Jeffrey Epstein

129,054 Views | 1539 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by BearlySane88
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scott Jennings . . . LOL!

One of the biggest Trump APOLOGISTS known to daytime cable news media.

He's on CNN every night and got totally DESTROYED last night by Kaitlan Collins for his claim that this just happens to be a "wild goose chase" that involves victims of sexual abuse.








CNN: Scott Jennings Gets Laughed at Over Epstein Claim on Kaitlan Collins Show
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

Trump could have headed off all of this Epstein speculation by simply releasing the evidence as he said he was going to do. Instead he's participating in a cover-up, which only makes him look suspicious. As usual, "TDS" is mostly down to his own actions and the fully predictable reaction.


Yes probably true but why didn't Biden release it? Is there something preventing everyone from releasing it? We all know people on both sides are going to be named. Which ones tho?

Yeah, maybe Biden should have too. But only one of them made it a campaign promise.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Scott Jennings . . .





I feel like I typed some of these, or you did.
Change channel whenever he's on?
Don't watch for fear of seeing him?
Punchable face?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

WHY IS TRUMP PRESSURING LAUREN BOEBERT AND NANCY MACE TO VOTE AGAINST RELEASING THE EPSTEIN FILES?

WHY DOES THE ORANGE MAN WANT THEM TO BLOCK THE RELEASE?




I've seen no proof of this happening, just anonymous sources but regardless, how am I supposed to know? I'm not Trump


One would think a female who works with other females the age of these victims would be a little more caring to the issue.

Your post would be understandable if you were a different party (older, this doesn't affect you), but that you are the demographic that you are and you still turn your head to it shows that you are
A) uninformed
B) totally politically biased/blinded.
C) combination of both.


Let me ask you about the issue of rape?
I've had numerous friends and family members be raped. I've known of date rape, gang rape in hs of a passed out girl, and a number of other lurid, sad, stories. More recently, I've also raised 5 girls. This is all to say, I'm very sensitive to the issue and my antenna are up.

Further, as a male, I understand my own sex drive, and I understand men in a group, whether that be in fraternity or at work or….

There is an evolutionary Play at work here, and it results in women getting victimized.

Trump is a sexual predator!!! He admitted and laughed about it.

I don't want that kind of person in any position of power. We aim to be more civilized, and that needs to be stamped out.
I support women!




The man is TOTAL SCUM!!
And you see no evidence of it?
What the hell is the matter with you?!?!
Wake up!
One day when the story is explained in a way for you to digest (translation: the partisan divide on Trump has faded), you are going to feel VERY STUPID.





If Trump is ever criminally convicted of SA or rape, hit me up.


Do we get to stop all these courts blocking his convictions because of his role?

I guess you think OJ didn't slash Nicole and Ron?

Do you have a problem with the fact that he cheated on all 3 wives,
Slept with a porn star and a playboy bunny,
Was accused of grabbing a woman seated next to him on a plane,
Laughed off accusations that he's a sexual predator with "true" on Howard stern show,
Was found civilly responsible for sexual assault,
Said on access Hollywood that he tried to F some other woman and then that you can grab women by the P* and do whatever you want when you're a star,
Said that sexual philandering in the 70's was his personal Vietnam
????????????????????????????

You're okay with all that?


Nah OJ did it for sure.

Nope.
Nope.
Nope… key word accused.
Nope and nope. My female friends say wayyyyy worse things. Women are by far raunchier and more inappropriate than men. Locker room talk exists everywhere, if you deny that you're lying to yourself.
Nope.

The only one that gives me pause is that he was found civilly responsible for SA. But then I learned about the victim and tend to not believe a word she says. Juries get it wrong sometimes.

So again, if he's found criminally responsible for rape or SA I will gladly speak up against it. But he hasn't been so hmu if that changes


Thank you for representing the new (pot smoking, sexually loose) Republican Party. It's good to know which party stands for what.

We will have to have a broader redefinition of Conservatism.

Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Trump really did sleep with 1,000 women, then most of them must have been one night stands. If women aren't willing to have repeat trysts with a billionaire real estate mogul, I have to conclude that Trump is lousy in bed. Certainly Stormy Daniels suggested that was the case.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The 1000 number is just a ballpark figure I threw out there.
Let's take a sampling from folks here. What do you all think? Have you known people with high counts?

I knew a guy estimated his count at 100 after 4 years of college. And he had had a girlfriend for 4 years!
I've known other people who toured with rock bands that would have unimaginably high counts.

Trump himself said in a recorded call while pretending to be someone else who knew Trump really well that Trump had women throwing themselves at him and he could have anyone he wanted (it's on YouTube, I'm not making this up, I've posted it here before)

As for one night stands vs continuing the encounters, I think often times the thrill is the chase and the conquest - not the act or the person involved. People often have someone in mind they could have sex with, but instead of picking up the phone, they go out to bars to see what they can find. Mystery, excitement.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I seriously question Epstein dying of suicide.
It appears to be. But in the emails he sounds like someone both interested in fighting and also someone who needed to be silenced.

Here's a 60 minutes article link, and below that an AI response as to whether there was an autopsy.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/jeffrey-epstein-autopsy-a-closer-look-60-minutes-2020-01-05/


Yes, an autopsy was performed on Jeffrey Epstein's body by the New York City Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. Barbara Sampson. The official conclusion was that the cause of death was hanging and the manner was suicide.
However, the autopsy findings and the official ruling have been disputed:

Official Findings: The New York City Medical Examiner's office stood firmly behind its determination of suicide, concluding that the injuries found, including multiple broken neck bones, were consistent with hanging, especially in an older individual.

Disputed Findings: A private forensic pathologist, Dr. Michael Baden, was hired by Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, to observe the autopsy. Dr. Baden argued that the injuries, specifically fractures to the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage, were "extremely unusual in suicidal hangings" and more indicative of homicidal strangulation.

Ongoing Questions: The circumstances surrounding Epstein's death in a federal prison cell, including serious irregularities in guard supervision and a previous apparent suicide attempt, fueled widespread speculation and multiple federal investigations into how the death occurred, though no evidence contradicting the FBI's determination of no criminality was found in one Office of the Inspector General report.
Ultimately, despite the disputes raised by the family-hired pathologist, the official cause of death determined by the medical examiner remains suicide by hanging.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

If Trump really did sleep with 1,000 women, then most of them must have been one night stands. If women aren't willing to have repeat trysts with a billionaire real estate mogul, I have to conclude that Trump is lousy in bed. Certainly Stormy Daniels suggested that was the case.


This sounds like the logical argument an incel would use.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:

Trump could have headed off all of this Epstein speculation by simply releasing the evidence as he said he was going to do. Instead he's participating in a cover-up, which only makes him look suspicious. As usual, "TDS" is mostly down to his own actions and the fully predictable reaction.


Yes probably true but why didn't Biden release it? Is there something preventing everyone from releasing it? We all know people on both sides are going to be named. Which ones tho?

Yeah, maybe Biden should have too. But only one of them made it a campaign promise.


Maybe he should have? He definitely should have. As should Trump.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

WHY IS TRUMP PRESSURING LAUREN BOEBERT AND NANCY MACE TO VOTE AGAINST RELEASING THE EPSTEIN FILES?

WHY DOES THE ORANGE MAN WANT THEM TO BLOCK THE RELEASE?




I've seen no proof of this happening, just anonymous sources but regardless, how am I supposed to know? I'm not Trump


One would think a female who works with other females the age of these victims would be a little more caring to the issue.

Your post would be understandable if you were a different party (older, this doesn't affect you), but that you are the demographic that you are and you still turn your head to it shows that you are
A) uninformed
B) totally politically biased/blinded.
C) combination of both.


Let me ask you about the issue of rape?
I've had numerous friends and family members be raped. I've known of date rape, gang rape in hs of a passed out girl, and a number of other lurid, sad, stories. More recently, I've also raised 5 girls. This is all to say, I'm very sensitive to the issue and my antenna are up.

Further, as a male, I understand my own sex drive, and I understand men in a group, whether that be in fraternity or at work or….

