sycasey said:

---

Problem with saying "Russiagate was a hoax" is you need to define your terms there. Did anyone prove that Trump was personally colluding with Russia? No. Was it a legitimate thing to investigate? Yes.

---

No, it was bull**** from the beginning. But the Democrats on this forum have never been able to have an honest discussion about Russiagate and that isn't ever going to change.

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Problem with saying "Russiagate was a hoax" is you need to define your terms there. Did anyone prove that Trump was personally colluding with Russia? No. Was it a legitimate thing to investigate? Yes.

---

No, it was bull**** from the beginning. But the Democrats on this forum have never been able to have an honest discussion about Russigate and that isn't ever going to change.

---

Okay, let's have an honest discussion. Tell me why it was "bulls**t." By that I assume you mean that no investigation should have happened? Or if not, please define your terms.

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Problem with saying "Russiagate was a hoax" is you need to define your terms there. Did anyone prove that Trump was personally colluding with Russia? No. Was it a legitimate thing to investigate? Yes.

---

No, it was bull**** from the beginning. But the Democrats on this forum have never been able to have an honest discussion about Russigate and that isn't ever going to change.

---

Okay, let's have an honest discussion. Tell me why it was "bulls**t." By that I assume you mean that no investigation should have happened? Or if not, please define your terms.

---

They can't have an honest discussion about it. They'll just say "Steele Doisier", "no pee tape", "it's a hoax". They can't discuss actual substance on the matter.

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Problem with saying "Russiagate was a hoax" is you need to define your terms there. Did anyone prove that Trump was personally colluding with Russia? No. Was it a legitimate thing to investigate? Yes.

---

No, it was bull**** from the beginning. But the Democrats on this forum have never been able to have an honest discussion about Russigate and that isn't ever going to change.

---

Okay, let's have an honest discussion. Tell me why it was "bulls**t." By that I assume you mean that no investigation should have happened? Or if not, please define your terms.

---

I did that before and you guys did exactly what you always do. Blame the source.

The bull**** about Russiagate is well documented at this point. I'm not interested in jockeying with sycophants on the topic again. Anyone that is not already well educated on how the whole thing started as a Clinton op that morphed into an intelligence agency op based on a false predicate and has a more curious mind than the Democrat sycophants can PM me for what to read. I'm not giving their BS air.