So you're saying the government actively silenced negative stories about vaccines? Where and when? By what means?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:
There's nothing wrong with the government spending money to advertise free vaccines that would help end the pandemic faster. I would consider it a dereliction of duty if they didn't.
There's a lot wrong if the media outlets were directed not to report on anything negative related to the vaccines or by not allowing voices to be heard from the medical and scientific community that run counter to their narrative.. This the definition of propaganda.
Vaccine Redux - Vax up and go to Class
549,503 Views |
5407 Replies |
Last: 2 days ago by Zippergate
sycasey said:So you're saying the government actively silenced negative stories about vaccines? Where and when? By what means?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:
There's nothing wrong with the government spending money to advertise free vaccines that would help end the pandemic faster. I would consider it a dereliction of duty if they didn't.
There's a lot wrong if the media outlets were directed not to report on anything negative related to the vaccines or by not allowing voices to be heard from the medical and scientific community that run counter to their narrative.. This the definition of propaganda.
You don't think negative vaccine stories were silenced? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
Your claim is about government propaganda. How did the government silence contrary voices on vaccines?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:So you're saying the government actively silenced negative stories about vaccines? Where and when? By what means?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:
There's nothing wrong with the government spending money to advertise free vaccines that would help end the pandemic faster. I would consider it a dereliction of duty if they didn't.
There's a lot wrong if the media outlets were directed not to report on anything negative related to the vaccines or by not allowing voices to be heard from the medical and scientific community that run counter to their narrative.. This the definition of propaganda.
You don't think negative vaccine stories were silenced? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
oski003 has posted plenty of negative vaccine stories here, so the information doesn't seem inaccessible to me.
sycasey said:Your claim is about government propaganda. How did the government silence contrary voices on vaccines?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:So you're saying the government actively silenced negative stories about vaccines? Where and when? By what means?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:
There's nothing wrong with the government spending money to advertise free vaccines that would help end the pandemic faster. I would consider it a dereliction of duty if they didn't.
There's a lot wrong if the media outlets were directed not to report on anything negative related to the vaccines or by not allowing voices to be heard from the medical and scientific community that run counter to their narrative.. This the definition of propaganda.
You don't think negative vaccine stories were silenced? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
oski003 has posted plenty of negative vaccine stories here, so the information doesn't seem inaccessible to me.
He did? From where? NYT? ABC news? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
So are you suggesting that whatever you describe as "mainstream" sources should be required to run stories to your liking? I don't understand the point here. I want to know how you think the government squashed anti-vaccine stories.BearForce2 said:sycasey said:Your claim is about government propaganda. How did the government silence contrary voices on vaccines?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:So you're saying the government actively silenced negative stories about vaccines? Where and when? By what means?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:
There's nothing wrong with the government spending money to advertise free vaccines that would help end the pandemic faster. I would consider it a dereliction of duty if they didn't.
There's a lot wrong if the media outlets were directed not to report on anything negative related to the vaccines or by not allowing voices to be heard from the medical and scientific community that run counter to their narrative.. This the definition of propaganda.
You don't think negative vaccine stories were silenced? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
oski003 has posted plenty of negative vaccine stories here, so the information doesn't seem inaccessible to me.
He did? From where? NYT? ABC news? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
sycasey said:So are you suggesting that whatever you describe as "mainstream" sources should be required to run stories to your liking? I don't understand the point here. I want to know how you think the government squashed anti-vaccine stories.BearForce2 said:sycasey said:Your claim is about government propaganda. How did the government silence contrary voices on vaccines?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:So you're saying the government actively silenced negative stories about vaccines? Where and when? By what means?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:
There's nothing wrong with the government spending money to advertise free vaccines that would help end the pandemic faster. I would consider it a dereliction of duty if they didn't.
There's a lot wrong if the media outlets were directed not to report on anything negative related to the vaccines or by not allowing voices to be heard from the medical and scientific community that run counter to their narrative.. This the definition of propaganda.
You don't think negative vaccine stories were silenced? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
oski003 has posted plenty of negative vaccine stories here, so the information doesn't seem inaccessible to me.
He did? From where? NYT? ABC news? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
The reason why you can't remember is because there probably weren't any stories out there. Don't worry, you will learn more about the vaccines you just took when journalists feel safe to ask questions and investigate.
