coming to play in Omaha.

My heart wants Gates. I always loved his hard-nosed, work-a-day attitude as a player, and always thought that I'd love to see him coach Cal someday. Maybe this is some day.

My head says experienced head coach, preferably with west coast experience.
- I disagree with you on Crean - I don't think he's forgotten how to coach, and this could be an opportunity to get his experience on the cheap -- and cheap will probably be a consideration.
- Randy Bennett is a Bay Area fixture, and notwithstanding his recruiting issues, has had fairly consistent success at St. Mary's. My question about that would be how much leeway he had to dip down into sub-par academics to assemble his teams.

The multi-million dollar question: there's a new chancellor in town and a big deficit. What will she approve?
SoFlaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
grandmastapoop;842819915 said:

Shareef quit the Kings almost 3 years ago and sued the team. I doubt he's still in Sacramento.


FWIW, Wikipedia says that he currently resides in Granite Bay, CA; is pursuing an MBA through the USC Marshall School of Business; and is currently the associate vice president of basketball operations of the NBA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareef_Abdur-Rahim
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearchamp;842821408 said:

People's preoccupation with 5* high school players is a bit misplaced. Steph Curry and Westbrook were both 3* out of high school. In the NBA:

5 Stars: 51
4 Stars: 35
3 Stars: 28
2 Stars: 1
0 Stars: 11


Go over the past 10 years of Final four teams. Sort line ups by season scoring average. Then look at HS stars. Bet you at LEAST 50% of top 50 scorers were at 4* plus
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoFlaBear;842821414 said:

McDermott has been very successful at Creighton, and the Big East is probably as tough a basketball conference as the Big XII. It's a school with reasonably high academic standards (albeit a private school) and you have to do something right to talk kids into coming to play in Omaha.

My heart wants Gates. I always loved his hard-nosed, work-a-day attitude as a player, and always thought that I'd love to see him coach Cal someday. Maybe this is some day.

My head says experienced head coach, preferably with west coast experience.
- I disagree with you on Crean - I don't think he's forgotten how to coach, and this could be an opportunity to get his experience on the cheap -- and cheap will probably be a consideration.
- Randy Bennett is a Bay Area fixture, and notwithstanding his recruiting issues, has had fairly consistent success at St. Mary's. My question about that would be how much leeway he had to dip down into sub-par academics to assemble his teams.

The multi-million dollar question: there's a new chancellor in town and a big deficit. What will she approve?


I have no problem with McDermott. He's a good coach that has a nice offensive system, which is a big plus in my mind. He tried to build at Iowa State with HS kids. That didn't work because at Iowa state you're not going to beat out KU and Texas, etc. for the better high school kids. You need transfers and JC's to succeed at Iowa State. At Creighton, he's built with his son and transfers and as he's become successful there Hs kids are now starting to listen. In any event, I don't think he's trying to move, but I guess he's worth a look.
OBear073akaSMFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeff82;842821338 said:

Bennett is clearly the candidate of the coach-'em-up crowd, versus the recruit-studs faction. If you look at his record, it's virtually identical to Monty's at Stanford. In his first eight years, SMC went toe NCAAs twice, losing in the first round both times, and one NIT. His winning percentage over that period was .615. He's been in the post season more frequently since then, but mostly in the NIT. This suggests that if you hire him, you have to be willing to stick with him for a long time, on the assumption that, like Monty, he can initially win with less, and that the winning will eventually translate into better recruiting. My question is, if we came to the Pac-12, and had a similarly soft non-conference schedule as he's mostly had at SMC, would he get to the NCAAs more frequently, just by virtue of being in a Power 5 league? Or would he end up playing a tougher schedule, and lose more often as a result, meaning he never gets the traction Monty finally got at Stanford? Also, is the fan base willing to go through six or eight years of relatively so-so results on the hope that he'll eventually reach critical mass? I'd certainly take him ahead of Musselman or Pasternak or Shaw, because he's likely to stay longer if we want him.


I would take him in a heart beat, if he whips AZ this weekend!
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OBear073akaSMFan;842821427 said:

I would take him in a heart beat, if he whips AZ this weekend!


