WHAT THE ****. That's all I can say. And if this turns out to be true, sign me up for the fire Knowlton bandwagon.
If Cal decides that losing on the cheap is more cost effective then spending money and winning, I can accept that. I might not be happy about it, but I understand.ducky23 said:
Dare I say I might have preferred just keeping wyking over this bs
Sadly, I agree. At least WJ was starting to trend up. Fox reached a middling ceiling and ended his HC career trending down.ducky23 said:
Dare I say I might have preferred just keeping wyking over this bs
Guess.LOUMFSG2 said:
Nice to see us ignore Monty again? Did DeCuire and Turner turn us down, or did we choose Fox over them? I don't get it
That's my sense of it. Feels like Sonny Dykes, basketball version.OaktownBear said:
This is plain and simple a Sonny Dykes hire.
joe amos yaks said:
Everybody should just settle down and be positive.
This is not a personal thing about any coach.
Go Bears!
sycasey said:That's my sense of it. Feels like Sonny Dykes, basketball version.OaktownBear said:
This is plain and simple a Sonny Dykes hire.
Of course, you never know, maybe he'll turn out to be great. I wouldn't put money on it.
This doesn't feel like a Sonny hire to me.sycasey said:That's my sense of it. Feels like Sonny Dykes, basketball version.OaktownBear said:
This is plain and simple a Sonny Dykes hire.
Of course, you never know, maybe he'll turn out to be great. I wouldn't put money on it.
+1. It reeks of an AD who doesn't know BB (but probably DIGS olympic swimming). WAC was WEAK when he was winning at NEvada (prior Mountain West move). SEC was weak when he got there and as the football money flowed down to BB steadily slacked off.boredom said:
if this is true this is a terrible hire. We went after poor man's Ben Braun? Why not just hire actual Ben Braun at that point? He's local and available. (I'm not advocating for Braun to be hired, just pointing out how preposterous this decision is.)
He did well at Nevada but he came into what was likely a good situation. They went to the sweet 16 the year before and their coach was hired away (by furd).
He did not do well at Georgia. 6 of his 9 years there he finished 6th or worse in the SEC. He made 1 NCAA tournament. His peak was winning about 20 games and consistently making the NIT which is worse than the peak every coach we've had in a long while except Wyking. His last 2 years he finished 8th and tied for 11th.
Also, the SEC was bad when he was at his peak (of making the NIT consistently... sigh). His best year in conference he went 12-6 and tied for 2nd in the SEC. Went to the NIT. Think about how bad the conference has to be to have a 12-6 2nd place team miss the NCAAs. This year's PAC sent 12-6 ASU and 10-8 Oregon (though 11-7 Utah didn't go).
Garbage hire if true. The buyout needs to be non-existent.
EricBear said:joe amos yaks said:
Everybody should just settle down and be positive.
This is not a personal thing about any coach.
Go Bears!
Fan sites are about discussion, not cheerleading.
Let everyone pick at this hire. It's the right thing to do. Ultimately I think it will be alright.
bearsandgiants said:
this is reminiscent of the classic giants moves, hiring 38-year old veterans, former all-stars, two years removed from their peak , .305, 20hr season, and hoping for a miracle.
Why should we expect the moron who couldn't figure out Jones needed to be fired could figure out how to make a decent hire.helltopay1 said:
To all those who demanded that WJ be fired: Are you happy now??
Highly doubt thisAnother Bear said:
I think there's a good chance TDC declined. Doing well at his alma mater, winning, way lower cost of living...doesn't have to rebuild in a difficult situation. Why would he leave? Even money can't buy some stuff.
Cost of living? He makes $175K. If he declined it is because he figures he can get a better offer in a year or two. Not because he'd rather make one sixth the salary in Montana.Another Bear said:
I think there's a good chance TDC declined. Doing well at his alma mater, winning, way lower cost of living...doesn't have to rebuild in a difficult situation. Why would he leave? Even money can't buy some stuff.
Fox was a good hire for Georgia. That is the kind of guy you promote. Once he had 9 years of failure at the next level, it isn't a good hire any more. Stepping down to mid major makes sense. Power conference? No way in hell that makes sense.R90 said:
Fox was a success at Nevada, which is why Georgia poached him.
Nevada Coaches
1970-1972 Jackson Spencer 10-64 .135
1973-1976 Jim Padgett 43-61 .413
1977-1980 Jim Carey 65-46 .586
1981-1987 Sonny Allen 114-89 .562
1988-1993 Len Stevens 91-79 .535
1994-1999 Pat Foster 90-81 .526
2000-2004 Trent Johnson 79-74 .516
2005-2009 Mark Fox 123-43 .741
2010-2015 David Carter 98-97 .503
2016-Present Eric Musselman 100-30 .769
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nevada_Wolf_Pack_men%27s_basketball
Granted, he took over a program Trent Johnson had built up before Stanford hired him away, but he was WAC Coach of the Year twice in five years and his team never finished lower than 2nd.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Fox_(basketball)