Jeffrey Epstein

196,388 Views | 2321 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by cal83dls79
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

bearister said:

"While there is no official single tally of every minute Hillary Clinton has spent in every legislative hearing, public records and news reports confirm she has spent at least 20 to 25 hours testifying under oath in high-profile legislative investigation hearings."
AI Overview

*All Republican investigations that were bridges to nowhere and that cost the taxpayers millions.

Is it really testifying when you say I "do not recall" or I " have no personal knowledge" over and over and over again? When her brain was wiped clean, was it "like with a cloth or something?".
If you think that is what Hillary Clinton did, why are you asking her to do it again? Is there some reason to think this time will be different?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:

"While there is no official single tally of every minute Hillary Clinton has spent in every legislative hearing, public records and news reports confirm she has spent at least 20 to 25 hours testifying under oath in high-profile legislative investigation hearings."
AI Overview

*All Republican investigations that were bridges to nowhere and that cost the taxpayers millions.

Is it really testifying when you say I "do not recall" or I " have no personal knowledge" over and over and over again? When her brain was wiped clean, was it "like with a cloth or something?".

If you think that is what Hillary Clinton did, why are you asking her to do it again? Is there some reason to think this time will be different?

Even though she couldn't remember anything at all about her time as Secretary of State, perhaps she and her husband will be made to recall things about their close friendship with the underage sex trafficker. Just because you are crooked and have lied in the past, it doesn't mean you shouldn't ever be asked questions under oath in the future, especially about a different issue.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:

"While there is no official single tally of every minute Hillary Clinton has spent in every legislative hearing, public records and news reports confirm she has spent at least 20 to 25 hours testifying under oath in high-profile legislative investigation hearings."
AI Overview

*All Republican investigations that were bridges to nowhere and that cost the taxpayers millions.

Is it really testifying when you say I "do not recall" or I " have no personal knowledge" over and over and over again? When her brain was wiped clean, was it "like with a cloth or something?".

If you think that is what Hillary Clinton did, why are you asking her to do it again? Is there some reason to think this time will be different?

Even though she couldn't remember anything at all about her time as Secretary of State, perhaps she and her husband will be made to recall things about their close friendship with the underage sex trafficker. Just because you are crooked and have lied in the past, it doesn't mean you shouldn't ever be asked questions under oath in the future, especially about a different issue.


Lies
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

bearister said:

"While there is no official single tally of every minute Hillary Clinton has spent in every legislative hearing, public records and news reports confirm she has spent at least 20 to 25 hours testifying under oath in high-profile legislative investigation hearings."
AI Overview

*All Republican investigations that were bridges to nowhere and that cost the taxpayers millions.


Hillary Clinton is now a victim? Maybe the investigation into her private email server went nowhere because James Comey is a corrupt deep state actor? Comey made up his mind not to charge Hillary before his investigation.

James Comey won the election for Trump and everyone knows it, especially Trump. It explains this photo:


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Quote:



James Comey won the election for Trump and everyone knows it, especially Trump. It explains this photo:



Possibly the stupidest myth perpetuated by Trump haters and promoted especially hard by the biggest loser of all time in Presidential politics, Hillary Clinton.

She lost because she sucked and had to fix the Democratic primary to win. The country at large didn't want her. If she hadn't been running against Trump, she'd have been crushed in the general.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Quote:

Quote:



James Comey won the election for Trump and everyone knows it, especially Trump. It explains this photo:



Possibly the stupidest myth perpetuated by Trump haters and promoted especially hard by the biggest loser of all time in Presidential politics, Hillary Clinton.

She lost because she sucked and had to fix the Democratic primary to win. The country at large didn't want her. If she hadn't been running against Trump, she'd have been crushed in the general.


Bingo.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Quote:

Quote:



James Comey won the election for Trump and everyone knows it, especially Trump. It explains this photo:



Possibly the stupidest myth perpetuated by Trump haters and promoted especially hard by the biggest loser of all time in Presidential politics, Hillary Clinton.

She lost because she sucked and had to fix the Democratic primary to win. The country at large didn't want her. If she hadn't been running against Trump, she'd have been crushed in the general.


Another educated idiot. Her America-hater DEI staff actually prepared written comments that referred to a large swath of Americans as "a basket of deplorables", and had her bring hot sauce in her purse to a restaurant! So unlikable. They really jobbed Bernie.

HRC reference made me do a quick search in Haiti. Over $13 Billion raised, and most went to ... NGOs! Overhead, salary, etc.

"American Red Cross: Raised $500M but built only a handful of homes, with poor management, questionable spending, and unmet goals."

"They came to do good, and did very well, indeed."
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?




bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree HRC is unlikable. As of 1/23/26 do you think people think Trump is more likable than Hillary?