You know what. Tomorrow's game is a very nice test of this proposition. I guess I will try/have to watch. If, as I suspect, Bennett gets out played because of sheer athleticism perhaps that will put a fork in this argument. If he plays them close or actually wins, well lets get it done.
Cal8285
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeff82;842821369 said:

You can't really put Braun in the coach-em-up camp. I mean, Montgomery won the Pac-12 title primarily with players that Ben had recruited. Braun sort of gets a double-whammy, in that he not only couldn't coach the players he recruited, he also in some cases couldn't keep them eligible, which is an even bigger problem. I do tend to agree with your broader point. The problem with the coach-em-up theory is that you never really know when to pull the plug, because it's always the next year that Monty, Campanelli, etc. would reach critical mass. I'm not sure I agree with you about Campanelli, who was sabotaged by Bozeman, and also by his own inability to keep his temper. Could his inability to control the Kidd group have resulted in a Romar-style collapse? Perhaps, but we don't have the evidence of that, because he was canned before we could find out.
The first Braun year was misleading to most of us. He was following in the heels of a guy who couldn't coach, period, so anything was good by comparison. Braun won with Bozeman's guys, in part because anybody with any idea of how to coach was going to be an improvement.

We got a good idea of how things were going with the Kidd group under Campy, it was worse than a Romar-style collapse. Even taking into account the occasional off night, there is no way they should have lost more than 2 of the 7 games they lost before Campy got fired. They clearly tanked 2 of them in response to being pissed at Campy. The first was the Cornell game, after Campy busted up the post-game spread following the loss in the Meadowlands and then left the team on its own, they lost by 20 to Cornell, and the game wasn't as close as the score would indicate. That team lost by TWENTY to CORNELL!! Why? Because the team was pissed at Lou. Then there was the game against WSU, Cal was up 20 right before the half and allowed a 3 at the buzzer to cut the lead to 17. Campy ripped the team a new one in the locker room when it had a 17 point lead, and that was it, the were done with him. The team said "FU" in its own way to Lou, losing the game by 7, and the backroom plotting began. You can justify the loss in the next game at Tucson, but no way they should have lost at ASU. I suspect it was more distraction by the backroom plotting going on than tanking, but still. Idiot Bockrath checked out the locker room on the trip to the desert the next week, but Campy's foul mouth at that point was an excuse for the real reason he had to be fired, Campy had lost the team due to his own behavior. You're right that Campy was sabotaged by his own inability to keep his temper, but while Bozeman's backroom plotting was designed to help Bockrath see the light, the person Bozeman truly sabotaged was Stanford's current James C. Gaither Assistant Coach of Men's Basketball Jeff Wulbrun, who as Campy's top assistant should have gotten the interim job after Campy lost the team (and deserved to lose his job, Bozeman plotting or no).

In any event, I think too many players regressed under Campy to put him in the coach-em-up camp. The fact that Campy helped KJ defensively and was an improvement over Kuchen doesn't really mean much. Sort of the same deal as with the Braun first year -- didn't take much coaching-em-up to be an improvement over Kuchen.
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842821431 said:

You know what. Tomorrow's game is a very nice test of this proposition. I guess I will try/have to watch. If, as I suspect, Bennett gets out played because of sheer athleticism perhaps that will put a fork in this argument. If he plays them close or actually wins, well lets get it done.


You don't judge a coach (or player) on one game. He has 16 years of work to be judged on. That he's elevated SMC to a point where a game against Arizona is a statistical toss-up is evidence of his program-building ability.
Cal8285
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842821431 said:

You know what. Tomorrow's game is a very nice test of this proposition. I guess I will try/have to watch. If, as I suspect, Bennett gets out played because of sheer athleticism perhaps that will put a fork in this argument. If he plays them close or actually wins, well lets get it done.
Win or lose, overreacting to one game is a bad idea (Ben Braun beat Duke in the NCAA tournament when he was at Eastern Michigan, what did that say?).

Nonetheless, beating AZ would say something about what Bennett can do with lesser talent. Losing, especially if SMC stays in the game, won't say that Bennett couldn't make Cal competitive, because there is no real doubt he could get better talent to Cal than he could to SMC. Being a P5 school with a national and international academic reputation will only help get better players than he can get to SMC. Whether he get good enough talent so that he could win in the Pac-12 with his system, or get good enough talent and change his system to win in the Pac-12, we'll never know (unless we hire him).
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;842821435 said:

You don't judge a coach (or player) on one game. He has 16 years of work to be judged on. That he's elevated SMC to a point where a game against Arizona is a statistical toss-up is evidence of his program-building ability.


OK. If he gets run out of the gym by 20? If on display is the vast and wide gap between what his players can do and what an Alonzo Treir can do? that is the point. If the eyeballs say "well ****, that can't get it done against the Cats" what then? Essentially you have to base your support (if that is what you are doing) on the hope that even tough he has NEVER gotten a local star kid to go to Moraga he suddenly can.

