BearlySane88 said:
We've heard nothing but doom and gloom from you for months.
Must be hard to admit when Trump has success.
DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:
We've heard nothing but doom and gloom from you for months.
Must be hard to admit when Trump has success.
I'm doing well with the polling in my family.
Trump's polling is at NEW LOWS from Americans.
BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:
We've heard nothing but doom and gloom from you for months.
Must be hard to admit when Trump has success.
I'm doing well with the polling in my family.
Trump's polling is at NEW LOWS from Americans.
If your family invests, as you do, they should all be thanking their president right about now.
DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:
We've heard nothing but doom and gloom from you for months.
Must be hard to admit when Trump has success.
I'm doing well with the polling in my family.
Trump's polling is at NEW LOWS from Americans.
If your family invests, as you do, they should all be thanking their president right about now.
Investments that were made over 10 years ago.
BearlySane88 said:
You doubled it this year! Thank your president.
DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:
You doubled it this year! Thank your president.
Let me guess.
You also thank Donald Trump for Ai too.
BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:
You doubled it this year! Thank your president.
Let me guess.
You also thank Donald Trump for Ai too.
Nope, I thank Martin Shkreli
DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:DiabloWags said:BearlySane88 said:
You doubled it this year! Thank your president.
Let me guess.
You also thank Donald Trump for Ai too.
Nope, I thank Martin Shkreli
I bet you "thank" Al Gore for creating the internet too.
Have a nice day!
By far Trump’s biggest accomplishment…
— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) September 30, 2026
After 4 straight years of record-breaking illegal immigration, we now have the fewest border crossings in 50+ years.
Stopped cold. It was done on purpose. pic.twitter.com/stwIXTtOXH
🚨 The Pentagon is "increasing [nuclear] options available to the President," per classified briefing to Congress:https://t.co/NDT96yiy9k
— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) September 30, 2026
concordtom said:
I remember you said "this is what we voted for"
DiabloWags said:
Heard from a Jan 6th protestor on social media:
"Joe Biden ... I cannot believe you are letting this economy go into the toilet. High inflation, poor jobs numbers, high interest rates, mortgage rates over 7%, diesel prices at record highs, and you really screwed us on these gas and grocery prices. Hope you are happy. Man if we only had a business man as president."
Aunburdened said:concordtom said:
I remember you said "this is what we voted for"
No you don't because I didn't vote for him.
DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
White men?
Unlike the Central Park 5?
https://whyy.org/articles/central-park-five-defamation-case-president-trump/
DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
White men?
Unlike the Central Park 5?
https://whyy.org/articles/central-park-five-defamation-case-president-trump/
oski003 said:DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
White men?
Unlike the Central Park 5?
https://whyy.org/articles/central-park-five-defamation-case-president-trump/
Totally different circumstances. One was a group of kids who savagely and violently raped a woman where the issue is the identity of the perpetrators; the other is a group of college guys who engaged in morally indecent behavior but may or may not have raped a woman based on your definition of consent.
dajo9 said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
White men?
Unlike the Central Park 5?
https://whyy.org/articles/central-park-five-defamation-case-president-trump/
Totally different circumstances. One was a group of kids who savagely and violently raped a woman where the issue is the identity of the perpetrators; the other is a group of college guys who engaged in morally indecent behavior but may or may not have raped a woman based on your definition of consent.
Based on whose definition of consent?
oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
White men?
Unlike the Central Park 5?
https://whyy.org/articles/central-park-five-defamation-case-president-trump/
Totally different circumstances. One was a group of kids who savagely and violently raped a woman where the issue is the identity of the perpetrators; the other is a group of college guys who engaged in morally indecent behavior but may or may not have raped a woman based on your definition of consent.
Based on whose definition of consent?
The beholder for now but it may become clearer as facts come out.
dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
White men?
Unlike the Central Park 5?
https://whyy.org/articles/central-park-five-defamation-case-president-trump/
Totally different circumstances. One was a group of kids who savagely and violently raped a woman where the issue is the identity of the perpetrators; the other is a group of college guys who engaged in morally indecent behavior but may or may not have raped a woman based on your definition of consent.
Based on whose definition of consent?
The beholder for now but it may become clearer as facts come out.
Do you think all that would have transpired if she weren't on ketamine?
dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
White men?
Unlike the Central Park 5?
https://whyy.org/articles/central-park-five-defamation-case-president-trump/
Totally different circumstances. One was a group of kids who savagely and violently raped a woman where the issue is the identity of the perpetrators; the other is a group of college guys who engaged in morally indecent behavior but may or may not have raped a woman based on your definition of consent.
Based on whose definition of consent?
The beholder for now but it may become clearer as facts come out.
Do you think all that would have transpired if she weren't on ketamine?
dajo9 said:oski003 said:dajo9 said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:DiabloWags said:
Trump speaks on Cornell 7.