BearForce2 said:sycasey said:So are you suggesting that whatever you describe as "mainstream" sources should be required to run stories to your liking? I don't understand the point here. I want to know how you think the government squashed anti-vaccine stories.BearForce2 said:sycasey said:Your claim is about government propaganda. How did the government silence contrary voices on vaccines?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:So you're saying the government actively silenced negative stories about vaccines? Where and when? By what means?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:
There's nothing wrong with the government spending money to advertise free vaccines that would help end the pandemic faster. I would consider it a dereliction of duty if they didn't.
There's a lot wrong if the media outlets were directed not to report on anything negative related to the vaccines or by not allowing voices to be heard from the medical and scientific community that run counter to their narrative.. This the definition of propaganda.
You don't think negative vaccine stories were silenced? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
oski003 has posted plenty of negative vaccine stories here, so the information doesn't seem inaccessible to me.
He did? From where? NYT? ABC news? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
The reason why you can't remember is because there probably weren't any stories out there. Don't worry, you will learn more about the vaccines you just took when journalists feel safe to ask questions and investigate.
So you have no evidence. I figured, just wanted to make sure.
sycasey said:BearForce2 said:sycasey said:So are you suggesting that whatever you describe as "mainstream" sources should be required to run stories to your liking? I don't understand the point here. I want to know how you think the government squashed anti-vaccine stories.BearForce2 said:sycasey said:Your claim is about government propaganda. How did the government silence contrary voices on vaccines?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:So you're saying the government actively silenced negative stories about vaccines? Where and when? By what means?BearForce2 said:sycasey said:
There's nothing wrong with the government spending money to advertise free vaccines that would help end the pandemic faster. I would consider it a dereliction of duty if they didn't.
There's a lot wrong if the media outlets were directed not to report on anything negative related to the vaccines or by not allowing voices to be heard from the medical and scientific community that run counter to their narrative.. This the definition of propaganda.
You don't think negative vaccine stories were silenced? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
oski003 has posted plenty of negative vaccine stories here, so the information doesn't seem inaccessible to me.
He did? From where? NYT? ABC news? Do you remember hearing anything from the "mainstream" media?
The reason why you can't remember is because there probably weren't any stories out there. Don't worry, you will learn more about the vaccines you just took when journalists feel safe to ask questions and investigate.
So you have no evidence. I figured, just wanted to make sure.
For information regarding virus origins, however, you'll have to wait until the midterm elections are over when the Republicans take over Congress. Who knows, the next one might be worse.
1) Media outlets do not speak out against products they are paid to advertise.
2) There is a legitimate consensus belief that our country is better off with everyone eligible getting vaccinated as soon as possible.
-This message brought to you by Pfizer
2) There is a legitimate consensus belief that our country is better off with everyone eligible getting vaccinated as soon as possible.
-This message brought to you by Pfizer
oski003 said:
1) Media outlets do not speak out against products they are paid to advertise.
2) There is a legitimate consensus belief that our country is better off with everyone eligible getting vaccinated as soon as possible.
-This message brought to you by Pfizer
Our free press and media have definitely had a history of speaking out against products they are paid to advertise.
dimitrig said:oski003 said:
1) Media outlets do not speak out against products they are paid to advertise.
2) There is a legitimate consensus belief that our country is better off with everyone eligible getting vaccinated as soon as possible.
-This message brought to you by Pfizer
Our free press and media have definitely had a history of speaking out against products they are paid to advertise.
Not when the same entity paying you to advertise is also the entity with the authority to say that it is safe. The burden of proof to show efficacy is a tiny burden with a moving goal post. The burden of proof to show side effects is mountainous.
Here are nine more US soldiers, all in their 20s or 30s, who recently died at Fort Bragg from “undetermined” causes, or after being discovered “unresponsive” in their bunks.
— Seth Harp (@sethharpesq) March 9, 2022
How can the US Army not know what is killing these soldiers?
No comment from Fort Bragg. pic.twitter.com/AuSRvIu6x4
Wigs, have you been checking the VAERS database recently? Are military personnel listed?