There is an evolutionary Play at work here, and it results in women getting victimized.

Trump is a sexual predator!!! He admitted and laughed about it.

I don't want that kind of person in any position of power. We aim to be more civilized, and that needs to be stamped out.
I support women!




The man is TOTAL SCUM!!
And you see no evidence of it?
What the hell is the matter with you?!?!
Wake up!
One day when the story is explained in a way for you to digest (translation: the partisan divide on Trump has faded), you are going to feel VERY STUPID.





If Trump is ever criminally convicted of SA or rape, hit me up.


Do we get to stop all these courts blocking his convictions because of his role?

I guess you think OJ didn't slash Nicole and Ron?

Do you have a problem with the fact that he cheated on all 3 wives,
Slept with a porn star and a playboy bunny,
Was accused of grabbing a woman seated next to him on a plane,
Laughed off accusations that he's a sexual predator with "true" on Howard stern show,
Was found civilly responsible for sexual assault,
Said on access Hollywood that he tried to F some other woman and then that you can grab women by the P* and do whatever you want when you're a star,
Said that sexual philandering in the 70's was his personal Vietnam
????????????????????????????

You're okay with all that?


Nah OJ did it for sure.

Nope.
Nope.
Nope… key word accused.
Nope and nope. My female friends say wayyyyy worse things. Women are by far raunchier and more inappropriate than men. Locker room talk exists everywhere, if you deny that you're lying to yourself.
Nope.

The only one that gives me pause is that he was found civilly responsible for SA. But then I learned about the victim and tend to not believe a word she says. Juries get it wrong sometimes.

So again, if he's found criminally responsible for rape or SA I will gladly speak up against it. But he hasn't been so hmu if that changes


Thank you for representing the new (pot smoking, sexually loose) Republican Party. It's good to know which party stands for what.

We will have to have a broader redefinition of Conservatism.




I represent myself, not a party. My views and beliefs are my own.

You're welcome.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Attorney General Pam Bondi assigned the U.S. attorney in Manhattan to investigate Jeffrey Epstein's ties to prominent Democrats, including former President Clinton. President Trump ordered the investigation on Truth Social."
Axios

In Trump's 10 year old boy brain, he thinks this threat is a great diversion and a method to make this go away.

Unfortunately for Trump:

1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; and

2. This stunt, like the one he pulled with Ghislaine Maxwell, did little more than underscore his guilt x 1000.


Pam Bondi has that look on her face that reflects the intersection of psychotropic drug mismanagement and having come to the realization that the trace element of desire to be a warrior for justice that was fighting for survival in her being just died.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:



1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; .


Really? I do if they were involved in illegal actions.

You're saying if it turns out dems are named and pointed out as pedos that you wouldn't care? So it is all a witch-hunt to find dirt on Trump. You don't care about the women and girls. You care about nailing Trump.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:



1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; .


Really? I do if they were involved in illegal actions.

You're saying if it turns out dems are named and pointed out as pedos that you wouldn't care? So it is all a witch-hunt to find dirt on Trump. You don't care about the women and girls. You care about nailing Trump.

That's all it's ever been for 8 years. Dems turning a blind eye to their own corruption and hypocrisy because they need to get Trump for the crime of being better at politics than Hillary. That's the "crime" that is unforgivable in their eyes - him beating her at her exact game of identity politics.

It's why I no longer care about whether Trump uses the office to enrich himself or abuses it for pay to play pardons. Democrat voters don't care when their guys do it - they just go back to brunch. So when he does the same thing, but more flagrantly and out in the open, so what? He's just better at the same game they play than they are.

I need to be offered a non-corrupt option. I don't care which corrupt party is in power cause neither of them are gonna do anything for me.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:



1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; .


Really? I do if they were involved in illegal actions.

You're saying if it turns out dems are named and pointed out as pedos that you wouldn't care? So it is all a witch-hunt to find dirt on Trump. You don't care about the women and girls. You care about nailing Trump.


