I present the 2023 GT3 RS.
DiabloWags said:He's 82.Big C said:
Paul Pelosi probably has a hard time moving when he is stone cold sober. How old is the dude?
It is just another example of an out-of-touch, way too rich person in the Bay Area behaving badly. Not shocked at all. I definitely do not need more platitudes from a politician or a celebrity. But whether someone is a politicians or not, how many victims of school shooting or drunk drivers do we need to see before we as Americans ****ing give a **** and exercise some self control and some serious regulation and punishment?82gradDLSdad said:DiabloWags said:82gradDLSdad said:DiabloWags said:
PAUL PELOSI GETS JAIL TIME.
LOCK HIM UP!
Paul Pelosi gets 5 days in jail, 3 years of probation in DUI | AP News
GO TRUMP GO!
Surprised Nancy hasn't come out and said all the politically correct and practically correct statements regarding drunk driving. There is a small part of me that is cynical enough to not be surprised.
She has repeatedly declined to comment about the incident.
Her husband was 0.082%
The legal limit is .080%
I just hope that all of the "good" Christians out there will be able to forgive him and not judge.
The guy could barely stand up. Did you see the CHP video? I don't care what the blood alcohol was. All I'm saying is this is a softball for Nancy to comment on. It actually does her and her party more harm for it to just hang out there with no comment. And the 'what would happen if it was one of Trump's relatives' is not the issue.
I would agree.Unit2Sucks said:
I agree DW - GT3 is the way to go but Pelosi might have a few cars. The 4S is a great daily driver if you don't need a more practical car although an Uber would be far better if you are drinking.
DiabloWags said:Unit2Sucks said:82gradDLSdad said:
She's one of the most powerful people in the world and she is involved with making and enforcing laws like the drunk driving law. She's also probably been involved in the last 40 year push to enforce the drunk driving laws. I think she needs to make a statement, as a high ranking person in our society. You are thinking I want that because I've voted for a lot of Republicans. I can tell you it is not. I really have no party. I could care less at this point what party someone is from.
Lolwut? Drunk driving isn't a federal crime.
Agreed.
I fail to understand the logic displayed here that claims that the House Speaker needs to make a statement.
Paul Pelosi is a private citizen. He plead guilty to a state vehicle code (23153a).
DiabloWags said:
Hang On
I dont use my Porsche as a daily driver.concordtom said:DiabloWags said:
Hang On
I'd love to race you and a few others her on that track. But it's gotta blow sitting in a machine like that for 45 minutes at a crawl down Ygnacio, or worse, down Clayton Rd.
DiabloWags said:
The Carrera 4S is a fine sports car, but if I had my choice I'd go with a GT3 or GT3RS.
Turbos just dont do it for me.
I own a GT4.
The unveiling of the 9,000 rpm screamer, the GT3 RS this last weekend at Monterey Car Week.
DiabloWags said:
Stirewalt has recently been outspoken about the narratives pushed by his former employer (FOX), and he believes it's a disservice to those who have given their lives for this country.
"When we use fear, and when we use hate, and when we use anger, and when we use paranoia to keep ratings high and keep people attached," Stirewalt said, "then we are not living up to I mean, I think about this all the time. A million American men and women died to preserve, protect and defend this country and our Constitution."
But Stirewalt claimed the network, along with others, are just giving viewers what they want.
"And then as news consumers, let's not kid ourselves," Stirewalt said, "this isn't a supply side problem, this is a demand side, right?"
dajo9 said:
They want her to say something so the story will stay in the news. Then they want the criticism of what she said in the news. Then they want her clarification in the news. Then there will be a demand for an apology in the news. Then the apology will be in the news. Then the criticism of the apology will be in the news. The goal is for this to be in the news through the midterms.
The Pelosi's don't have to say anything.
DiabloWags said:I dont use my Porsche as a daily driver.concordtom said:DiabloWags said:
Hang On
I'd love to race you and a few others her on that track. But it's gotta blow sitting in a machine like that for 45 minutes at a crawl down Ygnacio, or worse, down Clayton Rd.
And when I head out on the weekend, I go in the early AM when the road is relatively free of traffic.
But yeah, I get your point.
Make no mistake.
The RS is for the track.
RS = Rennsport.
DiabloWags said:dajo9 said:
They want her to say something so the story will stay in the news. Then they want the criticism of what she said in the news. Then they want her clarification in the news. Then there will be a demand for an apology in the news. Then the apology will be in the news. Then the criticism of the apology will be in the news. The goal is for this to be in the news through the midterms.
The Pelosi's don't have to say anything.
Agreed 1000%
And that's why I totally disagreed with "82gradDLSdad" from the start on this.
It's to facilitate nothing more than a continued Faux News charade.
Unit2Sucks said:
Cal88 can't find anything bad to say about war criminals like Putin, but for the spouse of a congress member, he can criticize everything from his choice of car to the imagined failings of the wine he drank which put him 3% over the legal limit. I'm surprised he didn't find a fake magazine cover to support his notion that Pelosi prefers over oaked Chards.