COVID pandemic death toll may be 3 times higher than official tally, new study finds - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-pandemic-deaths-18-million-study/
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-pandemic-deaths-18-million-study/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Yes, but some people have been forced to endure the inconvenience of masks indoors. So, fine people on both sides.bearister said:
COVID pandemic death toll may be 3 times higher than official tally, new study finds - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/covid-pandemic-deaths-18-million-study/
The next wave in Europe has begun pic.twitter.com/2qm4JzOqit
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) March 12, 2022
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
COVID update: Based on European case increases, the US could see a new rise in COVID cases over the Spring.
— Andy Slavitt 💙💛 (@ASlavitt) March 14, 2022
The wave is likely to look different in several ways. 1/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Shocked, just shocked.
Quote:
Reuters: Demand for the COVID-19 vaccine produced by U.S. biotech firm Novavax has been underwhelming in the European Union's main countries in the early rollout, so far undermining hopes that it could convince vaccine sceptics to get a shot.
Unit2Sucks said:
Shocked, just shocked.Quote:
Reuters: Demand for the COVID-19 vaccine produced by U.S. biotech firm Novavax has been underwhelming in the European Union's main countries in the early rollout, so far undermining hopes that it could convince vaccine sceptics to get a shot.
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+. Give it a little time. Reuters and Politico are the mouthpieces for Pfizer and BioNTech. Their writing is slanted.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
Oh right, you have a conspiracy theory for everything. Fire Fauci!oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Shocked, just shocked.Quote:
Reuters: Demand for the COVID-19 vaccine produced by U.S. biotech firm Novavax has been underwhelming in the European Union's main countries in the early rollout, so far undermining hopes that it could convince vaccine sceptics to get a shot.
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+. Give it a little time. Reuters and Politico are the mouthpieces for Pfizer and BioNTech. Their writing is slanted.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
Unit2Sucks said:Oh right, you have a conspiracy theory for everything. Fire Fauci!oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Shocked, just shocked.Quote:
Reuters: Demand for the COVID-19 vaccine produced by U.S. biotech firm Novavax has been underwhelming in the European Union's main countries in the early rollout, so far undermining hopes that it could convince vaccine sceptics to get a shot.
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+. Give it a little time. Reuters and Politico are the mouthpieces for Pfizer and BioNTech. Their writing is slanted.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
You call biased journalism a conspiracy? It is the truth. Pfizer's board has the ex Reuters CEO on Chairman of the Reuters Foundation. The article is misleading, and I gave you facts demonstrating such.
What control does the ex Reuters CEO still have over Reuters reporting?oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:Oh right, you have a conspiracy theory for everything. Fire Fauci!oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Shocked, just shocked.Quote:
Reuters: Demand for the COVID-19 vaccine produced by U.S. biotech firm Novavax has been underwhelming in the European Union's main countries in the early rollout, so far undermining hopes that it could convince vaccine sceptics to get a shot.
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+. Give it a little time. Reuters and Politico are the mouthpieces for Pfizer and BioNTech. Their writing is slanted.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
You call biased journalism a conspiracy? It is the truth. Pfizer's board has the ex Reuters CEO on Chairman of the Reuters Foundation. The article is misleading, and I gave you facts demonstrating such.
Your claim that it is biased is literally a conspiracy theory. You believe the ex Reuters CEO is exercising editorial discretion and/or modifying content. That's lunacy and completely baseless.oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:Oh right, you have a conspiracy theory for everything. Fire Fauci!oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Shocked, just shocked.Quote:
Reuters: Demand for the COVID-19 vaccine produced by U.S. biotech firm Novavax has been underwhelming in the European Union's main countries in the early rollout, so far undermining hopes that it could convince vaccine sceptics to get a shot.
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+. Give it a little time. Reuters and Politico are the mouthpieces for Pfizer and BioNTech. Their writing is slanted.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
You call biased journalism a conspiracy? It is the truth. Pfizer's board has the ex Reuters CEO on Chairman of the Reuters Foundation. The article is misleading, and I have you facts demonstrating such.
I'm not sure why you brought up Politico other than to burnish your conspiracy theorist credentials - I certainly made no reference to them.
If people were so eager for this traditional vaccine tech, like you claim, then they would be clamoring for it now. And it's not just Germany. Please work on your next conspiracy theory.