Do you have to have a tortured interpretation of everything? I'm not saying any of the garbage in your response. Only you are saying that. Trump is threatening to prosecute them so the reasonable, non @$$hole interpretation of what I said is: who cares if Clinton and any other Democrat gets exposed, disgraced and prosecuted (if not barred)? F all of them. That threat provides no bargaining chip in preventing going after Trump on Epstein matter.

Is there something wrong with you? You invent arguments that don't exist so you can spew your bullsh@it.

Why don't you look up the term "Pedophilia" so you can stop embarrassing yourself? The only evidence discussed in connection with Epstein and his buddies is that they were statutory rapists and perhaps rapists if it was non consensual.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:


I need to be offered a non-corrupt option. I don't care which corrupt party is in power cause neither of them are gonna do anything for me.



So why are you here crying and whining about not having an option if there is none?
You just looking for a place to vent?

"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:



1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; .


Really? I do if they were involved in illegal actions.

You're saying if it turns out dems are named and pointed out as pedos that you wouldn't care? So it is all a witch-hunt to find dirt on Trump. You don't care about the women and girls. You care about nailing Trump.


Do you have to have a tortured interpretation of everything? I'm not saying any of the garbage in your response. Only you are saying that. Trump is threatening to prosecute them so the reasonable, non @$$hole interpretation of what I said is: who cares if Clinton and any other Democrat gets exposed, disgraced and prosecuted (if not barred). F all of them. Is there something wrong with you. You invent arguments that don't exist so you can spew your bullsh@it.

Why don't you look up the term "Pedophilia" so you can stop embarrassing yourself? The only evidence discussed in connection with Epstein and his buddies is that they were statutory rapists and perhaps rapists if it was non consensual.


If that's what you were trying to say, you sure as hell made it sound like something else.

This is your quote "No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein;"

It's not a stretch at all for me, and others, to assume you meant something entirely different than what you're saying now

And what do you mean Epstein hasn't been connected to being a pedo?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shocker.
Tit for Tat.

"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"If that's what you were trying to say, you sure as hell made it sound like something else."

……says the only guy on BI that seriously thought I believe ICE Barbie is a serial killer in the making.
Is there a BI blackboard function I can use when posting a comment so I can chalk it out for you next time.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

WHY IS TRUMP PRESSURING LAUREN BOEBERT AND NANCY MACE TO VOTE AGAINST RELEASING THE EPSTEIN FILES?

WHY DOES THE ORANGE MAN WANT THEM TO BLOCK THE RELEASE?




I've seen no proof of this happening, just anonymous sources but regardless, how am I supposed to know? I'm not Trump


One would think a female who works with other females the age of these victims would be a little more caring to the issue.

Your post would be understandable if you were a different party (older, this doesn't affect you), but that you are the demographic that you are and you still turn your head to it shows that you are
A) uninformed
B) totally politically biased/blinded.
C) combination of both.


Let me ask you about the issue of rape?
I've had numerous friends and family members be raped. I've known of date rape, gang rape in hs of a passed out girl, and a number of other lurid, sad, stories. More recently, I've also raised 5 girls. This is all to say, I'm very sensitive to the issue and my antenna are up.

Further, as a male, I understand my own sex drive, and I understand men in a group, whether that be in fraternity or at work or….

There is an evolutionary Play at work here, and it results in women getting victimized.

Trump is a sexual predator!!! He admitted and laughed about it.

I don't want that kind of person in any position of power. We aim to be more civilized, and that needs to be stamped out.
I support women!




The man is TOTAL SCUM!!
And you see no evidence of it?
What the hell is the matter with you?!?!
Wake up!
One day when the story is explained in a way for you to digest (translation: the partisan divide on Trump has faded), you are going to feel VERY STUPID.





If Trump is ever criminally convicted of SA or rape, hit me up.


Do we get to stop all these courts blocking his convictions because of his role?

I guess you think OJ didn't slash Nicole and Ron?