If their answer to that question is "yes," I just have one question for them:

What happened in their lives that made them hate America so much that they want to undermine it and all it has historically stood for?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

I agree HRC is unlikable. As of 1/23/26 do you think people think Trump is more likable than Hillary?

If their answer to that question is "yes," I just have one question for them:

What happened in their lives that made them hate America so much that they want to undermine it and all it has historically stood for?


The problem is, each side feels this way about the other side. Left thinks right is ruining America, right thinks left is ruining America. If we could meet in the middle more, we might actually save America.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am the middle. The middle dislikes Trump and AOC equally. Trump would like you to think only the Far Left Radicals dislike him. No, all people of common sense, good judgment, good will, morals and ethics dislike him. The extremes are both bullies.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

I am the middle. The middle dislikes Trump and AOC equally. Trump would like you to think only the Far Left Radicals dislike him. No, all people of common sense, good judgment, good will, morals and ethics dislike him. The extremes are both bullies.




Trump doesn't win the election in the fashion he did with all of the middle disliking him.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?





Justice Department says it's releasing 3 million pages from its Jeffrey Epstein files
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.

Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?

Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.

Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?




It wasn't that, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I have provided you with a valuable star for your contribution. In response to this I've decided to burn all of my Bill Gates gear. I also will not continue to support Bill Gates, nor will I vote for him should he choose to run for any office in the face of evidence that he absolutely sucks.

Will all of the people who are in this thread that are still wearing their Bill Gates gear join me!?!?!?!
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

> Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?


coool. geez, hope nobody notices, you know, like during elections and so fort.
< first time i ever liked iffy allegations from the original poster (handle somehow forgotten) >
FUNK TRUNK !
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Slipping someone drugs without consent is a crime. Felony?
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
> felony

pretty sure big wheels in high office don't have to worry about stuff like that.
FUNK TRUNK !
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Slipping someone drugs without consent is a crime. Felony?
ask Bill.
He'd know….well at least his attorney does

https://www.tmz.com/2026/01/28/bill-cosby-did-not-take-his-prescription-quaaludes/
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:

Slipping someone drugs without consent is a crime. Felony?
ask Bill.
He'd know….well at least his attorney does

https://www.tmz.com/2026/01/28/bill-cosby-did-not-take-his-prescription-quaaludes/


Democrat-leaning Bill Gates.

I wonder what the current girlfriend thinks?
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

movielover said:

Slipping someone drugs without consent is a crime. Felony?

ask Bill.
He'd know….well at least his attorney does
https://www.tmz.com/2026/01/28/bill-cosby-did-not-take-his-prescription-quaaludes/

yeahbut, hire enough quality lawyers (though expensive) all your troubles go far away
# life, liberty justice is the amurican way
FUNK TRUNK !
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.

Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?




It wasn't that, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I have provided you with a valuable star for your contribution. In response to this I've decided to burn all of my Bill Gates gear. I also will not continue to support Bill Gates, nor will I vote for him should he choose to run for any office in the face of evidence that he absolutely sucks.

Will all of the people who are in this thread that are still wearing their Bill Gates gear join me!?!?!?!

I also promise to not vote for Bill Gates.

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.

Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?




It wasn't that, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I have provided you with a valuable star for your contribution. In response to this I've decided to burn all of my Bill Gates gear. I also will not continue to support Bill Gates, nor will I vote for him should he choose to run for any office in the face of evidence that he absolutely sucks.

Will all of the people who are in this thread that are still wearing their Bill Gates gear join me!?!?!?!

That's nice. I've decided to burn all my non-existent Trump gear, will continue not supporting Trump, nor will I vote for him for any office (he could run for Congress like John Quincy Adams, but not President) as I've never done either.

Not voting for whatever moderate you Dems try to push on us either though.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Haloski said:

Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.

Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?




It wasn't that, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I have provided you with a valuable star for your contribution. In response to this I've decided to burn all of my Bill Gates gear. I also will not continue to support Bill Gates, nor will I vote for him should he choose to run for any office in the face of evidence that he absolutely sucks.

Will all of the people who are in this thread that are still wearing their Bill Gates gear join me!?!?!?!

I also promise to not vote for Bill Gates.


I am burning all of my blue pullovers without Cal logos in solidarity
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.

Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?




It wasn't that, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I have provided you with a valuable star for your contribution. In response to this I've decided to burn all of my Bill Gates gear. I also will not continue to support Bill Gates, nor will I vote for him should he choose to run for any office in the face of evidence that he absolutely sucks.

Will all of the people who are in this thread that are still wearing their Bill Gates gear join me!?!?!?!

That's nice. I've decided to burn all my non-existent Trump gear, will continue not supporting Trump, nor will I vote for him for any office (he could run for Congress like John Quincy Adams, but not President) as I've never done either.

