Jeffrey Epstein

104,823 Views | 1232 Replies | Last: 18 min ago by oski003
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 3:21p, 11/13/25
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
WHY IS TRUMP PRESSURING LAUREN BOEBERT AND NANCY MACE TO VOTE AGAINST RELEASING THE EPSTEIN FILES?

WHY DOES THE ORANGE MAN WANT THEM TO BLOCK THE RELEASE?



I've seen no proof of this happening, just anonymous sources but regardless, how am I supposed to know? I'm not Trump


See above post by Cal88.


You think I believe Massie? Dudes a grifter. Not proof of anything imo


But you believed Charlie Kirk.
Thanks for claifying.



Yes. You're welcome.
Reply Quote
1
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 3:22p, 11/13/25
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
WHY IS TRUMP PRESSURING LAUREN BOEBERT AND NANCY MACE TO VOTE AGAINST RELEASING THE EPSTEIN FILES?

WHY DOES THE ORANGE MAN WANT THEM TO BLOCK THE RELEASE?



I've seen no proof of this happening, just anonymous sources but regardless, how am I supposed to know? I'm not Trump


See above post by Cal88.


You think I believe Massie? Dudes a grifter. Not proof of anything imo


It's 10:30am on a Thursday.
Class is in session.
What are you doing on BearInsider?


Lucky for yall I have light Thursday teaching schedule


Oh right.
Gotta prepare tomorrow's lessons for your pupils.


Nope. That's been done. Everything is prepped for the week by Monday end of day.
Reply Quote
2
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 3:36p, 11/13/25
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
dajo9 said:
Speaking of pedophile deadenders


Who is defending a proven pedo here? Please provide quotes of what they said so we can all lambast them.


Trump, Patel, Bongino, half of Congress.


Where?


A question so dumb it's not worth addressing beyond this.
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 3:42p, 11/13/25
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
dajo9 said:
Speaking of pedophile deadenders


Who is defending a proven pedo here? Please provide quotes of what they said so we can all lambast them.


Trump, Patel, Bongino, half of Congress.


Where?


A question so dumb it's not worth addressing beyond this.


Or you just can't answer it.

When you have facts of them defending a pedo, lmk. What were the democrat members of congress doing then when they didn't release the files? Omg they were defending a pedo! So hypocritical.

Plus my original question was who HERE, as in on BI, is defending pedophiles? I have yet to see anyone defend a pedophile. Not someone yall claim is a pedophile but a convicted, proven pedophile. If anyone can show me where that has happened, I'll gladly block that poster and create a thread calling them out.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearNIt • 3:48p, 11/13/25
BearNIt said:
President Pedo continues to protect the men that abused children. That will be his legacy due to the fact that he continues to deny and prevent the full disclosure of the facts in the Epstein files. It's like quicksand as the more he struggles to prevent full disclosure after promising such, the more he becomes trapped by the Epstein file, and the stronger the calls for transparency and full disclosure are.

The coverup is always worse than the crime.


Why didn't Biden and the dems release the files? Please someone explain this to me. If they didn't release the files, they all must be covering up for President Pedo Biden. Add that to Biden's dumpster fire of a legacy
Reply Quote
3
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 4:59p, 11/13/25
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearNIt said:


The coverup is always worse than the crime.

Assuredly, everyone already knows that he's had 1000+ sex partners. And they still voted for him.
He might as well just come out and say it. There, no more scandal.


There is actually nothing illegal with having over 1,000 sexual partners, just in case you weren't aware


The Republican Party.
Home of FAMILY VALUES!
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
5
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 5:02p, 11/13/25
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearNIt said:


The coverup is always worse than the crime.

Assuredly, everyone already knows that he's had 1000+ sex partners. And they still voted for him.
He might as well just come out and say it. There, no more scandal.


There is actually nothing illegal with having over 1,000 sexual partners, just in case you weren't aware


The Republican Party.
Home of FAMILY VALUES!