Do you have a problem with the fact that he cheated on all 3 wives,
Slept with a porn star and a playboy bunny,
Was accused of grabbing a woman seated next to him on a plane,
Laughed off accusations that he's a sexual predator with "true" on Howard stern show,
Was found civilly responsible for sexual assault,
Said on access Hollywood that he tried to F some other woman and then that you can grab women by the P* and do whatever you want when you're a star,
Said that sexual philandering in the 70's was his personal Vietnam
????????????????????????????

You're okay with all that?


Nah OJ did it for sure.

Nope.
Nope.
Nope… key word accused.
Nope and nope. My female friends say wayyyyy worse things. Women are by far raunchier and more inappropriate than men. Locker room talk exists everywhere, if you deny that you're lying to yourself.
Nope.

The only one that gives me pause is that he was found civilly responsible for SA. But then I learned about the victim and tend to not believe a word she says. Juries get it wrong sometimes.

So again, if he's found criminally responsible for rape or SA I will gladly speak up against it. But he hasn't been so hmu if that changes


Thank you for representing the new (pot smoking, sexually loose) Republican Party. It's good to know which party stands for what.

We will have to have a broader redefinition of Conservatism.




I represent myself, not a party. My views and beliefs are my own.

You're welcome.

Well, then, you represent yourself poorly.
I mean, people are dog piling on you here.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats posted and then Deleted a wildly false assertion that President Trump 1.0 spent Thanksgiving with Epstein.

FAFO: President Trump announces a request for our DOJ to review Epstein's relationship with Democrats
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:



1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; .


Really? I do if they were involved in illegal actions.

You're saying if it turns out dems are named and pointed out as pedos that you wouldn't care? So it is all a witch-hunt to find dirt on Trump. You don't care about the women and girls. You care about nailing Trump.


He's pretty clearly alluding to what is largely the fact that novody cares if Clinton goes down for misdeeds in this case. If you're a decent person, you can be disappointed that people you once supported were involved but absolutely be in favor of them enduring consequences for their actions.

What the hell kind of interpretation idiocy is your response? Your simultaneously hyper defensive and overtly offensive stances are confounding at times.

These are bad people. Trump knew who Epstein was FOR YEARS and let him operate on his property without consequence until it became an issue for him due to a member's daughter interacting with Epstein. There was nothing noble about his actions. He was buds with the guy and had a falling out. He enabled him.

I don't think that Trump is a pedophile, so you can trash that as something to react to. He's a terrible POS human being who was fine with Epstein being Epstein until he wasn't. I've been saying this for a long time now.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He kicked him out of his club in 2004?

Epstein was convicted of two crimes on June 30, 2008, in Florida.

Katie Couric, Woody Allen, and dozens of other Democrats joined him for a feast in his mansion, and elsewhere, AFTER his conviction.

Epstein reportedly paid off a debt for Sarah Ferguson.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:



1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; .


Really? I do if they were involved in illegal actions.

You're saying if it turns out dems are named and pointed out as pedos that you wouldn't care? So it is all a witch-hunt to find dirt on Trump. You don't care about the women and girls. You care about nailing Trump.


He's pretty clearly alluding to what is largely the fact that novody cares if Clinton goes down for misdeeds in this case. If you're a decent person, you can be disappointed that people you once supported were involved but absolutely be in favor of them enduring consequences for their actions.

What the hell kind of interpretation idiocy is your response? Your simultaneously hyper defensive and overtly offensive stances are confounding at times.

These are bad people. Trump knew who Epstein was FOR YEARS and let him operate on his property without consequence until it became an issue for him due to a member's daughter interacting with Epstein. There was nothing noble about his actions. He was buds with the guy and had a falling out. He enabled him.

I don't think that Trump is a pedophile, so you can trash that as something to react to. He's a terrible POS human being who was fine with Epstein being Epstein until he wasn't. I've been saying this for a long time now.


"Michael Cohen, who spent time in prison earlier this year for fraud and tax evasion, lying to Congress and campaign finance violations, detailed the allegation in his recently released book, according to Vanity Fair, writing that in 2012, he and Trump were chatting at Trump's property in Bedminster, New Jersey, when Trump noticed Samantha Cohen approaching them, unaware that she was his lawyer's daughter.