Says the Cornell 7 "won't get a fair shake" because of the NY AG.
The New York prosecutor won a $454 million judgment against Trump for defrauding lenders by inflating his assets in 2024.
Trump says Cornell 7 'won't get fair shake' because NY AG Letitia James
Well we know whose side Trump is on. Not necessarily on the side of justice but on the side of the men.
White men?
Unlike the Central Park 5?
https://whyy.org/articles/central-park-five-defamation-case-president-trump/
Totally different circumstances. One was a group of kids who savagely and violently raped a woman where the issue is the identity of the perpetrators; the other is a group of college guys who engaged in morally indecent behavior but may or may not have raped a woman based on your definition of consent.
Based on whose definition of consent?
The beholder for now but it may become clearer as facts come out.
Do you think all that would have transpired if she weren't on ketamine?
dajo9 said:
When you're being texted invites for "free *****" for a woman your crew gave ketamine to you are being invited to a rape.
BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:
When you're being texted invites for "free *****" for a woman your crew gave ketamine to you are being invited to a rape.
Not necessarily. You're making a lot of assumptions. I don't really want to know but my guess is you haven't had a lot of group/party/open sexual adventures.
dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:
When you're being texted invites for "free *****" for a woman your crew gave ketamine to you are being invited to a rape.
Not necessarily. You're making a lot of assumptions. I don't really want to know but my guess is you haven't had a lot of group/party/open sexual adventures.
This is not that. This was predatory. She was alone in the sense that she was the only woman involved at the frat house doing things nobody would have reasonably believed she would consent to prior to taking a very strong and illegal drug.
BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:
When you're being texted invites for "free *****" for a woman your crew gave ketamine to you are being invited to a rape.
Not necessarily. You're making a lot of assumptions. I don't really want to know but my guess is you haven't had a lot of group/party/open sexual adventures.
This is not that. This was predatory. She was alone in the sense that she was the only woman involved at the frat house doing things nobody would have reasonably believed she would consent to prior to taking a very strong and illegal drug.
She went over and started before taking ketamine. It's not really accurate to blame it on that. You also have no idea what this woman would have or wouldn't have done. All we can go off of is what she did do.
I've seen people do things you would never guess they would do.
dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:
When you're being texted invites for "free *****" for a woman your crew gave ketamine to you are being invited to a rape.
Not necessarily. You're making a lot of assumptions. I don't really want to know but my guess is you haven't had a lot of group/party/open sexual adventures.
This is not that. This was predatory. She was alone in the sense that she was the only woman involved at the frat house doing things nobody would have reasonably believed she would consent to prior to taking a very strong and illegal drug.
She went over and started before taking ketamine. It's not really accurate to blame it on that. You also have no idea what this woman would have or wouldn't have done. All we can go off of is what she did do.
I've seen people do things you would never guess they would do.
It is because when somebody is drug addled and you invite new people into the situation to have their way with her, that is rape
BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:
When you're being texted invites for "free *****" for a woman your crew gave ketamine to you are being invited to a rape.
Not necessarily. You're making a lot of assumptions. I don't really want to know but my guess is you haven't had a lot of group/party/open sexual adventures.
This is not that. This was predatory. She was alone in the sense that she was the only woman involved at the frat house doing things nobody would have reasonably believed she would consent to prior to taking a very strong and illegal drug.
She went over and started before taking ketamine. It's not really accurate to blame it on that. You also have no idea what this woman would have or wouldn't have done. All we can go off of is what she did do.
I've seen people do things you would never guess they would do.
It is because when somebody is drug addled and you invite new people into the situation to have their way with her, that is rape
Actually that's not necessarily true. In New York, simply being drunk or under the influence of drugs does not necessarily mean a person is legally incapable of consenting to sex.
dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:BearlySane88 said:dajo9 said:
When you're being texted invites for "free *****" for a woman your crew gave ketamine to you are being invited to a rape.
Not necessarily. You're making a lot of assumptions. I don't really want to know but my guess is you haven't had a lot of group/party/open sexual adventures.
This is not that. This was predatory. She was alone in the sense that she was the only woman involved at the frat house doing things nobody would have reasonably believed she would consent to prior to taking a very strong and illegal drug.
She went over and started before taking ketamine. It's not really accurate to blame it on that. You also have no idea what this woman would have or wouldn't have done. All we can go off of is what she did do.
I've seen people do things you would never guess they would do.
It is because when somebody is drug addled and you invite new people into the situation to have their way with her, that is rape
Actually that's not necessarily true. In New York, simply being drunk or under the influence of drugs does not necessarily mean a person is legally incapable of consenting to sex.
I didnt say it did. If she'd had sex only with the people she got incapacitated with that would not be rape. But when they started inviting others that is rape. Have you ever had sex while somewhat incapacitated? I know I have.
