MinotStateBeav said:
This is some solid fantasy my guy. We have the evidence Biden was taking money from Ukraine. Unless you just want to stick your head in the sand and pretend the "Big Guy" isn't Sleepy Joe. The laptop is damning to the entire Biden Family and if we had a real DOJ, there would be arrests. They obviously aren't going to arrest a sitting president because it would be an embarrassment to the establishment.
Again -- Where is this so-called evidence? IF "we" have it, why wasn't it put into the Congressional Record? Why is there such widespread agreement about "having" such "evidence" if this evidence can't be produced in a Congressional investigation?
Even IF "Big Guy" Joe Biden got $$ from Burisma, how is that substantially different from Trump getting $$ from the Saudis, or anyone in Congress getting $$ from any country or corporation? Isn't this what we collectively chose with our current SCOTUS and their disastrous
Citizens United v FEC decision? Huge corporations throughout the world funneling gobs of $$$ and gold bars to the bank accounts and freezers of U.S. politicians in exchange for favorable policies for donors, at the expense of U.S. Taxpayers, Workers, & Consumers. Isn't that just how Washington, D.C. works?
Besides, why would Biden risk taking $$
illegally from
anyone, when he has access to nearly unlimited
legal $$ from the likes of Chevron, Exxon-Mobil, JPM Chase, Goldman Sachs, etc??
There's no doubt that Biden, Trump, and nearly every member of Congress are as corrupt as the day is long. How, then, does a Congressional investigation committee gather evidence of a "crime" that they, themselves, are committing at the same time?
Whatever Biden (Joe &/or Hunter) is accused of doing in Ukraine, isn't Jared Kushner's $2 Billion real estate deal with the Saudis for 666 5th Ave 100x worse??
Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) was getting his gold bars & luxury Mercedes from Egypt, instead of Saudi Arabia or Israel. Is that why he was indicted?? Just asking...