Trump's attention was diverted to another skirt walking off a tennis court. 'Look at that piece of a,' Cohen recalls Trump saying, as he whistled and pointed," according to Vanity Fair. "'I would love some of that.' It so happened that Trump was referring to Cohen's then 15-year-old daughter, Samantha."

"Cohen informed Trump of his mistake. 'That's your daughter?' Trump responded. 'When did she get so hot?' When Samantha reached her dad, Trump asked her for a kiss on the cheek, before inquiring, 'When did you get such a beautiful figure?' and warning her that in a few years, he would be dating one of her friends," the magazine reported."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/14/politics/samantha-cohen-donald-trump-cnntv

Trump Walked in on Teen Pageant Contestants Changing https://people.com/politics/donald-trump-walks-in-miss-teen-usa-contestants-changing/
https://people.com/politics/donald-trump-walks-in-miss-teen-usa-contestants-changing/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

"If that's what you were trying to say, you sure as hell made it sound like something else."

……says the only guy on BI that seriously thought I believe ICE Barbie is a serial killer in the making.
Is there a BI blackboard function I can use when posting a comment so I can chalk it out for you next time.


Who uses blackboards anymore?
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

WHY IS TRUMP PRESSURING LAUREN BOEBERT AND NANCY MACE TO VOTE AGAINST RELEASING THE EPSTEIN FILES?

WHY DOES THE ORANGE MAN WANT THEM TO BLOCK THE RELEASE?




I've seen no proof of this happening, just anonymous sources but regardless, how am I supposed to know? I'm not Trump


One would think a female who works with other females the age of these victims would be a little more caring to the issue.

Your post would be understandable if you were a different party (older, this doesn't affect you), but that you are the demographic that you are and you still turn your head to it shows that you are
A) uninformed
B) totally politically biased/blinded.
C) combination of both.


Let me ask you about the issue of rape?
I've had numerous friends and family members be raped. I've known of date rape, gang rape in hs of a passed out girl, and a number of other lurid, sad, stories. More recently, I've also raised 5 girls. This is all to say, I'm very sensitive to the issue and my antenna are up.

Further, as a male, I understand my own sex drive, and I understand men in a group, whether that be in fraternity or at work or….

There is an evolutionary Play at work here, and it results in women getting victimized.

Trump is a sexual predator!!! He admitted and laughed about it.

I don't want that kind of person in any position of power. We aim to be more civilized, and that needs to be stamped out.
I support women!




The man is TOTAL SCUM!!
And you see no evidence of it?
What the hell is the matter with you?!?!
Wake up!
One day when the story is explained in a way for you to digest (translation: the partisan divide on Trump has faded), you are going to feel VERY STUPID.





If Trump is ever criminally convicted of SA or rape, hit me up.


Do we get to stop all these courts blocking his convictions because of his role?

I guess you think OJ didn't slash Nicole and Ron?

Do you have a problem with the fact that he cheated on all 3 wives,
Slept with a porn star and a playboy bunny,
Was accused of grabbing a woman seated next to him on a plane,
Laughed off accusations that he's a sexual predator with "true" on Howard stern show,
Was found civilly responsible for sexual assault,
Said on access Hollywood that he tried to F some other woman and then that you can grab women by the P* and do whatever you want when you're a star,
Said that sexual philandering in the 70's was his personal Vietnam
????????????????????????????

You're okay with all that?


Nah OJ did it for sure.

Nope.
Nope.
Nope… key word accused.
Nope and nope. My female friends say wayyyyy worse things. Women are by far raunchier and more inappropriate than men. Locker room talk exists everywhere, if you deny that you're lying to yourself.
Nope.

The only one that gives me pause is that he was found civilly responsible for SA. But then I learned about the victim and tend to not believe a word she says. Juries get it wrong sometimes.

So again, if he's found criminally responsible for rape or SA I will gladly speak up against it. But he hasn't been so hmu if that changes


Thank you for representing the new (pot smoking, sexually loose) Republican Party. It's good to know which party stands for what.

We will have to have a broader redefinition of Conservatism.




I represent myself, not a party. My views and beliefs are my own.

