The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

938,772 Views | 10272 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Cal88
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Ukraine-Russia crisis: What is the Minsk agreement? | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/9/what-is-the-minsk-agreement-and-why-is-it-relevant-now
From the article:

A major blockage has been Russia's insistence that it is not a party to the conflict and therefore is not bound by its terms.

In general, Moscow and Kyiv interpret the pact very differently, leading to what has been dubbed by some observers as the "Minsk conundrum".

What is the 'Minsk conundrum'?
Ukraine sees the 2015 agreement as an instrument to re-establish control over the rebel territories.
It wants a ceasefire, control of the Russia-Ukraine border, elections in the Donbas, and a limited devolution of power to the separatists in that order.

Russia views the deal as obliging Ukraine to grant rebel authorities in Donbas comprehensive autonomy and representation in the central government, effectively giving Moscow the power to veto Kyiv's foreign policy choices.

Only then would Russia return the Russia-Ukraine border to Kyiv's control."
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Castreau with Foot-in-Mouth disease yet again. Regrets the lack of vetting of the celebrated Ukranian Nazi (admitting to ignorance on the issue), but then goes to blame it all on the Russians.
Hey Justin, it's okay to support current Nazis who celebrate the old Nazi murderers of the past, but it's not okay to directly support the old Nazi murderers. Got it?



"Speaking for the first time since a Ukrainian Nazi Veteran was appalled [meant applauded] during the Zelensky speech, Justin Trudeau says "this is deeply embarrassing to the Parliament of Canada and by extension to all Canadians," adding it is "extremely upsetting that this happened"


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

Zippergate said:

tequila4kapp said:

Zippergate said:

"he will be up there at the gates of the Baltic from Kaliningrad, from the neighboring regions, and the gates of Poland, and this will be a direct confrontation with a NATO state."

Ukraine is NOT a member of NATO. Poland and the Baltics are. If Putin wants to enter into direct conflict with NATO, fine, so be it. There is no evidence, however, that that is his plan, such a move would serve no purpose, and it would be sheer lunacy on his part. The idea that we have to escalate the war in Ukraine to protect other NATO is emotionalism rooted in rabid anti-Russian bigotry.
Putin's own words and writings say he wants to reunify the USSR. Many of the newer NATO members asked to join NATO precisely because they take him at his word. Putin has a current track record of initiating military actions that serve no purpose and are sheer lunacy. Sometimes people tell you who and what they are, you just have to be willing to believe them.

Arming a country so they can defend themselves is an escalation? Uh huh, sure, this is all our fault. .

Preventing escalation to a neighboring NATO country and not being legally obligated to come to their aid with boots on the ground is precisely a (THE?) reason to arm Ukraine. Stop Putin's naked aggression now in Ukraine when it only costs us money, not the flesh and blood of America's youth.
I call b.s. Let's see it. Hard to reconcile that view in light of the Minsk agreements and the peace offered early in the war that US/NATO rejected.
Timeline summarized from the always authoritative Wikipedia:
  • February 2014 - Russia invades Crimea
  • April 2014 - The Donbas war starts when Russian back separatists seized government buildings.
  • September 2014 - Minsk 1 signed. Fighting does not stop.
  • January 2015 - Minsk cease fire completely collapses. DPR / separatists take the Donetsk airport in violation of the protocols and declare Minsk 1 void.
  • February 2015 - Minsk 2 signed. Fighting subsides but never fully stops.
  • March 2015 - Separatists declare Minsk 2 void. Nearly 7 years of attempted diplomacy ensues with assorted charges by both sides related to Minsk violations, etc.
  • February 2022 - Russia invades Ukraine.

In summary, Russia invaded Ukraine and violated Ukraine's sovereignty before the 1st Minsk agreement. Russian back separatists declared Minsk 1 void. The 7 years of attempted diplomacy are classically characterized by both sides making charges against the other...you simply choose to accept the view that benevolent Russia's offer of peace was maliciously rejected by evil NATO.
Pretty much this. Virtually every instance of major violence was initiated by Russia or Russian-backed separatist groups. Then when Ukraine or anyone else responds to that, Russia and its propagandists instantly turn around and complain about it. They are the biggest cry-bullies in the world.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

Castreau with Foot-in-Mouth disease yet again. Regrets the lack of vetting of the celebrated Ukranian Nazi (admitting to ignorance on the issue), but then goes to blame it all on the Russians.
Hey Justin, it's okay to support current Nazis who celebrate the old Nazi murderers of the past, but it's not okay to directly support the old Nazi murderers. Got it?



