CAL vs Ducks Game thread

39,334 Views | 640 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by BearForce2
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our real D is back now
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fix is in.
NeverOddOrEven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kirklandblue said:

A week off seems to have helped so far, usually does for anyone; see if we can sustain it.


Their best player is out till half. It's really a shame these games aren't 15 or 30 minutes. We'd be decent. Already starting to melt down.
XXXBEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope. Bad call.
RonO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
good flag
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NeverOddOrEven said:

I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
the ball rotated when it hit the ground. 100/0 no catch
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NeverOddOrEven said:

I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field

But the ball clearly moved.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NeverOddOrEven said:

I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
That is such an odd rule.

Nice play by Gamble -- first time ever I've seen a Cal DB turn around.
NeverOddOrEven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

NeverOddOrEven said:

I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
the ball rotated when it hit the ground. 100/0 no catch


The rotation is not proof, and is why I think it's more likely not a catch, but I'm not going to argue
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yasss!
upsetof86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cmon 3rd and 14
RonO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear ball
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FUMBLE
NeverOddOrEven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FUMBLE!!!! Woooooi
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NeverOddOrEven said:

LunchTime said:

NeverOddOrEven said:

I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
the ball rotated when it hit the ground. 100/0 no catch


The rotation is not proof, and is why I think it's more likely not a catch, but I'm not going to argue


You are making arguments. If you don't want to argue, don't.
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need to play all our games on National TV on Friday nights.
KenBurnski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We will get screwed on this too and they'll say the guy that recovered was out of bounds
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trying to get those extra yards…

Honestly D is playing reasonably well. Giving up some plays but also making some good ones. So far…
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It didn't hit sideline did it?

"The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!"
upsetof86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another incredo stop
m2bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
was he out of bounds on reovery?
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oregon's doing what Cal normally does--stall on offense and commit turnover in the red zone
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

NeverOddOrEven said:

I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
That is such an odd rule.

Nice play by Gamble -- first time ever I've seen a Cal DB turn around.


Lol
NeverOddOrEven
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

NeverOddOrEven said:

LunchTime said:

NeverOddOrEven said:

I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
the ball rotated when it hit the ground. 100/0 no catch


The rotation is not proof, and is why I think it's more likely not a catch, but I'm not going to argue


You are making arguments. If you don't want to argue, don't.


Just clarifying, but OK.
1CalFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is Tattersall hurt or in doghouse?
Wang24
How long do you want to ignore this user?
would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:

NeverOddOrEven said:

I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field

But the ball clearly moved.


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Need to capitalize. Like Garbers not channeling Joe Ayoob on that last drive.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wang24 said:

would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL ON THE ROAD AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!
Field goals are iffy and wont beat Oregon.
Go Bears!
RonO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KenBurnski said:

We will get screwed on this too and they'll say the guy that recovered was out of bounds
worries me. Hicks was in but our other guys wasn't.
graguna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wang24 said:

would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!
really? I have no confidence is our ability to kick field goals. that and in order to win as a 14 pt dog on the road, you need to play to win.
TouchedTheAxeIn82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wang24 said:

would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!
You mean it might have been 10-3. Making a field goal is a crap shoot for Cal.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wang24 said:

would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!


With our STs field goals are no sure thing
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thing of beauty right there, especially after that juke. Go Bears!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.