Who cares? Whoever you sleep with is your business not mine.
Reply Quote
2
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:05p, 11/13/25
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:06p, 11/13/25
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
4
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 5:12p, 11/13/25
DiabloWags said:


Booth
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:34p, 11/13/25
Reply Quote
3
smh
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 11:27p, 11/13/25
Quote:
> You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.
> You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.

sorry, no offense intended, but always surprised whenever our best posters are apparently just figuring out the nature of resident trolls?? come on, shirley it's obvious.
Reply Quote
4
2 edits
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to smh • 3:47a, 11/14/25
smh said:
Quote:
> You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.
> You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.

sorry, no offense intended, but always surprised whenever our best posters are apparently just figuring out the nature of resident trolls?? come on, shirley it's obvious.

Yeah, I was thinking that recently.
This person Aims to Antagonize with the Absurd.

Coincidentally enough, I came here to post this article. And let me pull a quote from it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jeffrey-epstein-brother-says-trump-003510730.html

"Trump is full of sh*t."
"When are people going to realize that Trump just makes stuff up?"

-Mark Epstein, quoting his brother.
Something about wondering when there was going to be a day of reckoning.



Of course, Epstein himself wrote much worse about Trump: "evil to the core."




I'm shaking my head, too, smh.
Thanks for the advice. I know what you are saying. Thank you.
Reply Quote
4
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:49a, 11/14/25
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 6:28a, 11/14/25
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearNIt said:


The coverup is always worse than the crime.

Assuredly, everyone already knows that he's had 1000+ sex partners. And they still voted for him.
He might as well just come out and say it. There, no more scandal.


There is actually nothing illegal with having over 1,000 sexual partners, just in case you weren't aware


The Republican Party.
Home of FAMILY VALUES!


Who cares? Whoever you sleep with is your business not mine.


You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.

You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.


That wasn't at all was I was responding to. Go back and read the chain of posts before spouting off nonsense. I said it wasn't illegal to have 1000 partners. No where did I mention that it was okay to have sex with minors. You sir are the idiot. I worry for your daughters.

Rape is wrong. Sex with minors is wrong. Please be better. You know that's not at all what I was saying.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to smh • 6:29a, 11/14/25
smh said:
Quote:
> You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.
> You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.

sorry, no offense intended, but always surprised whenever our best posters are apparently just figuring out the nature of resident trolls?? come on, shirley it's obvious.


Lololol that's your problem. You think ConcordTom is one of the best posters
Reply Quote
3
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 6:30a, 11/14/25
concordtom said:
smh said:
Quote:
> You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.
> You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.

sorry, no offense intended, but always surprised whenever our best posters are apparently just figuring out the nature of resident trolls?? come on, shirley it's obvious.

Yeah, I was thinking that recently.
This person Aims to Antagonize with the Absurd.

Coincidentally enough, I came here to post this article. And let me pull a quote from it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jeffrey-epstein-brother-says-trump-003510730.html

"Trump is full of sh*t."
"When are people going to realize that Trump just makes stuff up?"

-Mark Epstein, quoting his brother.
Something about wondering when there was going to be a day of reckoning.



Of course, Epstein himself wrote much worse about Trump: "evil to the core."

I'm shaking my head, too, smh.
Thanks for the advice. I know what you are saying. Thank you.


Does Mark Epstein have some evidence that Trump is involved with underage girls? If so, I'd love to see it. He certainly seems to be a character connecting many Democrats to his brother's girls. Didn't Jeffrey Epstein traffick girls out of Mark's properties?

There is zero known validity to what Mark claims about Trump. If he has evidence, which he should, he needs to bring it to light. In glorifying Mark, you seem to be defending pedophiles, per Dajo's logic. Thanks.
Reply Quote
2
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 6:31a, 11/14/25
concordtom said:


The same old picture is constantly recycled. Is this all we got?
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 6:36a, 11/14/25
oski003 said:
concordtom said:
smh said:
Quote:
> You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.
> You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.

sorry, no offense intended, but always surprised whenever our best posters are apparently just figuring out the nature of resident trolls?? come on, shirley it's obvious.