"Speaking for the first time since a Ukrainian Nazi Veteran was appalled [meant applauded] during the Zelensky speech, Justin Trudeau says "this is deeply embarrassing to the Parliament of Canada and by extension to all Canadians," adding it is "extremely upsetting that this happened"


They knew exactly whose banner that veteran was fighting under, that of the two-letter army that starts with an S and ends with an S. Trudeau's second in command is Chrystia Freeland, a 2nd generation Ukrainian-Canadian whose grandfather also fought with the SS, she's been in charge of Canada's Ukraine policy, and had no qualms displaying the red and black banner of the UPA...


Quote:

The flag of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (Ukrainian: , romanized: Prapor UPA), also known as the red-and-black flag (Ukrainian: - , romanized: Chervono-chornyi prapor), is a flag previously used by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) and the Bandera wing of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), and now used by various Ukrainian nationalist organizations and parties, including UNA-UNSO, Right Sector, Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists and others.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_Ukrainian_Insurgent_Army
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

bearister said:

Ukraine-Russia crisis: What is the Minsk agreement? | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/9/what-is-the-minsk-agreement-and-why-is-it-relevant-now
From the article:

A major blockage has been Russia's insistence that it is not a party to the conflict and therefore is not bound by its terms.

In general, Moscow and Kyiv interpret the pact very differently, leading to what has been dubbed by some observers as the "Minsk conundrum".

What is the 'Minsk conundrum'?
Ukraine sees the 2015 agreement as an instrument to re-establish control over the rebel territories.
It wants a ceasefire, control of the Russia-Ukraine border, elections in the Donbas, and a limited devolution of power to the separatists in that order.

Russia views the deal as obliging Ukraine to grant rebel authorities in Donbas comprehensive autonomy and representation in the central government, effectively giving Moscow the power to veto Kyiv's foreign policy choices.

Only then would Russia return the Russia-Ukraine border to Kyiv's control."

As I've pointed out numerous times (example here), the propagandists on BI have been lying (or ignorant) about Minsk from the get go.

This is no different from their ignorance of Putin's historical meddling in Ukraine's affairs.

They pretend like Yanukovych wasn't a puppet installed by Putin and his oligarchs (with a big assist from Paul Manafort) who was thrown out because he abandoned the platform he was elected on (taking Ukraine closer to the West) in favor of cozying up to Putin. Had Ukrainians known he was a puppet, he never would have been elected. Given that he had previously had an election victory overturned due to election fraud, it's a wonder he was able to do it again.

They also pretend like the "separatists" in the Donbas are anything other than Russian proxy forces.

If you aren't willing to ignore them entirely, at least be forewarned that their positions should only be understood as a reflection of exactly what Putin would want them to think. Whether that information comes to them through zerohedge, the gray zone, seymour hersch, obvious Russian state twitter handles or through discord servers, the origin point is always the same.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

tequila4kapp said:

bearister said:

Ukraine-Russia crisis: What is the Minsk agreement? | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/2/9/what-is-the-minsk-agreement-and-why-is-it-relevant-now
From the article:

A major blockage has been Russia's insistence that it is not a party to the conflict and therefore is not bound by its terms.

In general, Moscow and Kyiv interpret the pact very differently, leading to what has been dubbed by some observers as the "Minsk conundrum".

What is the 'Minsk conundrum'?
Ukraine sees the 2015 agreement as an instrument to re-establish control over the rebel territories.
It wants a ceasefire, control of the Russia-Ukraine border, elections in the Donbas, and a limited devolution of power to the separatists in that order.

Russia views the deal as obliging Ukraine to grant rebel authorities in Donbas comprehensive autonomy and representation in the central government, effectively giving Moscow the power to veto Kyiv's foreign policy choices.

