BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
BearlySane88 said:
Cal88 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
MinotStateBeav said:
I'll be honest, I am concerned about the Iranian people taking power following the bombing/strikes, because I think besides the internal threats, the outside threats looking to secure power will be the most dangerous, how does Iran stabilize without border security?
All legitimate concerns. But not today.
Scenes that you won't see in your neocon info bubble:
Based on your previous post, this top video is also likely from 2020
98% incompetence
2% bad faith
You can see in the video the mourners brandishing the portrait of Khameinei.
All the videos you posted were from 2020. This is hilarious, how much is Iran paying you?
"No, the videos attached to that X post from The Cradle are not from 2026. They appear to be recycled footage from earlier large-scale gatherings in Iran, most likely Qasem Soleimani's funeral in January 2020. The visual elementsdense crowds in black attire filling Tehran streets and squares, Iranian flags, raised fists, and anti-American bannersmatch archived aerial and ground-level shots from that event, which drew millions and featured similar anti-US chants and mobilization.
This aligns with documented patterns where pro-regime or aligned media outlets, including those covering West Asian geopolitics, have repurposed Soleimani funeral footage to depict current support or mourning, as seen in fact-checks from sources like Vishvas News, Misbar, and Euronews reporting on such misuse in other contexts."
It's pretty simple.
You AI slop says that the videos were from 2020, of the mourning of slained general Soleimani.
The portraits brandished by the mourners in the video
are of the guy who was just killed yesterday, and none of the guy who was killed in 2020.
Your source is 100% bad faith, don't double down on that, otherwise your own bad faith score is going to blow up.
If you want to skip silly internet back and forths and talk seriously about Iran, here is a very helpful quick background and timeline, from a source you would probably trust on a range of issues:
> 70 years ago, Iran looked just like any Western country.
> Short skirts, rock'n'roll, open universities.
> It's 1953. Iran elects a secular socialist: Mohammad Mossadegh.
> He nationalizes oil. That pisses off BP.
> Cold War excuse.
> CIA and MI6 stage a coup. Operation Ajax.
> Mossadegh is overthrown.
> They install the Shah, a brutal US-backed dictator.
> Secret police. Torture chambers.
> Iran turns into a puppet state.
> People are that desperate, they turn to Khomeini, an exiled cleric, promising independence and dignity.
> 1979: Islamic Revolution.
> The Shah flees.
> US embassy stormed. Hostage crisis.
> America never forgives.
> Arms Saddam Hussein.
> Iraq invades Iran.
> US provides chemical weapons, satellite intel, logistics.
> 1 million Iranians die.
> Iranian kids sent into minefields with plastic keys around their necks.
> US shoots down Iran Air Flight 655
> 290 civilians dead.
> No apology.
> Fast forward today, Israel attacks Iran.
> The U.S. immediately says "we stand with Israel."
> They talk about "regime change."
> They say that Iranians "deserve freedom."
> No mention of the coup they started.
> No mention of the dictator they installed.
> No mention of the war they fueled.
> No mention of the decades of sanctions and sabotage.
> They created the monster, and now they attacked it because it was still breathing.
> Watch who they try to put on the throne next.
> The son of the Shah is already being presented as the "alternative."
> The same dynasty.
> The same foreign backing.
>The same promises of stability.
> History will repeats itself.
> And it's not gonna end well.