Hundreds of MSM articles on why Ukrainians are leaving the country and somehow not a single one mentions the new national pastime—hunting down Roma + Russian speakers, beating them, and leaving them bound, gagged, and exposed to the elements https://t.co/4DxcuPVpSg
— Wyatt Reed (@wyattreed13) August 23, 2022
Happy Independence day. Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦😢 pic.twitter.com/8uf3lqVqbK
— Medovukha (@Zzzaikar) August 24, 2022
"Russia state-affiliated media"Cal88 said:Hundreds of MSM articles on why Ukrainians are leaving the country and somehow not a single one mentions the new national pastime—hunting down Roma + Russian speakers, beating them, and leaving them bound, gagged, and exposed to the elements https://t.co/4DxcuPVpSg
— Wyatt Reed (@wyattreed13) August 23, 2022
Weird, I wonder when US news stopped accepting Kremlin propaganda as truth?Cal88 said:
You're not going to see these pics in CIA-affiliated Washington Post. or the rest of the MSM.
Unit2Sucks said:
When accused of repeatedly posting Russian propaganda, Cal88 responds by posting Russian propaganda from a "reporter" from Sputnik News, Putin's state-owned mouthpiece.
sycasey said:
I'm sure there are places in Ukraine where the locals are going too far with anti-Russian sentiment. That also happened here in the US against German and (especially) Japanese citizens during WW2.
That doesn't mean Russia was justified to invade Ukraine, of course. Russian state-affiliated media has reason to over-focus on these kinds of stories, as a way of distracting from the obvious larger war crime committed by Putin.
#Azov: I was at war against DPR in 2017. I'm a #Nazi
— Vanessa Prevost (@vanessa_p_831) April 10, 2022
Reporter: Are the people in #Donetsk Ukrainian or Russian?
Azov: They're not Ukrainians, when the Ukrainian tanks enter Donetsk, they will all be destroyed
Reporter: But we can stop the war
Azov: No. They have to be slaughtered pic.twitter.com/TLdJywZ4DC
As outlets like the BBC attempt to whitewash the role of neo-Nazis in instigating the war with Russia, let's go back to their reporting from 2014 showing the role of neo-Nazis in overthrowing the government & their involvement in the post-coup Kiev regime https://t.co/tFNyPDSCNk pic.twitter.com/5FooLfWLD2
— Alex Rubinstein (@RealAlexRubi) March 4, 2022
Unit2Sucks said:
When accused of repeatedly posting Russian propaganda, Cal88 responds by posting Russian propaganda from a "reporter" from Sputnik News, Putin's state-owned mouthpiece.
Quelle surprise.Weird, I wonder when US news stopped accepting Kremlin propaganda as truth?Cal88 said:
You're not going to see these pics in CIA-affiliated Washington Post. or the rest of the MSM.
These photos all looked staged, they are about as reliable as the fake magazine covers that Cal88 has posted in the past.
You recklessly post fake news all the time. You have no idea whether this stuff is real or not and, let's be honest, you don't care. You literally just posted Kremlin propaganda from someone who represents themselves as working for the Kremlin so you'll have to forgive us for healthy skepticism when you post photos that looked staged.Cal88 said:Unit2Sucks said:
When accused of repeatedly posting Russian propaganda, Cal88 responds by posting Russian propaganda from a "reporter" from Sputnik News, Putin's state-owned mouthpiece.
Quelle surprise.Weird, I wonder when US news stopped accepting Kremlin propaganda as truth?Cal88 said:
You're not going to see these pics in CIA-affiliated Washington Post. or the rest of the MSM.
These photos all looked staged, they are about as reliable as the fake magazine covers that Cal88 has posted in the past.
So you think those aren't actual scenes taking place in Ukraine, a kind of false flag psyop?!? Or do you believe they're photoshopped?
calbear93 said:
OK, Cal88, bottom line it for us.
Give us your elevator speech.
Do you believe that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a justified and righteous incursion?
Yes or no?
No deflection or whataboutism.
So you are essentially blaming the United States since NATO is the U.S.Cal88 said:
The real tragedy is that it could have been easily averted with the proper handling by NATO. Instead its various governments pushed for this war, using Ukraine as a pawn to weaken Russia. Pure geoplolitics play.
It's always inevitable, because Russia could never just choose to not invade a smaller neighbor.DiabloWags said:So you are essentially blaming the United States since NATO is the U.S.Cal88 said:
The real tragedy is that it could have been easily averted with the proper handling by NATO. Instead its various governments pushed for this war, using Ukraine as a pawn to weaken Russia. Pure geoplolitics play.
Yes, we all wanted our fuel prices to go through the roof and commodity prices to create the highest inflation in 40 years.
Brilliant!
So, you didn't really answer.Cal88 said:calbear93 said:
OK, Cal88, bottom line it for us.
Give us your elevator speech.
Do you believe that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a justified and righteous incursion?
Yes or no?
No deflection or whataboutism.
Here it is in a nutshell.
It's a civil war that has been fuelled by a nationalist ideology that is incompatible with the ethno-linguistically diverse nature of Ukraine.
The Minsk Agreements largely addressed this problem, providing some cultural autonomy for the Donbas.
Ukraine violated this agreement, largely because of the influence of ultranationalists within the Zelensky govt that forced a hardline policy and created the Donbas rebellion. This was a civil war with a strong element of ethnic cleansing.
This, along the fact that Ukraine was arming (potentially with nuclear weapons, having both the fuel and know how), precipitated the Russian invasion.
I can't call it "righteous" because it is going to result in tens, hundreds of thousands of dead, majority of them conscript hacks, but it was inevitable at that point.
The real tragedy is that it could have been easily averted with the proper handling by NATO. Instead its various governments pushed for this war, using Ukraine as a pawn to weaken Russia. Pure geoplolitics play.