Only then would Russia return the Russia-Ukraine border to Kyiv's control."

As I've pointed out numerous times (example here), the propagandists on BI have been lying (or ignorant) about Minsk from the get go.

This is no different from their ignorance of Putin's historical meddling in Ukraine's affairs.

They pretend like Yanukovych wasn't a puppet installed by Putin and his oligarchs (with a big assist from Paul Manafort) who was thrown out because he abandoned the platform he was elected on (taking Ukraine closer to the West) in favor of cozying up to Putin. Had Ukrainians known he was a puppet, he never would have been elected. Given that he had previously had an election victory overturned due to election fraud, it's a wonder he was able to do it again.

They also pretend like the "separatists" in the Donbas are anything other than Russian proxy forces.

If you aren't willing to ignore them entirely, at least be forewarned that their positions should only be understood as a reflection of exactly what Putin would want them to think. Whether that information comes to them through zerohedge, the gray zone, seymour hersch, obvious Russian state twitter handles or through discord servers, the origin point is always the same.

From Wiki:

Quote:

Yanukovytch Presidential campaign and election

Early vote returns from the first round of the election held on 17 January showed Yanukovych in first place with 35.8% of the vote. He faced a 7 February 2010 runoff against Tymoshenko, who finished second (with 24.7% of the vote).

After all ballots were counted, the Ukrainian Central Election Commission declared that Yanukovych won the runoff election with 48.95% of the vote compared with 45.47% for Tymoshenko.

Election observers from the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) said there were no indications of serious fraud and described the vote as an "impressive display" of democracy. Tymoshenko withdrew her subsequent legal challenge of the result.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych#Presidential_campaign_and_election

Had Yanukovych not been overturned by the Maidan color revolution/coup, Ukraine would have been intact today, including Crimea, with good economic and political relations with both the EU and Russia, and there would have been no war in the Donbass, and no war with Russia.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html
SFCityBear
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."






tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html
Firewall.

Important details are needed. Are these rogue volunteers fighting with Ukraine? Are these active US military personnel stationed in Ukraine. The latter would be ... disastrous for Biden politically and a terrible development (IMO) for the US generally.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html
Firewall.

Important details are needed. Are these rogue volunteers fighting with Ukraine? Are these active US military personnel stationed in Ukraine. The latter would be ... disastrous for Biden politically and a terrible development (IMO) for the US generally.

These are volunteers. There are about 200 of them according to the article.

See here:

https://archive.ph/Yo2ba


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."



Zippergate has already assured us that Russia will not attack a NATO country directly, and he is never wrong.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
US death toll in Ukraine is probably in the low 100s by now. There have been hundreds of volunteers on the frontline, as well as many boots on the ground manning US/NATO equipment like Patriot batteries, or involved in maintenance, and special forces operating in Ukraine. Then there are higher-level US NATO officers in command centers and training facilities as well as many intel officers, many of those locations have been hit in the course of this war, including the hypersonic missile strike on NATO base/training complex near the Polish border last year. That strike alone might have killed over 100 NATO soldiers.

More recently, the Russians allegedly killed a crew of a Leopard II tank belonging to the Bundeswehr, German regular army.


The Polish death toll is in the thousands, this explains why Polish president Duda decided to distance his country from the war, which is not popular among his right wing base, going into the October elections.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."







Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
SFCityBear
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.


dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.

Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.



bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html


Putin doesn't want to start WWIII because of his incursion into the Ukraine any more than the U.S. was going to start WWIII over Vietnam.

If that was the case, Putin would be slaughtering civilians in the tens of thousands and in Vietnam, we would have bombed the dams in the North and drowned them. When there is a superpower on the other side, you fight with handcuffs on.

If in fact Putin is willing to start WWIII, then if it isn't because of the Ukraine, it will be over whatever is next up.

I understand isolationists. Pat Buchanan has written many lucid articles regarding the subject.*What I don't understand is isolationists feeling they have to shore up their position by maintaining that Putin is a reasonable guy that is a victim of bad press.

