Please Mr. Narcissist blow your head off on national TV. You will get the biggest street celebrating ever.
he U.S. Border Patrol Chief, Carla Provost said, "We certainly do need a wall. If you talk to any Border Patrol Agent, they will tell you that. This is something we've been doing for the last 30 years. We have identified across the entire southwest bordersycasey said:Nope.kelly09 said:
The Border Patrol people say a wall is needed.
I agree with you. Most of the people in this state with deep pockets are not Republicans.AunBear89 said:Hiring undocumented workers is also ILLEGAL! Violating the law should lead to prosecution. Yet so many of the employers are Republicans with deep pockets (or POTUS) so...kelly09 said:Illegal immigtation is ILLEGAL! Violating the law should lead to expulsion. So many deportees come back. A better means of stopping people at the border should be implemented.The Border Patrol people say a wall is needed. Why do you Dems oppose? Certainly it's not because you see a new voting bloc. Well, not the new...Another Bear said:
Yeah it's bullshtt. Half of illegal immigration comes through airports and are visa violations.
Still need border security but the "wall" (really a fence) does little except let Trump play to his base. So it's really a $5billion play to his base. Not suprisingly his base is starting to feel the squeeze from the shutdown.
Trump really fccked up here, painting himself into a corner. Needs the wall for his base but the shut down is hurting his base. Meanwhile Congress isn't buying any of it and illegal immigration at the border has been on the down swing for a while. Trump picked a wedge issue that he can't work because he's incompetent.
Any way, the address tonight will make things worse and less likely anything passes. Trump doesn't have the vote. Calling for emergency funding is going to be a noose around his neck.
The GOP have tried to tag Nancy Pelosi as the next Hillary to hate. The GOP is trying to do the same to Alexandra Cortez...and it's not working on either. Nancy Pelosi is polling better than Trump and there's no reason to hate her. I love that Nancy barely raised her voice on calling it the Trump Shutdown. You're right about the veteran. She knows the rules and how to run legislation. Trump...makes a stupid demand, shuts down government and calls a national TV address...because that's all he knows. He can't win on this.concordtom said:
Lol
He will never allow himself to get tag-teamed like that again! What a foolish maneuver on his part.
You know, how he was always saying that Nancy Pelosi should be the speaker? I think he thought he was going to be able to completely blow her over. It's a machoism thing. He thought wrong. He's a rookie, and she is a deep veteran. Who has not yet lost her marbles at, what? 78 years old?
Did anyone else notice how when Trump got upset in that meeting he picked out Schumer to stare at, lean forward in the chair at, and try to intimidate? He didn't even want to take on Nancy, For fear of being called a male attacker.
So, she ditched out the Trump shutdown label, and he got upset and went after Schumer. Ha ha ha.
I'll give you that opinion seems . . . mixed.kelly09 said:he U.S. Border Patrol Chief, Carla Provost said, "We certainly do need a wall. If you talk to any Border Patrol Agent, they will tell you that. This is something we've been doing for the last 30 years. We have identified across the entire southwest bordersycasey said:Nope.kelly09 said:
The Border Patrol people say a wall is needed.
What about Arizona and Texas?kelly09 said:I agree with you. Most of the people in this state with deep pockets are not Republicans.AunBear89 said:Hiring undocumented workers is also ILLEGAL! Violating the law should lead to prosecution. Yet so many of the employers are Republicans with deep pockets (or POTUS) so...kelly09 said:Illegal immigtation is ILLEGAL! Violating the law should lead to expulsion. So many deportees come back. A better means of stopping people at the border should be implemented.The Border Patrol people say a wall is needed. Why do you Dems oppose? Certainly it's not because you see a new voting bloc. Well, not the new...Another Bear said:
Yeah it's bullshtt. Half of illegal immigration comes through airports and are visa violations.
Still need border security but the "wall" (really a fence) does little except let Trump play to his base. So it's really a $5billion play to his base. Not suprisingly his base is starting to feel the squeeze from the shutdown.
Trump really fccked up here, painting himself into a corner. Needs the wall for his base but the shut down is hurting his base. Meanwhile Congress isn't buying any of it and illegal immigration at the border has been on the down swing for a while. Trump picked a wedge issue that he can't work because he's incompetent.