Yeah, I was thinking that recently.
This person Aims to Antagonize with the Absurd.

Coincidentally enough, I came here to post this article. And let me pull a quote from it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/jeffrey-epstein-brother-says-trump-003510730.html

"Trump is full of sh*t."
"When are people going to realize that Trump just makes stuff up?"

-Mark Epstein, quoting his brother.
Something about wondering when there was going to be a day of reckoning.



Of course, Epstein himself wrote much worse about Trump: "evil to the core."

I'm shaking my head, too, smh.
Thanks for the advice. I know what you are saying. Thank you.


Does Mark Epstein have some evidence that Trump is involved with underage girls? If so, I'd love to see it. He certainly seems to be a character connecting many Democrats to his brother's girls. Didn't Jeffrey Epstein traffick girls out of Mark's properties?

There is zero known validity to what Mark claims about Trump. If he has evidence, which he should, he needs to bring it to light. In glorifying Mark, you seem to be defending pedophiles, per Dajo's logic. Thanks.


They have no logic with this. It's entirely TDS. There's no evidence. There's no facts. They are now choosing to quote and believe someone who they all have rightly demonized. The hypocrisy and double standard is
unreal. They stay in their lefty echo chamber and don't care what the truth is. They are better than everyone else in their own mind.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 6:42a, 11/14/25
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearNIt said:


The coverup is always worse than the crime.

Assuredly, everyone already knows that he's had 1000+ sex partners. And they still voted for him.
He might as well just come out and say it. There, no more scandal.


There is actually nothing illegal with having over 1,000 sexual partners, just in case you weren't aware


The Republican Party.
Home of FAMILY VALUES!


Who cares? Whoever you sleep with is your business not mine.


You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.

You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.


That wasn't at all was I was responding to. Go back and read the chain of posts before spouting off nonsense. I said it wasn't illegal to have 1000 partners. No where did I mention that it was okay to have sex with minors. You sir are the idiot. I worry for your daughters.

Rape is wrong. Sex with minors is wrong. Please be better. You know that's not at all what I was saying.


So, sex with a thousand people is fine with you?
I do not choose that person to be our leader.

And if there is credible evidence that Trump had sex with a minor, are you okay with him, still, as President? Go on the record now, and don't tell me it has to be in a criminal court with 11 jurors, because we both know that is never going to happen. SCOTUS won't allow it.
Reply Quote
1
concordtom
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to oski003 • 6:45a, 11/14/25
oski003 said:
concordtom said:


The same old picture is constantly recycled. Is this all we got?


The quote, not the photo. It's Epstein speaking to you from the grave. It's in his emails.
Reply Quote
2
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 6:46a, 11/14/25
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearNIt said:


The coverup is always worse than the crime.

Assuredly, everyone already knows that he's had 1000+ sex partners. And they still voted for him.
He might as well just come out and say it. There, no more scandal.


There is actually nothing illegal with having over 1,000 sexual partners, just in case you weren't aware


The Republican Party.
Home of FAMILY VALUES!


Who cares? Whoever you sleep with is your business not mine.


You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.

You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.


That wasn't at all was I was responding to. Go back and read the chain of posts before spouting off nonsense. I said it wasn't illegal to have 1000 partners. No where did I mention that it was okay to have sex with minors. You sir are the idiot. I worry for your daughters.

Rape is wrong. Sex with minors is wrong. Please be better. You know that's not at all what I was saying.


So, sex with a thousand people is fine with you?
I do not choose that person to be our leader.

And if there is credible evidence that Trump had sex with a minor, are you okay with him, still, as President? Go on the record now, and don't tell me it has to be in a criminal court with 11 jurors, because we both know that is never going to happen. SCOTUS won't allow it.


SCOTUS would throw your imaginary conviction out because without stipulation it requires 12 jurors, not 11.
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 6:50a, 11/14/25
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearlySane88 said:
DiabloWags said:
BearlySane88 said:
concordtom said:
BearNIt said:


The coverup is always worse than the crime.