Well, I guess Pat Buchanan disagrees with me. He thinks Putin is going to weaponize Winter and kill a lot of civilians:

Putin's 'Winter War' on Ukraine Patrick J. Buchanan Official Website


https://buchanan.org/blog/putins-winter-war-on-ukraine-159782


* Where US and Ukrainian War Aims Collide Patrick J. Buchanan Official Website


https://buchanan.org/blog/where-us-and-ukrainian-war-aims-collide-159740




I JUST NOTED THESE ARTICLES ARE A YEAR OLD. LOOKS LIKE PAT WAS WRONG ABOUT PUTIN FREEZING TENS OF THOUSANDS OF CIVILIANS TO DEATH LAST WINTER

Pat Buchanan political pundit and three-time presidential candidate announced he is retiring from writing. January, 2023
.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.

Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.


Have you been to China?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
U.S. Army vs People's Liberation Army


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Commander of Putin's Black Sea Fleet 'KILLED in missile strike along with 33 leaders in biggest scalp of whole war' | The US Sun


https://www.the-sun.com/news/9171720/commander-black-sea-fleet-killed/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:

Castreau with Foot-in-Mouth disease yet again. Regrets the lack of vetting of the celebrated Ukranian Nazi (admitting to ignorance on the issue), but then goes to blame it all on the Russians.
Hey Justin, it's okay to support current Nazis who celebrate the old Nazi murderers of the past, but it's not okay to directly support the old Nazi murderers. Got it?



"Speaking for the first time since a Ukrainian Nazi Veteran was appalled [meant applauded] during the Zelensky speech, Justin Trudeau says "this is deeply embarrassing to the Parliament of Canada and by extension to all Canadians," adding it is "extremely upsetting that this happened"

Trudeau has also appeared in blackface on multiple occasions.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:


They knew exactly whose banner that veteran was fighting under, that of the two-letter army that starts with an S and ends with an S. Trudeau's second in command is Chrystia Freeland, a 2nd generation Ukrainian-Canadian whose grandfather also fought with the SS, she's been in charge of Canada's Ukraine policy, and had no qualms displaying the red and black banner of the UPA...


Clown world.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Speaking of Putin, the Biden regime reportedly stopped Tucker Carlson from interviewing Putin.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.

Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.


Have you been to China?


Understanding how to provision soldiers in a war when the enemy is trying to stop you is an acquired skill quite different from ferrying around passengers and cargo in peacetime as Russia has discovered. The US has absorbed decades of lessons by virtue of being involved in armed conflicts around the world.

This article talks about what China has learned from Russia's failures. I think that China not being battle tested in any way is a severe detriment to their military preparedness.

Link:
https://www.rand.org/blog/2023/08/china-ponders-russias-logistical-challenges-in-the.html
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

Cal88 said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.

Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.


Have you been to China?


Understanding how to provision soldiers in a war when the enemy is trying to stop you is an acquired skill quite different from ferrying around passengers and cargo in peacetime as Russia has discovered. The US has absorbed decades of lessons by virtue of being involved in armed conflicts around the world.





Not against a real military.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Commander of Putin's Black Sea Fleet 'KILLED in missile strike along with 33 leaders in biggest scalp of whole war' | The US Sun


https://www.the-sun.com/news/9171720/commander-black-sea-fleet-killed/

Apparently the guy is still very much alive.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is that good?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As good a time as any to post some recent Russian propaganda fails.





This last one is still up in the air. Ukraine claims that their attach on the Russian Black Sea fleet HQ killed dozens of officers including a guy named Sokolov who is/was the commander. In response, Russia posted a questionable video clip purporting to be from a meeting today featuring Sokolov and which has only raised more questions. It's possible that the actual meeting took place and Russia chose to share a doctored video in good faith, but would anyone be surprised if the alternative were true? Credit to Russia for getting all of their propaganda channels synced. If you search for Sokolov on twitter you will see numerous Russian state accounts masquerading as independent handles who essentially reported this exactly the same way with only minor word variations.



dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

dimitrig said:

Cal88 said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.

Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.


Have you been to China?


Understanding how to provision soldiers in a war when the enemy is trying to stop you is an acquired skill quite different from ferrying around passengers and cargo in peacetime as Russia has discovered. The US has absorbed decades of lessons by virtue of being involved in armed conflicts around the world.