Not voting for whatever moderate you Dems try to push on us either though.

Who did you vote for in 2024?
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

> not voting for whatever moderate you Dems try to push on us either though.

sorry, no semi-anon handles have any credibility here
# vote early, vote often
FUNK TRUNK !
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Haloski said:

Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.

Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?




It wasn't that, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I have provided you with a valuable star for your contribution. In response to this I've decided to burn all of my Bill Gates gear. I also will not continue to support Bill Gates, nor will I vote for him should he choose to run for any office in the face of evidence that he absolutely sucks.

Will all of the people who are in this thread that are still wearing their Bill Gates gear join me!?!?!?!

I also promise to not vote for Bill Gates.


I not only didn't vote for Bill Gates, I only post here from Apple and Android devices. That lets me thumb my nose at Steve Ballmer too, though I do find it interesting that he apparently never gets invited to the cool parties like Bill Gates and Trump.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Trump and DoJ Cover Up Continues.

They turned over only 50% of the 6 million files and have said that the investigation is over.

Never mind that the GOP has prevented Pam Bondi from having to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee.

Never mind that the subpoena that was issued provides for NO EXEMPTIONS due to ongoing investigations or internal discussions among department heads.

Not a single perp's name has been made known from the DoJ's release.
Shocker.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/video/epstein-files-donald-trump-bill-clinton-department-justice-release
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Aunburdened said:

Haloski said:

Hello to all the "if there was anything in there that is damaging to Donald Trump, the Biden administration would have released it" people. Solid day for y'all and your continued defense of this honorable man.

Not sure what you're referring to, was it this?




It wasn't that, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I have provided you with a valuable star for your contribution. In response to this I've decided to burn all of my Bill Gates gear. I also will not continue to support Bill Gates, nor will I vote for him should he choose to run for any office in the face of evidence that he absolutely sucks.

Will all of the people who are in this thread that are still wearing their Bill Gates gear join me!?!?!?!

That's nice. I've decided to burn all my non-existent Trump gear, will continue not supporting Trump, nor will I vote for him for any office (he could run for Congress like John Quincy Adams, but not President) as I've never done either.

Not voting for whatever moderate you Dems try to push on us either though.


It is nice! Thank you!

I have given you another star! Happy to know we're on the same team here. Down with them all!
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Slipping someone drugs without consent is a crime. Felony?


Seems like it's gotta be a felony. Throw the book at them all!
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

The Trump and DoJ Cover Up Continues.

They turned over only 50% of the 6 million documents and have said that the investigation is over.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/video/epstein-files-donald-trump-bill-clinton-department-justice-release


That's not complete and unredacted. How curious. Can you imagine what's in the stuff they are refusing to share?

Remember when he administration said there was nothing to see? Crazy times.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

The Trump and DoJ Cover Up Continues.

They turned over only 50% of the 6 million files and have said that the investigation is over.

Never mind that the GOP has prevented Pam Bondi from having to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee.

Never mind that the subpoena that was issued provides for NO EXEMPTIONS due to ongoing investigations or internal discussions among department heads.

Not a single perp's name has been made known from the DoJ's release.
Shocker.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/video/epstein-files-donald-trump-bill-clinton-department-justice-release


She is testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee in February

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/01/14/congress/bondi-set-to-testify-00729891
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

DiabloWags said:

The Trump and DoJ Cover Up Continues.

They turned over only 50% of the 6 million documents and have said that the investigation is over.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/video/epstein-files-donald-trump-bill-clinton-department-justice-release


That's not complete and unredacted. How curious. Can you imagine what's in the stuff they are refusing to share?

Remember when he administration said there was nothing to see? Crazy times.


They've literally REDACTED the names of perps and people like Trump while allowing the names of Jane Doe victims to be revealed. When Deputy Attorney General Todd Blance was asked how this has happened when it comes to Jane Doe's, he said that "Mistakes have been made."

Huh?
These files have been sitting on Pam Bondi's desk for months!

Why would anyone but a Trumpanzee trust Todd Blanche?
Blanche has ZERO credibility.

THE WHITE HOUSE COVER UP CONTINUES.



"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

The Trump and DoJ Cover Up Continues.

They turned over only 50% of the 6 million files and have said that the investigation is over.

Never mind that the GOP has prevented Pam Bondi from having to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee.

Never mind that the subpoena that was issued provides for NO EXEMPTIONS due to ongoing investigations or internal discussions among department heads.

Not a single perp's name has been made known from the DoJ's release.
Shocker.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/30/us/video/epstein-files-donald-trump-bill-clinton-department-justice-release


She is testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee in February

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/01/14/congress/bondi-set-to-testify-00729891


AntiochWags: Be better.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.