Quote:
But initial data on Nuvaxovid's rollout show that it has had a small impact on vaccination campaigns.
In Germany, the EU's most populous country and home to more than 10 million unvaccinated adults, only about 38,000 Novavax doses have been administered since the start of the rollout on Feb. 24, according to data from the Robert Koch Institute.
In March so far on average nearly 90,000 COVID-19 vaccines have been administered daily in Germany, mostly boosters. Only three per cent of them were Novavax's, despite over two million doses distributed to the country.
A similar situation is emerging in Italy, where less than 16,000 Nuvaxovid doses have been administered since Feb 28, when the rollout started after the delivery of one million shots to vaccination centres. In the same period, the country injected over 70,000 COVID-19 vaccines a day, largely boosters, data from the government show.
Novavax said its protein-based shot will play a role in driving vaccination among those who have been hesitant to get immunized and it has started an educational effort on vaccine choices.
The arrival of the vaccine so far into the region's campaign which started in late 2020 and amid the easing of restrictive measures were among the reasons for the "disappointing performance," former head of the EU's drugs agency, Guido Rasi, said.
Unit2Sucks said:Your claim that it is biased is literally a conspiracy theory. You believe the ex Reuters CEO is exercising editorial discretion and/or modifying content. That's lunacy and completely baseless.oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:Oh right, you have a conspiracy theory for everything. Fire Fauci!oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Shocked, just shocked.Quote:
Reuters: Demand for the COVID-19 vaccine produced by U.S. biotech firm Novavax has been underwhelming in the European Union's main countries in the early rollout, so far undermining hopes that it could convince vaccine sceptics to get a shot.
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+. Give it a little time. Reuters and Politico are the mouthpieces for Pfizer and BioNTech. Their writing is slanted.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
You call biased journalism a conspiracy? It is the truth. Pfizer's board has the ex Reuters CEO on Chairman of the Reuters Foundation. The article is misleading, and I have you facts demonstrating such.
I'm not sure why you brought up Politico other than to burnish your conspiracy theorist credentials - I certainly made no reference to them.
If people were so eager for this traditional vaccine tech, like you claim, then they would be clamoring for it now. And it's not just Germany. Please work on your next conspiracy theory.Quote:
But initial data on Nuvaxovid's rollout show that it has had a small impact on vaccination campaigns.
In Germany, the EU's most populous country and home to more than 10 million unvaccinated adults, only about 38,000 Novavax doses have been administered since the start of the rollout on Feb. 24, according to data from the Robert Koch Institute.
In March so far on average nearly 90,000 COVID-19 vaccines have been administered daily in Germany, mostly boosters. Only three per cent of them were Novavax's, despite over two million doses distributed to the country.
A similar situation is emerging in Italy, where less than 16,000 Nuvaxovid doses have been administered since Feb 28, when the rollout started after the delivery of one million shots to vaccination centres. In the same period, the country injected over 70,000 COVID-19 vaccines a day, largely boosters, data from the government show.
Novavax said its protein-based shot will play a role in driving vaccination among those who have been hesitant to get immunized and it has started an educational effort on vaccine choices.
The arrival of the vaccine so far into the region's campaign which started in late 2020 and amid the easing of restrictive measures were among the reasons for the "disappointing performance," former head of the EU's drugs agency, Guido Rasi, said.
Since you won't address anything I said, I will repeat myself.
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+. Give it a little time. Reuters and Politico are the mouthpieces for Pfizer and BioNTech. Their writing is slanted.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
Secondly, the ex CEO of Reuters and Chairman of Reuters Foundation profits from Pfizer's stock price. you are apparently too naive to see the connection between Pfizer adding people like ex FDA head Scott Gottlieb (who is a talking head on the news) and the Reuters ex CEO /Chair and their news coverage. It is very savvy of them.
Repeating conspiracy theories doesn't make them more credible but I get that it's all you have.
Unit2Sucks said:
Repeating conspiracy theories doesn't make them more credible but I get that it's all you have.
Again,
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Repeating conspiracy theories doesn't make them more credible but I get that it's all you have.
