Truly Horrible

16,829 Views | 115 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by oski003
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


When none of your players have faith in your new coach.

Great job, Jim.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaliganbear said:



When none of your players have faith in your new coach.

Great job, Jim.


Crap. Cue the apologists ("they were no good anyway" "they are not loyal"....). ...3...2....1
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaliganbear said:



When none of your players have faith in your new coach.

Great job, Jim.
JHD, don't care. In fact, actively happy to see his untalented ass go elsewhere so that people stop pretending he's not bad.

Vanover though, that's crushing.

This is a complete from the bottom rebuild now.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, it's official.

We really would've been better off just keeping wyking (especially in the short term)

Only time will tell if fox is a better move for the long term. Not looking good so far.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is getting hilarious.
TheSouseFamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not good. But...

calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yogi Bear said:

socaliganbear said:



When none of your players have faith in your new coach.

Great job, Jim.
JHD, don't care. In fact, actively happy to see his untalented ass go elsewhere so that people stop pretending he's not bad.

Vanover though, that's crushing.

This is a complete from the bottom rebuild now.


That will buy him a few years. His defenders will point to how few players he "inherited." His first year with "his" recruits will be year 2. Then he needs those guys to be seniors in year 5, but prior to that he will need an extension for "recruiting purposes."
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No it would not be better to keep jones. Most of these guys did not play good defense. Some of it was effort. Glad i dont have to watch Dyson anymore . Agree with Yogi.

Walk ons might play harder. Lets hope Bradley stays. This could now affect recruits.

How do you say you are leaving but might not? Personally I hope they leave. They have no allegiance to Cal nor do they value the education. Its all me me me. How about playing harder then we would not be in this mess
Go Bears!
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

We really would've been better off just keeping wyking (especially in the short term)
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In the long run a redshirt year will probably help Vanover develop his body. And it might help Harris-Dyson develop his game.

I'm wondering how Fox approached the team as this many defections following a coaching change seems unusually high. I wouldn't have expected this with DeCuire.
R90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
With the way Connor came on toward the end of the season, I imagine he could go just about anywhere he wanted. That doesn't mean it would be the right decision for him. At another school he could still end up getting stuck on the bench.
It's all just entertainment, so find a way to enjoy it.
The refs are there to feed your hatred addiction and keep the games close.
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

In the long run a redshirt year will probably help Vanover develop his body. And it might help Harris-Dyson develop his game.

I'm wondering how Fox approached the team as this many defections following a coaching change seems unusually high. I wouldn't have expected this with DeCuire.
Harris-Dyson's transfer was expected before Fox was named. The one that is a surprise is Vanover.
TheSouseFamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

In the long run a redshirt year will probably help Vanover develop his body. And it might help Harris-Dyson develop his game.

I'm wondering how Fox approached the team as this many defections following a coaching change seems unusually high. I wouldn't have expected this with DeCuire.



While not a good look for the new regime, I actually think it' says more about the current status of college basketball and guys having a lot of options than it says specifically about Fox. Look at Oregon. They just had most of their entire starting lineup (Pritchard, Bol, Wooten, King) declare early for the draft. A few may return (even after hiring an agent) because a) they can and b) the draft isn't a better option. But the same is true about the portal. There's no downside of putting yourself into the portal and hearing from other coaches about what your other options are.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe the entire team will threaten to transfer and Knowlton will be forced to fire Fox for cause.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If they change their mind, do we have to take them back?
Go Bears!
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

If they change their mind, do we have to take them back?
No.

http://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/di-saac-notification-transfer.pdf
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good . We should cancel the scholarships now. I hope Fox does that. Nobody will take Dyson. We should free up that scholarship asap.
Go Bears!
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Good . We should cancel the scholarships now. I hope Fox does that. Nobody will take Dyson. We should free up that scholarship asap.
We have to wait till the end of the semester.
KenBurnski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm surprised. The "I'll get you four extra years in the NBA" speech had really grown on me. Another coach must have offered five.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When is that?
Go Bears!
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Good . We should cancel the scholarships now. I hope Fox does that. Nobody will take Dyson. We should free up that scholarship asap.


Vindictive much? We have a bunch of open scholarships now.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Absolutely
Go Bears!
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

When is that?
The semester ends Friday May 17.

My own view is if Coach Fox communicates as well in private as he does in public then I understand players wanting to explore their options.
KenBurnski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We should hire a casting agency to field us a team of loveable losers for next year. Major League it.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does anyone know if Fox has actually signed his contract? And if so, does it include incentives for fielding a team with at least 5 players?
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bleak view - we are going to suck for a LONG time
Optimistic view - he took a look at their games and the tape and frankly didn't believe they were long term competitive in the Pac-12 and believed he could recruit better. Not sure I would agree about Connor but even there I saw a kid who was going to get into foul trouble often because of his build (or lack thereof) and his SLOOOOWWWW jump.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is it too late to say we are sorry, and ask Travis to be our coach?

This was so predictable
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Is it too late to say we are sorry, and ask Travis to be our coach?

This was so predictable
How do you know players would have stayed if DeCuire was the coach?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Connor is such a unique player and a personality fit for Berkeley. I dont know if there are many players i have been more excited to watch develop and to cheer for. He was the player to build around. I am crushed.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's a Premium thread titled "Setting The Year Zero Mark Fox Expectations". Maybe they should have omitted the word "Year".
Bear19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can't say I'm surprised. Clearly none of these players had an interest in their education at Cal. They also clearly have no interest in playing for the new coaches. If we were coming off a three loss season I'd be more upset. Players who produced the most losses in Cal's history over two years are not irreplaceable. So be it.
sandiegobears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hasn't DeCuire been hired by another program in the last 6 years? Oh wait...people need to leave DeCuire (and Turner for that matter) out of the discussion. No one else has hired them in 6 or 9 years, respectively, maybe there's a reason?

That being said, this ain't fun.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear19 said:

Clearly none of these players had an interest in their education at Cal. They also clearly have no interest in playing for the new coaches.
It may be they were indeed interested in their Cal educations but their aversion to playing for the new coaches prevailed. It would be ironic if some of them end up at UC Irvine.
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
R90 said:

With the way Connor came on toward the end of the season, I imagine he could go just about anywhere he wanted. That doesn't mean it would be the right decision for him. At another school he could still end up getting stuck on the bench.
Vanover has a lot of potential; he mainly needs to put on weight and muscle. Not many 7'3" kids can shoot threes like he can. Losing him is really going to hurt. I think he could have become our best player in another year or two.
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.