Jeffrey Epstein

104,747 Views | 1231 Replies | Last: 5 min ago by concordtom
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scott Jennings . . . LOL!

One of the biggest Trump APOLOGISTS known to daytime cable news media.

He's on CNN every night and got totally DESTROYED last night by Kaitlan Collins for his claim that this just happens to be a "wild goose chase" that involves victims of sexual abuse.








CNN: Scott Jennings Gets Laughed at Over Epstein Claim on Kaitlan Collins Show
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

Trump could have headed off all of this Epstein speculation by simply releasing the evidence as he said he was going to do. Instead he's participating in a cover-up, which only makes him look suspicious. As usual, "TDS" is mostly down to his own actions and the fully predictable reaction.


Yes probably true but why didn't Biden release it? Is there something preventing everyone from releasing it? We all know people on both sides are going to be named. Which ones tho?

Yeah, maybe Biden should have too. But only one of them made it a campaign promise.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Scott Jennings . . .





I feel like I typed some of these, or you did.
Change channel whenever he's on?
Don't watch for fear of seeing him?
Punchable face?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

WHY IS TRUMP PRESSURING LAUREN BOEBERT AND NANCY MACE TO VOTE AGAINST RELEASING THE EPSTEIN FILES?

WHY DOES THE ORANGE MAN WANT THEM TO BLOCK THE RELEASE?




I've seen no proof of this happening, just anonymous sources but regardless, how am I supposed to know? I'm not Trump


One would think a female who works with other females the age of these victims would be a little more caring to the issue.

Your post would be understandable if you were a different party (older, this doesn't affect you), but that you are the demographic that you are and you still turn your head to it shows that you are
A) uninformed
B) totally politically biased/blinded.
C) combination of both.


Let me ask you about the issue of rape?
I've had numerous friends and family members be raped. I've known of date rape, gang rape in hs of a passed out girl, and a number of other lurid, sad, stories. More recently, I've also raised 5 girls. This is all to say, I'm very sensitive to the issue and my antenna are up.

Further, as a male, I understand my own sex drive, and I understand men in a group, whether that be in fraternity or at work or….

There is an evolutionary Play at work here, and it results in women getting victimized.

Trump is a sexual predator!!! He admitted and laughed about it.

I don't want that kind of person in any position of power. We aim to be more civilized, and that needs to be stamped out.
I support women!




The man is TOTAL SCUM!!
And you see no evidence of it?
What the hell is the matter with you?!?!
Wake up!
One day when the story is explained in a way for you to digest (translation: the partisan divide on Trump has faded), you are going to feel VERY STUPID.





If Trump is ever criminally convicted of SA or rape, hit me up.


Do we get to stop all these courts blocking his convictions because of his role?

I guess you think OJ didn't slash Nicole and Ron?

Do you have a problem with the fact that he cheated on all 3 wives,
Slept with a porn star and a playboy bunny,
Was accused of grabbing a woman seated next to him on a plane,
Laughed off accusations that he's a sexual predator with "true" on Howard stern show,
Was found civilly responsible for sexual assault,
Said on access Hollywood that he tried to F some other woman and then that you can grab women by the P* and do whatever you want when you're a star,
Said that sexual philandering in the 70's was his personal Vietnam
????????????????????????????

You're okay with all that?


Nah OJ did it for sure.

Nope.
Nope.
Nope… key word accused.
Nope and nope. My female friends say wayyyyy worse things. Women are by far raunchier and more inappropriate than men. Locker room talk exists everywhere, if you deny that you're lying to yourself.
Nope.

The only one that gives me pause is that he was found civilly responsible for SA. But then I learned about the victim and tend to not believe a word she says. Juries get it wrong sometimes.

So again, if he's found criminally responsible for rape or SA I will gladly speak up against it. But he hasn't been so hmu if that changes


Thank you for representing the new (pot smoking, sexually loose) Republican Party. It's good to know which party stands for what.

We will have to have a broader redefinition of Conservatism.

Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Trump really did sleep with 1,000 women, then most of them must have been one night stands. If women aren't willing to have repeat trysts with a billionaire real estate mogul, I have to conclude that Trump is lousy in bed. Certainly Stormy Daniels suggested that was the case.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The 1000 number is just a ballpark figure I threw out there.
Let's take a sampling from folks here. What do you all think? Have you known people with high counts?

I knew a guy estimated his count at 100 after 4 years of college. And he had had a girlfriend for 4 years!
I've known other people who toured with rock bands that would have unimaginably high counts.

Trump himself said in a recorded call while pretending to be someone else who knew Trump really well that Trump had women throwing themselves at him and he could have anyone he wanted (it's on YouTube, I'm not making this up, I've posted it here before)

As for one night stands vs continuing the encounters, I think often times the thrill is the chase and the conquest - not the act or the person involved. People often have someone in mind they could have sex with, but instead of picking up the phone, they go out to bars to see what they can find. Mystery, excitement.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I seriously question Epstein dying of suicide.
It appears to be. But in the emails he sounds like someone both interested in fighting and also someone who needed to be silenced.

Here's a 60 minutes article link, and below that an AI response as to whether there was an autopsy.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/jeffrey-epstein-autopsy-a-closer-look-60-minutes-2020-01-05/


Yes, an autopsy was performed on Jeffrey Epstein's body by the New York City Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. Barbara Sampson. The official conclusion was that the cause of death was hanging and the manner was suicide.
However, the autopsy findings and the official ruling have been disputed:

Official Findings: The New York City Medical Examiner's office stood firmly behind its determination of suicide, concluding that the injuries found, including multiple broken neck bones, were consistent with hanging, especially in an older individual.

Disputed Findings: A private forensic pathologist, Dr. Michael Baden, was hired by Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, to observe the autopsy. Dr. Baden argued that the injuries, specifically fractures to the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage, were "extremely unusual in suicidal hangings" and more indicative of homicidal strangulation.

Ongoing Questions: The circumstances surrounding Epstein's death in a federal prison cell, including serious irregularities in guard supervision and a previous apparent suicide attempt, fueled widespread speculation and multiple federal investigations into how the death occurred, though no evidence contradicting the FBI's determination of no criminality was found in one Office of the Inspector General report.
Ultimately, despite the disputes raised by the family-hired pathologist, the official cause of death determined by the medical examiner remains suicide by hanging.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.