Off Topic
Sponsored by

Are Democrats Out-of-Touch, Senile, Nuts or Something Worse?

19,640 Views | 265 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by BearlySane88
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Oh this is just too good. One of you might need to redirect your fascist comments now.




Wow. What a gotcha moment. Devastating. Your hours of being fed right wing tweets has really paid off.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Oh this is just too good. One of you might need to redirect your fascist comments now.




Wow. What a gotcha moment. Devastating. Your hours of being fed right wing tweets has really paid off.


This would be very shocking if I was you. I could see why you're so defensive.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Will you vote at all? If one is Maga and in Cali, do they feel compelled to vote? I've always wondered.

Even Hilton the other night in the debate admitted he had no chance at winning. Not a competitor at all, just a fraud.

Vote blue and vote Kamala

Is Kamala running for something again? Hadn't heard that.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

SBGold said:

Will you vote at all? If one is Maga and in Cali, do they feel compelled to vote? I've always wondered.

Even Hilton the other night in the debate admitted he had no chance at winning. Not a competitor at all, just a fraud.

Vote blue and vote Kamala

Is Kamala running for something again? Hadn't heard that.

Let's hope!

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE TALARICO
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Big C said:

SBGold said:

Will you vote at all? If one is Maga and in Cali, do they feel compelled to vote? I've always wondered.

Even Hilton the other night in the debate admitted he had no chance at winning. Not a competitor at all, just a fraud.

Vote blue and vote Kamala

Is Kamala running for something again? Hadn't heard that.

Let's hope!

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE TALARICO


If only I could be so lucky
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Big C said:

SBGold said:

Will you vote at all? If one is Maga and in Cali, do they feel compelled to vote? I've always wondered.

Even Hilton the other night in the debate admitted he had no chance at winning. Not a competitor at all, just a fraud.

Vote blue and vote Kamala

Is Kamala running for something again? Hadn't heard that.

Let's hope!

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE TALARICO

I hope not, actually. Kamala Harris ran a pretty good campaign, all things considered (open to 20/20 hindsight criticisms) and I'm sure she'd be an okay President... but let's try somebody different this time.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Oh this is just too good. One of you might need to redirect your fascist comments now.



It's kind of an own goal on your part to post something that says Democrats have twice the favorable rating of the Republicans.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Oh this is just too good. One of you might need to redirect your fascist comments now.



It's kind of an own goal on your part to post something that says Democrats have twice the favorable rating of the Republicans.

Democrats will claim they just liked his art.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Oh this is just too good. One of you might need to redirect your fascist comments now.



It's kind of an own goal on your part to post something that says Democrats have twice the favorable rating of the Republicans.


I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. If not, you might want to read that X post again
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Oh this is just too good. One of you might need to redirect your fascist comments now.



It's kind of an own goal on your part to post something that says Democrats have twice the favorable rating of the Republicans.


I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. If not, you might want to read that X post again

There's more than one way to read that post. I took it one way initially and now I see it could be interpreted the way you must be seeing it.
ChudBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

BearlySane88 said:

Oh this is just too good. One of you might need to redirect your fascist comments now.



It's kind of an own goal on your part to post something that says Democrats have twice the favorable rating of the Republicans.


I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. If not, you might want to read that X post again

There's more than one way to read that post. I took it one way initially and now I see it could be interpreted the way you must be seeing it.

No there isn't unless you didn't actually read it all
Abbott Laboratories donated $500,000 to the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee

Gold Curse is undefeated

#KoolaidGang #DWcallsDTdaddy
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Hitler obsessives should provide a link to the poll instead of just an unlinked tweet from somebody or something. Here is a real YouGov poll that shows 17% of Republicans say Hitler was a "good person or an equally good or bad person". 11% of Democrats say the same. If other people have a different poll they should provide an actual link.

https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/50864-two-thirds-of-americans-say-hitler-was-completely-bad
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

The Hitler obsessives should provide a link to the poll instead of just an unlinked tweet from somebody or something. Here is a real YouGov poll that shows 17% of Republicans say Hitler was a "good person or an equally good or bad person". 11% of Democrats say the same. If other people have a different poll they should provide an actual link.

https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/50864-two-thirds-of-americans-say-hitler-was-completely-bad

This is more accurate
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
ChudBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

The Hitler obsessives

Who are you speaking to? Your side is the side obsessed with calling everyone Nazi's so this is directed at Democrats?
Abbott Laboratories donated $500,000 to the Trump-Vance Inaugural Committee

Gold Curse is undefeated

#KoolaidGang #DWcallsDTdaddy
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ChudBear said:

dajo9 said:

The Hitler obsessives

Who are you speaking to? Your side is the side obsessed with calling everyone Nazi's so this is directed at Democrats?


Where is the link to the poll?
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder if the poll included "He did some good things" as a multiple choice response
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Happy two year anniversary to arguably one of the worst but funniest political ads I've ever seen.

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems are great at the ads now:



Scanduel!

What a crap wagon Paxie and all the other MAGAs running for office are

Vote Blue and Vote Talarico, Cooper, Peltola, Ossoff, Jackson, Becerra and Flanagan
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It sounds like a commercial for a bargain store stale.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Huh?
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Huh?


"Sunday, Sunday, Sunday!"
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.