Look at it this way....why couldn't he get Rabb? Closer. He has a better track record that Martin. Has just as many guys in the NBA. But St. Mary's wasn't even a nano second of consideration for Gordon, Rabb, et al.

yeah. Not a P5. Well guess what. There are lots of options beside cal in the P5 as well.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal8285;842821436 said:

Win or lose, overreacting to one game is a bad idea (Ben Braun beat Duke in the NCAA tournament when he was at Eastern Michigan, what did that say?).

Nonetheless, beating AZ would say something about what Bennett can do with lesser talent. Losing, especially if SMC stays in the game, won't say that Bennett couldn't make Cal competitive, because there is no real doubt he could get better talent to Cal than he could to SMC. Being a P5 school with a national and international academic reputation will only help get better players than he can get to SMC. Whether he get good enough talent so that he could win in the Pac-12 with his system, or get good enough talent and change his system to win in the Pac-12, we'll never know (unless we hire him).


What if he gets run out of the gym by 20 and there is a complete gap in athleticism apparent from the opening tip?
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842821441 said:

OK. If he gets run out of the gym by 20? If on display is the vast and wide gap between what his players can do and what an Alonzo Treir can do? that is the point. If the eyeballs say "well ****, that can't get it done against the Cats" what then? Essentially you have to base your support (if that is what you are doing) on the hope that even tough he has NEVER gotten a local star kid to go to Moraga he suddenly can.

Look at it this way....why couldn't he get Rabb? Closer. He has a better track record that Martin. Has just as many guys in the NBA. But St. Mary's wasn't even a nano second of consideration for Gordon, Rabb, et al.

yeah. Not a P5. Well guess what. There are lots of options beside cal in the P5 as well.


Socal, you're a dedicated Cal fan, but at times you lack reason. I don't mean that as disrespect. This post is complete nonsense. You expect SMC to be players in the recruitments of 5-star players? Really? Not even Gonzaga, with their global brand, has been consistently able to do that. They still rely on transfers and international players.
Jeff82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bennett has a perceptual geometry problem to overcome, which he can do on Saturday. Arizona lost to Gonzaga on a neutral court. Gonzaga beat SMC three times this season, including once in the bandbox in Moraga. Bennett can overcome that on Saturday, by winning in front of what will likely be a pro-Arizona crowd. Otherwise, he retains the rep of being someone who basically beats the teams he's supposed to beat, but not anyone else. There's just more teams beneath him in the WCC than there would be if he came to Cal. At least, that's my current impression. Again, you won't really know unless you hire him on a long-term plan.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;842821446 said:

Socal, you're a dedicated Cal fan, but at times you lack reason. I don't mean that as disrespect. This post is complete nonsense. You expect SMC to be players in the recruitments of 5-star players? Really? Not even Gonzaga, with their global brand, has been consistently able to do that. They still rely on transfers and international players.


The argument for Bennett is that he is a wonderkid. Mr. X and O extraordinaire. Bring him to Cal and mana from heaven - match coaching with talent = championships.

And yet he has been in Moraga for 16 years and no stars.

And no. It can be done. Look at SDSU. Fisher took over a WOEFUL program just about the same time as Bennett. Arguably LESS success than Morago. Tough call as to which is better WCC or MW. But guess what, SDSU gets 3 and 4 stars and probably has as much talent as upper half PAc-12 teams. We haven't beaten them (as I am FREQUENTLY reminded) in over a decade. And he is starting to keep kids in San Diego/Inland Empire that have Pac-12 offers (though not yet head to head against UCLA and Zona).

The argument hinges on a serious unknown. And then you ask yourself - better Bennett or Turner. Cause on this dimension you probably can make just about equal arguments.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
North Carolina State hired Kevin Keatts day after Wilmington losses. Will we hire Bennett after tomorrow?.... ;-)
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842821455 said:

North Carolina State hired Kevin Keatts day after Wilmington losses. Will we hire Bennett after tomorrow?.... ;-)


He might not even be interested in leaving SMC.
Cal8285
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842821443 said:

What if he gets run out of the gym by 20 and there is a complete gap in athleticism apparent from the opening tip?
Well, there will be a complete gap in athleticism from the opening tip regardless of the final score.

