How did it get there? This article (supported by a peer-reviewed journal article) describes how.
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/new-published-study-shows-theresRegarding claims that 1) the vaccines stay in the arm and 2) cannot enter the cell nucleus to affect or integrate with DNA...
"The first claim is a lie and they knew that. Biodistribution of LNPs is the bread-and-butter-modus-operandi of LNPs. In fact, they are often studded with specific proteins to enable location-specific trafficking in the body, like to the liver to deliver pro-drugs, for example.
The second statement is categorically false and you know how I know that? Because they have no scientific evidence to make this claim, and in light of the fact that multiple studies from multiple labs (reproduced finding from non-conflicted labs) have identified DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna vials, it is a false statement.
If there's DNA in the vials with appropriate mammalian promoters, then host cell genomic damage is a concern. In fact, Moderna acknowledge in their own patent from 2018 that foreign DNA introduction is a no-no because of potential for "alterations and/or damage to host cell genomic DNA"."...
"This isn't the worst of it.
We found SV40 promoter/enhancers in the Pfizer vials. We did not find them in the Moderna vials. This is likely because they didn't grab the gene therapy plasmid off the shelf when they went to up-scale production for commercial use. This SV40 is NOT the simian virus as a complete virus. It's a component of SV40, and is a gene therapy tool used in biotech/on the bench to get stuff to the nucleus of cells. Read
David Dean's work.
2We do not know why it's in the vials but we suspect that it's there because Pfizer grabbed a plasmid from the shelf that contained it and just thought 'meh, this won't be a problem, and if it is, who cares'. That seems to be the attitude from many regulators at least.
Before I go further, there's something else of importance that I need to explain. I keep using the word
plasmid and you need to know more about that. I recommend reading Retsef Levi and Josh Guetzkow's BMJ
rapid response article about Process 1 and Process 2.
Process 1 involves amplifying DNA using PCR to produce the material for subsequent production of nucleoside modified RNA - the infamous coding material for spike used in the Pifzer and Moderna shots. This is the process they used for production in the case of the clinical trials. But hold up. Did they use this production method for the commercial products: the shots that went into billions of people? Nope.
They used Process 2. Process 2 involved making tons of DNA for nucleoside modified RNA production using something called a plasmid/
E. coli system. It's an extremely cost-efficient and rapid way to use the doubling-power of
E. coli bacteria to make tons of DNA, and in this case, spike DNA. The problem with this is that if you don't purify your end-product - in this case, nucleoside-modified RNA - you might end up with DNA impurities and even lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contamination. LPS is a component part of the
E. coli outer membrane of the cell wall. You should know that if you accidentally inject LPS into a person, they will likely go into anaphylactic shock. There are currently 10,911 reports of anaphylaxis in VAERS.
3 Well, it seems that the only explanation for the DNA in the vials is that this last step failed.
They needed a super fast and cheap way to make this stuff, so they up-scaled production by switching to this process. You should know, that they did NOT do any safety testing worth mentioning on the products of the Process 2 materials - they looked at safety signals in a few hundred people from one lot. That's it. Does that sound ok to you?
New manufacturing procedure; new trials!
Back to SV40.
SV40 is a gene therapy tool. It's used to traffic stuff to the nucleus of cells. If a cell is dividing, its nuclear membrane breaks down and any old foreign DNA can hypothetically gain access to become integrated. It's possible. So there's that. But foreign DNA like SV40 and the other junk only needs to find its way to the juicy interior of a cell to wreak havoc in terms of activating cancer pathways (see: cGas-STING pathway).
There's also the fact that the SV40 promoter/enhancer sequences are known to interact with the quintessential p53 protein. You know, that tumor suppressor thingy often called the guardian of the genome? What effect is that having? Is it impairing the tumor suppressor effects of p53? Is this why we're seeing cancers on the rise? There's more that SV40 can do to mess things up, but I will leave it at this."