Our real D is back now
kirklandblue said:
A week off seems to have helped so far, usually does for anyone; see if we can sustain it.
the ball rotated when it hit the ground. 100/0 no catchNeverOddOrEven said:
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
NeverOddOrEven said:
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
That is such an odd rule.NeverOddOrEven said:
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
LunchTime said:the ball rotated when it hit the ground. 100/0 no catchNeverOddOrEven said:
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
NeverOddOrEven said:LunchTime said:the ball rotated when it hit the ground. 100/0 no catchNeverOddOrEven said:
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
The rotation is not proof, and is why I think it's more likely not a catch, but I'm not going to argue
KoreAmBear said:That is such an odd rule.NeverOddOrEven said:
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
Nice play by Gamble -- first time ever I've seen a Cal DB turn around.
LunchTime said:NeverOddOrEven said:LunchTime said:the ball rotated when it hit the ground. 100/0 no catchNeverOddOrEven said:
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
The rotation is not proof, and is why I think it's more likely not a catch, but I'm not going to argue
You are making arguments. If you don't want to argue, don't.
Golden One said:NeverOddOrEven said:
I think the catch/no catch is closer than most people here. You're allowed to have it hit the ground if you have control of it, and I think it was 60/40 no catch, so it should go to the call on the field
But the ball clearly moved.
Field goals are iffy and wont beat Oregon.Wang24 said:
would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL ON THE ROAD AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!
worries me. Hicks was in but our other guys wasn't.KenBurnski said:
We will get screwed on this too and they'll say the guy that recovered was out of bounds
really? I have no confidence is our ability to kick field goals. that and in order to win as a 14 pt dog on the road, you need to play to win.Wang24 said:
would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!
You mean it might have been 10-3. Making a field goal is a crap shoot for Cal.Wang24 said:
would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!
Wang24 said:
would have been 10 -3 if wilcox would have went for the field goal...EVERY POINT IS CRUCIAL AGAINST AN OPPONENT!!