Bennett isn't my first choice for a lot of reasons, but it is silly to base anything on one game. It is silly to base anything on losing one game where there is a clear talent gap. If you don't think that Bennett could get more talent at Cal than he can at SMC based on a) being a P5 school and b) being a nationally and internationally renowned academic institution, then you should be opposed to Bennett as Cal HC. Yes, there are P5 schools other than Cal, but there are plenty of mid-majors other than SMC, and Bennett has managed to perform better than almost all the other western US mid-majors.

Bennett beat Stanford by 15 at Maples this year, a year when Cal lost at Maples at full strength, two games after a 25 point win at ASU and one game after a 5 point loss at Tucson. Do I conclude therefore that Bennett can certainly compete in the Pac-12 even with the talent level he is recruiting at St. Mary's? No. And one 20 point loss to Arizona with lesser talent than he would be able to recruit at Cal shouldn't lead to the conclusion that Bennett can't compete in the Pac-12.

I don't know if Bennett can compete in the Pac-12 (and I'll be surprised if he ends up in the Pac-12), but taking too much either way out of one game is foolish.
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bennett's X's & O's with a great recruiter would be very interesting.
TheSouseFamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;842821422 said:

I have no problem with McDermott. He's a good coach that has a nice offensive system, which is a big plus in my mind. He tried to build at Iowa State with HS kids. That didn't work because at Iowa state you're not going to beat out KU and Texas, etc. for the better high school kids. You need transfers and JC's to succeed at Iowa State. At Creighton, he's built with his son and transfers and as he's become successful there Hs kids are now starting to listen. In any event, I don't think he's trying to move, but I guess he's worth a look.


Wait a minute. You'd give a guy like McDermott a thumbs up who in 20+ years of coaching has one 1 concerence title and has never made it past the round of 32 in the tourney (which he's missed entirely the last 3 years)....and a thumbs down to a guy of a similar age like Howland with 3 Final Fours, 4 PAC-10 titles, 2 Big East titles (where he went from 13-15 to 28-5), 2 Big Sky titles and a national coach of the year award? Sorry, don't get the logic. You know your stuff, Tsuba, but I don't get this one.
BearsObserver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWIW ... if we are to land Bennett and he gets Angus Glover to come with him, we will be getting arguably the No. 1 ranked Aussie recruit for the 2017 class.

https://www.hoops.com.au/forum/38005-latest-top-20-school-age-ausa-basketball-prospects/

Note that the list is from late 2015, but Glover has been active in leading Australia U19 and U20 teams the last couple of years and there is no indication he has fallen much from the No. 1 ranking. And note the No. 1 ranked recruits for the two prior years (2015 and 2016), both are in the NBA. By comparison, Grant Anticevich is ranked 19 in the 2017 Aussie recruiting class. Of course this assumes Glover wants to come and can be released from St Marys (he did sign NLI back in Nov) and also if he qualifies for Cal admission. Jonah Bolden is an example of an Aussie recruit who did not stick with UCLA for whatever reason.

BearBackerinLA;842821193 said:

Getting Bennett from St Mary's could potentially land us the next Aussie superstar recruit in 6-4 PG Angus Glover. Glover is also a teammate of current Cal commit Grant Anticevich on the New South Wales U-20 team and a possible member of the Aussie national team at the next Olympics.

https://pickandroll.com.au/angus-glover-selected-nike-hoop-summit/
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheSouseFamily;842821466 said:

Wait a minute. You'd give a guy like McDermott a thumbs up who in 20+ years of coaching has one 1 concerence title and has never made it past the round of 32 in the tourney (which he's missed entirely the last 3 years)....and a thumbs down to a guy of a similar age like Howland with 3 Final Fours, 4 PAC-10 titles, 2 Big East titles (where he went from 13-15 to 28-5), 2 Big Sky titles and a national coach of the year award? Sorry, don't get the logic. You know your stuff, Tsuba, but I don't get this one.


The logic is recent results and what I know about Howland. I wouldn't touch Howland if had won 3 Nattys at UCLA.
BearsObserver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is the person behind Earl Watson Elite AAU team where Jemarl Baker played ...

socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;842821471 said:

The logic is recent results and what I know about Howland. I wouldn't touch Howland if had won 3 Nattys at UCLA.


+1. If anyone wants to make the case for Howland they have to bridge the gap between what we saw when he would coach against Cal (a frustrating but very effective grab, bump, claw, and body defense) with the new freedom of movement emphasis - that arguably were a DIRECT result of frustration with the way Howland was teaching defense and how it was being copied by others. I don't see how the rules regime hasn't made him obsolete. Plus players HATE him (ditto AAU coaches)
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearBackerinLA;842821475 said:

He is the person behind Earl Watson Elite AAU team where Jemarl Baker played ...