You're welcome.

Well, then, you represent yourself poorly.
I mean, people are dog piling on you here.


Bro…. It's a board full of mostly democrats. I'm fully aware more people are going to disagree with me. I'm good
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:



1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; .


Really? I do if they were involved in illegal actions.

You're saying if it turns out dems are named and pointed out as pedos that you wouldn't care? So it is all a witch-hunt to find dirt on Trump. You don't care about the women and girls. You care about nailing Trump.


He's pretty clearly alluding to what is largely the fact that novody cares if Clinton goes down for misdeeds in this case. If you're a decent person, you can be disappointed that people you once supported were involved but absolutely be in favor of them enduring consequences for their actions.

What the hell kind of interpretation idiocy is your response? Your simultaneously hyper defensive and overtly offensive stances are confounding at times.

These are bad people. Trump knew who Epstein was FOR YEARS and let him operate on his property without consequence until it became an issue for him due to a member's daughter interacting with Epstein. There was nothing noble about his actions. He was buds with the guy and had a falling out. He enabled him.

I don't think that Trump is a pedophile, so you can trash that as something to react to. He's a terrible POS human being who was fine with Epstein being Epstein until he wasn't. I've been saying this for a long time now.


He's still your president. God bless America.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haloski said:



I don't think that Trump is a pedophile, so you can trash that as something to react to. He's a terrible POS human being who was fine with Epstein being Epstein until he wasn't. I've been saying this for a long time now.


I agree, though he definitely knew what was going on.
Although, Epstein did say he spent hours with that girl at Epstein's house.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well the Epstein files won't be coming out any time soon. The DOJ won't release them while there is an ongoing investigation.

Trump Epstein cover up will continue for years more
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

Haloski said:



I don't think that Trump is a pedophile, so you can trash that as something to react to. He's a terrible POS human being who was fine with Epstein being Epstein until he wasn't. I've been saying this for a long time now.


I agree, though he definitely knew what was going on.
Although, Epstein did say he spent hours with that girl at Epstein's house.


That "girl" cleared Trump of any wrongdoing
Haloski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Haloski said:

BearlySane88 said:

bearister said:



1. No one gives a flying f@uck about Clinton or any other Dem involved with Epstein; .


Really? I do if they were involved in illegal actions.

You're saying if it turns out dems are named and pointed out as pedos that you wouldn't care? So it is all a witch-hunt to find dirt on Trump. You don't care about the women and girls. You care about nailing Trump.


He's pretty clearly alluding to what is largely the fact that novody cares if Clinton goes down for misdeeds in this case. If you're a decent person, you can be disappointed that people you once supported were involved but absolutely be in favor of them enduring consequences for their actions.

What the hell kind of interpretation idiocy is your response? Your simultaneously hyper defensive and overtly offensive stances are confounding at times.

These are bad people. Trump knew who Epstein was FOR YEARS and let him operate on his property without consequence until it became an issue for him due to a member's daughter interacting with Epstein. There was nothing noble about his actions. He was buds with the guy and had a falling out. He enabled him.

I don't think that Trump is a pedophile, so you can trash that as something to react to. He's a terrible POS human being who was fine with Epstein being Epstein until he wasn't. I've been saying this for a long time now.


He's still your president. God bless America.


That he is and will continue to be until the end of his term. God bless America, indeed. Stop playing defense for this guy.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Epstein email dump shows Democrats were working with Jeffrey Epstein on the eve of his second indictment to push for Donald Trump's indictment and impeachment.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The weirdest thing about the Epstein emails is that democrats published them but took Epstein's side
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Trump could have headed off all of this Epstein speculation by simply releasing the evidence as he said he was going to do. Instead he's participating in a cover-up, which only makes him look suspicious. As usual, "TDS" is mostly down to his own actions and the fully predictable reaction.

Actually, what Trump did was he successfully tricked the Left into acknowledging Epstein after they ignored him for 20 years. They said Epstein was a "conspiracy theory". Now they have to deal with the reality that Clinton, Obama, and Biden hid information from them, including information that supposedly implicates Trump.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.