Assuredly, everyone already knows that he's had 1000+ sex partners. And they still voted for him.
He might as well just come out and say it. There, no more scandal.


There is actually nothing illegal with having over 1,000 sexual partners, just in case you weren't aware


The Republican Party.
Home of FAMILY VALUES!


Who cares? Whoever you sleep with is your business not mine.


You are an idiot, because we are not talking about two married people having an affair, or two teenagers jumping in the back of a car. We are talking about statutory rape by grown adults far older than the minors they raped.

You are an amazing specimen of stupidity.


That wasn't at all was I was responding to. Go back and read the chain of posts before spouting off nonsense. I said it wasn't illegal to have 1000 partners. No where did I mention that it was okay to have sex with minors. You sir are the idiot. I worry for your daughters.

Rape is wrong. Sex with minors is wrong. Please be better. You know that's not at all what I was saying.


So, sex with a thousand people is fine with you?
I do not choose that person to be our leader.

And if there is credible evidence that Trump had sex with a minor, are you okay with him, still, as President? Go on the record now, and don't tell me it has to be in a criminal court with 11 jurors, because we both know that is never going to happen. SCOTUS won't allow it.


I have no problem with how many people anyone has had sex with. It's really not my business or yours how many people someone sleeps with. The fact you judge someone for that is very old school of you and not open minded.

Great, you don't have to choose them. Half the voting population did choose him and he's your president.

Ive already said it multiple times bro, even within this thread. If Trump is ever proven to be a pedophile, I will denounce him fully. And every other pedo along with them.

Reply Quote
1
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:51a, 11/14/25
Reply Quote
3
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 6:52a, 11/14/25
concordtom said:
oski003 said:
concordtom said:


The same old picture is constantly recycled. Is this all we got?


The quote, not the photo. It's Epstein speaking to you from the grave. It's in his emails.


Wow, must be true then, just like everything Hitler and Bin Laden said about America and its leaders. Obviously, the main difference here is Epstein and Trump were somewhat acquainted. Of course, this quote was taken after Trump kicked Epstein out of his club and allegedly ratted on him.
Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:52a, 11/14/25
So, let's get this straight:

With the release of Epstein's emails, we found out that:

- Epstein hated Trump.
- Didn't trust him.
- They weren't friends.
- The NYT directly worked with Epstein to suppress stories about him.
- After Bradley Edwards (the lawyer for the accusers) said that Trump was the only individual to cooperate and help, Epstein said Trump didn't have "one decent cell in his body."
- This was all so compelling that the democrats faked the redaction of a supposed victim's name.
- The name they blocked was Virginia Giuffre, who publicly testified that Trump was innocent.
- Oh, and also, Russiagate was confirmed a hoax, just like we said.

Are democrats ******ed?
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to concordtom • 6:52a, 11/14/25
concordtom said:
oski003 said:
concordtom said:


The same old picture is constantly recycled. Is this all we got?


The quote, not the photo. It's Epstein speaking to you from the grave. It's in his emails.


It's you believing the words of the worst trafficker and pedo we have seen in my lifetime.
Reply Quote
3
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 6:53a, 11/14/25
PAC-10-BEAR said:
So, let's get this straight:

With the release of Epstein's emails, we found out that:

- Epstein hated Trump.
- Didn't trust him.
- They weren't friends.
- The NYT directly worked with Epstein to suppress stories about him.
- After Bradley Edwards (the lawyer for the accusers) said that Trump was the only individual to cooperate and help, Epstein said Trump didn't have "one decent cell in his body."
- This was all so compelling that the democrats faked the redaction of a supposed victim's name.
- The name they blocked was Virginia Giuffre, who publicly testified that Trump was innocent.
- Oh, and also, Russiagate was confirmed a hoax, just like we said.

Are democrats ******ed?