Shoot me now if they are serious about Kyle Smith. Honestly?????
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842821477 said:

Shoot me now if they are serious about Kyle Smith. Honestly?????


He's a Randy Bennett protege. Good coach but not ready for a Power 5 job. Eran Ganot is another up and coming coach from the Bennett tree. I wonder who's pushing some of these names because that's the only way to make sense of a guy like Smith being considered. Lavin, too.
Jeff82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842821477 said:

Shoot me now if they are serious about Kyle Smith. Honestly?????


At least it's a new name to add to the list. For those just tuning in, he's the head coach at USF, having come there from Columbia. His record there was underwhelming. At first glance, I'd rather have Turner than Smith, since Turner has at least been on the West Coast. On the other hand, Smith beat Turner in the CIT (whoop-de-doo!!!) final a few years back, which just proves how convoluted this whole decision gets.

One other comment about Randy Bennett. He's 54. Monty retired at 67. My guess is if you hire Bennett, he's at Cal until he retires or is fired, so if you want to give the coach-em-up thesis a true test, he's probably the guy. We also don't know if he would take the job, but I would think he would, just for the actual money. Salary information for him is hard to come by, because SMC is a private school, but Forbes in 2014 reported his salary at just shy of $400,000 a year. Even if he's doubled that since then, it's way less than he would get at Cal.
BearsObserver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWIW ... Angus Glover was mentioned by the Aussie broadcast crew on the Cal Australia basketball tour two seasons ago as a rising star.


BearBackerinLA;842821470 said:

FWIW ... if we are to land Bennett and he gets Angus Glover to come with him, we will be getting arguably the No. 1 ranked Aussie recruit for the 2017 class.

https://www.hoops.com.au/forum/38005-latest-top-20-school-age-ausa-basketball-prospects/

Note that the list is from late 2015, but Glover has been active in leading Australia U19 and U20 teams the last couple of years and there is no indication he has fallen much from the No. 1 ranking. And note the No. 1 ranked recruits for the two prior years (2015 and 2016), both are in the NBA. By comparison, Grant Anticevich is ranked 19 in the 2017 Aussie recruiting class. Of course this assumes Glover wants to come and can be released from St Marys (he did sign NLI back in Nov) and also if he qualifies for Cal admission. Jonah Bolden is an example of an Aussie recruit who did not stick with UCLA for whatever reason.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear;842821361 said:

I personally like to watch guys develop for four years, or even five, grow as a team, and win with experience and team skill over sheer athleticism and individual skills. However, let's be honest about what has worked at Cal ... Bottom line - we've done a lot of the coach-em-up guys and few of the recruit them guys, and the recruit them guys have produced the best teams.


I too would much rather watch players grow and develop over 4 or 5 years and play together as a team. And graduate! I'm OK with the occasional one-and-done, so long as that player can be integrated into the team and eventually graduate, e.g. Shareef. I think good coaching with a mix of 3- and 4-star recruits could produce a competitive team and I wouldn't care about a Kentucky-like collection of ever-changing stars.

I'm a fan of our women's team because our players are thinking about the team, about their schoolwork, about whatever foolishness kids follow on Twitter. They're not thinking about showcasing themselves for the NBA or getting a shoe contract and their dads aren't suddenly driving new Lamborghinis.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm 7 pages in to this thread and I'm skipping ahead to say this:

1. Some of you are aiming pretty low. Our last 2 hires have been Mike Montgomery and Cuonzo. We are not institutionally constrained to mid major and P5 assistant coaches.

2. Whoever it is, we need to believe that they are who they are and not expect any transformations. Montgomery was known as an indifferent recruiter ... and he recruited badly. Cuonzo had a reputation as a poor offensive coach ... and our offenses sucked. We are 0-2 on the idea that we'll hire a kick ass assistant coach to overcome the HC's MO. We need to find someone that has a demonstrated competency at all facets of the job.

I don't have any names. One thing the last 3 years have shown me is the CM philosophy of having 2 unathletic seven footers with no offensive skills is mega-antiquated. (I admittedly haven't watched a lot of the tourney but so far I haven't seen a single tourney team using that approach). Just saying...
R.Hobbs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I read UDub is spending $2-3 million on a new coach and Cal will not offer anywhere near what Cuonzo was making ...Cal can still get a good coach but it may have to think outside the box ..
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.