Not against a real military.


What does that even mean?

What military actions has China been involved in against a foe of any stature?

tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

movielover said:

dimitrig said:

Cal88 said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.
Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.


Have you been to China?


Understanding how to provision soldiers in a war when the enemy is trying to stop you is an acquired skill quite different from ferrying around passengers and cargo in peacetime as Russia has discovered. The US has absorbed decades of lessons by virtue of being involved in armed conflicts around the world.
Not against a real military.
What does that even mean?

What military actions has China been involved in against a foe of any stature?
It means there's yet another instance of laughable lengths some will go to to side with the Russians or denigrate the US. I wouldn't be surprised if he was among those saying we were going to have 10's of thousands dead against Iraq's vaunted military but is now saying we haven't face a real military.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

dimitrig said:

movielover said:

dimitrig said:

Cal88 said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.
Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.


Have you been to China?


Understanding how to provision soldiers in a war when the enemy is trying to stop you is an acquired skill quite different from ferrying around passengers and cargo in peacetime as Russia has discovered. The US has absorbed decades of lessons by virtue of being involved in armed conflicts around the world.
Not against a real military.
What does that even mean?

What military actions has China been involved in against a foe of any stature?
It means there's yet another instance of laughable lengths some will go to to side with the Russians or denigrate the US. I wouldn't be surprised if he was among those saying we were going to have 10's of thousands dead against Iraq's vaunted military but is now saying we haven't face a real military.


Bombing goat herders and droning weddings hardly counts as experience. A superpower that actually has an air force; air defense system; navy; and the capability to easily outfit a million-man military.

This would be like gloating over beating Sac States JV team.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

dimitrig said:

movielover said:

dimitrig said:

Cal88 said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.
Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.


Have you been to China?


Understanding how to provision soldiers in a war when the enemy is trying to stop you is an acquired skill quite different from ferrying around passengers and cargo in peacetime as Russia has discovered. The US has absorbed decades of lessons by virtue of being involved in armed conflicts around the world.
Not against a real military.
What does that even mean?

What military actions has China been involved in against a foe of any stature?
It means there's yet another instance of laughable lengths some will go to to side with the Russians or denigrate the US. I wouldn't be surprised if he was among those saying we were going to have 10's of thousands dead against Iraq's vaunted military but is now saying we haven't face a real military.


In 2003/2004 movielover was pro Iraq War and pro WBush. Even if he says he wasn't - he'd be lying
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So how did the Progressives become war mongers? $$$?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

So how did the Progressives become war mongers? $$$?


Biden got us out of Afghanistan and gave us our first year without a hostile combat casualty since President Clinton.

You hate all of that and supported our entry into Iraq. You are the warmonger.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

tequila4kapp said:

dimitrig said:

movielover said:

dimitrig said:

Cal88 said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

SFCityBear said:

dimitrig said:

SFCityBear said:

A US Army hospital in Germany which has been treating the wounded from the war in Ukraine is now treating American fighters wounded in that war. 20 have died during the conflict so far, according to this article in the NY Times. As we inch closer and closer to WW3.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/23/us/us-soldiers-ukraine-hospital-germany.html

I don't think you need to worry about WW3.

"For years, there was fear that providing certain types of aid would provoke Russia," said Mr. Taylor, who now oversees Europe for the United States Institute of Peace in Washington. "It turns out, they didn't need to be provoked."

The United States has crossed numerous so-called red lines in the last year, by providing Ukraine with rocket artillery, tanks and pilot training, Mr. Taylor said, and Russia has not responded by escalating the conflict."
Gee, somehow that does not make me feel any better.

Just because you start poking a bear a little bit at a time, and he hasn't responded in kind, does not mean he will never react.