They are just so blinded by their unfounded hatred. It's honestly fascinating.
Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:58a, 11/14/25
-Yes, Trump knew Epstein. He admitted it himself.

-The photos of them together are from before 2003.

-In 2004 Trump not only barred Epstein from Mar-a-lago estate, he also placed a bid on property (and won) in Palm Beach that Epstein was looking to purchase.

-In 2005 Trump revealed Epstein secrets to PBSCO investigation.

-In 2006, two of Epstein's victims confirmed they knew Trump had barred Epstein from his estate in Mar-a-la--Lago.

-In 2009 Bradley Edwards (Prosecutor on the Epstein case) made a public statement that Trump was the only individual who helped in the prosecutions against Epstein.

-Per victim testimonies on the newly released Epstein/Maxwell documents reveal that Trump was not seen on Epstein's island or anywhere with Epstein.

-The newly released documents show that the FBI withheld victim evidence in 2009 and in 2014.

-Who was the President in 2009 and 2014?-Obama.

-Who was the FBI director in 2009?-Mueller

-Who was the FBI director in 2014?-Comey

-Who led the Russia Collusion Hoax against Trump?-Mueller and Comey.

-Who was Mueller's key witness during the Russian Collusion Hoax?-George Nadler

-Who was recently sentenced to 10 years in prison for Pedophilia, with dozens of images and footage of children being sexually abused?-George Nadler

-Who was the Secretary of State under Obama?-Hillary Clinton

-Who did Epstein's victims list on the pedo island?-Bill Clinton

-Who funded the Russian Dossier?- Hilary Clinton

-Who fired Comey in 2017?-Trump

-Who praised Weinstein for being a great human being in 2013?-Obama

-Who was Obama's VP?-Biden

-Who ran for President against Trump?-Biden

-Who received campaign donations from Epstein's law firm?-Kamala
Reply Quote
2
2 edits
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:15a, 11/14/25
Nice to see ConcordTom's blatantly false accusation post get taken down. Thank you mods.
Reply Quote
3
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:24a, 11/14/25
Trump could have headed off all of this Epstein speculation by simply releasing the evidence as he said he was going to do. Instead he's participating in a cover-up, which only makes him look suspicious. As usual, "TDS" is mostly down to his own actions and the fully predictable reaction.
Reply Quote
5
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:26a, 11/14/25
Why did congress choose to release the files in PDF format instead of EML format which would have been as easy as "right click --> save as"??? I will tell you why they made this decision.

In EML, which is the format that Wikileaks the famous producer of the Podesta emails, the Clinton Emails, and the DNC leaked emails chose to use.

Why did Wikileaks choose to use this format? Because it is a cross platform format for email files and more importantly this format preserves DKIM in the original header of the email.

Emails have headers with DKIM Signatures signed each way on a chain multiple times over. It is hash of the domain key, and validates the content itself as authentic. All of the DNC leaks, HRC leaks, Podesta leaks all pass this signature check by the way.

Congress PURPOSELY CHOSE not to release the files in EML format because they don't want you to confirm the emails authenticity. Why don't they want you to confirm the emails authenticity?
Because the emails are most likely forged and fake.
Reply Quote
2
BearlySane88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 7:30a, 11/14/25
sycasey said:
Trump could have headed off all of this Epstein speculation by simply releasing the evidence as he said he was going to do. Instead he's participating in a cover-up, which only makes him look suspicious. As usual, "TDS" is mostly down to his own actions and the fully predictable reaction.


Yes probably true but why didn't Biden release it? Is there something preventing everyone from releasing it? We all know people on both sides are going to be named. Which ones tho?
Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:32a, 11/14/25
Reply Quote
1
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearlySane88 • 7:55a, 11/14/25
BearlySane88 said:

They are just so blinded by their unfounded hatred. It's honestly fascinating.

Yes, the Trump Devotion Syndrome here by "educated" Cal alums is terribly fascinating.
They will go to great lengths to defend their great American White Hope and right-wing agenda.

We see it play out every day here.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.