Official University of No Classes @ California Golden Bears game thread

55,058 Views | 498 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by packawana
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kaplanfx said:

I think Garbers is the guy. I'm not usually one to think the QB is the problem, but I just don't see Bowers ever being really good.
I'd like to see what he can do on a downfield throw though, although I don't think Bowers' arm strenght is good anyway.
tigertim
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well whatever that was, we drove 80 yards for a TD
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kaplanfx said:

I think Garbers is the guy. I'm not usually one to think the QB is the problem, but I just don't see Bowers ever being really good.
Bowers would be fine if we had a true deep threat. Sadly, we don't have that, which means he becomes a liability much like Longshore was during his time at Cal.

I get a feeling that Garbers or McIllwan will be playing most of the 4th quarter.
MB Cal Golf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Penn state 31-31 versus App St ... I will take us up 24-3 any day ... yes I wish our offemse was better ...
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clarity is coming. Garbers gives us better versatility. Bowers is pocket & hand off, no more
tigertim
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Low-key, team has been doing well avoiding penalties. Dunno how much of that is skill and how much is luck, but it's definitely a plus.
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tigertim said:

Low-key, team has been doing well avoiding penalties. Dunno how much of that is skill and how much is luck, but it's definitely a plus.
experience and good coaching. Also not being completely physically overmatched and trying desperately to find a way to compensate.
BearChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mvargus said:

kaplanfx said:

I think Garbers is the guy. I'm not usually one to think the QB is the problem, but I just don't see Bowers ever being really good.
Bowers would be fine if we had a true deep threat. Sadly, we don't have that, which means he becomes a liability much like Longshore was during his time at Cal.

I get a feeling that Garbers or McIllwan will be playing most of the 4th quarter.
The problem is, last year Bowers' pass accuracy beyond 10 yard had a sharp drop-off. He is the king of slants.
LACalFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MB Cal Golf said:

Penn state 31-31 versus App St ... I will take us up 24-3 any day ... yes I wish our offemse was better ...
Karma! Hope Pedo St goes down
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Clarity is coming. Garbers gives us better versatility. Bowers is pocket & hand off, no more


Yep we seem to be able to do a lot more things with garbers

And with this offense, we need all the trickery we can get
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Northside91 said:

Curious to me that there's hand wringing over any of this. Cal has zero playmakers. Win or lose, the talent isn't there to become bowl eligible. UNC is dreadful, but it's a game. I didn't think it would be quite this bad, but there it is.
Of course it is. I'm not saying this is a 9 or 10 win team but any team that plays D like this is in the mix to win 7, which is enough for a bowl.

And it's not a game at all. There's zero chance UNC wins this game. This is a workmanlike Wisconsin type W.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearChemist said:

Cal Strong! said:

BearRaidNation said:

Let's get Forrest in there - might as well give all 4 a shot at this point
Anything to get him to take off weak red shirt.
Most if not every team would put the signaling QB in contrast color so that it is easy to find him from the field.
Fluorescent yellow green is nice. NO red
BearRaidNation
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GG - UNC is not coming back down 21 - gotta love rhe D!

Hope this sells future elite QBs on committing
FloriDreaming
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice to see Garbers having some success. Would like to see the baton passed, Garbers has considerably more upside.
LACalFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ball-Hawkins again!!! Both were gifts tho
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garbers in for the start of this drive, lets see if they keep him in...
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Goode is just that!
BearRaidNation
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garbers 7/11 - nice pct
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearRaidNation said:

GG - UNC is not coming back down 21 - gotta love rhe D!

Hope this sells future elite QBs on committing
This is partly a QB issue, but the lack of speed at WR is also part of the problem. We really need a WR who can stretch the defense. Right now NC's defense has 7-8 players within 7-9 yards of the ball when its snapped. They don't fear our passing game at all and figure they can get away with man coverage.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Laird has to be near 100
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LACalFan said:

Ball-Hawkins again!!! Both were gifts tho
Both caused by the pass rush. The NC QB has a habit of throwing the ball a bit too hard when under pressure and expecting a hit.
BearRaidNation
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just got a text from Jalen Ramsey - can't repeat what he said about Elliot
LACalFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mvargus said:

LACalFan said:

Ball-Hawkins again!!! Both were gifts tho
Both caused by the pass rush. The NC QB has a habit of throwing the ball a bit too hard when under pressure and expecting a hit.
Yup
BearRaidNation
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Laird at 97
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearRaidNation said:

Just got a text from Jalen Ramsey - can't repeat what he said about Elliot
Honestly after his 3rd INT he should have been benched. He's definitely no longer got his head in the game.
tim94501
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I hate to be negative about a decisive victory over an ACC opponent but if your line and qb play aren't better we are gonna be really bad in conference.
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tim94501 said:

I hate to be negative about a decisive victory over an ACC opponent but if your line and qb play aren't better we are gonna be really bad in conference.
I get a feeling that next week we'll see some big improvements in both the OL and QB play. I did see that on that last drive it was the 2nd string OL in there on the last 2 plays (which included the sack). The coaching staff appears to be experimenting and substituting freely.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mvargus said:

BearRaidNation said:

GG - UNC is not coming back down 21 - gotta love rhe D!

Hope this sells future elite QBs on committing
This is partly a QB issue, but the lack of speed at WR is also part of the problem. We really need a WR who can stretch the defense. Right now NC's defense has 7-8 players within 7-9 yards of the ball when its snapped. They don't fear our passing game at all and figure they can get away with man coverage.
Have we run many/any crossing patterns. Noa is sure hands over the middle
FloriDreaming
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tim94501 said:

I hate to be negative about a decisive victory over an ACC opponent but if your line and qb play aren't better we are gonna be really bad in conference.


Gotta agree. D is good but won't carry the team in conference play. Poor O could even be an issue next week against BYU.
mvargus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

mvargus said:

BearRaidNation said:

GG - UNC is not coming back down 21 - gotta love rhe D!

Hope this sells future elite QBs on committing
This is partly a QB issue, but the lack of speed at WR is also part of the problem. We really need a WR who can stretch the defense. Right now NC's defense has 7-8 players within 7-9 yards of the ball when its snapped. They don't fear our passing game at all and figure they can get away with man coverage.
Have we run many/any crossing patterns. Now is sure hands over the middle
As I remember after last season, Baldwin appears to dislike using slant patterns and crossing patterns. We rarely used them last season.
txwharfrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hope Beck isn't hurt....
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When did we learn how to tackle?
tigertim
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Weaver could use some sunscreen
txwharfrat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crap! Now Goode is down! Yikes!
BerlinerBaer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Last year?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.