Unit2Sucks said:
MinotStateBeav said:
I was shocked reading some of this stuff, because the media isn't talking about this at all.
I think the nuance is a bit different, but the media has covered this extensively. We know that Zelensky fired Moskalyov a few weeks ago. We know that there has been a lot of discussion by Zelensky and military leadership about whether to continue to defend Bakhmut. We know that part of the reason Ukraine continues to defend Bakhmut is because it is generating a high ratio of Russian casualties compared to UFA casualties.
I think the specific discussion of old guard Soviet-trained leaders being more willing to sacrifice their men and making poor strategic and tactical decisions is unsurprising - it's exactly what we are seeing from Russia and will continue to see from Russia as this war continues. Ukraine will obviously benefit from continuing to employ a modern command and control structure and more sophisticated tactics because they aren't going to beat Russia at its own game.
I love how you use the presidential "we" here, as if your statements are established universal truths...
Ukrainian propaganda is filled with projections, like the notion that they have better trained or equipped troops, or they have had a favorable kill ratio in Bakhmut, which is a complete reversal of the truth as narrated by their grunts in many videos, or more serious reports by embedded officers like the Australian volunteer I've recently posted here.
If Ukraine was really scoring 5 to 1 or even 10 to 1 kills in Bakhmut, then:
-why would they
ever decide to leave??
-and if they could inflict such a high casualty rate on the Russians, how could they
possibly be pushed back?
-At these alleged killed ratios, they would have the manpower to sustain any volume of Russian "human waves", given that Ukraine has up to 50,000 soldiers stationed in or near the Bakhmut front.
They could have finished the entire invading Russian army, and then some, with these 50k soldiers alone, if the reports of great kill ratios for Ukraine were really true...
What we have instead is videos of disorganized Ukrainian conscripts trudging through sticky, deep muddy roads under Russian artillery fire.
The Russians have shaped the frontlines of this battle in order to extract a maximum amount of damage in this battle with a minimum of losses, through a wide pincer action that extends over long stretches of the main paved roads where all heavy equipment has to go through, which makes them easy targets for heavy and light artillery:
The very shape of the frontlines alone gives you a good indication of what is really going on there, and which side has been shaping the battle and having the upper hand.