There are two main players in this game. One is a calculating bully, and the other is increasingly inept. We are the one doing the escalation at the moment. There will be a point where Putin may say, "Enough is enough", and depending on whether his forces are equipped and trained well enough, dedicated enough, Putin will either escalate or give in and sue for peace. It is a game of chicken, and it could go either way or somewhere in between. In any case, American lives, volunteer or regular military, are American lives, which may or may not eventually enter in to the calculus.
You think Putin is the bear? With what army is Russia going to escalate? He's got close to 100% of his army in Ukraine holding on for dear life at the moment. What have you seen that has made you believe that Russia, which is 600 days into its 3 day war with Ukraine and which has lost terrain in the last 12 months, would pose a military threat to anyone else, let alone NATO and the US? If Russia's military was so strong, why have they been unable to make any territorial gains in like 18 months other than the pyrrhic victory in Bakhmut which only happened because the now-disbanded Wagner chose to do it?

Russia had ~16 million rounds of artillery before the war and has pretty much burned through it all by now. They are begging North Korea and others to sell them artillery because their industrial base can't even come close to producing as many as Russian military doctrine requires to continue to muddle about in Ukraine. They would love to burn 10M+ per year but can only produce 2M or so. I'm sure some shill will come here and claim that I'm wrong and that the real number is 3M or some other made up number but everyone paying attention knows that the current production rate is nowhere near enough to sustain the initial pace which caused them to burn through decades of artillery stockpiles. Russia is unlikely to ever again be in a position to fight a large scale war like they fought in 2022 and the early part of 2023 and it wasn't enough to actually win the war.

If I recall correctly, you are of an age that means that most of your adulthood was during the cold war. As you probably recall, when the iron curtain eventually fell, we learned that we had over-estimated Russian military might for decades. The famous missile gap that wasn't is but one example. You have a lot of Russian shills (whether knowingly or not) working very hard both on BI and elsewhere to convince people like you that Russia is many fold stronger than it actually is and that the US and NATO are far weaker than we actually are. By and large, Ukraine is fighting Russia to a brutal and bloody draw using decades-old western technology combined with modern commodity (and home made) drones. Russia is throwing everything it has at this war and hasn't been able to accomplish any strategic priorities. Their famed Kinzhal missiles have proven themselves completely ineffective and Russia jailed the inventors. The shills here spent months telling us what a gamechanger those hypersonics would be and they've been completely neutralized. The US is slow-walking decades-old technology like F-16s and ATACMS and there has been no discussion of ever arming Ukraine with modern Western capabilities. Hopefully one of the big takeaways for the US is that we can replace big dollar weapons systems with drone technology which will be far more cost effective, faster to develop and which is more than enough to defeat what has proven to be a paper tiger in Russia's military. The same may not be true of China but lord help us all if we ever find ourselves in a hot war with China. That would be a disaster for humanity.

To the extent this really is a game of chicken, it's a game of chicken between two very unequal parties and if Putin is the "calculating bully" that you claim he is, he will turn tail just like schoolyard bullies who get punched in the face. Only instead of a 90 lb kid bullying a 6-year old, the bully tried to square up a heavyweight boxer.
Exactly.

As for China, they have absolutely no experience with modern warfare. None. No experienced soldiers or officers. No experience with logistics, communications, intelligence, or anything else.

They aren't a military threat except for, like Russia, their nuclear arsenal.


Have you been to China?


Understanding how to provision soldiers in a war when the enemy is trying to stop you is an acquired skill quite different from ferrying around passengers and cargo in peacetime as Russia has discovered. The US has absorbed decades of lessons by virtue of being involved in armed conflicts around the world.
Not against a real military.
What does that even mean?

What military actions has China been involved in against a foe of any stature?
It means there's yet another instance of laughable lengths some will go to to side with the Russians or denigrate the US. I wouldn't be surprised if he was among those saying we were going to have 10's of thousands dead against Iraq's vaunted military but is now saying we haven't face a real military.


Bombing goat herders and droning weddings hardly counts as experience. A superpower that actually has an air force; air defense system; navy; and the capability to easily outfit a million-man military.

This would be like gloating over beating Sac States JV team.


Wake me when China demonstrates the ability to bomb goat herders 7000 miles from its borders.


Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

What U.S taxpayers are getting for their money in Ukraine | 60 Minutes - CBS News


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-aid-ukraine-60-minutes-transcript/

Yes, Cal88, you will have fun with it. Imagine Lindsey Graham and Elizabeth Warren on the same side of an issue. THE HORROR!

Elizabeth is on the warpath.
First Page Last Page
Page 196 of 294
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.