Any way, the address tonight will make things worse and less likely anything passes. Trump doesn't have the vote. Calling for emergency funding is going to be a noose around his neck.
What about golf courses in West Palm Beach and Bedminster?sycasey said:What about Arizona and Texas?kelly09 said:I agree with you. Most of the people in this state with deep pockets are not Republicans.AunBear89 said:Hiring undocumented workers is also ILLEGAL! Violating the law should lead to prosecution. Yet so many of the employers are Republicans with deep pockets (or POTUS) so...kelly09 said:
.
He'd get untoppable ratings, that's for sure.OBear073akaSMFan said:
Please Mr. Narcissist blow your head off on national TV. You will get the biggest street celebrating ever.
You keep telling yourself that. Do whatever you need to do to help yourself justify your questionable choices in life.kelly09 said:I agree with you. Most of the people in this state with deep pockets are not Republicans.AunBear89 said:Hiring undocumented workers is also ILLEGAL! Violating the law should lead to prosecution. Yet so many of the employers are Republicans with deep pockets (or POTUS) so...kelly09 said:Illegal immigtation is ILLEGAL! Violating the law should lead to expulsion. So many deportees come back. A better means of stopping people at the border should be implemented.The Border Patrol people say a wall is needed. Why do you Dems oppose? Certainly it's not because you see a new voting bloc. Well, not the new...Another Bear said:
Yeah it's bullshtt. Half of illegal immigration comes through airports and are visa violations.
Still need border security but the "wall" (really a fence) does little except let Trump play to his base. So it's really a $5billion play to his base. Not suprisingly his base is starting to feel the squeeze from the shutdown.
Trump really fccked up here, painting himself into a corner. Needs the wall for his base but the shut down is hurting his base. Meanwhile Congress isn't buying any of it and illegal immigration at the border has been on the down swing for a while. Trump picked a wedge issue that he can't work because he's incompetent.
Any way, the address tonight will make things worse and less likely anything passes. Trump doesn't have the vote. Calling for emergency funding is going to be a noose around his neck.
B.A. Bearacus said:
Incredibly insincere-sounding, low-energy Cheeto right now.
Wrong. That's not why they are coming.going4roses said:
I have heard that people are starving ( no food/cant afford to buy seeds/ livestock dying from drought) that is why they are walking to the boarder trying to crossover
I listened on radio. He didn't say anything new.dajo9 said:
Sounds like the speech was a dud. I didn't watch it.
The border is porous. As stated above, I know illegal people who've crossed many times.Anarchistbear said:
There is no need for a wall; there is no need for a Democrat compromise of "securing our border". The border is secure. These people are walking into here. The crisis is a deranged, inefficient and heartless state.
Our land borders and coastlines and airports should not be porous. Does anyone disagree with that? The first immigration discussion should be about how to make them non-porous. I'm against a wall on our land borders primarily because it's Trump's baby. I have personal contempt for the man and root for his political and personal misfortune. But if a wall is cost-effective, I recognize it is an irrational position to take.concordtom said:The border is porous. As stated above, I know illegal people who've crossed many times.Anarchistbear said:
There is no need for a wall; there is no need for a Democrat compromise of "securing our border". The border is secure. These people are walking into here. The crisis is a deranged, inefficient and heartless state.
But trump's proposal is a non-starter b/c it's more about emotion than closing the border.
I'm all good with discussing a plan to resolve the porous border. I am not okay with trump's lies, inability to discuss fact, and whipping up racist and xenophobic attitudes.
concordtom said:The border is porous. As stated above, I know illegal people who've crossed many times.Anarchistbear said:
There is no need for a wall; there is no need for a Democrat compromise of "securing our border". The border is secure. These people are walking into here. The crisis is a deranged, inefficient and heartless state.
But trump's proposal is a non-starter b/c it's more about emotion than closing the border.
I'm all good with discussing a plan to resolve the porous border. I am not okay with trump's lies, inability to discuss fact, and whipping up racist and xenophobic attitudes.