Again,
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
Vaccine hesitant don't need boosters and you are ignoring Italy. I don't have the time to fact check the exact date it became available but I've seen Feb 28 in Germany.
None of this justifies your continuous abuse of baseless conspiracy theories. But please tell me about Politico for no reason.
Unit2Sucks said:oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Repeating conspiracy theories doesn't make them more credible but I get that it's all you have.
Again,
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
Vaccine hesitant don't need boosters and you are ignoring Italy. I don't have the time to fact check the exact date it became available but I've seen Feb 28 in Germany.
None of this justifies your continuous abuse of baseless conspiracy theories. But please tell me about Politico for no reason.
Politico and Reuters write the news disparaging Novavax. Not too many other outlets originate articles that do so. The last two you posted disparaging Novavax we're from Reuters and Novavax. This is not continuous abuse of conspiracy theories.
Dr. Campbell talks about PFE Docs. He's not happy..
CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Reveals 31% Vaccine Effectiveness to Kids 5 -11 After Receiving 2 Doses of Pfizer Vaccine
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7111e1.htm?s_cid=mm7111e1_e&ACSTrackingID=USCDC_921-DM77620&ACSTrackingLabel=MMWR%20Early%20Release%20-%20Vol.%2071%2C%20March%2011%2C%202022&deliveryName=USCDC_921-DM77620&fbclid=IwAR3IRkGtGQlGmI_V_zRW7BvBNZimAv9srI5McX2cv-R5ozuqlSJBUmGtXW4#T1_down
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7111e1.htm?s_cid=mm7111e1_e&ACSTrackingID=USCDC_921-DM77620&ACSTrackingLabel=MMWR%20Early%20Release%20-%20Vol.%2071%2C%20March%2011%2C%202022&deliveryName=USCDC_921-DM77620&fbclid=IwAR3IRkGtGQlGmI_V_zRW7BvBNZimAv9srI5McX2cv-R5ozuqlSJBUmGtXW4#T1_down
Naomi Wolf Confirms Big Pharma Was Adding Varying Amounts of Active Ingredient to Batches of COVID Vaccine
Former Clinton adviser, Naomi Wolf and her team of investigators, doctors and attorneys identified several US government documents that confirm that Pfizer was adding varying amounts of active ingredient to their experimental COVID vaccines. According to the data, the range of dangerous active ingredient went from 3g, to 10g, to 30g, to 100g depending on the batch they happened to inject you with.
Former Clinton adviser, Naomi Wolf and her team of investigators, doctors and attorneys identified several US government documents that confirm that Pfizer was adding varying amounts of active ingredient to their experimental COVID vaccines. According to the data, the range of dangerous active ingredient went from 3g, to 10g, to 30g, to 100g depending on the batch they happened to inject you with.
oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Repeating conspiracy theories doesn't make them more credible but I get that it's all you have.
Again,
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
Vaccine hesitant don't need boosters and you are ignoring Italy. I don't have the time to fact check the exact date it became available but I've seen Feb 28 in Germany.
None of this justifies your continuous abuse of baseless conspiracy theories. But please tell me about Politico for no reason.
Politico and Reuters write the news disparaging Novavax. Not too many other outlets originate articles that do so. The last two you posted disparaging Novavax we're from Reuters and Novavax. This is not continuous abuse of conspiracy theories.
I haven't posted anything about Novavax from Politico and have no idea why there would be any connection there but since I'm not in your world conspiracy theory world, I would have no reason to.
Are you surprised that all the conspiracy theories that you rely on are likely to backfire and keep the same people away from Novavax? I'm not.
Unit2Sucks said:
003 why aren't you reporting on Novavax?
Politico is: 'They rushed the process': Vaccine maker's woes hamper global inoculation campaign
There's more to the story but needless to say, 003 will have to spin it in such a way as not to conflict with his narrative that Big Pharma is to blame and that Fauci and entrenched interests are the reason that we don't have alternative vaccines right now. But make no mistake, spin he will.Quote:
The U.S. and the world made a huge bet on Novavax, but manufacturing problems are jeopardizing billions of doses earmarked for poor and middle-income countries.
The delay, which was confirmed by three other people familiar with the discussions between Maryland-based Novavax and the Biden administration, represents a major setback in the effort to vaccinate the world in the wake of new, more transmissible variants.
The U.S. government invested $1.6 billion in Novavax in 2020 the most it devoted to any vaccine maker at the time in hopes that it would offer the world another option for a safe and effective vaccine to help protect against Covid-19. But the company has consistently run into production problems. The methods it used to test the purity of the vaccine have fallen short of regulators' standards and the company has not been able to prove that it can produce a shot that is consistently up to snuff, according to multiple people familiar with Novavax's difficulties. All spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive company conversations.
Although Novavax recently attested to some of its analytics and testing issues in a quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company's issues are more concerning than previously understood, according to two of the people with direct knowledge of the matter.
Come on unit2
Unit2Sucks said:oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
Repeating conspiracy theories doesn't make them more credible but I get that it's all you have.
Again,
It only became available in some parts of Germany on March 4 and is only available for primary and secondary (not boost) vaccination for 18+.
https://www.uniklinik-freiburg.de/impfstuetzpunkt-freiburg.html
Vaccine hesitant don't need boosters and you are ignoring Italy. I don't have the time to fact check the exact date it became available but I've seen Feb 28 in Germany.
None of this justifies your continuous abuse of baseless conspiracy theories. But please tell me about Politico for no reason.
Politico and Reuters write the news disparaging Novavax. Not too many other outlets originate articles that do so. The last two you posted disparaging Novavax we're from Reuters and Novavax. This is not continuous abuse of conspiracy theories.
I haven't posted anything about Novavax from Politico and have no idea why there would be any connection there but since I'm not in your world conspiracy theory world, I would have no reason to.
Are you surprised that all the conspiracy theories that you rely on are likely to backfire and keep the same people away from Novavax? I'm not.
...
oski003 said:Unit2Sucks said:
003 why aren't you reporting on Novavax?
Politico is: 'They rushed the process': Vaccine maker's woes hamper global inoculation campaign
There's more to the story but needless to say, 003 will have to spin it in such a way as not to conflict with his narrative that Big Pharma is to blame and that Fauci and entrenched interests are the reason that we don't have alternative vaccines right now. But make no mistake, spin he will.Quote:
The U.S. and the world made a huge bet on Novavax, but manufacturing problems are jeopardizing billions of doses earmarked for poor and middle-income countries.
The delay, which was confirmed by three other people familiar with the discussions between Maryland-based Novavax and the Biden administration, represents a major setback in the effort to vaccinate the world in the wake of new, more transmissible variants.
The U.S. government invested $1.6 billion in Novavax in 2020 the most it devoted to any vaccine maker at the time in hopes that it would offer the world another option for a safe and effective vaccine to help protect against Covid-19. But the company has consistently run into production problems. The methods it used to test the purity of the vaccine have fallen short of regulators' standards and the company has not been able to prove that it can produce a shot that is consistently up to snuff, according to multiple people familiar with Novavax's difficulties. All spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive company conversations.
Although Novavax recently attested to some of its analytics and testing issues in a quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company's issues are more concerning than previously understood, according to two of the people with direct knowledge of the matter.
Come one unit2
You're still butthurt over a Politico article from October?
Can you point me to the den of COVID vaccine conspiracy theories that you use to stay abreast of the latest misinformation? Is politico one of the hot button sites for your ilk? Why you would bring up an article I posted 6 months ago in an unrelated discussion of Novavax with no application to the current conversation just shows how obsessed you are.
Whatever it takes for you to keep your conspiracy theories going.
Covid is over.*
— Dan Diamond (@ddiamond) March 15, 2022
* if you ignore the kids who still can’t be vaccinated; the half-dozen lawmakers who have freshly tested positive; the many people with long symptoms; and the nearly 10,000 Americans who died with it last week.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Featured Stories
See All
Cal Pulls Away For Second Straight Win
by Cal Athletics
Bears Bash Bengals 88-36
by Cal Athletics
Lema Named ACC Offensive Player Of The Year
by Cal Athletics
Ultimate Insider Podcast E97: Oregon State Wrap-up, Wake Forest Preview
by Mike Pawlawski
Bears Hold Off CSU Bakersfield in 86-73 Win in Opener
by Jim McGill